Search

Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/G584).

Introduction: Gunshot wounding (GSW) is the second most common mechanism of injury in warfare after explosive injury. The aim of this study was to define the clinical burden of GSW placed on UK forces throughout the recent Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts., Methods: This study was a retrospective review of data from the UK Military Joint Theatre Trauma Registry (JTTR). A JTTR search identified records within the 12 year period of conflict between 19 Mar 2003 and 27 Oct 2014 of all UK military GSW casualties sustained during the complete timelines of both conflicts. Included cases had their clinical timelines and treatment further examined from time of injury up until discharge from hospital or death., Results: There were 723 casualties identified (177 fatalities, 546 survivors). Median age at the time of injury was 24 years (range 18-46 years), with 99.6% of casualties being male. Most common anatomical locations for injury were the extremities, with 52% of all casualties sustaining extremity GSW, followed by 16% GSW to the head, 15% to the thorax, and 7% to the abdomen. In survivors, the rate of extremity injury was higher at 69%, with head, thorax and abdomen injuries relatively lower at 5%, 11% and 6% respectively. All GSW casualties had a total of 2827 separate injuries catalogued. A total of 545 casualties (523 survivors, 22 fatalities) underwent 2357 recorded surgical procedures, which were carried out over 1455 surgical episodes between admission to a deployed medical facility and subsequent transfer to the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (RCDM) in the UK. This gave a median of 3 (IQR 2-5) surgical procedures within a median of 2 (IQR 2-3) surgical episodes per casualty. Casualties had a combined length of stay (LoS) of 25 years within a medical facility, with a mean LoS in a deployed facility of 1.9 days and 14 days in RCDM., Conclusion: These findings define the massive burden of injury associated with battlefield GSW and underscore the need for further research to both reduce wound incidence and severity of these complex injuries., (Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Combat casualty care is a complex system involving multiple clinicians, medical interventions and casualty transfers. Improving the performance of this system requires examination of potential weaknesses. This study reviewed the cause and timing of death of casualties deemed to have died from their injuries after arriving at a medical treatment facility during the recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, in order to identify potential areas for improving outcomes., Methods: This was a retrospective review of all casualties who reached medical treatment facilities alive, but subsequently died from injuries sustained during combat operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. It included all deaths from start to completion of combat operations. The UK military joint theatre trauma registry was used to identify cases, and further data were collected from clinical notes, postmortem records and coroner's reports., Results: There were 71 combat-related fatalities who survived to a medical treatment facility; 17 (24%) in Iraq and 54 (76%) in Afghanistan. Thirty eight (54%) died within the first 24 h. Thirty-three (47%) casualties died from isolated head injuries, a further 13 (18%) had unsurvivable head injuries but not in isolation. Haemorrhage following severe lower limb trauma, often in conjunction with abdominal and pelvic injuries, was the cause of a further 15 (21%) deaths., Conclusions: Severe head injury was the most common cause of death. Irrespective of available medical treatment, none of this group had salvageable injuries. Future emphasis should be placed in preventative strategies to protect the head against battlefield trauma., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/)

Extremity injuries define the surgical burden of recent conflicts. Current literature is inconclusive when assessing the merits of limb salvage over amputation. The aim of this study was to determine medium term functional outcomes in military casualties undergoing limb salvage for severe open tibia fractures, and compare them to equivalent outcomes for unilateral trans-tibial amputees. Cases of severe open diaphyseal tibia fractures sustained in combat between 2006 and 2010, as described in a previously published series, were contacted. Consenting individuals conducted a brief telephone interview and were asked to complete a SF-36 questionnaire. These results were compared to a similar cohort of 18 military patients who sustained a unilateral trans-tibial amputation between 2004 and 2010. Forty-nine patients with 57 severe open tibia fractures met the inclusion criteria. Telephone follow-up and SF-36 questionnaire data was available for 30 patients (61%). The median follow-up was 4 years (49 months, IQR 39-63). Ten of the 30 patients required revision surgery, three of which involved conversion from initial fixation to a circular frame for non- or mal-union. Twenty-two of the 30 patients (73%) recovered sufficiently to complete an age-standardised basic military fitness test. The median physical component score of SF-36 in the limb salvage group was 46 (IQR 35-54) which was similar to the trans-tibial amputation cohort (p=0.3057, Mann-Whitney). Similarly there was no difference in mental component scores between the limb salvage and amputation groups (p=0.1595, Mann-Whitney). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients in either the amputation or limb salvage group reporting pain (p=0.1157, Fisher's exact test) or with respect to SF-36 physical pain scores (p=0.5258, Mann-Whitney). This study demonstrates that medium term outcomes for military patients are similar following trans-tibial amputation or limb salvage following combat trauma., (Crown Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Recent conflicts have been characterised by the use of improvised explosive devices causing devastating injuries, including heavily contaminated wounds requiring meticulous surgical debridement. After being rendered surgical clean, these wounds are dressed and the patient transferred back to the UK for on-going treatment. A dressing that would prevent wounds from becoming colonised during transit would be desirable. The aim of this study was to establish whether using nanocrystalline silver dressings, as an adjunct to the initial debridement, would positively affect wound microbiology and wound healing compared to standard plain gauze dressings., Methods: Patients were prospectively randomised to receive either silver dressings, in a nanocrystalline preparation (Acticoat™), or standard of care dressings (plain gauze) following their initial debridement in the field hospital. On repatriation to the UK microbiological swabs were taken from the dressing and the wound, and an odour score recorded. Wounds were followed prospectively and time to wound healing was recorded. Additionally, patient demographic data were recorded, as well as the mechanism of injury and Injury Severity Score., Results: 76 patients were recruited to the trial between February 2010 and February 2012. 39 received current dressings and 37 received the trial dressings. Eleven patients were not swabbed. There was no difference (p=0.1384, Fishers) in the primary outcome measure of wound colonisation between the treatment arm (14/33) and the control arm (20/32). Similarly time to wound healing was not statistically different (p=0.5009, Mann-Whitney). Wounds in the control group were scored as being significantly more malodorous (p=0.002, Mann-Whitney) than those in the treatment arm., Conclusions: This is the first randomised controlled trial to report results from an active theatre of war. Performing research under these conditions poses additional challenges to military clinicians. Meticulous debridement of wounds remains the critical determinant in wound healing and infection and this study did not demonstrate a benefit of nanocrystaline silver dressing in respect to preventing wound colonisation or promoting healing, these dressings do however seem to significantly reduce the unpleasant odour commonly associated with battlefield wounds., (Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study aims to characterise the injuries and surgical management of British servicemen sustaining bilateral lower limb amputations., Methods: The UK Military Trauma Registry was searched for all cases of primary bilateral lower limb amputation sustained between March 2004 and March 2010. Amputations were excluded if they occurred more than 7 days after injury or if they were at the ankle or more distal., Results: There were 1694 UK military patients injured or killed during this six-year study period. Forty-three of these (2.8%) were casualties with bilateral lower limb amputations. All casualties were men with a mean age of 25.1 years (SD 4.3): all were injured in Afghanistan by Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs). Six casualties were in vehicles when they were injured with the remaining 37 (80%) patrolling on foot. The mean New Injury Severity Score (NISS) was 48.2 (SD 13.2): four patients had a maximum score of 75. The mean TRISS probability of survival was 60% (SD 39.4), with 18 having a survival probability of less than 50% i.e. unexpected survivors. The most common amputation pattern was bilateral trans-femoral (TF) amputations, which was seen in 25 patients (58%). Nine patients also lost an upper limb (triple amputation): no patients survived loss of all four limbs. In retained upper limbs extensive injuries to the hands and forearms were common, including loss of digits. Six patients (14%) sustained an open pelvic fracture. Perineal/genital injury was a feature in 19 (44%) patients, ranging from unilateral orchidectomy to loss of genitalia and permanent requirement for colostomy and urostomy. The mean requirement for blood products was 66 units (SD 41.7). The maximum transfusion was 12 units of platelets, 94 packed red cells, 8 cryoprecipitate, 76 units of fresh frozen plasma and 3 units of fresh whole blood, a total of 193 units of blood products., Conclusions: Our findings detail the severe nature of these injuries together with the massive surgical and resuscitative efforts required to firstly keep patients alive and secondly reconstruct and prepare them for rehabilitation., (Crown Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Due to the nature of IED injuries, during the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan The traditional, two-stage amputation for unsalvageable combat lower limb injuries has evolved into a strategy of serial debridement and greater use of plastic surgical techniques in order to preserve residual limb length. This study aimed to characterise the current treatment of lower limb loss with particular focus on the impact of specific wound infections. The UK military trauma registry and clinical notes were reviewed for details of all lower limb amputation identifying: 51 patients with 70 lower limb amputations. The mean number of debridements per stump prior to closure was 4.1 (95% CI 3.5-4.7). A final more proximal amputation level was required in 21 stumps (30%). Recovery of A. hydrophillia from wounds was significantly associated with a requirement for a more proximal amputation level (p=0.0038) and greater number of debridements (p=0.0474) when compared to residual limb wounds withoutA. hydrophillia.