27 results on '"Perelman I"'
Search Results
2. Turnover temperatures of ST-cut quartz with sputtered-deposited thin layers of SiO2 and ZnO.
- Author
-
Perelman, I., Kornblit, L., Gorodetsky, G., and Rokhlin, S. I.
- Subjects
- *
ZINC oxide , *SILICA , *SPUTTERING (Physics) , *QUARTZ - Abstract
Presents a study which examined the effect of sputter-deposited thin layers of zinc oxide and silicon dioxide on the turnover temperature of an ST-cut quartz surface-acoustic-wave delay line. Methods; Results; Discussion.
- Published
- 1989
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Geophysical exploration in Uzbekistan
- Author
-
Babadzhanov, T. L., primary, Zuev, Y. N., additional, Perelman, I. I., additional, Rubo, V. V., additional, and Yachmennikov, Y. M., additional
- Published
- 1998
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Turnover temperatures of ST‐cut quartz with sputtered‐deposited thin layers of SiO2and ZnO
- Author
-
Perelman, I., primary, Kornblit, L., additional, Gorodetsky, G., additional, and Rokhlin, S. I., additional
- Published
- 1989
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Sequential Regression Analysis and Its Application to Some Problems of Automatic Control
- Author
-
PERELMAN, I. I., primary
- Published
- 1961
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. To the clinic of perforated ulcers of the stomach and duodenum
- Author
-
Perelman, I. M., primary and Babuk, V. V., additional
- Published
- 1926
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Hospital policy of tranexamic acid to reduce transfusion in major non-cardiac surgery (TRACTION): protocol for a phase IV randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Houston BL, McIsaac DI, Breau RH, Andrews M, Avramescu S, Bagry H, Balshaw RF, Daya J, Duncan K, Harle C, Jacobsohn E, Kerelska T, McIsaac S, Ramsay T, Saha T, Perelman I, Recio A, Solvason D, Szoke D, Tenenbein M, Fergusson DA, and Zarychanski R
- Subjects
- Humans, Blood Loss, Surgical prevention & control, Canada, Cross-Over Studies, Erythrocyte Transfusion, Organizational Policy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Antifibrinolytic Agents therapeutic use, Antifibrinolytic Agents administration & dosage, Tranexamic Acid therapeutic use, Tranexamic Acid administration & dosage
- Abstract
Introduction: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an inexpensive and widely available medication that reduces blood loss and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in cardiac and orthopaedic surgeries. While the use of TXA in these surgeries is routine, its efficacy and safety in other surgeries, including oncologic surgeries, with comparable rates of transfusion are uncertain. Our primary objective is to evaluate whether a hospital-level policy implementation of routine TXA use in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery reduces RBC transfusion without increasing thrombotic risk., Methods and Analysis: A pragmatic, registry-based, blinded, cluster-crossover randomised controlled trial at 10 Canadian sites, enrolling patients undergoing non-cardiac surgeries at high risk for RBC transfusion. Sites are randomised in 4-week intervals to a hospital policy of intraoperative TXA or matching placebo. TXA is administered as 1 g at skin incision, followed by an additional 1 g prior to skin closure. Coprimary outcomes are (1) effectiveness, evaluated as the proportion of patients transfused RBCs during hospital admission and (2) safety, evaluated as the proportion of patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism within 90 days. Secondary outcomes include: (1) transfusion: number of RBC units transfused (both at a hospital and patient level); (2) safety: in-hospital diagnoses of myocardial infarction, stroke, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism; (3) clinical: hospital length of stay, intensive care unit admission, hospital survival, 90-day survival and the number of days alive and out of hospital to day 30; and (4) compliance: the proportion of enrolled patients who receive a minimum of one dose of the study intervention., Ethics and Dissemination: Institutional research ethics board approval has been obtained at all sites. At the completion of the trial, a plain language summary of the results will be posted on the trial website and distributed in the lay press. Our trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal., Trial Registration Number: NCT04803747., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Effect of Donor Sex on Recipient Mortality in Transfusion.
- Author
-
Chassé M, Fergusson DA, Tinmouth A, Acker JP, Perelman I, Tuttle A, English SW, Hawken S, Forster AJ, Shehata N, Thavorn K, Wilson K, Cober N, Maddison H, and Tokessy M
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Blood Transfusion mortality, Canada, Proportional Hazards Models, Sex Factors, Double-Blind Method, Hemoglobins analysis, Blood Donors, Erythrocyte Transfusion mortality, Anemia blood, Anemia therapy
- Abstract
Background: Conflicting observational evidence exists regarding the association between the sex of red-cell donors and mortality among transfusion recipients. Evidence to inform transfusion practice and policy is limited., Methods: In this multicenter, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients undergoing red-cell transfusion to receive units of red cells from either male donors or female donors. Patients maintained their trial-group assignment throughout the trial period, including during subsequent inpatient and outpatient encounters. Randomization was conducted in a 60:40 ratio (male donor group to female donor group) to match the historical allocation of red-cell units from the blood supplier. The primary outcome was survival, with the male donor group as the reference group., Results: A total of 8719 patients underwent randomization before undergoing transfusion; 5190 patients were assigned to the male donor group, and 3529 to the female donor group. At baseline, the mean (±SD) age of the enrolled patients was 66.8±16.4 years. The setting of the first transfusion was as an inpatient in 6969 patients (79.9%), of whom 2942 (42.2%) had been admitted under a surgical service. The baseline hemoglobin level before transfusion was 79.5±19.7 g per liter, and patients received a mean of 5.4±10.5 units of red cells in the female donor group and 5.1±8.9 units in the male donor group (difference, 0.3 units; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.1 to 0.7). Over the duration of the trial, 1141 patients in the female donor group and 1712 patients in the male donor group died. In the primary analysis of overall survival, the adjusted hazard ratio for death was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.91 to 1.06)., Conclusions: This trial showed no significant difference in survival between a transfusion strategy involving red-cell units from female donors and a strategy involving red-cell units from male donors. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; iTADS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03344887.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Elective Bowel Resection Before and After Implementation of an Anemia Screening and Treatment Program.
- Author
-
Gilbert RWD, Zwiep T, Greenberg J, Lenet T, Touchie DL, Perelman I, Musselman R, Williams L, Raiche I, McIsaac DI, Thavorn K, Fergusson D, and Moloo H
- Subjects
- Adult, Elective Surgical Procedures adverse effects, Humans, Postoperative Complications surgery, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Proctectomy, Rectal Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Background: Patients with anemia undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery are known to have significantly higher rates of postoperative complications and worse outcomes., Objective: This study aimed to improve rates of anemia screening and treatment in patients undergoing elective colon and rectal resections through a quality improvement initiative., Design: We compared a historical cohort of patients before implementation of our anemia screening and treatment quality improvement program to a prospective cohort after implementation., Settings: This study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital., Patients: This study included all adult patients with a new diagnosis of colon or rectal cancer without evidence of metastatic disease between 2017 and 2019., Interventions: The interventions include the anemia screening and treatment quality improvement program., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was hospital cost per admission., Results: This study includes a total of 84 patients who underwent elective colon or rectal resection before implementation of our anemia quality improvement project and 88 patients who underwent surgery after. In the preimplementation cohort 44 of 84 patients (55.9%) were anemic compared to 47 of 99 patients (54.7%) in the postimplementation cohort. Rates of screening (25%-86.4%) and treatment (27.8%- 63.8%) were significantly increased in the postimplementation cohort. Mean total cost per admission was significantly decreased in the postimplementation cohort (mean cost $16,827 vs $25,796; p = 0.004); this significant reduction was observed even after adjusting for relevant confounding factors (ratio of means: 0.74; 95% CI, 0.65-0.85). The mechanistic link between treatment of anemia and reductions in cost remains unknown. No significant difference was found in rates of blood transfusion, complications, or mortality between the groups., Limitations: The study limitation includes before-after design subjected to selection and temporal biases., Conclusions: We demonstrate the successful implementation of an anemia screening and treatment program. This program was associated with significantly reduced cost per admission. This work demonstrates possible value and benefits of implementation of an anemia screening and treatment program. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C15 .RESULTADOS DE LOS PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A RESECCIÓN INTESTINAL ELECTIVA ANTES Y DESPUÉS DE LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE UN PROGRAMA DE DETECCIÓN Y TRATAMIENTO DE ANEMIA., Antecedentes: Se sabe que los pacientes anémicos que se someten a una cirugía electiva de cáncer colorrectal tienen tasas significativamente más altas de complicaciones posoperatorias y peores resultados., Objetivo: Mejorar las tasas de detección y tratamiento de la anemia en pacientes sometidos a resecciones electivas de colon y recto a través de una iniciativa de mejora de calidad., Diseo: Comparamos una cohorte histórica de pacientes antes de la implementación de nuestro programa de detección de anemia y mejora de la calidad del tratamiento con una cohorte prospectiva después de la implementación., Entorno Clinico: Hospital de atención terciaria., Pacientes: Todos los pacientes adultos con un nuevo diagnóstico de cáncer de colon o recto sin evidencia de enfermedad metastásica entre 2017 y 2019., Intervenciones: Detección de anemia y programa de mejora de la calidad del tratamiento., Principales Medidas De Resultado: El resultado primario fue el costo hospitalario por ingreso., Resultados: Un total de 84 pacientes se sometieron a resección electiva de colon o recto antes de la implementación de nuestro proyecto de mejora de calidad de la anemia y 88 pacientes se sometieron a cirugía después. En la cohorte previa a la implementación, 44/84 (55,9 %) presentaban anemia en comparación con 47/99 (54,7 %) en la cohorte posterior a la implementación. Las tasas de detección (25 % a 86,4 %) y tratamiento (27,8 % a 63,8 %) aumentaron significativamente en la cohorte posterior a la implementación. El costo total medio por admisión se redujo significativamente en la cohorte posterior a la implementación (costo medio $16 827 vs. $25 796, p = 0,004); esta reducción significativa se observó incluso después de ajustar los factores de confusión relevantes (proporción de medias: 0,74, IC del 95 %: 0,65 a 0,85). El vínculo mecánico entre el tratamiento de la anemia y la reducción de costos sigue siendo desconocido. No hubo diferencias significativas en las tasas de transfusión de sangre, complicaciones o mortalidad entre los grupos., Limitaciones: El diseño de antes y después está sujeto a sesgos temporales y de selección., Conclusiones: Demostramos la implementación exitosa de un programa de detección y tratamiento de anemia. Este programa se asoció con un costo por admisión significativamente reducido. Este trabajo demuestra el valor y los beneficios posibles de la implementación de un programa de detección y tratamiento de la anemia. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C15 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2022.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Plasma transfusion practices: A multicentre electronic audit.
- Author
-
Khandelwal A, Minuk L, Liu Y, Arnold DM, Heddle NM, Barty R, Hsia C, Solh Z, Shehata N, Thompson T, Tinmouth A, Perelman I, Skeate R, Kron AT, and Callum J
- Subjects
- Adult, Canada, Electronics, Hemorrhage, Humans, International Normalized Ratio, Blood Component Transfusion methods, Plasma
- Abstract
Background and Objectives: Plasma is often transfused to patients with bleeding or requiring invasive procedures and with abnormal tests of coagulation. Chart audits find half of plasma transfusions unnecessary, resulting in avoidable complications and costs. This multicentre electronic audit was conducted to determine the proportion of plasma transfused without an indication and/or at a sub-therapeutic dose., Methods: Data were extracted on adult inpatients in 2017 at five academic sites from the hospital electronic chart, laboratory information systems and the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database. Electronic criteria for plasma transfusion outside recommended indications were: (1) international normalized ratio (INR) < 1.5 with no to moderate bleeding; (2) INR ≥ 1.5, with no to mild bleeding and no planned procedures; and (3) no INR before or after plasma infusion. Sub-therapeutic dose was defined as ≤2 units transfused., Results: In 1 year, 2590 patients received 6088 plasma transfusions encompassing 11,490 units of plasma occurred at the five sites. 77.7% of events were either outside indications or under-dosed. Of these, 34.8% of plasma orders had no indication identified, and 62% of these occurred in non-bleeding patients and no planned procedure with an isolated elevated INR. 70.7% of transfusions were under-dosed. Most plasma transfusions occurred in the intensive care unit or the operating room. Inter-hospital variability in peri-transfusion testing and dosing was observed., Conclusion: The majority of plasma transfusions are sub-optimal. Local hospital culture may be an important driver. Electronic audits, with definitions employed in this study, may be a practical alternative to costly chart audits., (© 2022 International Society of Blood Transfusion.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Prophylactic tranexamic acid use in non-cardiac surgeries at high risk for transfusion.
- Author
-
Houston BL, Fergusson DA, Falk J, Krupka E, Perelman I, Breau RH, McIsaac DI, Rimmer E, Houston DS, Garland A, Ariano RE, Tinmouth A, Balshaw R, Turgeon AF, Jacobsohn E, and Zarychanski R
- Subjects
- Blood Loss, Surgical prevention & control, Canada, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Antifibrinolytic Agents, Tranexamic Acid
- Abstract
Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces transfusion in a wide range of surgical populations, although its real-world use in non-cardiac surgeries has not been well described. The objective of this study was to describe prophylactic TXA use in non-cardiac surgeries at high risk for transfusion., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of all adult patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery at ≥5% risk of perioperative transfusion at five Canadian hospitals between January 2014 and December 2016. Canadian Classification of Health Interventions procedure codes within the Discharge Abstract Database were linked to transfusion and laboratory databases. TXA use was ascertained electronically from The Ottawa Hospital Data Warehouse and via manual chart review for Winnipeg hospitals. For each surgery, we evaluated the percentage of patients who received TXA as well as the specifics of TXA dosing and administration., Results: TXA use was evaluable in 14 300 patients. Overall, 17% of surgeries received TXA, ranging from 0% to 68% among individual surgeries. TXA use was more common in orthopaedic (n = 2043/4942; 41%) and spine surgeries (n = 239/1322; 18%) compared to other surgical domains (n = 109/8036; 1%). TXA was commonly administered as a bolus (n = 2097/2391; 88%). The median TXA dose was 1000 mg (IQR 1000-1000 mg)., Conclusion: TXA is predominantly used in orthopaedic and spine surgeries, with little uptake in other non-cardiac surgeries at high risk for red blood cell transfusion. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TXA and to understand the barriers to TXA administration in a broad range of non-cardiac surgeries., (© 2021 British Blood Transfusion Society.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Red blood cell transfusion and associated outcomes in patients referred for palliative care: A retrospective cohort study.
- Author
-
Chin-Yee N, Scott M, Perelman I, Pugliese M, Tuna M, Fitzgibbon E, Downar J, Tinmouth A, Fergusson D, Tanuseputro P, and Saidenberg E
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Hematologic Neoplasms epidemiology, Hemoglobins analysis, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Survival Analysis, Erythrocyte Transfusion, Hematologic Neoplasms therapy, Palliative Care
- Abstract
Background: We aim to describe the occurrence of red blood cell transfusion and associated predictive factors and outcomes among patients referred for palliative care., Study Design and Methods: This retrospective cohort study used linked health administrative data of adults referred for palliative care at an academic hospital from 2014 to 2018. Multivariable regression models were employed to evaluate patient characteristics associated with transfusion and the relationship between transfusion status and location of death. Survival analyses were performed using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards modeling., Results: Of 6980 evaluated patients, 885 (12.7%) were transfused following palliative care consultation. Covariate factors associated with transfusion included younger age, higher performance status, lower baseline hemoglobin, and a diagnosis of hematologic malignancy (OR = 2.97, 95% CI 2.20-4.01) or solid organ tumor (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.10-1.71) vs. noncancer diagnosis. Median survival from palliative care consultation was 19 (IQR 5-75) days; 83 (32-305) days in those transfused and 15 (4-57) days in the nontransfused group (p < .0001). Median survival following transfusion was 56 (19-200) days. Solid organ tumor diagnosis was independently associated with poor survival (HR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.39-2.09 vs. non-cancer diagnosis). Among individuals who survived ≥30 days, transfusion was associated with a higher likelihood of death in hospital (OR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.71-2.70 vs. home/subacute setting)., Discussion: Transfusions commonly occurred in patients receiving palliative care, associated with cancer diagnoses and favorable baseline prognostic factors. Poor survival following transfusion, particularly in solid organ tumor patients, and the twofold likelihood of death in hospital associated with this intervention have important implications in prescribing transfusion for this population., (© 2021 AABB.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Variation in prophylactic tranexamic acid administration among anesthesiologists and surgeons in orthopedic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
- Author
-
Houston BL, Fergusson DA, Falk J, Ariano R, Houston DS, Krupka E, Blankstein A, Perelman I, Breau RH, McIsaac DI, Rimmer E, Garland A, Tinmouth A, Balshaw R, Turgeon AF, Jacobsohn E, Bohm E, and Zarychanski R
- Subjects
- Adult, Anesthesiologists, Blood Loss, Surgical prevention & control, Canada, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Antifibrinolytic Agents, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Surgeons, Tranexamic Acid
- Abstract
Purpose: Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces red blood cell transfusion in various orthopedic surgeries, yet the degree of practice variation in its use among anesthesiologists and surgeons has not been described. To target future knowledge transfer and implementation strategies, and to better understand determinants of variability in prophylactic TXA use, our primary objective was to evaluate the influence of surgical team members on the variability of prophylactic TXA administration., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all adult patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), hip fracture surgery, and spine fusion ± vertebrectomy at two Canadian hospitals between January 2014 and December 2016. We used Canadian Classification of Health Interventions procedure codes within the Discharge Abstract Database which we linked to the Ottawa Data Warehouse. We described the percentage of patients that received TXA by individual surgery, the specifics of TXA dosing, and estimated the effect of anesthesiologists and surgeons on prophylactic TXA using multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression analyses., Results: In the 3,900 patients studied, TXA was most commonly used in primary THA (85%; n = 1,344/1,582), with lower use in hip fracture (23%; n = 342/1,506) and spine fusion surgery (23%; n = 186/812). The median [interquartile range] total TXA dose was 1,000 [1,000-1,000] mg, given as a bolus in 92% of cases. Anesthesiologists and surgeons added significant variability to the odds of receiving TXA in hip fracture surgery and spine fusion, but not primary THA. Most of the variability in TXA use was attributed to patient and other factors., Conclusion: We confirmed the routine use of TXA in primary THA, while observing lower utilization with more variability in hip fracture and spine fusion surgery. Further study is warranted to understand variations in use and the barriers to TXA implementation in a broader population of orthopedic surgical patients at high risk for transfusion.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol.
- Author
-
Fergusson DA, Chassé M, Tinmouth A, Acker JP, English S, Forster AJ, Hawken S, Shehata N, Thavorn K, Wilson K, Tuttle A, Perelman I, Cober N, Maddison H, and Tokessy M
- Subjects
- Adult, Canada, Double-Blind Method, Female, Hospitals, Humans, Male, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Erythrocyte Transfusion, Erythrocytes
- Abstract
Introduction: With over 1 million units of blood transfused each year in Canada, their use has a significant clinical and economic impact on our health system. Adequate screening of blood donors is important to ensure the safety and clinical benefit of blood products. Some adverse transfusion reactions have been shown to be related to donor factors (eg, lung injury), whereas other adverse outcomes have been theoretically related to donor factors (mortality and infection). Our clinical trial will test whether male donor blood leads to a greater benefit for transfusion recipients compared with female donor blood., Methods and Analysis: We have designed a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial that will allocate transfusion recipients to receive either male-only or female-only donor transfusions. We will enrol 8850 adult patients requiring at least one transfusion at four sites over an approximate 2-year period. Randomisation and allocation will occur in the blood bank prior to release of the units of blood for transfusion. Our primary outcome is mortality. An intent-to-treat analysis will be applied using all randomised and transfused patients. The principal analysis will be a survival analysis comparing the time from randomisation to death between patients allocated to male donor red blood cells (RBCs) and female donor RBCs., Ethics and Dissemination: Approval has been obtained from research ethics boards of all involved institutions, as well as from privacy offices of Canadian Blood Services, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Science and The Ottawa Hospital Data Warehouse. Our findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant stakeholder conferences and meetings., Trial Registration Number: NCT03344887; Pre-results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Exploring Peaks in Hospital Blood Component Utilization: A 10-Year Retrospective Study at a Large Multisite Academic Centre.
- Author
-
Perelman I, Fergusson D, Lampron J, Mack J, Rubens F, Giulivi A, Tokessy M, Shorr R, and Tinmouth A
- Subjects
- Hospitals, Humans, Plasma, Retrospective Studies, Blood Component Transfusion, Blood Transfusion
- Abstract
Peak demand analysis is common in industries such as the energy sector, but can also be applied to the field of transfusion to characterize the nature and timing of peak days in hospital blood utilization. This information can be used to forecast future peak days or to inform hospital emergency preparedness plans. The aims of this study are to characterize peak days in red blood cell (RBC) utilization over the past 10 years at our hospital, and to compare RBC peaks with peaks in platelet, plasma, and cryoprecipitate utilization. This was a retrospective cohort study of RBC, platelet, plasma, and cryoprecipitate transfusions in the inpatient and emergency department setting between May 2009 and April 2019 at a large academic hospital, containing regional trauma and cardiovascular surgery centers. For each blood product, a peak in utilization was defined as a day with a ≥50% increase in the number of units transfused compared to the previous 90-day average. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed to characterize peak days. There were on average 20,501 RBCs transfused per year and 56 RBCs transfused per day over the 10-year period. A total of 134 peaks in RBC utilization occurred over the study period, with an average of 14 peaks per year. RBC peak days required on average 69% more RBC units compared to nonpeak days (P< .0001). 77% of RBC peaks were caused either solely or in part by surgical bleeding, 34% were caused entirely or in part by trauma, and other causes were infrequent. RBC peaks occurred most often on Fridays and least often on weekends (P< .0001). While there were 134 RBC peaks over the study period, there was a larger number of platelet (n = 292), plasma (n = 467), and cryoprecipitate peaks (n = 579). RBC peak days often coincided with plasma peak days, but less frequently with platelet and cryoprecipitate peaks. More studies are needed to determine whether analysis of peak usage will be of value to hospital blood banks for emergency planning and blood inventory management., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Evaluation of Transfusion Practices in Noncardiac Surgeries at High Risk for Red Blood Cell Transfusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
- Author
-
Houston BL, Fergusson DA, Falk J, Krupka E, Perelman I, Breau RH, McIsaac DI, Rimmer E, Houston DS, Garland A, Ariano RE, Tinmouth A, Balshaw R, Turgeon AF, Jacobsohn E, Park J, Buduhan G, Johnson M, Koulack J, and Zarychanski R
- Subjects
- Canada, Erythrocytes, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Blood Transfusion, Erythrocyte Transfusion
- Abstract
Perioperative bleeding is a major indication for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, yet transfusion data in many major noncardiac surgeries are lacking and do not reflect recent blood conservation efforts. We aim to describe transfusion practices in noncardiac surgeries at high risk for RBC transfusion. We completed a retrospective cohort study to evaluate adult patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery at 5 Canadian hospitals between January 2014 and December 2016. We used Canadian Classification of Health Interventions procedure codes within the Discharge Abstract Database, which we linked to transfusion and laboratory databases. We studied all patients undergoing a major noncardiac surgery at ≥5% risk of perioperative RBC transfusion. For each surgery, we characterized the percentage of patients exposed to an RBC transfusion, the mean/median number of RBC units transfused, and platelet and plasma exposure. We identified 85 noncardiac surgeries with an RBC transfusion rate ≥5%, representing 25,607 patient admissions. The baseline RBC transfusion rate was 16%, ranging from 5% to 49% among individual surgeries. Of those transfused, the median (Q1, Q3) number of RBCs transfused was 2 U (1, 3 U); 39% received 1 U RBC, 36% received 2 U RBC, and 8% were transfused ≥5 U RBC. Platelet and plasma transfusions were overall low. In the era of blood conservation, we described transfusion practices in major noncardiac surgeries at high risk for RBC transfusion, which has implications for patient consent, preoperative surgical planning, and blood bank inventory management., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Red-blood-cell alloimmunization and prophylactic antigen matching for transfusion in patients with warm autoantibodies.
- Author
-
Delaney M, Apelseth TO, Bonet Bub C, Cohn CS, Dunbar NM, Mauro Kutner J, Murphy M, Perelman I, Selleng K, Staves J, Wendel S, and Ziman A
- Subjects
- Adult, Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune etiology, Blood Transfusion, Autologous adverse effects, Erythrocytes immunology, Female, Humans, Male, Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune epidemiology, Autoantibodies immunology, Blood Transfusion, Autologous methods
- Abstract
Background: Warm autoantibodies (WAA) are antibodies that react with an antigen on a patient's own red-blood-cells and can complicate compatibility testing whether or not they cause clinical haemolysis. The goal of this study was to understand the overall prevalence of WAA, the risk of RBC alloimmunization and determine whether RBC selection practices have an impact on alloimmunization., Materials and Methods: Records of patients (>1 year of age) with an indirect antibody detection test (IAT) and serologic evidence of WAA over a 10-year-period were included. Eight centres from 5 countries collectively reviewed 1 122 245 patients who had an IAT., Results: Of patients having IAT, 1214 had WAA (0·17%). Transfusion information for 1002 of the patients was available; 631 were transfused after identification of the WAA (63%); of the transfused patients, 390 received prophylactic antigen-matched (PAM) RBCs and 241 did not. Of the 372 patients with WAA who were transfused and had serologic testing 30+ days following transfusion (30-2765 days), 56 developed new RBC alloimmunization (15·1%). Patients who were transfused using a PAM strategy were not protected from new RBC alloimmunization [14·6% (31 of 212 patients) having PAM transfusion approach compared with those not receiving PAM approach (15·6%, 25 of 160 patients, P = 0·8837)]., Conclusions: The prevalence of WAA in patients having an IAT is low (<1%). A significant portion of patients with WAA form new RBC alloimmunization (15·1%); however, the use of PAM approach for RBC selection was not found to be protective against new alloimmunization., (© 2020 International Society of Blood Transfusion.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Patient-Centred Outcomes in Anaemia and Renal Disease: A Systematic Review.
- Author
-
Staibano P, Perelman I, Lombardi J, Davis A, Tinmouth A, Carrier M, Stevenson C, and Saidenberg E
- Abstract
Background: Anaemia is a nearly universal complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have been demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in renal patients with anaemia. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly being used to evaluate the patient-centred impact of medical therapy. Here, we describe a systematic review of studies that evaluated patient-centred outcomes (PCOs) in renal patients undergoing anaemia treatment., Methods: We conducted a search of Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PsychINFO, and CINAHL databases for studies published until March 2018 that investigated an intervention to treat anaemia in renal patients and used at least one PROM. We also performed a quality assessment for all included studies. Statistical analyses characterized each study, PROMs used, the quality of PCO reporting, and the association between haematological outcomes and PCOs., Results: Of the 3,533 studies identified in the database search, 21 met all eligibility criteria. Fourteen (67%) of the studies were randomized-controlled trials. Most studies (81%) investigated CKD patients, 14% investigated post-renal transplant patients and 5% assessed patients with heart disease on haemodialysis. The most common anaemia intervention, used in 95% of studies, was ESAs. Forty-three percent of studies utilized one PROM, most commonly the SF-36, a measure of QOL not specifically created for use in nephrology patients. About a third of studies selectively reported PROM subscales, rather than reporting all subscales. Notable biases among included studies included lack of blinding, selective outcome reporting, and lack of power estimates for PCOs. We did not find a statistically significant association between improvements in haemoglobin and QOL., Conclusions: Future studies employing anaemia and nephrology-specific PROMs and conducted with greater rigour, standardization in the research methods, and reporting of PCOs in renal populations will improve understanding of PCOs in this patient group and hopefully improve patient outcomes and experiences., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2019 by S. Karger AG, Basel.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Exclusion criteria and adverse events in perioperative trials of tranexamic acid in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Khair S, Perelman I, Yates J, Taylor J, Lampron J, Tinmouth A, and Saidenberg E
- Subjects
- Antifibrinolytic Agents adverse effects, Blood Loss, Surgical prevention & control, Blood Transfusion, Eligibility Determination, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic methods, Tranexamic Acid adverse effects, Antifibrinolytic Agents administration & dosage, Cardiac Surgical Procedures methods, Tranexamic Acid administration & dosage
- Abstract
Purpose: Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirement following cardiac surgery. Nevertheless, TXA remains underutilized because of concerns regarding development of adverse events. We conducted a systematic review to determine which patients are commonly excluded from TXA cardiac surgery clinical trials to determine if there are patient groups lacking safety data on TXA., Methods: The databases Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until September 2017. Eligible studies were randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) administering systemic TXA perioperatively to patients undergoing any cardiac surgery. Our primary outcome was the exclusion criteria for each RCT, and the secondary endpoint was TXA safety. A descriptive synthesis was performed to analyze the exclusion criteria. TXA safety was assessed with meta-analysis., Principal Findings: Seventy eligible RCTs were included. The most common reasons for excluding patients from TXA cardiac surgery trials were major hepatic, renal, or cardiac comorbidities (76% of studies). Meta-analysis showed that TXA did not increase the risk of adverse events compared with placebo or no intervention (risk ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.07), including thrombosis and seizure., Conclusion: We found that systemic TXA is safe to use in cardiac surgery. Certain patient groups are frequently excluded from TXA cardiac surgery trials, and may consequently have limited efficacy and safety data on TXA. Further research in these patient groups may be needed; nevertheless, for many patient populations there are sufficient data to inform evidence-based guidelines for TXA use in cardiac surgery., Trial Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42017060971); registered 4 April, 2017.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. The Effectiveness of Tranexamic Acid at Reducing Blood Loss and Transfusion Requirement for Women Undergoing Myomectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Fusca L, Perelman I, Fergusson D, Boutet M, and Chen I
- Subjects
- Adult, Female, Humans, Leiomyoma surgery, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Uterine Neoplasms surgery, Uterus surgery, Antifibrinolytic Agents adverse effects, Antifibrinolytic Agents therapeutic use, Blood Loss, Surgical prevention & control, Blood Loss, Surgical statistics & numerical data, Blood Transfusion statistics & numerical data, Tranexamic Acid adverse effects, Tranexamic Acid therapeutic use, Uterine Myomectomy adverse effects, Uterine Myomectomy statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Background: The surgical removal of fibroids can be associated with excessive blood loss requiring transfusion., Objective: This review sought to determine the effectiveness of tranexamic acid (TA) in reducing perioperative blood loss in women undergoing myomectomy., Methods: Electronic bibliographic databases were searched from inception until June 3, 2017. The review included RCTs of women of reproductive age with uterine fibroids who were undergoing myomectomy and who received TA or a comparator. Two independent reviewers extracted relevant data, and meta-analysis was performed., Results: Three studies included women undergoing abdominal myomectomy. TA significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss by a mean difference of 213.1 mL (95% CI -242.4 to -183.7) and postoperative blood loss by a mean difference of 56.3 mL (95% CI -67.8 to -44.8) compared with control arms. However, no significant differences were seen in blood transfusion requirement (relative risk 0.58; 95% CI 0.33-1.00). In one study for women undergoing hysteroscopic myomectomy, TA was not associated with improved outcomes in transfusion requirement and resulted in reduced postoperative hemoglobin levels compared with oxytocin., Conclusion: Among women undergoing abdominal myomectomy, TA is effective at reducing perioperative blood loss compared with no treatment or placebo. For women undergoing hysteroscopic myomectomy, TA compared with oxytocin is not associated with improved outcomes in transfusion requirement and resulted in reduced postoperative hemoglobin levels., (Copyright © 2019 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Trends and outcomes in multicomponent blood transfusion: an 11-year cohort study of a large multisite academic center.
- Author
-
Perelman I, Saidenberg E, Tinmouth A, and Fergusson D
- Subjects
- Academic Medical Centers statistics & numerical data, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Component Transfusion adverse effects, Blood Component Transfusion mortality, Blood Transfusion methods, Blood Transfusion mortality, Canada epidemiology, Cohort Studies, Female, Hospital Mortality, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Transfusion Reaction epidemiology, Transfusion Reaction etiology, Treatment Outcome, Blood Component Transfusion statistics & numerical data, Blood Component Transfusion trends, Blood Transfusion statistics & numerical data, Blood Transfusion trends
- Abstract
Background: Most studies reporting on blood component utilization overlook patients transfused with more than one type of blood product (multicomponent transfusion). These patients are of importance, as they are large consumers of blood products and likely have different characteristics and outcomes than nontransfused patients and patients transfused with only one blood component type. Our study aimed to determine the prevalence of multicomponent transfusion at a large multisite academic center, as well as the patient characteristics and outcomes associated with multicomponent transfusion., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of transfused adult inpatients at the Ottawa Hospital between 2007 and 2017 was performed. Eligible transfusions were red blood cells (RBCs), platelets, plasma, cryoprecipitate, and/or fibrinogen concentrate. Descriptive analyses were done to determine multicomponent transfusion prevalence. Patient characteristics and outcomes associated with multicomponent transfusion were assessed using multivariable regressions., Results: Of 55,719 adult transfused inpatient admissions, 25% received a multicomponent transfusion. Multicomponent transfusion prevalence was highest in hematology (51%), cardiac surgery (45%), and critical care (40%) patients. Multivariable regression analysis showed that compared to RBC-only transfusion, multicomponent transfusion was associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 3.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.26-3.73), greater odds of institutional discharge as opposed to discharge home (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15-1.30), and a 1.58 time increase in duration of hospitalization (95% CI, 1.54-1.62)., Conclusion: Multicomponent transfusion recipients make up a large proportion of transfused patients and have poorer outcomes. It is necessary to continue studying these patients, including outcomes and transfusion appropriateness, to inform best practices., (© 2019 AABB.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Exclusion criteria and adverse events in perioperative trials of tranexamic acid: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Yates J, Perelman I, Khair S, Taylor J, Lampron J, Tinmouth A, and Saidenberg E
- Subjects
- Drug Hypersensitivity, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Blood Loss, Surgical prevention & control, Blood Transfusion, Thromboembolism therapy, Tranexamic Acid adverse effects, Tranexamic Acid therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an inexpensive therapy effective at minimizing perioperative blood loss and transfusion. However, it remains underutilized due to safety concerns. To date, no evidence-based guidelines exist identifying which patients should not receive TXA therapy. This study determined patient groups for whom safety information regarding TXA is lacking due to common exclusion from perioperative TXA trials., Study Design and Methods: A systematic review searching the databases Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) administering systemic TXA perioperatively to elective or emergent surgery patients were eligible. Our primary outcome was to describe exclusion criteria of RCTs, and the secondary outcome was TXA safety. A descriptive synthesis of exclusion criteria was performed, and TXA safety was assessed by meta-analysis., Results: A total of 268 eligible RCTs were included. Meta-analysis showed that systemic TXA did not increase risk of adverse events compared to placebo or no intervention (relative risk, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.12). Patient groups commonly excluded from perioperative TXA trials, and thus potentially lacking TXA safety data, were those with major comorbidities, a history of thromboembolism, medication use affecting coagulation, TXA allergy, and coagulopathy. Exclusion of patients with major comorbidities may not be necessary; we showed that the risk of adverse events was similar in studies that excluded patients with major comorbidities and those that did not., Conclusion: Sufficient evidence exists to develop perioperative guidelines for TXA use in many populations. Further studies evaluating perioperative TXA use in patients with a history of thromboembolism are warranted., (© 2018 AABB.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. The peptidoglycan and biofilm matrix of Staphylococcus epidermidis undergo structural changes when exposed to human platelets.
- Author
-
Loza-Correa M, Ayala JA, Perelman I, Hubbard K, Kalab M, Yi QL, Taha M, de Pedro MA, and Ramirez-Arcos S
- Subjects
- Blood Platelets microbiology, Blood Platelets pathology, Humans, Biofilms growth & development, Blood Platelets metabolism, Peptidoglycan metabolism, Staphylococcus epidermidis physiology
- Abstract
Staphylococcus epidermidis is a bacterium frequently isolated from contaminated platelet concentrates (PCs), a blood product used to treat bleeding disorders in transfusion patients. PCs offer an accidental niche for colonization of S. epidermidis by forming biofilms and thus avoiding clearance by immune factors present in this milieu. Using biochemical and microscopy techniques, we investigated the structural changes of the peptidoglycan (PG) and the biofilm matrix of S. epidermidis biofilms formed in whole-blood derived PCs compared to biofilms grown in glucose-supplemented trypticase soy broth (TSBg). Both, the PG and the biofilm matrix are primary mechanisms of defense against environmental stress. Here we show that in PCs, the S. epidermidis biofilm matrix is mainly of a proteinaceous nature with extracellular DNA, in contrast to the predominant polysaccharide nature of the biofilm matrix formed in TSBg cultures. PG profile studies demonstrated that the PG of biofilm cells remodels during PC storage displaying fewer muropeptides variants than those observed in TSBg. The PG muropeptides contain two chemical modifications (amidation and O-acetylation) previously associated with resistance to antimicrobial agents by other staphylococci. Our study highlights two key structural features of S. epidermidis that are remodeled when exposed to human platelets and could be used as targets to reduce septic transfusions events., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Management of Anemia: A Scoping Review.
- Author
-
Staibano P, Perelman I, Lombardi J, Davis A, Tinmouth A, Carrier M, Stevenson C, and Saidenberg E
- Subjects
- Humans, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Patient-Centered Care, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Research Design, Surveys and Questionnaires, Anemia complications, Anemia therapy, Medical Oncology methods, Neoplasms complications, Patient Reported Outcome Measures
- Abstract
Anemia is a frequently diagnosed condition that may be a symptom of or complication of many illnesses affecting patients of all demographics. Anemia can lead to both worsened clinical outcomes and reduced quality of life. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are methodological tools used to capture the impact of disease on patient well-being. Use of PROMs in medical research is becoming more common as it is increasingly recognized that disease outcomes of interest to researchers and clinicians are not always consistent with patients' greatest concerns related to their diseases. We conducted a scoping review to characterize the studies that have evaluated patient-centered outcomes using PROMs in patients undergoing treatment for anemia. We conducted a search of Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PsychINFO, and CINAHL databases for studies published until January 2017 that investigated an intervention to treat anemia in any patient population and used at least 1 PROM to evaluate patient-centered outcomes. A descriptive synthesis was performed to characterize the PROMs used and to evaluate the quality of patient-centered outcome (PCO) reporting. Of the 3224 studies identified in the initial search, 130 met all eligibility criteria. We found that the population most frequently studied was oncology patients (46.2% of studies). The therapy for anemia evaluated in the most studies was erythropoietin-stimulating agents (77.7% of studies). The most commonly used PROM was the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy tool (46.9%), and the majority of studies used only 1 PROM tool (53.1%). We found significant variability in the quality of PCO reporting across all included studies. Improved methodologic rigor in the assessment of PCOs in anemia management is needed in future studies., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Personal goal-setting among women living with breast cancer: protocol for a scoping review.
- Author
-
Chow A, Presseau J, Perelman I, Sikora L, and Fergusson D
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Motivation, Systematic Reviews as Topic, Breast Neoplasms diagnosis, Breast Neoplasms psychology, Goals
- Abstract
Background: Breast cancer and its treatment can have many physical and psychological effects on affected women. Women's personal goals may provide insight into their priorities and motivations in the context of breast cancer. Incorporating personal goal-setting into support and care interventions may have an effect on psychological well-being. This protocol describes our scoping review methods, the aim of which is to examine and map the existing evidence on personal goal-setting among women with a breast cancer diagnosis., Methods: Our scoping review will search for published, full-length articles, where personal goal-setting is a major component of the study, and the study population is females with breast cancer. MEDLINE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and AMED databases will be searched. Two independent reviewers will conduct all screening and extract data. Descriptive information about the studies, participants, any interventions, measurement tools, outcomes, and results will be reported., Discussion: The results from this review will chart the literature, contributing to optimizing the incorporation of personal goal-setting approaches into effective interventions for the care and support of women with breast cancer.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Canadian Surgery Forum 2018: St. John's, NL Sept. 13-15, 2018.
- Author
-
Jayaraman S, Lee L, Mata J, Droeser R, Kaneva P, Liberman S, Charlebois P, Stein B, Fried G, Feldman L, Schellenberg M, Inaba K, Cheng V, Bardes J, Lam L, Benjamin E, Matsushima K, Demetriades D, Schellenberg M, Inaba K, Cho J, Strumwasser A, Grabo D, Bir C, Eastman A, Demetriades D, Schellenberg M, Inaba K, Bardes J, Orozco N, Chen J, Park C, Kang T, Demetriades D, Jung J, Elfassy J, Grantcharov T, Jung J, Grantcharov T, Jung J, Grantcharov T, Taylor J, Stem M, Yu D, Chen S, Fang S, Gearhart S, Safar B, Efron J, Serrano P, Parpia S, McCarty D, Solis N, Valencia M, Jibrael S, Wei A, Gallinger S, Simunovic M, Hummadi A, Rabie M, Al Skaini M, Shamshad H, Shah S, Verhoeff K, Glen P, Taheri A, Min B, Tsang B, Fawcett V, Widder S, Yang M, Wanis K, Gilani O, Vogt K, Ott M, VanKoughnett J, Vinden C, Balvardi S, St Louis E, Yousef Y, Toobaie A, Guadagno E, Baird R, Poenaru D, Kleiman A, Mador B, Widder S, Serrano P, Moulton C, Lee E, Li C, Beyfuss K, Solomon H, Sela N, McAlister V, Ritter A, Gallinger S, Hallet J, Tsang M, Martel G, Jalink D, Husien M, Gu C, Levine M, Otiti S, Nginyangi J, Yeo C, Ring J, Holden M, Ungi T, Fichtinger G, Zevin B, Fang B, Dang J, Karmali S, Serrano P, Kim M, Zhang B, Duceppe E, Rieder S, Maeda A, Okrainec A, Jackson T, Kegel F, Lachance S, Landry T, Feldman L, Fried G, Mueller C, Lee L, Kegel F, Kegel F, Lachance S, Lee L, Joharifard S, Nyiemah E, Howe C, Dobboh C, Kortimai LG, Kabeto A, Beste J, Garraway N, Riviello R, Hameed S, Shinde S, Marcil G, Prasad S, Arminan J, Debru E, Church N, Gill R, Mitchell P, Delisle M, Chernos C, Park J, Hardy K, Vergis A, Guez M, Hong D, Guez M, Hong D, Koichopolos J, Hilsden R, Thompson D, Myslik F, Vandeline J, Leeper R, Doumouras A, Govind S, Hong D, Govind S, Valanci S, Alhassan N, Lee L, Feldman L, Fried G, Mueller C, Wong T, Nadkarni N, Chia S, Seow D, Carter D, Li C, Valencia M, Ruo L, Parpia S, Simunovic M, Levine O, Serrano P, Vogt K, Allen L, Murphy P, van Heest R, Saleh F, Widder S, Minor S, Engels P, Joos E, Wang C, Nenshi R, Meschino M, Laane C, Parry N, Hameed M, Lacoul A, Lee L, Chrystoja C, Ramjist J, Sutradhar R, Lix L, Simunovic M, Baxter N, Urbach D, Ahlin J, Patel S, Nanji S, Merchant S, Lajkosz K, Brogly S, Groome P, Sutherland J, Liu G, Crump T, Bair M, Karimuddin A, Sutherland J, Peterson A, Karimuddin A, Liu G, Crump T, Koichopolos J, Hawel J, Shlomovitz E, Habaz I, Elnahas A, Alkhamesi N, Schlachta C, Akhtar-Danesh G, Doumouras A, Hong D, Daodu T, Nguyen V, Dearden R, Datta I, Hampton L, Kirkpatrick A, McKee J, Regehr J, Brindley P, Martin D, LaPorta A, Park J, Vergis A, Gillman L, DeGirolamo K, Hameed M, D'Souza K, Hartford L, Gray D, Murphy P, Hilsden R, Clarke C, Vogt K, Wigen R, Allen L, Garcia-Ochoa C, Gray S, Maciver A, Parry N, Van Koughnett J, Leslie K, Zwiep T, Ahn S, Greenberg J, Balaa F, McIsaac D, Musselman R, Raiche I, Williams L, Moloo H, Nguyen M, Naidu D, Karanicolas P, Nadler A, Raskin R, Khokhotva V, Poirier R, Plourde C, Paré A, Marchand M, Leclair M, Deshaies J, Hebbard P, Ratnayake I, Decker K, MacIntosh E, Najarali Z, Valencia M, Zhang B, Alhusaini A, Solis N, Duceppe E, Parpia S, Ruo L, Simunovic M, Serrano P, Murphy P, Murphy P, McClure A, Dakouo M, Vogt K, Vinden C, Behman R, Nathens A, Hong NL, Pechlivanoglou P, Karanicolas P, Lung K, Leslie K, Parry N, Vogt K, Leeper R, Simone P, Leslie K, Schemitsch E, Laane C, Chen L, Rosenkrantz L, Schuurman N, Hameed M, Joos E, George R, Shavit E, Pawliwec A, Rana Z, Laane C, Joos E, Evans D, Dawe P, Brown R, Hameed M, Lefebvre G, Devenny K, Héroux D, Bowman C, Mimeault R, Calder L, Baker L, Winter R, Cahill C, Fergusson D, Williams L, Schroeder T, Kahnamoui K, Elkheir S, Farrokhyar F, Wainman B, Hershorn O, Lim S, Hardy K, Vergis A, Arora A, Wright F, Nadler A, Escallon J, Gotlib L, Allen M, Gawad N, Raîche I, Jeyakumar G, Li D, Aarts M, Meschino M, Giles A, Dumitra T, Alam R, Fiore J, Mata J, Fried G, Vassiliou M, Mueller C, Lee L, Feldman L, Al Busaidi O, Brobbey A, Stelfox T, Chowdhury T, Kortbeek J, Ball C, AlShahwan N, Fraser S, Gawad N, Tran A, Martel A, Baxter N, Allen M, Manhas N, Balaa F, Mannina D, Khokhotva V, Tran A, Gawad N, Martel A, Manhas N, Allen M, Balaa F, Behman R, Behman A, Haas B, Hong NL, Pechlivanoglou P, Karanicolas P, Gawad N, Fowler A, Mimeault R, Raiche I, Findlay-Shirras L, Decker K, Singh H, Biswanger N, Park J, Gosselin-Tardif A, Khalil MA, Gutierrez JM, Guigui A, Feldman L, Lee L, Mueller C, Ferri L, Roberts D, Stelfox T, Moore L, Holcomb J, Harvin J, Sadek J, Belanger P, Nadeau K, Mullen K, Aitkens D, Foss K, MacIsaac D, Williams L, Musselman R, Raiche I, Moloo H, Zhang S, Ring J, Methot M, Zevin B, Yu D, Hookey L, Patel S, Yates J, Perelman I, Saidenberg E, Khair S, Taylor J, Lampron J, Tinmouth A, Lim S, Hammond S, Park J, Hochman D, Lê M, Rabbani R, Abou-Setta A, Zarychanski R, Patel S, Yu D, Elsoh B, Goldacre B, Nash G, Trepanier M, Alhassan N, Wong-Chong N, Sabapathy C, Chaudhury P, Liberman S, Charlebois P, Stein B, Feldman L, Lee L, Bradley N, Dakin C, Holm N, Henderson W, Roche M, Sawka A, Tang E, Murphy P, Allen L, Huang B, Vogt K, Gimon T, Rochon R, Lipson M, Buie W, MacLean A, Lau E, Alkhamesi N, Schlachta C, Mocanu V, Dang J, Tavakoli I, Switzer N, Tian C, de Gara C, Birch D, Karmali S, Young P, Chiu C, Meneghetti A, Warnock G, Meloche M, Panton O, Istl A, Gan A, Colquhoun P, Habashi R, Stogryn S, Abou-Setta A, Metcalfe J, Hardy K, Clouston K, Vergis A, Zondervan N, McLaughlin K, Springer J, Doumouras A, Lee J, Amin N, Caddedu M, Eskicioglu C, Hong D, Cahill C, Fowler A, Warraich A, Moloo H, Musselman R, Raiche I, Williams L, Keren D, Kloos N, Gregg S, MacLean A, Mohamed R, Dixon E, Rochan R, Ball C, Taylor J, Stem M, Yu D, Chen S, Fang S, Gearhart S, Safar B, Efron J, Yu D, Stem M, Taylor J, Chen S, Fang S, Gearhart S, Safar B, Efron J, Domouras A, Springer J, Elkheir S, Eskicioglu C, Kelly S, Yang I, Forbes S, Wong-Chong N, Khalil MA, Garfinkle R, Bhatnagar S, Ghitulescu G, Vasilevsky C, Morin N, Boutros M, Garfinkle R, Wong-Chong N, Petrucci A, Sylla P, Wexner S, Bhatnagar S, Morin N, Boutros M, Garfinkle R, Sigler G, Morin N, Ghitulescu G, Bhatnagar S, Faria J, Gordon P, Vasilevsky C, Boutros M, Garfinkle R, Khalil MA, Bhatnagar S, Wong-Chong N, Azoulay L, Morin N, Vasilevsky C, Boutros M, Alhassan N, Wong-Chong N, Trepanier M, Chaudhury P, Liberman A, Charlebois P, Stein B, Lee L, Alhassan N, Yang M, Wong-Chong N, Liberman A, Charlebois P, Stein B, Fried G, Lee L, Khorasani S, de Buck van Overstraeten A, Kennedy E, Hong NL, Mata J, Fiore J, Pecorelli N, Mouldoveanu D, Gosselin-Tardiff A, Lee L, Liberman S, Stein B, Charlebois P, Feldman L, Chau J, Bhatnagar S, Khalil MA, Morin N, Vasilevsky C, Ghitulescu G, Faria J, Boutros M, Fournier FR, Bouchard P, Khalil MA, Bhatnagar S, Khalil JA, Vasilevsky C, Morin N, Ghitulescu G, Faria J, Boutros M, Khalil MA, Morin N, Vasilevsky C, Ghitulescu G, Motter J, Boutros M, Wong-Chong N, Mottl J, Hwang G, Kelly J, Nassif G, Albert M, Lee L, Monson J, Wong-Chong N, Lee L, Kelly J, Nassif G, Albert M, Monson J, McLeod J, Cha J, Raval M, Phang T, Brown C, Karimuddin A, Karimuddin A, Robertson R, Letarte F, Karimuddin A, Raval M, Phang T, Brown C, Antoun A, Sigler G, Garfinkle R, Morin N, Vasilevsky C, Pelsser V, Ghitulescu G, Boutros M, Hyun E, Clouston-Chambers K, Hochman D, Helewa R, Park J, Candy S, Mir Z, Hanna N, Zevin B, Patel S, Azin A, Hirpara D, Quereshy F, Jackson T, Okrainec A, O'Brien C, Chadi S, Punnen S, Raval M, Karimuddin A, Phang T, Brown C, Yoon H, Brown C, Karimuddin A, Raval M, Phang T, Xiong W, Stuart H, Andrews J, Selvam R, Wong S, Hopman W, MacDonald P, Patel S, Dossa F, Medeiros B, Keng C, Acuna S, Hamid J, Baxter N, Ghuman A, Kasteel N, Brown C, Karimuddin A, Raval M, Phang T, Dossa F, Baxter N, Buie D, McMullen T, Elwi A, MacLean T, Wang H, Coutinho F, Le Q, Shack L, Roy H, Kennedy R, Hanna N, Zevin B, Bunn J, Mir Z, Chung W, Elmi M, Wakeam E, Azin A, Presutti R, Keshavjee S, Cil T, McCready D, Cheung V, Schieman C, Bailey J, Nelson G, Batchelor T, Grondin S, Graham A, Safieddine N, Johnson S, Hanna W, Cheung V, Schieman C, Bailey J, Nelson G, Low D, Safieddine N, Grondin S, Seely A, Bedard E, Finley C, Nayak R, Brogly S, Lajkosz K, Lougheed D, Petsikas D, Kinio A, Resende VF, Anstee C, Seely A, Maziak D, Gilbert S, Shamji F, Sundaresan S, Villeneuve P, Ojah J, Ashrafi A, Najjar A, Yamani I, Sersar S, Batouk A, Parente D, Laliberte A, McInnis M, McDonald C, Hasnain Y, Yasufuku K, Safieddine N, Waddell T, Chopra N, Nicholson-Smith C, Malthaner R, Patel R, Doubova M, Robaidi H, Anstee C, Delic E, Fazekas A, Gilbert S, Maziak D, Shamji F, Sundaresan S, Villeneuve P, Seely A, Taylor J, Hanna W, Hughes K, Pinkney P, Lopez-Hernandez Y, Coret M, Schneider L, Agzarian J, Finley C, Tran A, Shargall Y, Mehta M, Pearce K, Hanna W, Schneider L, Farrokhyar F, Agzarian J, Finley C, Shargall Y, Gupta V, Coburn N, Kidane B, Hess K, Compton C, Ringash J, Darling G, Mahar A, Gupta V, Kidane B, Ringash J, Sutradhar R, Darling G, Coburn N, Thomas P, Vernon J, Shargall Y, Schieman C, Finley C, Agzarian J, Hanna W, Spicer J, Renaud S, Seitlinger J, Al Lawati Y, Guerrera F, Falcoz P, Massard G, Ferri L, Hylton D, Huang J, Turner S, French D, Wen C, Masters J, Kidane B, Spicer J, Taylor J, Finley C, Shargall Y, Fahim C, Farrokhyar F, Yasufuku K, Agzarian J, Hanna W, Spicer J, Renaud S, Seitlinger J, St-Pierre D, Garfinkle R, Al Lawati Y, Guerrera F, Ruffini E, Falcoz P, Massard G, Ferri L, Agzarian J, Inra M, Abdelsattar Z, Allen M, Cassivi S, Nichols F 3rd, Wigle D, Blackmon S, Shen K, Gowing S, Robaidi H, Anstee C, Seely A, Beigee FS, Sheikhy K, Dezfouli AA, Shargall Y, Lopez-Hernandez Y, Schnurr T, Schneider L, Linkins L, Crowther M, Agzarian J, Hanna W, Finley C, Waddell T, de Perrot M, Uddin S, Douketis J, Taylor J, Finley C, Shargall Y, Agzarian J, Hanna W, Martel A, Angka L, Jeong A, Sadiq M, Kilgour M, de Souza CT, Baker L, Kennedy M, Auer R, Hallet J, Adam R, Karanicolas P, Memeo R, Goéré D, Piardi T, Lermite E, Turrini O, Lemke M, Li J, Dixon E, Tun-Abraham M, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Bennett S, Martel G, Navarro F, Sa Cunha A, Pessaux P, Hallet J, Isenberg-Grzeda E, Kazdan J, Beyfuss K, Myrehaug S, Singh S, Chan D, Law C, Nessim C, Paull G, Ibrahim A, Sabri E, Rodriguez-Qizilbash S, Berger-Richardson D, Younan R, Hétu J, Wright F, Johnson-Obaseki S, Angarita F, Elmi M, Zhang Y, Hong NL, Govindarajan A, Taylor E, Bayat Z, Bischof D, McCart A, Elmi M, Wakeam E, Azin A, Presutti R, Keshavjee S, McCready D, Cil T, Elmi M, Sequeira S, Azin A, Elnahas A, McCready D, Cil T, Samman S, Cornacchi S, Foster G, Thabane L, Thomson S, Lovrics O, Martin S, Lovrics P, Latchana N, Davis L, Coburn N, Mahar A, Liu Y, Hammad A, Kagedan D, Earle C, Hallet J, Zhang Y, Elmi M, Angarita F, Hong NL, Pang G, Hong NL, Paull G, Kupper S, Kagedan D, Nessim C, Quan M, Wright F, Hsiao R, Bongers P, Lustgarten M, Goldstein D, Dhar P, Rotstein L, Pasternak J, Nostedt J, Gibson-Brokop L, McCall M, Schiller D, Park J, Ratnayake I, Hebbard P, Mukhi S, Mack L, Singh N, Chanco M, Hilchie-Pye A, Kenyon C, Mathieson A, Burke J, Nason R, Kupper S, Austin J, Brar M, Wright F, Quan M, Hurton S, Quan M, Kong S, Xu Y, Thibedeau M, Cheung W, Dort J, Karim S, Crump T, Bouchard-Fortier A, Jeong Y, Mahar A, Li Q, Bubis L, Gupta V, Coburn N, Hirpara D, O'Rourke C, Azin A, Quereshy F, Chadi S, Dharampal N, Smith K, Harvey A, Pashcke R, Rudmik L, Chandarana S, Buac S, Latosinsky S, Shahvary N, Gervais M, Leblanc G, Brackstone M, Guidolin K, Yaremko B, Gaede S, Lynn K, Kornecki A, Muscedere G, Shmuilovich O, BenNachum I, Mouawad M, Gelman N, Lock M, Jayaraman S, Jayaraman S, Daza J, Solis N, Parpia S, Gallinger S, Moulton C, Levine M, Serrano P, Horkoff M, Sutherland F, Dixon E, Ball C, Bathe O, Moser M, Shaw J, Beck G, Luo Y, Ahmed S, Wall C, Domes T, Jana K, Waugh E, Tsang M, Jayaraman S, Tang E, Baird J, Newell P, Hansen P, Gough M, Garcia-Ochoa C, McArthur E, Tun-Abraham M, Hawel J, Skaro A, Leslie K, Garcia-Ochoa C, McArthur E, Tun-Abraham M, Leslie K, Skaro A, Gauvin G, Goel N, Mutabdzic D, Lambreton F, Kilcoyne M, Nadler A, Ang K, Karachristos A, Cooper H, Hoffman J, Reddy S, Park L, Gilbert R, Shorr R, Workneh A, Bertens K, Abou-Khalil J, Balaa F, Martel G, Smith H, Bertens K, Levy J, Hammad A, Davis L, Gupta V, Jeong Y, Mahar A, Coburn N, Hallet J, Mahar A, Jayaraman S, Serrano P, Martel G, Beyfuss K, Coburn N, Piardi T, Pessaux P, Hallet J, Ellis J, Bakanisi B, Sadeghi M, Beyfuss K, Michaelson S, Karanicolas P, Law C, Nathens A, Coburn N, Giles A, Daza J, Doumouras A, Serrano P, Tandan V, Ruo L, Marcaccio M, Dath D, Connell M, Selvam R, Patel S, Kleiman A, Bennett A, Wasey N, Sorial R, Macdonald S, Johnson D, Klassen D, Leung C, Vergis A, Botkin C, Azin A, Hirpara D, Jackson T, Okrainec A, Elnahas A, Chadi S, Quereshy F, Bahasadri M, Saleh F, Bahasadri M, Saleh F, Saleh F, Bahasadri M, MacLellan S, Tan J, Jun H, Cheah H, Wong K, Harvey N, Smith A, Cassie S, Sun S, Vallis J, Twells L, Lester K, Gregory D, Vallis J, Lester K, Gregory D, Twells L, Dang J, Sun W, Switzer N, Raghavji F, Birch D, Karmali S, Dang J, Switzer N, Delisle M, Laffin M, Gill R, Birch D, Karmali S, Marcil G, Bourget-Murray J, Switzer N, Shinde S, Debru E, Church N, Reso A, Mitchell P, Gill R, Sun W, Dang J, Switzer N, Tian C, de Gara C, Birch D, Karmali S, Jarrar A, Eipe N, Budiansky A, Walsh C, Mamazza J, Rashid M, and Engels P
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. The Efficacy of Postoperative Iron Therapy in Improving Clinical and Patient-Centered Outcomes Following Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- Author
-
Perelman I, Winter R, Sikora L, Martel G, Saidenberg E, and Fergusson D
- Subjects
- Administration, Oral, Hemoglobins analysis, Humans, Patient-Centered Care, Postoperative Period, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Anemia blood, Anemia therapy, Blood Transfusion, Erythrocyte Transfusion, Iron therapeutic use
- Abstract
Postoperative anemia is a common occurrence in surgical patients and leads to an increased risk for allogeneic blood transfusions. The efficacy of iron therapy in treating postoperative anemia has not been firmly established. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative oral and intravenous (IV) iron therapy in increasing hemoglobin levels and improving patient outcomes following elective surgery. The databases Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, the Transfusion Evidence Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials or prospective cohorts having a control group, where postoperative oral or IV iron was administered to elective surgery patients. Primary outcomes were hemoglobin levels and patient-centered outcomes of quality of life and functioning. Secondary outcomes were the safety of postoperative iron and blood transfusion requirement. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed. Seventeen relevant studies were identified, of which 7 investigated IV iron, 7 investigated oral iron, and 3 compared IV with oral iron. Postoperative oral and IV iron therapies were ineffective in improving quality of life and functioning (the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation [GRADE]: moderate-low quality). Compared with control, IV iron increased mean hemoglobin levels by 3.40 g/L (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-5.62) (GRADE: moderate quality); however, this increase is likely not clinically meaningful. Overall, oral iron was ineffective in increasing hemoglobin concentrations compared with control (mean difference=0.77, 95% CI: -1.48-3.01) (GRADE: moderate quality). Postoperative iron therapy did not significantly reduce the risk of blood transfusion (relative risk=0.75; 95% CI: 0.53-1.07) (GRADE: low quality). IV iron was not associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse events (relative risk=4.50, 95% CI: 0.64-31.56). There was insufficient information to determine the risk of adverse events for postoperative oral iron. This systematic review found no evidence to support the routine use of postoperative iron therapy in all elective surgery patient populations; however, results are based largely on studies with non-iron-deficient patients preoperatively. Further research on the role of postoperative IV iron is warranted for certain high-risk groups, including patients with iron deficiency or anemia prior to surgery. This systematic review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017057837)., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.