Search

Background/Objectives: Immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT) is a frequent adverse event after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy. Grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia occurs in around one-third of patients, and many of them become platelet transfusion-dependent. Eltrombopag is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) able to accelerate megakaryopoiesis, which has been used successfully in patients with bone marrow failure and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Its role in managing thrombocytopenia and other cytopenias in CAR-T cell-treated patients has been scarcely addressed. Our aim was to report the safety and efficacy of this approach in patients included in the Spanish Group for Hematopoietic Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (GETH-TC) registry. Methods: This is a retrospective, multicenter, observational study. Patients who developed platelet transfusion dependence subsequently to CAR-T cells and received eltrombopag to improve platelet counts were recruited in 10 Spanish hospitals. Results: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled and followed up for a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 175 (99, 489) days since CAR-T cell infusion. At the moment eltrombopag was indicated, 18 patients had thrombocytopenia and another severe cytopenia, while 8 patients had severe pancytopenia. After 32 (14, 38) days on eltrombopag, 29 (76.3%) patients recovered platelet transfusion independence. The number of platelet units transfused correlated with the time needed to restore platelet counts higher than 20 × 10 9 /L (Rho = 0.639, p < 0.001). Non-responders to eltrombopag required more platelet units (58 [29, 69] vs. 12 [6, 26] in responders, p = 0.002). Nineteen out of twenty-three (82.6%) patients recovered from severe neutropenia after 22 (11, 31) days on eltrombopag. Twenty-nine out of thirty-five (82.9%) patients recovered red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence after 29 (17, 44) days. Seven patients recovered all cell lineages while on treatment. No thromboembolic events were reported. Only two transient toxicities (cholestasis, hyperbilirubinemia) were reported during eltrombopag treatment, none of which compelled permanent drug withdrawal. Conclusions: Eltrombopag could be safely used to manage thrombocytopenia and accelerate transfusion independence in CAR-T cell-treated patients.

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a severe complication after allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HSCT). Several clinical trials have reported the use of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for the treatment of GVHD. In March 2008, the Andalusian Health Care System launched a compassionate use program to treat steroid-resistant GVHD with MSC. Clinical-grade MSC were obtained under GMP conditions. MSC therapy was administered intravenously in four separate doses of 1 × 106 cells/kg. Sixty-two patients, 45 males (7 children) and 17 females (2 children), received the treatment. Patients had a median age of 39 years (range: 7-66) at the time of the allogenic HSCT. The overall response was achieved in 58.7% of patients with acute (a)GVHD. Two years' survival for aGVHD responders was 51.85%. The overall response for patients with chronic (c)GVHD was 65.50% and the 2-year survival rate for responders was 70%. Age at the time of HSCT was the only predictor found to be inversely correlated with survival in aGVHD. Regarding safety, four adverse events were reported, all recovered without sequelae. Thus, analysis of this compassionate use experience shows MSC to be an effective and safe therapeutic option for treating refractory GVHD, resulting in a significant proportion of patients responding to the therapy., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

In this study, we took advantage of human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC) and CRISPR/Cas9 technology to investigate the potential roles of RIPK1 in regulating hematopoiesis and macrophage differentiation, proinflammatory activation, and cell death pathways. Knock-out of RIPK1 in hiPSCs demonstrated that this protein is not required for erythro-myeloid differentiation. Using a well-established macrophage differentiation protocol, knock-out of RIPK1 did not block the differentiation of iPSC-derived macrophages, which displayed a similar phenotype to WT hiPSC-derived macrophages. However, knock-out of RIPK1 leads to a TNFα-dependent apoptotic death of differentiated hiPSC-derived macrophages (iPS-MΦ) and progressive loss of iPS-MΦ production irrespective of external pro-inflammatory stimuli. Live video analysis demonstrated that TLR3/4 activation of RIPK1 KO hiPSC-derived macrophages triggered TRIF and RIPK3-dependent necroptosis irrespective of caspase-8 activation. In contrast, TLR3/4 activation of WT macrophages-induced necroptosis only when caspases were inhibited, confirming the modulating effect of RIPK1 on RIPK3-mediated necroptosis through the FADD, Caspase-8 pathway. Activation of these inflammatory pathways required RIPK3 kinase activity while RIPK1 was dispensable. However, loss of RIPK1 sensitizes macrophages to activate RIPK3 in response to inflammatory stimuli, thereby exacerbating a potentially pathological inflammatory response. Taken together, these results reveal that RIPK1 has an important role in regulating the potent inflammatory pathways in authentic human macrophages that are poised to respond to external stimuli. Consequently, RIPK1 activity might be a valid target in the development of novel therapies for chronic inflammatory diseases.

HLA-matched related or unrelated donors are not universally available. Consequently, patients can be offered hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from alternative donors, including mismatched unrelated donors (MMURD), known to cause a higher incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD. In vivo T-cell-depletion strategies, such as antithymocyte globulin (ATG) therapy, significantly decrease the risk of GVHD. We performed a multicenter, retrospective study comparing tacrolimus (TAC) and sirolimus (SIR) with or without ATG in 104 patients (TAC-SIR=45, TAC-SIR-ATG=59) who underwent MMURD HSCT. Use of ATG was associated with a lower incidence, albeit not statistically significant, of grades 2-4 aGVHD (46% vs 64%, P=0.09), no difference in grades 3-4 aGVHD (10% vs 15%, P=0.43), a trend for a lower incidence of moderate/severe chronic GVHD (16% vs 37%, P=0.09) and more frequent Epstein-Barr virus reactivation (54% vs 18%, P=0.0002). There were no statistically significant differences in 3-year overall survival (OS) (TAC-SIR-ATG=40% (95% confidence interval (CI)=24-56%) vs TAC-SIR=54% (95% CI=37-70%), P=0.43) or 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse/progression (TAC-SIR-ATG=40% (95% CI=28-58%) vs TAC-SIR=22% (95% CI=13-39%), P=0.92). An intermediate Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research disease risk resulted in a significantly lower non-relapse mortality and better OS at 3 years. Our study suggests that addition of ATG to TAC-SIR in MMURD HSCT does not affect OS when compared with TAC-SIR alone.

Large studies, mostly based on series of patients receiving CSA/tacrolimus (TKR) plus MTX as immunoprophylaxis, have demonstrated a deleterious effect on survival of the presence of a single mismatch out of eight loci after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (alloHSCT). We retrospectively analyzed a series of 159 adult patients who received sirolimus(SRL)/TKR prophylaxis after alloHSCT. We compared overall outcomes according to HLA compatibility in A, B, C and DRB1 loci at the allele level: 7/8 (n=20) vs 8/8 (n=139). Donor type was unrelated in 95% vs 70% among 7/8 vs 8/8 pairs, respectively (P=0.01). No significant differences were observed in 3-year OS (68 vs 62%), 3-year EFS (53 vs 49%) and 1-year non-relapse mortality (9 vs 13%). Cumulative incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) was significantly higher in 7/8 alloHSCT (68% vs 42%, P<0.001) but no significant differences were found for III-IV aGVHD (4.5% vs 11%), overall (35% vs 53%) and extensive (20% vs 35%) chronic GHVD in 7/8 vs 8/8 subgroups, respectively. In summary, the present study indicates favorable outcomes after alloHSCT using the combination of SRL/TKR combination as GVHD prophylaxis with OS in the range of 55-70%, and non-significant differences in overall outcomes, irrespective of the presence of any mismatches at obligatory loci.

Unlabelled: Fludarabine-based regimens are highly effective as first-line therapy in patients with follicular lymphoma. Nevertheless, noticeable haematological toxicity has been reported using fludarabine-based regimens., Aim: To analyse the combination of low-dose oral fludarabine and cyclophosphamide plus rituximab (FCR) as induction therapy, followed by rituximab as maintenance therapy., Methods: We retrospectively analysed 73 patients diagnosed with low-grade follicular lymphoma treated with two different schemes: attenuated oral (AO) and standard intravenous (SIV) FCR., Results: Overall response rate (ORR) was 95% (complete response rate, CRR 79.5%, partial response, PR 15.4%). CRR was 84.6% in AO vs. 61.9% in SIV (P = 0.058). 44.4% of patients underwent maintenance therapy. Grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia: 65.4%; anaemia: 39.7%; thrombocytopenia: five patients; infectious complications: six patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. 6.8% had a secondary malignancy. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 84.6% at 12 yr. The following variables influenced PFS in multivariate analysis: Hb < 12 g/dL [HR 4.7 (95% CI 1.18-18.6)], response after induction [HR 4.9 (95% CI 1.01-24)] for PR vs. CR and [HR 21.27 (95% CI 4.33-104)] for SD/DP vs. CR. OS was 83.1% at 12 yr. The following variables significantly influenced OS in multivariate analysis: not receiving rituximab as maintenance therapy (HR 10.7 (95% CI 1.4-82.5), increased levels of β2-microglobulin [HR 5.2 (95% CI 1.16-23.7)]., Conclusions: FCR allowed us to obtain a high response rate, which translated into promising progression free and overall survival with an acceptable and manageable toxicity profile, especially with the attenuated oral scheme., (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Different types of graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis have been proposed in the setting of reduced intensity and non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. An alternative combination with sirolimus and tacrolimus has recently been tested although comparative studies against the classical combination of a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil or methotrexate are lacking. We describe the results of a prospective, multicenter trial using sirolimus + tacrolimus as immunoprophylaxis, and compare this approach with our previous experience using cyclosporine + mycophenolate in the setting of unrelated donor transplantation setting after reduced-intensity conditioning. Forty-five patients received cyclosporine + mycophenolate between 2002 and mid-2007, while the subsequent 50 patients, who were transplanted from late 2007, were given sirolimus + tacrolimus. No significant differences were observed in terms of hematopoietic recovery or acute graft-versus-host disease overall, although gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease grade ≥ 2 was more common in the cyclosporine + mycophenolate group (55% versus 21%, respectively, P=0.003). The 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease was 50% versus 90% for the patients treated with the sirolimus- versus cyclosporine-based regimen, respectively (P<0.001), while the incidence of extensive chronic disease was 27% versus 49%, respectively (P=0.043). The 2-year non-relapse mortality rate was 18% versus 38% for patients receiving the sirolimus- versus the cyclosporine-based regimen, respectively (P=0.02). The event-free survival and overall survival at 2 years were 53% versus 29% (P=0.028) and 70% versus 45% (P=0.018) among patients receiving the sirolimus- versus the cyclosporine-based regimen, respectively. In conclusion, in the setting of reduced intensity transplantation from an unrelated donor, promising results can be achieved with the combination of sirolimus + tacrolimus, due to a lower risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease and non-relapse mortality, which translates into better event-free and overall survival rates, in comparison with those achieved with cyclosporine + mycophenolate.

To analyze the incidence, characteristics and risk factors of hyperbilirubinemia after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning (allo-RIC), we conducted a retrospective study in three Spanish centers. We analyzed 452 consecutive patients receiving allo-RIC. Of these, 92 patients (20%) developed marked hyperbilirubinemia (>4 mg/day or >68.4 μM) after allo-RIC. The main causes of marked hyperbilirubinemia after transplant were cholestasis due to GVHD or sepsis (n=57, 62%) and drug-induced cholestasis (n=13, 14%). A total of 22 patients with marked hyperbilirubinemia (24%) underwent liver biopsy. The most frequent histological finding was iron overload alone (n=6) or in combination with other features (n=6). In multivariate analysis, the risk factors for marked hyperbilirubinemia after allo-RIC were non-HLA-identical sibling donors (hazard ratio (HR) 2.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-3.6) P=0.001), female donors to male recipients (HR 2.1 (95% CI 1.3-3.3) P=0.003) and high levels of bilirubin and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase before transplant (HR 4.5 (95% CI 2.5-8.4) P<0.001 and HR 4.6 (95% CI 2.6-8.1) P<0.001, respectively). Patients with marked hyperbilirubinemia showed higher 4-year nonrelapse mortality (HR 1.3 (95% CI 1-1.7), P=0.02) and lower 4-year OS (HR 1.4 (95%CI 1.3-1.7), P<0.001) than patients without. In conclusion, we confirm that marked hyperbilirubinemia is frequent and diverse after allo-RIC. Development of marked hyperbilirubinemia after allo-RIC is associated with worse outcome of the procedure.

Background: Posttransplant cytopenias are a severe complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) and their origin is often multifactorial or unknown. They are frequently refractory to standard therapy, which may include steroids and/or immunoglobulins. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are an attractive therapeutic tool in the allo-SCT setting for the ability to enhance engraftment as well as acting as immunosuppressants for graft-versus-host disease. There is no prior experience in the literature of the use of MSCs to treat cytopenias after allo-SCT., Case Reports: In this work we report for the first time four cases of refractory posttransplant cytopenias (three patients with thrombocytopenia and one with neutropenia) that were treated with MSCs from a third-party donor. MSCs were expanded from 100 mL of marrow obtained under standard good manufacturing practice conditions. Most patients received more than one cell dose, and median dose of MSCs administered was 1 × 10(6) /kg., Results: All patients recovered normal blood counts, with a mean follow-up of 12.5 months. There were no adverse events related to MSC administration., Conclusion: MSC therapy may contribute to the recovery of refractory posttransplant peripheral cytopenias in patients undergoing allo-SCT., (© 2011 American Association of Blood Banks.)

B cell responses to minor histocompatibility antigens (mHags) have not been extensively studied after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) is a drug metabolizing enzyme encoded by a single gene that is highly expressed in liver and kidney. Anti-GSTT1 antibodies have been described in the context of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney and liver transplantation, due to a mismatch between donor and recipient. The aim of the present study was to investigate the specific immune response against GSTT1 in HSCT with production of antibodies and their influence in the development of hepatic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). Forty patients and their respective donors were included in the study. The median follow-up time was 35.6 months (range 0.6-76 months) and a total of 349 serum samples were tested for the presence of anti-GSTT1 antibodies by ELISA test. Statistical analysis was performed by defining the GSTT1 null donor/positive recipient as mismatch compared with the other three genetic combinations regarded as GSTT1-matched. Antibodies were found in three patients within the group of null donor/positive recipient and one within the null/null group. Development of liver GVHD, particularly its acute form, was highly associated with the GSTT1-mismatch (P=0.0178) and with the presence of post-transplant anti-GSTT1 antibodies (P=0.0076). We conclude that GSTT1 could be considered as a new mHag in hepatic GVHD. The fact that three donors were parous females and the rapid production of antibodies after HSCT suggests the existence in the graft of memory B-cells specific for the GSTT1 antigen., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Liver dysfunction is frequent before allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). However, its characteristics and impact on transplantation outcomes are uncertain, especially in the reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) setting. We analyzed 455 patients receiving an allo-SCT in 3 Spanish centers. Pretransplantation aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransaminase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (AP), total bilirubin, and international normalized ratio were analyzed. Pretransplantation liver function test abnormalities were found in 94 (22%) patients. The most frequent cause of pretransplantation liver dysfunction was isolated elevation of GGT/AP (n = 49, 53%). Patients with high bilirubin levels before allo-SCT showed higher 4-year nonrelapse mortality (4y-NRM) (hazard ratio [HR] 2 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.8] P = .02) and patients with high GGT levels showed higher 100-day NRM and lower 4-year overall survival (OS) (HR 3.4 [95% CI 1.8-6.7] P < .001, and HR 2 [95% CI 1.4-3], P = .001), respectively. High levels of transaminases did not influence on survival or mortality. In conclusion, hepatic dysfunction before allo-SCT is frequent and has an impact on transplantation outcomes. The best indicator of liver dysfunction still has to be determined., (Copyright © 2011 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)