Search

Recurrent stress on the isthmic pars interarticularis often leads to profound injury and symptom burden. When conservative and medical management fail, there are various operative interventions that can be used. The current review details the common clinical presentation and treatment of pars injury, with a special focus on the emerging minimally invasive procedures used in isthmic pars interarticularis repair. PubMed and Google Scholar database literature reviews were conducted. The keywords and phrases that were searched include but were not limited to; "history of spondylolysis", "pars interarticularis", "pars defect", "conventional surgical repair of pars", and "minimally invasive repair of pars". The natural history, conventional presentation, etiology, risk factors, and management of pars interarticularis injury are discussed by the authors. The surgical interventions described include the Buck's repair, Morscher Screw-Hook repair, Scott's Wiring technique, and additional pedicle screw-based repairs. Minimally invasive techniques are also reviewed, including the Levi technique. Surgical intervention has been proven to be safe and effective in managing pars interarticularis fractures. However, minimally invasive techniques often provide additional benefit to patients such as reducing damage of surrounding structures, decreasing postoperative pain, and limiting the time away from sports and other activities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The treatment options for thoracolumbar junction burst fractures remain a topic of controversy. Short-segment percutaneous fixation (SSPF) and short-segment open fixation including the fractured level (SSOFIFL) are both viable procedures for managing these fractures. At present, there is a lack of evidence in the literature demonstrating the absolute superiority of one treatment over the other. This study aimed to compare these two surgical strategies with a focus on radiological and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case-control multicenter analysis involved patients with A3 and A4 vertebral fractures at the thoracolumbar junction (T11-L2) who underwent surgical treatment with either SSPF or SSOFIFL in the participating centers. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Oswestry Disability Index and visual analogue scale (VAS) both pre- and postoperatively. Radiological outcomes included kyphotic deformity (KD), anterior vertebral body height (AVBH), segmental kyphosis, and sagittal alignment parameters. Results: A total of 156 patients were enrolled in the study, with 81 patients in Group A (SSPF) and 75 patients in Group B (SSOFIFL). Group B demonstrated better correction of KD (Group B: 3.4 ± 2.7° vs. Group A: 8.3 ± 3.2°, P = 0.003), AVBH, and sagittal alignment. A minor loss of correction was observed in Group B with respect to Group A (0.9 ± 1.7° vs 4.3° ± 2.1°, P = 0.043). Blood losses were lower in Group A (78 ± 15 min vs. 118 ± 23 min, P = 0.021) as well as during surgery (121.3 ± 34 mL vs. 210.2 ± 52 mL, P = 0.031), but the post-operative hemoglobin levels were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: SSOFIFL appears to show a major amount of KD correction and prevent loss of correction. This technique should be the preferred choice whenever possible. However, SSPF can be considered a valid alternative for damage control in polytrauma patients and fractures with low KD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) are commonly used in posterior spinal fusion to treat spine conditions such as trauma, tumors, and degenerative diseases. Precise PPS placement is essential in preventing neurological complications and improving patient outcomes. Recent studies have suggested that intraoperative computed tomography (CT) navigation can reduce the dependence on extensive surgical expertise for achieving accurate PPS placement. However, more comprehensive documentation is needed regarding the procedural accuracy of lateral spine surgery (LSS). In this retrospective study, we investigated patients who underwent posterior instrumentation with PPSs in the thoracic to lumbar spine, utilizing an intraoperative CT navigation system, between April 2019 and September 2023. The system's methodology involved real-time CT-based guidance during PPS placement, ensuring precision. Our study included 170 patients (151 undergoing LLIF procedures and 19 trauma patients), resulting in 836 PPS placements. The overall PPS deviation rate, assessed using the Ravi scale, was 2.5%, with a notably higher incidence of deviations observed in the thoracic spine (7.4%) compared to the lumbar spine (1.9%). Interestingly, we found no statistically significant difference in screw deviation rates between upside and downside PPS placements. Regarding perioperative complications, three patients experienced issues related to intraoperative CT navigation. The observed higher rate of inaccuracies in the thoracic spine suggests that various factors may contribute to these differences in accuracy, including screw size and anatomical variations. Further research is required to refine PPS insertion techniques, particularly in the context of LSS. In conclusion, this retrospective study sheds light on the challenges associated with achieving precise PPS placement in the lateral decubitus position, with a significantly higher deviation rate observed in the thoracic spine compared to the lumbar spine. This study emphasizes the need for ongoing research to improve PPS insertion techniques, leading to enhanced patient outcomes in spine surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Minimally invasive spine surgery became the gold standard for the treatment of many spinal diseases. Only a few comparative studies were performed regarding the superiority of robotic-assisted (RA) surgery over fluoroscopic guidance (FG) surgery during percutaneous pedicle screws placement. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to conduct a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy and potential advantages of RA compared with FG. Material and Methods: This study is a systematic literature review conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The review questions were formulated following the PICO scheme. Measured outcomes were presented using Forest plots. Heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using the Χ² test, and the I² statistic was utilized to estimate the proportion of total variation among the studies. A value exceeding 50% was considered indicative of substantial heterogeneity. Results: Seven studies that met inclusion criteria were finally included in this meta-analysis. These seven studies include: 447 patients, 228 patients (931 screws) treated with robotic guide, and 219 patients (767 pedicle screws) using fluoroscopic guide, with a mean age of 55.2. The percentages of clinically acceptable screws were 94.3% in the robot-assisted group and 89% in the fluoroscopic guided group. The percentages of non-acceptable screws were 5.7% in the robot-assisted group and 11% in the fluoroscopic-guided group. Discussion: Significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of radiographic and clinical outcomes, with the robotic-assisted pedicle screw group exhibiting longer operative times. Robot technology serves as a valuable tool for assisting surgeons in challenging scenarios such as anatomical variants or patients with spinal deformities, ensuring accurate screw placement. Conclusion: The accuracy of pedicle screw placement with robotic technology is higher than with FG. In fact, the robotic approach allows significantly lower complication rates, fewer cases of violation of the proximal articular facet, less intraoperative exposure to radiation, even if it requires longer surgical times than the FG technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement is a key step in several minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) procedures. Traditional technique for PPS makes use of C-arm fluoroscopy assistance (FA). More recently, newer intraoperative imaging techniques have been developed for PPS, including CT-guided navigation (CTNav). The aim of this study was to compare FA and CTNav techniques for PPS with regard to accuracy, complications, and radiation dosage. Materials and methods A total of 192 patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and canal stenosis who underwent MISS posterior fusion ± interbody fusion through transforaminal approach (TLIF) were retrospectively reviewed. Pedicle screws were placed percutaneously using either standard C-arm fluoroscopy guidance (FA group) or CT navigation (CTNav group). Intraoperative effective dose (ED, mSv) was measured. Screw placement accuracy was assessed postoperatively on a CT scan using Gertzbein and Robbins classification (grades A–E). Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared in both groups before and after surgery. Results A total of 101 and 91 procedures were performed with FA (FA group) and CTNav approach (CTNav group), respectively. Median age was 61 years in both groups, and the most commonly treated level was L4–L5. Median ED received from patients was 1.504 mSv (0.494–4.406) in FA technique and 21.130 mSv (10.840–30.390) in CTNav approach (p

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Background: Percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) have the advantage of being able to better preserve the paraspinal muscles when compared with a traditional open approach. However, the nature of changes in postoperative paraspinal muscle after damage by lumbar fusion surgery has remained largely unknown. It is clinically important to clarify and compare changes in paraspinal muscles after the various surgeries. Objective: (1) To determine postoperative changes of muscle density and cross-sectional area using computed tomography (CT), and (2) to compare paraspinal muscle changes after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with traditional open approaches and minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusions (LLIF) with PPS. Methods: We included data from 39 consecutive female patients who underwent open PLIF and 23 consecutive patients who underwent single-staged treatment with LLIF followed by posterior PPS fixation at a single level (L4-5). All patients underwent preoperative, 6 months postoperative, and 1-year postoperative CT imaging. Measurements of the cross-sectional area (CSA) and muscle densities of paraspinal muscles were obtained using regions of interest defined by manual tracing. Results: We did not find any decrease of CSA in any paraspinal muscles. We did find a decrease of muscle density in the multifidus at 1 year after surgery in patients in the PILF group, but not in those in LLIF/PPS group. Conclusions: One year after surgery, a significant postoperative decrease of muscle density of the multifidi was observed only in patients who underwent open PLIF, but not in those who underwent LLIF/PPS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objective To retrospectively analyze the short and long-term efficacies of O-arm-navigated percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation, with or without screwing of the fractured vertebra. Methods A total of 42 patients who underwent O-arm-navigated percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures from February 2015 to December 2018 were selected for analysis. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical intervention they received: Group A received percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation with screwing of the fractured vertebra and Group B received percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation without screwing of the fractured vertebra. Radiographic analysis included Cobb angles and percentage of anterior vertebral height (AVH%). Clinical functional outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain and the oswestry disability index (ODI) scores. Results No significant differences were observed in the operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P > 0.05). The length of incision was statistically significantly different between the two groups (P 0.05). However, the Cobb angle and AVH% were both significantly larger in Group A than Group B at the final follow-up (P 0.05). Conclusion In the short term, both minimally invasive treatments were safe and effective in treating thoracolumbar fracture. Although there was significant difference between the two groups in Cobb angle and vertebral body height at the last follow-up, the difference was small. Therefore, these specific parameters will be an important outcome measure in further investigations.

Background: Percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement is a key step in several minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) procedures. Traditional technique for PPS makes use of C-arm fluoroscopy assistance (FA). More recently, newer intraoperative imaging techniques have been developed for PPS, including CT-guided navigation (CTNav). The aim of this study was to compare FA and CTNav techniques for PPS with regard to accuracy, complications, and radiation dosage.Materials and Methods: A total of 192 patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and canal stenosis who underwent MISS posterior fusion ± interbody fusion through transforaminal approach (TLIF) were retrospectively reviewed. Pedicle screws were placed percutaneously using either standard C-arm fluoroscopy guidance (FA group) or CT navigation (CTNav group). Intraoperative effective dose (ED, mSv) was measured. Screw placement accuracy was assessed postoperatively on a CT scan using Gertzbein and Robbins classification (grades A-E). Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared in both groups before and after surgery.Results: A total of 101 and 91 procedures were performed with FA (FA group) and CTNav approach (CTNav group), respectively. Median age was 61 years in both groups, and the most commonly treated level was L4-L5. Median ED received from patients was 1.504 mSv (0.494-4.406) in FA technique and 21.130 mSv (10.840-30.390) in CTNav approach (p < 0.001). Percentage of grade A and B screws was significantly higher for the CTNav group (96.4% versus 92%, p < 0.001), whereas there were 16 grade E screws in the FA group and 0 grade E screws in the CTNav group (p < 0.001). A total of seven and five complications were reported in the FA and CTNav group, respectively (p = 0.771).Conclusions: CTNav technique increases accuracy of pedicle screw placement compared with FA technique without affecting operative time. Nevertheless, no significant difference was noted in terms of reoperation rate due to screw malpositioning between CTNav and FA techniques. Radiation exposure of patients was significantly higher with CTNav technique.Level Of Evidence: Level 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surgical palliative treatment of spinal metastases (SM) could influence the quality of life (QoL) in cancer patients, since the spine represents the most common site of secondary bony localization. Traditional open posterior instrumented fusion (OPIF) and Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) became the main surgical treatment alternatives for SM, but in Literature there is no evidence that describes the absolute superiority of one treatment over the other. Materials and Methods: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies on PPSF versus OPIF in patients with SM, conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The outcomes of interest were: complications, blood loss, infections, mortality, pain and also the Quality of Life (QoL). Results: There were a total of 8 studies with 448 patients included in the meta-analyses. Postoperative complications were more frequent in OPIF (odds ratio of 0.48. 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.83; p= 0.01), PPFS was associated with blood loss (odds ratio -585.70. 95% IC, -848.28 to -323.13.69; p< 0.0001) and a mean hospital stay (odds ratio -3.77. 95% IC, -5.92 to -1.61; p= 0.0006) decrease. The rate of infections was minor in PPFS (odds ratio of 0.31. 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.81; p= 0.02) whereas the occurrence of reinterventions (0.76. 95% CI, 0.25 to 2.27; p= 0.62) and the mortality rate was similar in both groups (odds ratio of 0.79. 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.58; p= 0.51). Finally, we also evaluated pre and post-operative VAS and the meta-analysis suggested that both techniques have a similar effect on pain. Discussion and Conclusion: The PPSF treatment is related with less complications, a lower rate of infections, a reduction in intraoperative blood loss and a shorter hospital stay compared to the OPIF treatment. However, further randomized clinical trials could confirm the results of this meta-analysis and provide a superior quality of scientific evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundSurgical palliative treatment of spinal metastases (SM) could influence the quality of life (QoL) in cancer patients, since the spine represents the most common site of secondary bony localization. Traditional open posterior instrumented fusion (OPIF) and Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) became the main surgical treatment alternatives for SM, but in Literature there is no evidence that describes the absolute superiority of one treatment over the other.Materials and MethodsThis is a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies on PPSF versus OPIF in patients with SM, conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The outcomes of interest were: complications, blood loss, infections, mortality, pain and also the Quality of Life (QoL).ResultsThere were a total of 8 studies with 448 patients included in the meta-analyses. Postoperative complications were more frequent in OPIF (odds ratio of 0.48. 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.83; p= 0.01), PPFS was associated with blood loss (odds ratio -585.70. 95% IC, -848.28 to -323.13.69; p< 0.0001) and a mean hospital stay (odds ratio -3.77. 95% IC, -5.92 to -1.61; p= 0.0006) decrease. The rate of infections was minor in PPFS (odds ratio of 0.31. 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.81; p= 0.02) whereas the occurrence of reinterventions (0.76. 95% CI, 0.25 to 2.27; p= 0.62) and the mortality rate was similar in both groups (odds ratio of 0.79. 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.58; p= 0.51). Finally, we also evaluated pre and post-operative VAS and the meta-analysis suggested that both techniques have a similar effect on pain.Discussion and ConclusionThe PPSF treatment is related with less complications, a lower rate of infections, a reduction in intraoperative blood loss and a shorter hospital stay compared to the OPIF treatment. However, further randomized clinical trials could confirm the results of this meta-analysis and provide a superior quality of scientific evidence.

Objective: To retrospectively analyze the short and long-term efficacies of O-arm-navigated percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation, with or without screwing of the fractured vertebra.Methods: A total of 42 patients who underwent O-arm-navigated percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures from February 2015 to December 2018 were selected for analysis. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical intervention they received: Group A received percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation with screwing of the fractured vertebra and Group B received percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation without screwing of the fractured vertebra. Radiographic analysis included Cobb angles and percentage of anterior vertebral height (AVH%). Clinical functional outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain and the oswestry disability index (ODI) scores.Results: No significant differences were observed in the operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P > 0.05). The length of incision was statistically significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in Cobb angle and AVH% between the two groups before and after the surgery (P > 0.05). However, the Cobb angle and AVH% were both significantly larger in Group A than Group B at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). In terms of clinical outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences in VAS and ODI scores between the two groups (P > 0.05).Conclusion: In the short term, both minimally invasive treatments were safe and effective in treating thoracolumbar fracture. Although there was significant difference between the two groups in Cobb angle and vertebral body height at the last follow-up, the difference was small. Therefore, these specific parameters will be an important outcome measure in further investigations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to demonstrate the utility of power tools and intraoperative neuromonitoring of percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) insertion (so-called PPS monitoring) by SINGLE-position surgery (SPS) after lateral lumbar interbody fusion. A retrospective analysis of medical records from a single center was performed to identify patients who underwent SPS for lateral lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation using PPS during intraoperative computed tomography navigation from 2020 to 2021. We investigated the PPS insertion time and screw positional accuracy of patients who underwent SPS involving power tools and PPS monitoring during this period. In this technical note, we report on this surgical technique. Twenty-four patients (mean age 72.0 ± 8.5 years, range 53–81 years) were included in this study. There were no intraoperative complications in all cases. Posterior fixation using PPS was added in all cases, and a total of 106 PPSs were inserted. It took an average of 6.2 ± 2.4 seconds to insert the PPS from the PPS insertion point to the end using a power tool and PPS monitoring. Moreover, there were no cases of pedicle breaches. Similar to previous reports related to power tools in the prone position, the lateral decubitus SPS technique can also use power tools to save PPS insertion time. Furthermore, we suggest that the use of PPS monitoring may prevent erroneous PPS insertions by using intraoperative computed tomography navigation in advance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background We aimed to analyze the clinical results of Schwab grade 4 osteotomy combined with percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) fixation for treatment of post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis (PTK). Methods Thirty four patients with PTK (group A) were included in our study. The average age was 54.9 ± 3.3 years. All patients had severe back pain with 8.6 ± 1.3 VAS scores. The affected level was T12 in 16 patients and L1 in 18 patients. The average preoperative regional kyphosis angle (RKA) was 30.7 ± 6.00. Three patients had neurological dysfunction with ASIA grade D. All patients underwent Schwab grade 4 osteotomy combined with PPS fixation. The control group (Group B) were 26 PTK patients treated with Schwab grade 4 osteotomy and open pedicle screws fixation in our institution. Results Operation time in groups A and B was 280 ± 50 min and 210 ± 30 min, respectively (P 0.05). CT showed that the misplacement rate in groups A and B was 5.5 and 6.6% (P > 0.05). The average follow-up in groups A and B was 25.2 ± 7.6 months and 30.6 ± 2.7 months. No fracture and other complications were observed in both groups. Solid bone fusion was showed in all cases at 6 months follow-up. In groups A and B, all patients with preoperative neurological dysfunction recovered to ASIA grade E at the last follow-up. The VAS score of back pain improved significantly from 8.6 ± 1.3 to 1.6 ± 1.0 at the last follow-up in group A (P

Abstract Background Neoplastic spinal cord compression is a cause of severe disability in cancer patients. To prevent irreversible paraplegia, a structured strategy is required to address the various impairments present in cancer patients. In this study, we aimed to identify the status where rehabilitation with minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) effectively improves ADL. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 27 consecutive patients with neoplastic spinal compression who were treated with MISt. We classified the impairments of patients through our multidisciplinary tumor board based on spine-specific factors, skeletal instability, and tumor growth. The neurological deficits, progress of pathological fracture, incidence of vertebral collapse, and postoperative implant failure were examined. Changes of the Barthel index (BI) scores before and after surgery were investigated throughout the clinical courses. Results The average duration to ambulation was 7.19 ± 11 days, and we observed no collapse or progression of paralysis except in four cases of complete motor paraplegia before the surgery. Neurological deficiency was improved to or maintained at Frankel’s grade E in 16 patients, remained unchanged in 6 patients (in grades B, C, D), and worsened in 5 patients. BI score comparisons before and after surgery in all patients showed statistically significant increments (p < 0.05). On further analysis, we noted good functional prognosis in patients capable of ambulation within 7 days (p < 0.05) and in patients who could survive longer than 3 months after the surgery (p < 0.05). Conclusions In various cancer patients with neoplastic spinal cord compression, skeletal instability as the primary impairment is a good indication for MISt, as the patients showed early ambulation with improved BI scores.

Endoscopic spine surgery has started replacing conventional microdiscectomy in various centers across the globe. With development in the field of optics and instrumentation, the field of percutaneous endoscopic spine surgery has evolved immensely. With increasing experience, endoscopic spine surgeons have expanded the indications not only to lumbar paramedian disc herniations but also to central disc herniations, high-grade migrated disc herniations, sequestered herniations, thoracic and cervical disc herniations, and more recently, lumbar canal stenosis. With broadening indications, unexpected adverse events are bound to increase. Hence, it is essential for the endoscopic spine surgeons to be aware of the potential hazards and unexpected complications of the procedure so that appropriate care is taken to avoid adverse events as much as possible. In this article, we summarize all the complications of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy reported in the literature. We have classified the complications into intraoperative, immediate postoperative, and late postoperative complications. The senior author has also suggested the tips to avoid these complications and carry out the procedure as safely as possible. As percutaneous instrumentation, particularly, percutaneous pedicular screws, is also becoming common with the development of minimally invasive spine surgery, we have also summarized its complications and limitations. An insight into these complications will help the endoscopic surgeons to take special precautions when performing the procedure.

Two-dimensional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement is currently the most widely applied instrumentation for minimally invasive treatment of spinal injuries requiring stabilization. Although this technique has advantages over open instrumentation, it also presents new challenges and specific complications. The objective of this study was to provide recommendations developed from the experience of several spinal surgeons at different minimally invasive spine surgery reference centers to solve specific problems and prevent complications during the learning curve of this technique. An AO Spine Latin America minimally invasive spine surgery study group analyzed the most frequent complications and challenges occurring during the placement of >14,000 two-dimensional fluoroscopy–guided percutaneous pedicle screws at different centers over 15 years. Twenty tips considered most relevant to performing this technique, excluding problems directly related to specific brands of instruments, were presented. The 20 tips included the following: (1) positioning; (2) clean and painless; (3) fewer x-rays; (4) check the clock; (5) beveled tip; (6) transverse-rib-pedicle; (7) double Jamshidi; (8) hammer the Kirschner wire; (9) bent tip; (10) too loose, too tight; (11) new trajectory; (12) manual control; (13) start over; (14) Kirschner wire first; (15) adhesive drape control; (16) bend the rod; (17) lower rods; (18) freehand inner; (19) posterior fusion; (20) revision. Implementation of these tips might improve performance of this technique and reduce the complications related to percutaneous pedicle screw placement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To explore the clinical effect of percutaneous pedicle screw anchored vertebral augmentation(PPSAVA) in the treatment of asymptomatic Kümmell disease without neurological symptoms., Methods: The clinical data of 20 patients with Kümmell disease without neurological symptoms treated with PPSAVA in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, including 5 males and 15 females, aged 56 to 88 (74.95±9.93) years old. and the course of disease was 7 to 60 days with an average of (21.35±14.46) days. All patients were treated with PPSAVA. The time of operation, the amount of bone cement injected and the leakage of bone cement were recorded. The visual analogue scale(VAS), Oswestry disability index(ODI), vertebral body angle(VBA), anterior edge height and midline height of vertebral body were compared among the before operation, 3 days after operation and during the final follow-up. The loosening and displacement of bone cement were observed during the final follow-up., Results: All the 20 patients completed the operation successfully. The operation time was 30 to 56 min with an average of (41.15±7.65) min, and the amount of bone cement injection was 6.0 to 12.0 ml with an average of (9.30±1.49) ml. Bone cement leakage occurred in 6 cases and there were no obvious clinical symptoms. The follow-up time was 6 to 12 months with an average of (8.43±2.82) months. The VBA, anterior edge height and midline height of of injured vertebral body were significantly improved 3 days after operation and the final follow-up( P <0.05), and the VBA, anterior edge height and midline height of of injured vertebral body were lost in different degrees at the final follow-up ( P <0.05). The VAS and ODI at 3 days after operation and at the final follow-up were significantly lower than those at preoperatively( P <0.05), but the VAS score and ODI at the final follow-up were not significantly different from those at 3 d after operation( P >0.05). At the last follow-up, no patients showed loosening or displacement of bone cement., Conclusion: PPSAVA is highly effective in treating Kümmell disease without neurological symptoms, improving patients' pain and functional impairment, and reducing the risk of cement loosening and displacement postoperatively.

Percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) are used to stabilize the spine after interbody fusion in minimally invasive approaches. Recently, robotic assistance has been developed to improve the accuracy of PPS. We report our initial experience with ExcelsiusGPS and compare its accuracy with our historical cohort of fluoroscopy-guided PPS. We reviewed prospectively collected data from our first 100 robot-assisted PPS. We graded accuracy of screws on computed tomography imaging and compared it with a previous cohort of 90 PPS placed using fluoroscopy. We also analyzed the effect of various demographic and perioperative metrics on accuracy. We placed 103 PPS in the first 20 consecutive patients with postoperative computed tomography imaging using ExcelsiusGPS. All screws were placed at L2 to S1. Our robot-assisted cohort had 6 breaches, with only 2 breaches >2 mm, yielding an overall breach rate of 5.8% and a significant breach rate of 1.9%. In comparison, our fluoroscopy-guided cohort had a breach rate of 3.3% and a significant breach rate of 1.1%, which was not significantly different. More breaches occurred in the first half of cases, suggesting a learning curve with robotic assistance. No demographic or perioperative metrics had a significant effect on accuracy. Our breach rates with ExcelsiusGPS were low and consistent with others reported in the literature, as well as with other robotic systems. Our series shows equivalent accuracy of placement of PPS with this robotic platform compared with fluoroscopic guidance and suggests a relatively short learning curve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• This study aimed to compare the incidence of facet joint violation (FJV) due to percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) insertion in patients who underwent surgery in a single position or dual position following LLIF. • There was no statistically significant difference in the FJV rate between SP and DP group, with both groups showing FJV in 28 of 182 (15.4%) and 18 of 167 (10.8%), respectively. • The incidence of FJV was 15.7% (13/83) for C-arm fluoroscopy and 15.2% (15/99) for intraoperative CT navigation in the SP group, these differences were not significant. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of facet joint violation (FJV) after placement of percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) in 2 cohorts of patients who underwent surgery in a single position or dual position following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) (extreme lateral interbody fusion [XLIF]). We reviewed 82 patients who underwent combined XLIF surgery and PPS fixation for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. Patient demographics were compared between 2 groups: those who remained in the lateral decubitus position for PPS fixation (SP group) and those who were turned to the prone position (DP group). Postoperative axial computed tomography scans were evaluated independently for FJV according to the following classification: grade 0, no impingement; grade 1, screw head in contact/suspected to be in contact with the facet joint; and grade 2, screw clearly invaded the facet joint. A total of 349 screws were graded. Using the consensus grades, the incidence of FJV was 13.2% (46/349), but the incidence of FJV did not differ significantly according to the position of the patient during PPS insertion (SP group; 15.4%, DP group; 10.8%, P = 0.204). Although the incidence of FJV after PPS insertion did not differ between the prone and lateral decubitus positions, grade 2 FJV was observed only in the SP group. To avoid FJV, the surgeon should pay close attention to the facet joints when inserting PPSs with the patient in a lateral decubitus position. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Neoplastic spinal cord compression is a cause of severe disability in cancer patients. To prevent irreversible paraplegia, a structured strategy is required to address the various impairments present in cancer patients. In this study, we aimed to identify the status where rehabilitation with minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) effectively improves ADL. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 27 consecutive patients with neoplastic spinal compression who were treated with MISt. We classified the impairments of patients through our multidisciplinary tumor board based on spine-specific factors, skeletal instability, and tumor growth. The neurological deficits, progress of pathological fracture, incidence of vertebral collapse, and postoperative implant failure were examined. Changes of the Barthel index (BI) scores before and after surgery were investigated throughout the clinical courses. Results: The average duration to ambulation was 7.19 ± 11 days, and we observed no collapse or progression of paralysis except in four cases of complete motor paraplegia before the surgery. Neurological deficiency was improved to or maintained at Frankel's grade E in 16 patients, remained unchanged in 6 patients (in grades B, C, D), and worsened in 5 patients. BI score comparisons before and after surgery in all patients showed statistically significant increments (p < 0.05). On further analysis, we noted good functional prognosis in patients capable of ambulation within 7 days (p < 0.05) and in patients who could survive longer than 3 months after the surgery (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In various cancer patients with neoplastic spinal cord compression, skeletal instability as the primary impairment is a good indication for MISt, as the patients showed early ambulation with improved BI scores. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• The tube provides visualization of the anatomy of the facet joints and enables accurate placement of the Jamshidi needles. • The radiation exposure was minimized since the accuracy of placement is increased. • The method is easy to be learned by spine surgeons who is familiar with the visualization of the facet joints. Percutaneous pedicle screws(PPS) have been used for decades. The difficult part of PPS placement is locating the proper entry sites on the facet joints for the Jamshidi needles. The correct positioning is usually ensured by fluoroscopy, which exposes surgeons and patients to extensive radiation exposure. To describe a novel retractor tube technique used in the placement of PPS, which enables visualization of the anatomy of the facet joints and enables accurate placement of the Jamshidi needles. A newly designed 15-mm-diameter retractor tube was applied during the placement of Jamshidi needles in 21 operations using PPS to treat thoracolumbar fracture. The anatomy of the entry site could be clearly visualized, and a Kirschner wire was inserted 2 mm into each of the ideal entry sites. When all the Kirschner wires were placed, the annular tubes of the Jamshidi needles were placed along the Kirschner wires into the pedicles. Fluoroscopy was used to confirm the positions of the Jamshidi needles. The rest of the procedure was conducted in the traditional PPS placement technique. The entrance sites were successfully accessed through the retractor tube, with only one adjustment needed at most. Only one or two fluoroscopy images were taken during the placement of the Kirschner wires, and another image was taken after all the Jamshidi needles were placed. Fluoroscopy confirmed that the positioning of the PPS was good. A retractor tube accurately exposes the entry points on the facet joints in PPS placement, and is technically easy to use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Traumatic high grade lateral spondylolisthesis at the thoracolumbar junction is an extremely severe injury caused by high-energy trauma, commonly resulting in polytrauma. The treatment of this pathology is challenging, and even death following surgery has been reported. Therefore, it is necessary to focus on making surgical invasion minimal. Methods: A 53-yearold female fell from a height and presented with severe back pain and complete paralysis below L1. Computed tomography (CT) showed a Grade 4 traumatic lateral spondylolisthesis and severe comminution of L1, and mild compression fractures at T9 and L3. Results: First, we performed posterior surgery on the day of the injury to reduce the fracture and stabilize the spinal column using percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS). Twelve days later we resected the L1 vertebral body and inserted a cage with an iliac bone graft using an anterior approach. The estimated blood loss from posterior and anterior surgeries was 320ml and 200ml, respectively. Bony fusion was achieved as seen on CT at the 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: A 2-stage combined posterior-anterior approach using PPS can be performed less invasively, enabling adequate reduction, internal fixation, and anterior reconstruction for patients with high grade traumatic lateral spondylolisthesis without spinal shortening or facet interlocking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The benefits of extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) as a minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis have been unclear. We sought to evaluate the invasiveness and tolerability of XLIF with percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) compared with traditional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Methods Fifty-six consecutive patients underwent open PLIF and 46 consecutive patients underwent single-staged treatment with XLIF with posterior PPS fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, and were followed up for a minimum of 1 year. We analyzed postoperative serum makers for muscle damage and inflammation, postoperative surgical pain, and performance status. A Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were obtained at the time of hospital admission and 1 year after surgery. Results Intraoperative blood loss (51 ± 41 ml in the XLIF/PPS group and 206 ± 191 ml in the PLIF group), postoperative WBC counts and serum CRP levels in the XLIF/PPS group were significantly lower than in the PLIF group. Postoperative serum CK levels were significantly lower in the XLIF/PPS group on postoperative days 4 and 7. Postoperative recovery of performance was significantly greater in the XLIF/PPS group than in the PLIF group from postoperative days 2 to 7. ODI and visual analog scale (VAS) score (lumbar) 1 year after surgery were significantly lower in the XLIF/PPS group compared with the PLIF group. Conclusions The XLIF/PPS procedure is advantageous to minimize blood loss and muscle damage, with consequent earlier recovery of daily activities and reduced incidence of low back pain after surgery than with the open PLIF procedure.

Pyogenic spondylitis is a frequently observed disease in orthopedics, and the number of cases is increasing. Some patients with pyogenic spondylitis suffer from vertebral destruction due to infection. The disease is typically treated with antibiotics, bed rest, spinal support, and lesion curettage; however, vigorous drug therapy against vertebral body destruction by pyogenic spondylitis has not been attempted. In this report, a case of pyogenic spondylitis with spinal destruction caused by infection and treated with once-weekly teriparatide administration is presented. Vertebral body erosion in cortical and cancellous areas by the infection was rapidly repaired after 6 weeks of once-weekly teriparatide treatment. Treatment with once-weekly teriparatide appears to be a new strategy for patients with severe osteoporosis suffering from pyogenic spondylitis.

The authors report a case of lumbar para-spinal muscle herniation following percutaneous thoraco-lumbar pedicle screw fixation. This is suggested to be due to subclinical iatrogenic increase in the intra-compartmental pressure. The possibility of ‘Iatrogenic paraspinal compartment syndrome’ following minimally invasive spine techniques has been discussed previously by other authors. Nevertheless, no such case has been reported so far in the literature. The awareness of this potential complication might be helpful for spinal surgeons for early detection and management.

Background: Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) and traditional open TLIF (O-TLIF) for degenerative lumbar disc disease have been poorly studied. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the outcomes between MI-TLIF and O-TLIF for patients with a degenerative disc disease, focusing on the functional capacity of patients in daily life., Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed, comparing 54 patients who underwent O-TLIF and 55 patients who underwent MI-TLIF with a follow-up of 4 years. Clinical evaluation was performed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-item short form survey (SF-36), and a visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain). Radiological evaluation was also performed., Results: At the final follow-up, compared with O-TLIF, MI-TLIF was associated with significantly better intraoperative results, including similar operative time ( p = 0.246), lower estimated blood loss ( p = 0.001), and shorter hospital stay ( p = 0.001). The final ODI score was significantly better in the MI-TLIF group ( p = 0.031). The SF-36-physical ( p = 0.023) and VAS pain ( p = 0.024) scores were significantly better in the MI-TLIF group. There was no significant difference in the fusion rate ( p = 0.747)., Conclusions: The MI-TLIF technique is an effective and safe procedure for degenerative lumbar disc disease. Compared to traditional O-TLIF, MI-TLIF was associated with less disability and higher quality of life, with a low rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (Copyright © 2023 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association.)

Background: To evaluate the accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) insertion in degenerative lumbar disease treated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) and to analyze risk factors and long-term clinical outcomes of screw violation., Methods: Sixty-two consecutive patients (262 screws) were included. Based on postoperative computed tomography (CT) axial images, a PPS that perforated out of the pedicle was classified into a violation group, while screws surrounded by pedicular cortical bone were classified into a correct group. A logistic regression model was used for risk factor analysis of violation. We also observed the long-term clinical outcomes using the Oswestry disability index and visual analog scale., Results: Of the 262 screws, 14 (5.3%) were considered to be violated (10 medial violations and 4 lateral violations). All violations of S1 and L5 were in the medial direction. In contrast, entire violations of L4 were always lateral and of the 2 violations of L3, one was lateral and the other was medial. There were no cases of superior or inferior violation. The mean pedicle convergence angle (CA) was significantly higher in the violation group (mean ± standard deviation, 27.0° ± 6.2°) than in the correct group (21.7° ± 5.4°). There were no significant differences according to vertebral rotational angle, body mass index, bone mineral density, and surgical timing (learning curve) between the two groups. Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that a high CA was a significant risk factor for pedicle wall violation ( p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in clinical or radiographic results between the two groups in 60 patients who were followed up for more than 1 year and in 40 patients who were followed up for more than 5 years. There were 2 patients who required reoperation to replace a screw due to leg pain., Conclusions: With PPS insertion during MI-TLIF, the rate of pedicle violation was 5.3% (14/262). An understanding of the anatomical characteristics of each vertebra and the unique structures of the patient is essential to prevent pedicle violations. Even in the violation group, PPS fixation was found to be a safe and useful procedure with successful long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (Copyright © 2023 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association.)

Study Design: Biomechanical.Objective: Evaluate spinal stability achieved with different levels of posterior percutaneous fixation (postPerc) for thoracolumbar fractures in cadavers subjected to ICU activities.Summary Of Background Data: "Spine damage control" involves postPerc performed within 24 hours of injury and staged, elective, definitive stabilization. Amount of instrumentation needed to initially achieve adequate spinal stability, minimize morbidity, and accommodate ICU care needs between stages are not defined.Methods: In full-unembalmed cadavers motion-tracking sensors were placed at T11 and L1. A T12 corpectomy with PLC injury was stabilized with 1, 2, and 3 levels of PostPerc above/below the injury. Motions between T11 and L1 were measured during Log-Roll and Sit-Up on an ICU bed. After in situ testing, anatomic spinal motion ranges were determined under pure moment loads.Results: 5 cadavers were evaluated. For Log-Roll, 2 and 3 levels above/below restored stability to intact, whereas 1 level above/below did not for axial rotation. For translation, all instrumentation restored stability to intact. During Sit-Up, a linear increase in flexion was observed. At 45° Sit-Up, 2 and 3 levels above/below were similar to intact for flexion; 1 level above/below had significantly more flexion. All instrumentations restored translation to intact for Sit-Up; significantly more axial collapse occurred for instrumentation compared with intact. During ex situ testing, 2 and 3 levels above/below were similar; 1 level above/below had significantly greater laxity in flexion, extension, and axial rotation.Conclusion: Posterior instrumentation 2 or 3 levels above/below a severe thoracolumbar fracture model can restore spinal stability back to its intact condition. 2 levels of fixation above/below this "worst-case scenario" is minimum fixation sufficient to provide absolute spinal stability in the ICU setting as a "Damage Control" technique in patients with polytrauma. In less severe injury models, 1 level of fixation above/below may provide adequate spinal stability; although this should be confirmed in future investigations.Level Of Evidence: N/A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Minimally invasive surgical techniques have expanded from their initial indications for the elective treatment of degenerative conditions to include their application in the setting of trauma. Percutaneous pedicle screw placement offers an option in the treatment of a variety of thoracolumbar fractures in neurologically intact patients. Screws can be used for the management of unstable burst fractures or as an “internal splint” for patients in whom bracing of a stable fracture may be contraindicated. In addition, they can be used for treatment of bony Chance fractures, allowing fracture healing without fusion. Percutaneous screws can be applied in a “damage control” setting as temporary stabilization in patients with multiple traumatic injuries who might not be physiologically able to tolerate a definitive open procedure early in their hospitalization. Finally, this technique can be applied to patients with ankylosing spinal disorders for stabilization without fusion until bony healing occurs. The technique for posterior pedicle screw placement and reduction maneuvers is described. Posterior minimally invasive screw placement is a safe, effective, viable option for stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures in a variety of settings. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Adult scoliosis is commonly treated with nonoperative measures. When treated surgically, traditional open methods of deformity correction are associated with high morbidity. Minimally invasive spine surgery allows for correction of adult deformity with reduced blood loss and reduced tissue trauma when compared to open methods. We describe the surgical technique used for the minimally invasive correction and fusion of adult scoliosis and review outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Posterior spinal procedures through tubular exposures have been described. However, tubes restrain visibility and require co-axial instrument manipulation, increasing difficulty and potentially compromising surgical results. An independent-blade retractor system overcomes the obstacles of working through a tube and has been used to perform minimally-disruptive decompression and instrumented tranforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Purpose: To evaluate the advantages to patient recovery and surgical efficacy of this technique. Methods/Results: Retrospective review of technique employing a minimally-disruptive approach to decompression and transforaminal lumber interbody fusion (TLIF). Conclusions: Minimally-disruptive decompression and instrumented TLIF can be performed in a safe and effective manner using an independent-blade retractor system. Relative to traditional-open techniques, surgical goals can be accomplished, but with the benefits of minimally-disruptive surgery. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: Single-position lateral lumbar interbody fusion (SP-LLIF) has recently gained significant popularity due to increased operative efficiency, but it remains technically challenging. Robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw (RA-PPS) placement can facilitate screw placement in the lateral position. The authors have reported their initial experience with SP-LLIF with RA-PPS placement in the lateral position, and they have compared this accuracy with that of RA-PPS placement in the prone position., Methods: The authors reviewed prospectively collected data from their first 100 lateral-position RA-PPSs. The authors graded screw accuracy on CT and compared it to the accuracy of all prone-position RA-PPS procedures during the same time period. The authors analyzed the effect of several demographic and perioperative metrics, as a whole and specifically for lateral-position RA-PPS placement., Results: The authors placed 99 lateral-position RA-PPSs by using the ExcelsiusGPS robotic platform in the first 18 consecutive patients who underwent SP-LLIF with postoperative CT imaging; these patients were compared with 346 prone-position RA-PPSs that were placed in the first consecutive 64 patients during the same time period. All screws were placed at L1 to S1. Overall, the lateral group had 14 breaches (14.1%) and the prone group had 25 breaches (7.2%) (p = 0.032). The lateral group had 5 breaches (5.1%) greater than 2 mm (grade C or worse), and the prone group had 4 (1.2%) (p = 0.015). The operative level had an effect on the breach rate, with breach rates (grade C or worse) of 7.1% at L3 and 2.8% at L4. Most breaches were grade B (< 2 mm) and lateral, and no breach had clinical sequelae or required revision. Within the lateral group, multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that BMI and number of levels affected accuracy, but the side that was positioned up or down did not., Conclusions: RA-PPSs can improve the feasibility of SP-LLIF. Spine surgeons should be cautious and selective with this technique owing to decreased accuracy in the lateral position, particularly in obese patients. Further studies should compare SP-LLIF techniques performed while the patient is in the prone and lateral positions.

Background: Traumatic high grade lateral spondylolisthesis at the thoracolumbar junction is an extremely severe injury caused by high-energy trauma, commonly resulting in polytrauma. The treatment of this pathology is challenging, and even death following surgery has been reported. Therefore, it is necessary to focus on making surgical invasion minimal., Methods: A 53-year-old female fell from a height and presented with severe back pain and complete paralysis below L1. Computed tomography (CT) showed a Grade 4 traumatic lateral spondylolisthesis and severe comminution of L1, and mild compression fractures at T9 and L3., Results: First, we performed posterior surgery on the day of the injury to reduce the fracture and stabilize the spinal column using percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS). Twelve days later we resected the L1 vertebral body and inserted a cage with an iliac bone graft using an anterior approach. The estimated blood loss from posterior and anterior surgeries was 320ml and 200ml, respectively. Bony fusion was achieved as seen on CT at the 1-year follow-up., Conclusion: A 2-stage combined posterior-anterior approach using PPS can be performed less invasively, enabling adequate reduction, internal fixation, and anterior reconstruction for patients with high grade traumatic lateral spondylolisthesis without spinal shortening or facet interlocking., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2021 Asian Journal of Neurosurgery.)

Objective: To investigate the accuracy and clinical efficacy of percutaneous pedicle screw placement under O-arm navigation and traditional fluoroscopy in patients with thoracolumbar fractures without neurological symptoms. Methods: From July 2016 to July 2018, 72 patients with thoracolumbar fractures in Peking University International Hospital without neurological symptoms were divided into two groups, group A and group B. In group A, 36 patients underwent the surgery of percutaneous pedicle screw implantation under traditional fluoroscopy and 168 pedicle screws were inserted. In group B, 36 patients underwent the surgery of percutaneous pedicle screw implantation under O-arm guided fluoroscopy and 164 pedicle screws were inserted by the same surgeon. The general condition, operation condition, radiation dose, fluoroscopy time of single screw, screw placement time and accuracy, visual analogue score (VAS) score, Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI), kyphosis Cobb's angle, anterior edge height of 1 week and 6 months after surgery were compared. The data were compared with paired t test between the two groups. Results: There was no significant differences between the two groups in general condition, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, VAS, ODI, kyphosis Cobb's angle, and anterior edge height of the injured vertebra (all P> 0.05). The operation time was (99±14) min in group A and (75±10) min in group B, the average screw setting time was (15.8±2.6) min in group A and (11.8±3.3) min in group B, the fluoroscopy time of each screw was (38.0±2.0) s in group A and (28.5±2.8) s in group B, the radiation dose of each surgery was (563±163) cGy/cm(2) in group A and (378±70) cGy/cm(2) in group B; the above-mentioned data of group A were all superior to those in group B and the differences between the two groups were all statistically significant ( t= 8.48, 5.73, 16.30, 6.25, all P< 0.05). Rampersaud grading in group A was better than group B, and the differences between the two groups was statistically significant(χ(2)=12.2, P< 0.05). Conclusion: The O-arm navigation system could not only provide high-definition navigation images and achieve high-precision navigation operations, which is more accurate than traditional pedicle screws placement, but also contribute to the reconstruction of spinal stability and reduce radiation dose, pedicle screws placement and operating time.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort., Objective: Facet fusion in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) may reduce morbidity and promote long-term construct stability. The study compares the maintenance of correction of thoracolumbar (TL) trauma patients who underwent MISS with facet fusion (FF) and without facet fusion (WOFF) and evaluates instrumentation loosening and failure., Methods: TL trauma patients who underwent MISS between 2006 and 2013 were identified and stratified into FF and WOFF groups. To evaluate progressive kyphosis and loss of correction, Cobb angles were measured at immediate postoperative, short-term, and long-term follow-up. Evidence of >2 mm of radiolucency on radiographs indicated screw loosening. If instrumentation was removed, postremoval kyphosis angle was obtained., Results: Of the 80 patients, 24 were in FF and 56 were in WOFF group. Between immediate postoperative and short-term follow-up, kyphosis angle changed by 4.0° (standard error [SE] 1.3°) in the FF and by 3.0° (SE 0.4°) in the WOFF group. The change between immediate postoperative and long-term follow-up kyphosis angles was 3.4° (S.E 1.1°) and 5.2° (S.E 1.6°) degrees in the FF and WOFF groups, respectively. Facet fusion had no impact on the change in kyphosis at short term ( P = .49) or long term ( P = .39). The screw loosening rate was 20.5% for the 80 patients with short-term follow-up and 68.8% for the 16 patients with long-term follow-up. There was no difference in screw loosening rate. Fifteen patients underwent instrumentation removal-all from the FF group., Conclusion: FF in MISS does not impact the correction achieved and maintenance of correction in patients with traumatic spine injuries., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr Gelb is a board member and fellowship committee chair for AOSpine NA. He receives payment for lectures and for development of educational presentations from AOSpine NA. He receives royalties from DePuy Synthes Spine and Globus Medical. He has stock in the American Society for Investigative Pathology. Dr Koh receives payment for consultancy from Biomet. His institution receives RO1 grant money from the National Institutes of Health. Dr Ludwig is a board member for Globus Medical, the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery, the American Orthopaedic Association, the Cervical Spine Research Society, and the Society for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. He is a paid consultant for DePuy Synthes, K2M, and Globus Medical. He receives payment for lectures and travel accommodations from DePuy Synthes and K2M. He receives payment for patents and royalties from DePuy Synthes and Globus Medical. He has stock in Innovative Surgical Designs and the American Society for Investigative Pathology. He receives research support from AO Spine North America Spine Fellowship support, Pacira Pharmaceutical, and AOA Omega Grant. He is a board member of Maryland Development Corporation. He receives royalties from Thieme, Quality Medical Publishers. He is on the governing board of Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, The Spine Journal, and Contemporary Spine Surgery. The authors have no further potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (© The Author(s) 2019.)

Objective: The level of radiation awareness by surgeons and residents in spinal surgery does not match the ubiquity of fluoroscopy in operating rooms in the United States. The present method of monitoring radiation exposure may contribute to the current deficiency in radiation awareness. Current dosimeters involve a considerable lag from the time that the surgical team is exposed to radiation to the time that they are provided with that exposure data. The objective of the current study was to assess the feasibility of monitoring radiation exposure in operating room personnel during lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) procedures by using a wearable personal device with real-time feedback., Methods: Operating room staff participating in minimally invasive surgical procedures under a single surgeon during a 6-month period were prospectively enrolled in this study. All radiation dose exposures were recorded for each member of the surgical team (surgeon, assistant surgeon, scrub nurse, and circulating nurse) using a personal dosimeter (DoseAware). Radiation doses were recorded in microsieverts (μSv). Comparisons between groups were made using ANOVA with the Tukey post hoc test and Student t-test., Results: Thirty-nine patients underwent interbody fusions: 25 underwent LLIF procedures (14 LLIF alone, 11 LLIF with percutaneous screw placement [PSP]) and 14 underwent MI-TLIF. For each operative scenario per spinal level, the surgeon experienced significantly higher (p < 0.035) average radiation exposure (LLIF: 167.9 μSv, LLIF+PSP: 424.2 μSv, MI-TLIF: 397.9 μSv) than other members of the team, followed by the assistant surgeon (LLIF: 149.7 μSv, LLIF+PSP: 242.3 μSv, MI-TLIF: 274.9 μSv). The scrub nurse (LLIF: 15.4 μSv, LLIF+PSP: 125.7 μSv, MI-TLIF: 183.0 μSv) and circulating nurse (LLIF: 1.2 μSv, LLIF+PSP: 9.2 μSv, MI-TLIF: 102.3 μSv) experienced significantly lower exposures. Radiation exposure was not correlated with the patient's body mass index (p ≥ 0.233); however, it was positively correlated with increasing patient age (p ≤ 0.004)., Conclusions: Real-time monitoring of radiation exposure is currently feasible and shortens the time between exposure and the availability of information regarding that exposure. A shortened feedback loop that offers more reliable and immediate data would conceivably raise the level of concern for radiation exposure in spinal surgeries and could alter patterns of behavior, leading to decreased exposures. Further studies are ongoing to determine the effect of real-time dosimetry in spinal surgery.

Tethered cord syndrome is a constellation of signs and symptoms involving sensory and motor dysfunction of the lower extremities, bladder, and bowel. The pathophysiology may be from a mechanical stretch of the distal spinal cord causing deleterious changes in blood supply and metabolism. The standard of care for tethered cord syndrome has been tethered cord release. However, drawbacks of traditional tethered cord release include neurological injury, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and intradural scarring and retethering of the spinal cord (secondary tethering). As such, spinal column shortening was described to avoid these risks.1 We applied spinal column shortening to children and transitional adults with secondary tethered cord syndrome.1 As shown in cadaveric biomechanical studies, the objective of surgery is to shorten by the spinal column by 1.5 to 2.5 cm, to obtain the equivalent relief of traction on the spinal cord and nerve roots as direct circumferential untethering.2 In this video, we present the case of an 11-yr-old boy with a history of VATERL (vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheo-esophageal fistula, renal anomalies, and limb abnormalities) and tethered cord syndromes manifest as bladder dysfunction. Our patient had segmentation and formation anomalies of the lumbosacral junction, imperforate anus, and leg length discrepancy. He had already undergone multiple tethered cord releases with no durable improvement in bladder function. After discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of spinal column shortening with the patient and his father, we decided to proceed with this treatment alternative. At 9 mo after surgery, the patient has satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes. Informed consent was obtained from the parents of the patient., (Copyright © 2018 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

Recent years have shown an increase in implementing robotics in surgical procedures. Utilizing robotic technology in spine surgery remains limited in comparison to other surgical fields. We present a surgical video of minimally invasive robotic-assisted insertion of posterior pedicle screws using the newest generation robotic technology (Mazor X, Mazor Robotics Ltd, Caesarea, Israel), in a 29-yr-old man who suffers from Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 levels and severe, right-sided foraminal stenosis. The plan was to perform anterior fusion at L5-S1 using robotic guidance with posterior pedicle screw supplementation due to his extensive smoking history. This technology has two distinct registration methods: (1) using a preoperative thin-cut computed tomography (CT) scan to create a surgical plan for screw placement; and (2) scan-and-plan using intraoperative 3-dimensional (3D) imaging to create a plan in real-time intraoperatively. We present the scan-and-plan technique. The widely used freehand technique allows the surgeon to manually direct tools and implants relying on the 6-degrees-of-freedom of the human arm. When Mazor X robotic technology is utilized, a pilot hole is drilled through a cannula docked to the bone above the entry point, which provides the surgeon with a planned trajectory and eliminates 4 of 6-degrees-of-freedom (up/down and yaw remain). This provides increased multidimensional control and reduces reliance on hand-eye coordination with simultaneous concentration on the imaging, potentially leading to increased rates of accuracy and reduction in severe complications of misplaced screws. Further prospective clinical studies are needed to determine the long-term effectiveness of this technology. Patient consent was obtained prior to performing the procedure. Institutional board review approval is not required for the report of a single case at the University at Buffalo., (Copyright © 2018 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques used for management of adult spinal deformity (ASD) aim to decrease the physiological demand on patients and minimize postoperative complications. A circumferential MIS (cMIS) protocol offers the potential to maximize this advantage over standard open approaches, through the concurrent use of multiple MIS techniques., Objective: To demonstrate through a case example the execution of a cMIS protocol for management of an ASD patient with severe deformity., Methods: Thorough preoperative assessment, surgical planning, and medical optimization were completed. Deformity correction was performed over 2 stages. During the first stage, interbody fusion was performed via an oblique lateral approach at all levels of the lumbar spine intended to be included in the final construct. The patient was kept as an inpatient and mobilized postoperatively. They were then re-imaged with standing films. The second stage occurred after 3 d and involved percutaneous instrumentation of all levels. Posterior fusion of the thoracic levels was achieved through decortication of pars and facets. These areas were accessed through the intermuscular plane established by the percutaneous screws. The patient was mobilizing on their first postoperative day., Results: In a 66-yr-old female with severe sagittal imbalance and debilitating back pain, effective use of this cMIS protocol allowed for correction of the Cobb angle from 52° to 4° correction of spinopelvic parameters and 13 cm of sagittal vertical axis improvement. No complications were identified by 2 yr postoperative., Conclusion: As a systematization of multiple MIS techniques combined, in a specific and staged manner, this cMIS protocol could provide a safe and effective approach to the management of ASD., (Copyright © 2017 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons)

Background: The benefits of extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) as a minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis have been unclear. We sought to evaluate the invasiveness and tolerability of XLIF with percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) compared with traditional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)., Methods: Fifty-six consecutive patients underwent open PLIF and 46 consecutive patients underwent single-staged treatment with XLIF with posterior PPS fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, and were followed up for a minimum of 1 year. We analyzed postoperative serum makers for muscle damage and inflammation, postoperative surgical pain, and performance status. A Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were obtained at the time of hospital admission and 1 year after surgery., Results: Intraoperative blood loss (51 ± 41 ml in the XLIF/PPS group and 206 ± 191 ml in the PLIF group), postoperative WBC counts and serum CRP levels in the XLIF/PPS group were significantly lower than in the PLIF group. Postoperative serum CK levels were significantly lower in the XLIF/PPS group on postoperative days 4 and 7. Postoperative recovery of performance was significantly greater in the XLIF/PPS group than in the PLIF group from postoperative days 2 to 7. ODI and visual analog scale (VAS) score (lumbar) 1 year after surgery were significantly lower in the XLIF/PPS group compared with the PLIF group., Conclusions: The XLIF/PPS procedure is advantageous to minimize blood loss and muscle damage, with consequent earlier recovery of daily activities and reduced incidence of low back pain after surgery than with the open PLIF procedure.