Search

Aim: Social media has transformed the interaction between healthcare professionals and consumers, yet research of its use in dietetics is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of dietetic user networks on use of social media and test the applicability of a social media metrics tool to determine influential users. Methods: An online survey about social media use and practices based on the scientific literature was developed and implemented online with dietitians. Feasibility of a social media metrics analysis was conducted via Twitter using the NodeXL metrics tool to determine influential dietetic networks based on four measures of network centrality (betweenness, eigenvector, closeness and degree). Results: The survey (n = 340) revealed social networking sites were the most widely used (by user) (n = 282) and micro‐blogging was the most regularly used (by frequency of use). Among respondents who used social media in a professional capacity (n = 130), the greatest benefit was communicating internationally and remotely while the delivery of health care was of least benefit. The majority of respondents (87.3%) indicated their primary efforts were to maintain e‐professionalism. Time restraints (18.6%) and not knowing where to start (18.6%) were common barriers to use. Highly influential connections between users were observed from network visualisations of dietitians in Australia and the United States. Conclusions: Professional use of social media among dietitians needs to be monitored over time for shifts of influential networks. Influential users from key networks can be identified from metrics analyses and should be engaged via professional bodies to upskill new users. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the serious complications after lumbar puncture, but there is no effective tool to predict it., Objectives: To explore whether ultrasound measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) as a predictor of PDPH can be a reliable tool supported by reliable protocols and data., Study Design: A prospective observational study., Setting: Department of Anesthesiology., Methods: This prospective observational study was performed in 156 patients undergoing cesarean section (CS). The patient's ONSD was recorded before anesthesia (T0), 10 minutes after anesthesia (T1), at the end of the operation (T2), at the first postoperative day (T24), at the second postoperative day (T48), and the third postoperative day (T72). During the 3-day follow-up, the patients were evaluated, identified, and divided into a PDPH group and a non-PDPH group. Age, weight, height, ASA, lumbar puncture location, and the number of lumbar puncture attempts were also recorded. We mainly analyzed the changes and differences between the 2 groups of ONSD., Results: Twenty-four patients (15%) developed PDPH. The ONSD was significantly lower in the PDPH group than in the non-PDPH group at T2, T24, T48, and T72. All patients showed a significant reduction in ONSD at T1 compared to T0. Women whose ONSD continued to fall without recovery from T0 to T2 were more likely to experience PDPH (RR 5. 022; 95 CI 3.343 to 7.508). The ONSD at T24 was the best predictor of PDPH (ACU 0. 9787, 95 CI 0.9578 to 0.9996), with a cutoff value of 0.40 cm (sensitivity 92%, specificity 94%)., Limitations: This is a single-center study, and ONSD may vary in different regions or ethnic groups., Conclusions: We believe that continuous measurements of ONSD may be a useful tool for predicting PDPH.