Fred M. Bourland, Daryl T. Bowman, David B. Weaver, Jane K. Dever, Gerald O. Myers, Vasu Kuraparthy, Wayne Smith, Don C. Jones, Peng W. Chee, Richard G. Percy, Peggy Thaxton, Jinfa Zhang, B. Todd Campbell, Mauricio Ulloa, Robert B. Hutmacher, John J. Burke, Steven D. Wright, and Ted Wallace
Published in Agron. J. 105:1635–1644 (2013) doi:10.2134/agronj2013.0264 Copyright © 2013 by the American Society of Agronomy, 5585 Guilford Road, Madison, WI 53711. All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. C is an economically important crop and provides the world’s leading natural fiber for the textile industry (Smith et al., 1999; Ulloa et al., 2007). The future of cotton improvement depends on plant characteristics conferring not only improved water-use efficiency and heat tolerance but also disease resistance. Integrating disease resistance into high-yielding, high-fiber-quality cultivars is one of the most important objectives in cotton breeding programs (Smith et al., 1999; Ulloa et al., 2009). Host-plant resistance can be a highly effective and economical approach for dealing with disease threats such as FOV and limiting yield loss in cotton (Hutmacher et al., 2011; Ulloa et al., 2010, 2011, 2013). Eight genotypes of FOV, called races, have been described (Skovgaard et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2005). Before 1986, only Races 1 and 2 were known to occur on significant acreage in the United States (DeVay, 1986). Since FOV disease in cotton was first reported in California in 1959 (Garber and Paxman, 1963), FOV Races 1 or 2 were recognized as the causal organism and were typically found in sandy soils with root-knot nematode (RKN) [Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid and White) Chitwood] (Garber et al., 1979; Veech, 1984; Bell, 1984). The FOV fungal pathogen is a soil inhabitant that can survive for long periods in the absence of a host. Consequently, it is nearly impossible to eradicate from a field. A marked increased in the susceptibility of cultivars to FOV Race 1 was noted in the presence of RKN (Garber et al., 1979). Cotton developed for resistance to FOV on soils infested with RKN usually maintained their resistance when simultaneously challenged by both organisms, FOV Race 1 and RKN (Sasser, 1972; Heald and Orr, 1982). In 2005, University of California-Davis scientists (Kim et al., 2005) identified additional FOV races (1, 3, 4, and 8) in California soils. During the past 9 yr, FOV Race 4 has increasingly impacted cotton fields in the San Joaquin Valley (SJV) of California (Hutmacher et al., 2011). In field soils with relatively high levels of FOV Race 4, extensive disease symptoms AbStrAct During the past 9 yr, a new race of Fusarium (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum [FOV Race 4]) has increasingly impacted cotton (Gossypium spp.) in the San Joaquin Valley of California. To assess the vulnerability of upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.) in California to FOV disease, elite upland germplasm lines from 13 U.S. public breeding programs across the Cotton Belt and commercial cultivars were evaluated for disease resistance to FOV Races 1 and 4. Ten independent replicated field trials were conducted: three in 2008, four in 2010, and three in 2011. Significant differences (P £ 0.05) were observed for disease severity index of leaves, vascular root staining, and plant survival values among the elite germplasm lines in all 3 yr for the levels of resistance–response to FOV Races 1 and 4. Also, significant interactions among germplasm lines, FOV races (1 and 4), and evaluation sites indicated that germplasm lines differed in mechanisms of plant-defense response for the two FOV races. Selected lines from programs in the states of Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi showed at least a moderate level of tolerance to both FOV races; however, several of these lines produced weak and coarse fibers. Based on these evaluations, many of the entries in public breeders’ current elite upland germplasm pools may be more susceptible than expected to some FOV races, and sources of acceptable levels of resistance may be limited when tested under infestation levels that resulted in only 5 to 35% plant survival in susceptible check cultivars.