Search

Abstract Background Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Dyslipidemia is a key focus of cardiovascular therapy and is characterized by hypertriglyceridemia mainly caused by lipoprotein lipase-mediated metabolism of ApoC-III in patients with ESRD. Pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulator, can be used regardless of renal function and inhibit ApoC-III expression in the liver. Case presentation We reported the cases of four patients on hemodialysis who met at least 175 mg/dL of triglycerides on the consecutive three tests between September 2022 and November 2022 and took 0.1 mg pemafibrate twice a day from November 2022 to May 2023. They experienced no adverse events after pemafibrate treatment. Pemafibrate significantly reduced triglyceride (TG) (302 ± 72 to 140 ± 50 mg/dL, p = 0.048), total cholesterol (187 ± 34 to 156 ± 48 mg/dL, p = 0.025), and Apo C-III (15.9 ± 8.2 to 12.6 ± 7.1, p = 0.030) levels. Apo A-II levels significantly increased after treatment (27.0 ± 6.1 to 37.1 ± 5.8, p = 0.041). Conclusions Pemafibrate decreased TG, total cholesterol, and Apo-CIII and increased Apo A-II without adverse events. Further study is needed to examine the favorable effects of pemafibrate on the risk of CVD.

Background: Pemafibrate is a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α modulator, which was demonstrated to reduce serum triglyceride levels with few drug-related adverse events in several clinical studies, as well as phase II and III clinical trials. One of the limitations of this medicine was the requirement of twice-daily oral administration, resulting in reduced medication adherence, particularly in elderly patients, who are rather good targets for this medicine. Recently, a once-daily extended-release (XR) tablet has been introduced. Given an improvement in medication adherence, the therapeutic efficacy of pemafibrate may be enhanced. Methods: Patients with hypertriglyceridemia, in whom conventional twice-daily immediate-release (IR) pemafibrate was converted to pemafibrate XR between 2023 and 2024, were eligible. Each type of tablet was prescribed for three months, respectively. A dose change was not attempted. The serum triglyceride levels were compared between 3 months pre-conversion and 3 months post-conversion using a Friedman test and a post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: A total of 46 patients were included. The median age was 62 years, and 29 were men. IR was continued for 698 (280, 1183) days before the conversion. During the last 3-month IR therapy, serum triglyceride levels remained unchanged from 171 (138, 239) mg/dL to 181 (123, 245) mg/dL (p = 0.78). Following the conversion, no patients had drug-related adverse events, and all patients completed 3-month XR therapy. At three months after the conversion, the serum triglyceride levels decreased significantly from 181 (123, 245) mg/dL to 146 (107, 184) mg/dL (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Pemafibrate XR might be a more promising medication than conventional IR in improving hypertriglyceridemia, probably due to improved medication adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Numerous epidemiological studies have shown that hypertriglyceridemia is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). However, large clinical studies on triglyceride‐lowering therapy have yielded inconsistent results. In the current review, we reassess the importance of triglyceride‐lowering therapy in preventing CVD based on previous literature and the recently published findings of the PROMINENT trial. Methods: This narrative review is based on literature and public documents published up to November 2023. Results: Meta‐analyses of trials on peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor α agonists and triglyceride‐lowering therapy, including the PROMINENT trial, have indicated that triglyceride‐lowering therapy can reduce CVD events. Mendelian randomization studies have also indicated that triglyceride is indeed a true risk factor for coronary artery disease, leaving no doubt about its relationship to CVD. Meanwhile, the negative results from the PROMINENT trial were likely due to the insufficient triglyceride‐lowering effect, slight increases in low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B, and the inclusion of mostly high‐intensity statin users as target patients. It is unlikely that adverse events counteracted the effectiveness of pemafibrate on outcomes. Additionally, pemafibrate has shown positive effects on non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease and peripheral artery disease. Conclusion: Although the PROMINENT trial did not demonstrate the significance of pemafibrate as a triglyceride‐lowering therapy in a specific population, it does not necessarily negate the potential benefits of treating hypertriglyceridemia in reducing CVD events. It is necessary to explore appropriate populations that could benefit from this therapy, utilize data from the PROMINENT trial and other databases, and validate findings in real‐world settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract The neutral result of the PROMINENT trial has led to questions about the future for pemafibrate. This commentary discusses possible reasons for the lack of benefit observed in the trial. There were, however, indicators suggesting therapeutic potential in microvascular ischaemic complications associated with peripheral artery disease, with subsequent analysis showing reduction in the incidence of lower extremity ischaemic ulceration or gangrene. Reassurance about the safety of pemafibrate, together with emerging data from PROMINENT and experimental studies, also suggest benefit with pemafibrate in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (alternatively referred to as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease) and microangiopathy associated with diabetes, which merit further study.

The neutral result of the PROMINENT trial has led to questions about the future for pemafibrate. This commentary discusses possible reasons for the lack of benefit observed in the trial. There were, however, indicators suggesting therapeutic potential in microvascular ischaemic complications associated with peripheral artery disease, with subsequent analysis showing reduction in the incidence of lower extremity ischaemic ulceration or gangrene. Reassurance about the safety of pemafibrate, together with emerging data from PROMINENT and experimental studies, also suggest benefit with pemafibrate in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (alternatively referred to as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease) and microangiopathy associated with diabetes, which merit further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim of the study: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a pathological condition associated with inflammation owing to fat deposition in the liver. Managing hypertriglyceridemia is essential for patients with NAFLD, including treatment with pemafibrate. However, whether pemafibrate affects fat deposition in the liver and whether hypertriglyceridemia is the primary treatment target remain unclear. Thus, in this single-arm, retrospective study, we explored how pemafibrate treatment affects fat deposition in the liver in patients with NAFLD using FibroScan, the only insurance-covered device in Japan for quantitatively measuring fat in the liver. Material and methods: Patients with NAFLD and hypertriglyceridemia were administered 0.2 mg/day of pemafibrate for either three (n = 51) or six (n = 42) months. The primary endpoint was the FibroScan (FibroScan 430 Mini, Echosens, France) controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) measurement. The secondary endpoints were liver transaminase levels, the FibroScan-aspartate aminotransferase (FAST) score, the hepatic steatosis index (HSI), the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), and the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score. Results: Three months of pemafibrate administration significantly improved the CAP values. The FAST score and HSI also significantly improved after three months, suggesting fatty liver improvements. Furthermore, the alanine aminotransferase and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase levels (indicators of hepatitis) decreased, and fibrosis improved in the liver fibrosis prediction assessments, such as the FIB-4 index, APRI, and ALBI score, after three months of pemafibrate administration. Most of these improvements remained after six months. Conclusions: Oral pemafibrate treatment improved NAFLD in patients with hypertriglyceridemia, indicating that pemafibrate may be a new treatment option for NAFLD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examined the effects of pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α agonist, on the serum biochemical parameters of male patients with coronary artery disease and metabolic syndrome (MetS). This was a post hoc analysis of a randomized, crossover study that treated hypertriglyceridemia with pemafibrate or bezafibrate for 24 weeks, followed by a crossover of another 24 weeks. Of the 60 patients enrolled in the study, 55 were male. Forty-one of 55 male patients were found to have MetS. In this sub-analysis, male patients with MetS (MetS group, n = 41) and those without MetS (non-MetS group, n = 14) were compared. The primary endpoint was a change in fasting serum triglyceride (TG) levels during pemafibrate therapy, and the secondary endpoints were changes in insulin resistance-related markers and liver function parameters. Serum TG levels significantly decreased (MetS group, from 266.6 to 148.0 mg/dL, p < 0.001; non-MetS group, from 203.9 to 97.6 mg/dL, p < 0.001); however, a percent change (%Change) was not significantly different between the groups (− 44.1% vs. − 51.6%, p = 0.084). Serum insulin levels and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance significantly decreased in the MetS group but not in the non-MetS group. %Change in liver enzyme levels was markedly decreased in the MetS group compared with that in the non-MetS group (alanine aminotransferase, − 25.1% vs. − 11.3%, p = 0.027; gamma-glutamyl transferase, − 45.8% vs. − 36.2%, p = 0.020). In conclusion, pemafibrate can effectively decrease TG levels in patients with MetS, and it may be a more efficient drug for improving insulin resistance and liver function in such patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Short-term use of pemafibrate (PEM), a selective modulator of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, has been reported to improve abnormal liver function in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with hypertriglyceridemia (HTG-NAFLD). This study aimed to clarify the effects and predictive factors of long-term 72-week PEM administration on body composition, and laboratory tests in HTG-NAFLD patients. Methods: Fifty-three HTG-NAFLD patients receiving a 72-week PEM regimen were retrospectively enrolled. Routine blood and body composition results were analyzed immediately before and at the end of the study period. Results: PEM treatment significantly improved liver enzyme levels such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase, along with lipid profiles including triglyceride, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. PEM did not have any detectable impact on body composition parameters. The factors of female, higher AST (= 46 U/L) and fat mass (= 31.9%), as well as lower soft lean mass (< 61.6%), skeletal muscle mass (< 36%), and skeletal muscle mass index (< 6.9 kg/m2) were significantly associated with the treatment response status of a > 30% decrease in ALT. All patients completed the treatment without any adverse effects. Conclusions: Long-term PEM treatment had a positive impact on liver enzymes and lipid profiles, but it did not result in significant changes in body composition among HTG-NAFLD patients. In predicting the response to PEM treatment, the evaluation of AST and body composition may be useful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of 48‐week pemafibrate treatment in patients with metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) complicated by dyslipidemia. Methods: A total of 110 patients diagnosed with MASLD complicated by dyslipidemia received pemafibrate at a dose of 0.1 mg twice daily for 48 weeks. Results: The participants were 54 males and 37 females, with a median age of 63 (52–71) years. Besides improvement in lipid profile, significant reductions from baseline to 48 weeks of treatment were found in liver‐related enzymes, such as aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma‐glutamyl transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase (P < 0.001 for all). A significant decrease in the homeostasis model assessment‐insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR) was observed in patients with insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR ≥ 2.5) (4.34 at baseline to 3.89 at Week 48, P < 0.05). Moreover, changes in ALT were weakly correlated with those in HOMA‐IR (r = 0.34; p < 0.05). Regarding noninvasive liver fibrosis tests, platelets, Wisteria floribunda agglutinin‐positive Mac‐2‐binding protein, type IV collagen 7s, and the non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score significantly decreased from baseline to Week 48. Most adverse events were Grades 1–2, and no drug‐related Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that 48‐week pemafibrate administration improved liver‐related enzymes and surrogate marker of liver fibrosis in patients with MASLD. The improvement of insulin resistance by pemafibrate may contribute to the favorable effect on MASLD complicated by dyslipidemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background and Aim In this retrospective study, we evaluated the effects of pemafibrate treatment in patients with metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and hypertriglyceridemia using non‐invasive stiffness‐based models, including magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) combined with the fibrosis‐4 (FIB‐4) (MEFIB) index and the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (MAST) score. Methods In total, 179 patients with MASLD treated with pemafibrate were enrolled. We evaluated the effects of 48‐week pemafibrate treatment using the MEFIB index, which classifies patients based on the combination of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) on MRE and FIB‐4 and the MAST score, which is calculated based on LSM on MRE, MRI‐proton density fat fraction (MRI‐PDFF), and AST levels. Results Pemafibrate treatment led to significant reduction in AST, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT) (P = 0.011,

Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate with those of fenofibrate in a real-world setting in patients with hypertriglyceridemia and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: This study included 155 patients with hypertriglyceridemia (>175 mg/dL) and T2D. Adjusted least square mean changes in the serum levels of triglycerides (TG), transaminases, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γGTP), and estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) were compared before and after a 3-month therapy with pemafibrate (0.2 mg), fenofibrate (160 mg), or bezafibrate (400 mg). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between fibrates, achievement of target TG levels, and deterioration of liver and renal function. Results: Pemafibrate therapy greatly reduced TG levels, which was three times better than fenofibrate therapy in achieving the target range for TG levels. The administration of pemafibrate, not fenofibrate, was significantly associated with a lower risk of increasing γGTP levels. Similarly, a lower risk of eGFR reduction was observed in the pemafibrate group than in the fenofibrate group. Conclusions: Pemafibrate achieved a greater reduction in TG levels toward the desired target range than did fenofibrate. Moreover, pemafibrate was associated with a lower risk profile for elevated γGTP and reduced eGFR than fenofibrate.

Abstract Background Pemafibrate has been reported to ameliorate lipid profiles and liver dysfunction. However, which patients derive benefit from the hepatoprotective effects of pemafibrate is unclear. Methods We conducted a sub-analysis of the PARM-T2D study where subjects with type 2 diabetes complicated by hypertriglyceridemia were prospectively treated with pemafibrate or conventional therapies for 52 weeks. From the original cohort, subjects who had metabolic-associated fatty liver disease without changing their treatment regimens for comorbidities were analyzed. Eligible subjects (n = 293) (average age 61.2 ± 11.7 years, 37.5% female) treated with pemafibrate (pemafibrate, n = 152) or controls who did not change their treatment regimens (controls, n = 141) were divided into three groups based on their alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels: ALT ≤ upper normal limit (UNL) (pemafibrate, n = 65; controls, n = 50), UNL

Aim: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease. Pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor α modulator (SPPARMα), has been reported to ameliorate liver function among patients with dyslipidemia. However, there are not many reports of the clinical effects of pemafibrate. This study aims to summarize the experience of using pemafibrate and analyze the effects on liver function in patients with dyslipidemia. Methods: One hundred twelve cases of hyperlipidemia receiving pemafibrate 0.2 mg/day were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Age, gender, BMI, complications, concomitant medications, serum parameters (TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, AST, ALT, γGTP, ALP, platelets, M2BPGi, Cre, eGFR, HbA1c, blood glucose level at any time) were investigated and evaluated. Results: Pemafibrate administration significantly improved serum TG and HDL-C, but not in LDL-C. Serum AST, ALT, γGTP, and ALP were also significantly improved. The fib-4 index, a liver fibrosis score, did not significantly change, but M2-BPGi, an index of fibrosis, significantly decreased. No correlation was observed between each lipid parameter and ALT, and ALT decreased independently of the lipid parameters. Conclusions: As we expected, pemafibrate demonstrated a lipid-improving effect without adversely affecting hepatic and renal functions. An unexpected finding was the decrease in ALT that was independent of lipid parameters.

Abstract Objective Insulin secretion is regulated by ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels in pancreatic beta-cells. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) α ligands are clinically used to treat dyslipidemia. A PPARα ligand, fenofibrate, and PPARγ ligands troglitazone and 15-deoxy-∆12,14-prostaglandin J2 are known to close KATP channels and induce insulin secretion. The recently developed PPARα ligand, pemafibrate, became a new entry for treating dyslipidemia. Because pemafibrate is reported to improve glucose intolerance in mice treated with a high fat diet and a novel selective PPARα modulator, it may affect KATP channels or insulin secretion. Results The effect of fenofibrate (100 µM) and pemafibrate (100 µM) on insulin secretion from MIN6 cells was measured by using batch incubation for 10 and 60 min in low (2 mM) and high (10 mM) glucose conditions. The application of fenofibrate for 10 min significantly increased insulin secretion in low glucose conditions. Pemafibrate failed to increase insulin secretion in all of the conditions experimented in this study. The KATP channel activity was measured by using whole-cell patch clamp technique. Although fenofibrate (100 µM) reduced the KATP channel current, the same concentration of pemafibrate had no effect. Both fenofibrate and pemafibrate had no effect on insulin mRNA expression.

Abstract Background and Aim This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of 48‐week pemafibrate treatment in patients with metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) complicated by dyslipidemia. Methods A total of 110 patients diagnosed with MASLD complicated by dyslipidemia received pemafibrate at a dose of 0.1 mg twice daily for 48 weeks. Results The participants were 54 males and 37 females, with a median age of 63 (52–71) years. Besides improvement in lipid profile, significant reductions from baseline to 48 weeks of treatment were found in liver‐related enzymes, such as aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma‐glutamyl transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase (P

Background and Aim: In this retrospective study, we evaluated the effects of pemafibrate treatment in patients with metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and hypertriglyceridemia using non‐invasive stiffness‐based models, including magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) combined with the fibrosis‐4 (FIB‐4) (MEFIB) index and the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (MAST) score. Methods: In total, 179 patients with MASLD treated with pemafibrate were enrolled. We evaluated the effects of 48‐week pemafibrate treatment using the MEFIB index, which classifies patients based on the combination of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) on MRE and FIB‐4 and the MAST score, which is calculated based on LSM on MRE, MRI‐proton density fat fraction (MRI‐PDFF), and AST levels. Results: Pemafibrate treatment led to significant reduction in AST, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT) (P = 0.011, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively) and significant improvements in triglyceride and high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (P < 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). The MRI‐PDFF values were not significantly altered. However, a significant decrease in LSM on MRE was detected (P = 0.003). Evaluation of fibrosis using the MEFIB index and MAST score demonstrated significant improvement (P = 0.004 and <0.001, respectively). Changes in the MAST score showed positive correlation with changes in ALT and GGT levels (r = 0.821, P < 0.001, and r = 0.808, P < 0.001, respectively). Additionally, ALT and GGT levels at baseline were significantly associated with improvements in the MAST score (P < 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Pemafibrate led to improvements in the MEFIB index and MAST score, as well as liver function. It is a promising therapeutic agent for patients with MASLD and hypertriglyceridemia with the potential to reduce liver‐related events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease. Pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor α modulator (SPPARMα), has been reported to ameliorate liver function among patients with dyslipidemia. However, there are not many reports of the clinical effects of pemafibrate. This study aims to summarize the experience of using pemafibrate and analyze the effects on liver function in patients with dyslipidemia. Methods: One hundred twelve cases of hyperlipidemia receiving pemafibrate 0.2 mg/day were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Age, gender, BMI, complications, concomitant medications, serum parameters (TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, AST, ALT, γGTP, ALP, platelets, M2BPGi, Cre, eGFR, HbA1c, blood glucose level at any time) were investigated and evaluated. Results: Pemafibrate administration significantly improved serum TG and HDL-C, but not in LDL-C. Serum AST, ALT, γGTP, and ALP were also significantly improved. The fib-4 index, a liver fibrosis score, did not significantly change, but M2-BPGi, an index of fibrosis, significantly decreased. No correlation was observed between each lipid parameter and ALT, and ALT decreased independently of the lipid parameters. Conclusions: As we expected, pemafibrate demonstrated a lipid-improving effect without adversely affecting hepatic and renal functions. An unexpected finding was the decrease in ALT that was independent of lipid parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Insulin secretion is regulated by ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels in pancreatic beta-cells. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) α ligands are clinically used to treat dyslipidemia. A PPARα ligand, fenofibrate, and PPARγ ligands troglitazone and 15-deoxy-∆12,14-prostaglandin J2 are known to close KATP channels and induce insulin secretion. The recently developed PPARα ligand, pemafibrate, became a new entry for treating dyslipidemia. Because pemafibrate is reported to improve glucose intolerance in mice treated with a high fat diet and a novel selective PPARα modulator, it may affect KATP channels or insulin secretion. Results: The effect of fenofibrate (100 µM) and pemafibrate (100 µM) on insulin secretion from MIN6 cells was measured by using batch incubation for 10 and 60 min in low (2 mM) and high (10 mM) glucose conditions. The application of fenofibrate for 10 min significantly increased insulin secretion in low glucose conditions. Pemafibrate failed to increase insulin secretion in all of the conditions experimented in this study. The KATP channel activity was measured by using whole-cell patch clamp technique. Although fenofibrate (100 µM) reduced the KATP channel current, the same concentration of pemafibrate had no effect. Both fenofibrate and pemafibrate had no effect on insulin mRNA expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pemafibrate has been reported to ameliorate lipid profiles and liver dysfunction. However, which patients derive benefit from the hepatoprotective effects of pemafibrate is unclear. Methods: We conducted a sub-analysis of the PARM-T2D study where subjects with type 2 diabetes complicated by hypertriglyceridemia were prospectively treated with pemafibrate or conventional therapies for 52 weeks. From the original cohort, subjects who had metabolic-associated fatty liver disease without changing their treatment regimens for comorbidities were analyzed. Eligible subjects (n = 293) (average age 61.2 ± 11.7 years, 37.5% female) treated with pemafibrate (pemafibrate, n = 152) or controls who did not change their treatment regimens (controls, n = 141) were divided into three groups based on their alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels: ALT ≤ upper normal limit (UNL) (pemafibrate, n = 65; controls, n = 50), UNL < ALT ≤ 2×UNL (pemafibrate, n = 58; controls, n = 54), and 2×UNL < ALT (pemafibrate, n = 29; controls, n = 27). Results: Pemafibrate treatment significantly ameliorated ALT levels (from 29 to 22 U/L, p < 0.001 by Wilcoxon's signed-rank test) in the total cohort and subjects with high ALT levels (2×ULN < ALT), and improved liver fibrosis as assessed by the Fibrosis-4 index (mean change − 0.05 (95% confidence interval: −0.22 to − 0.02), p < 0.05 versus baseline by the Mann-Whitney U-test and p < 0.05 versus the ALT ≤ UNL group by the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn's post-hoc analysis). Conclusions: The hepatoprotective effects of pemafibrate were dominant in subjects with type 2 diabetes complicated with liver dysfunction. Trial registration: This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Center Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000037385). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a chronic liver disease that affects more than a quarter of the global population and whose prevalence is increasing worldwide due to the pandemic of obesity. Obesity, impaired glucose metabolism, high blood pressure and atherogenic dyslipidemia are risk factors for MASLD. Therefore, insulin resistance may be closely associated with the development and progression of MASLD. Hepatic entry of increased fatty acids released from adipose tissue, increase in fatty acid synthesis and reduced fatty acid oxidation in the liver and hepatic overproduction of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins may induce the development of MASLD. Since insulin resistance also induces atherosclerosis, the leading cause for death in MASLD patients is cardiovascular disease. Considering that the development of cardiovascular diseases determines the prognosis of MASLD patients, the therapeutic interventions for MASLD should reduce body weight and improve coronary risk factors, in addition to an improving in liver function. Lifestyle modifications, such as improved diet and increased exercise, and surgical interventions, such as bariatric surgery and intragastric balloons, have shown to improve MASLD by reducing body weight. Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have been shown to improve coronary risk factors and to suppress the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases. Both SGLT2i and GLP-1 have been reported to improve liver enzymes, hepatic steatosis and fibrosis. We recently reported that the selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARα) modulator pemafibrate improved liver function. PPARα agonists have multiple anti-atherogenic properties. Here, we consider the pathophysiology of MASLD and the mechanisms of action of such drugs and whether such drugs and the combination therapy of such drugs could be the treatments for MASLD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: Pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α modulator, has been shown to improve liver function among nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients with dyslipidemia. The aim of this retrospective study is to identify predictors of pemafibrate efficacy in NAFLD patients. Methods: A total of 75 NAFLD patients with dyslipidemia who received pemafibrate twice per day for 48 weeks were enrolled in this study. We used the FibroScan‐aspartate aminotransferase (FAST) score as a benchmark for treatment efficacy. Results: Median FAST score significantly decreased from 0.96 at baseline to 0.93 at week 48 (P < 0.001). Significant improvements in levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT), and triglycerides were also noted. The serum level of GGT at baseline was correlated with change in FAST score (r = −0.22, P = 0.049). Changes in AST, ALT, and GGT were positively correlated with change in FAST score (r = 0.71, r = 0.61, and r = 0.38). Multivariate analyses identified age and GGT level at baseline as significantly associated with improvement of FAST score by pemafibrate therapy (odds ratio 1.11, 1.02, respectively). Patients over 50 years of age and with a GGT of 90 IU/L or higher showed significantly greater improvement in the FAST score than other groups. Conclusions: Pemafibrate improves the FAST score of NAFLD patients with complicating dyslipidemia, especially in older patients with high GGT level. GGT is useful as an indicator of optimal treatment choice for NAFLD patients with dyslipidemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims/introduction: Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is characterized predominantly by diastolic dysfunction. The multiple mechanisms underlying DCM include altered energy substrate utilization. Recent studies indicate that PPARα plays an important role in the pathogenesis of lipotoxic cardiomyopathy. Pemafibrate is known to be a selective PPARα modulator (SPPARMα). We thus investigated the effects of pemafibrate on cardiac diastolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and methods: Seventeen patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertriglyceridemia were screened and treated with pemafibrate at a dose of 0.2 mg/day for 8–16 weeks. Fourteen patients were eligible for analysis. Echocardiography was used for assessment of diastolic function. Early diastolic filling velocity (E), late atrial filling velocity (A) and the E/A ratio were included in this study. Peak early diastolic annular velocities (e′) were also assessed using color tissue Doppler images. The primary endpoints were changes in the ratio of E to A (E/A), e', and the ratio of E to e' (E/e') from baseline. Results: Pemafibrate significantly increased average e' (7.24 ± 0.58 vs 7.94 ± 0.67, p = 0.019) and a significant reduction in E/e' (9.01 ± 0.94 vs 8.20 ± 0.91, p = 0.041). The increase in e' was significantly related to increases in fasting blood glucose (r = 0.607, p = 0.021) and non-esterified fatty acid (r = 0.592, p = 0.026). Conclusion: Pemafibrate improved diastolic function in patients with T2D and hypertriglyceridemia, suggesting that PPARα activation by pemafibrate prevents the development of DCM at an early stage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The number of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is increasing globally and is raising serious concerns regarding the increasing medical and economic burden incurred for their treatment. The progression of NASH to more severe conditions such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma requires liver transplantation to avoid death. Therefore, therapeutic intervention is required in the NASH stage, although no therapeutic drugs are currently available for this. Several anti-NASH candidate drugs have been developed that enable treatment via the modulation of distinct signaling cascades and include a series of drugs targeting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) subtypes (PPARα/δ/γ) that are considered to be attractive because they can regulate both systemic lipid metabolism and inflammation. Multiple PPAR dual/pan agonists have been developed but only a few of them have been evaluated in clinical trials for NAFLD/NASH. Herein, we review the current clinical trial status and future prospects of PPAR-targeted drugs for treating NAFLD/NASH. In addition, we summarize our recent findings on the binding modes and the potencies/efficacies of several candidate PPAR dual/pan agonists to estimate their therapeutic potentials against NASH. Considering that the development of numerous PPAR dual/pan agonists has been abandoned because of their serious side effects, we also propose a repositioning of the already approved, safety-proven PPAR-targeted drugs against NAFLD/NASH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pemafibrate, a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor modulator, has beneficial effects on lipid metabolism. However, its effects on glucose metabolism in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) remain to be fully clarified. This was a subanalysis of the PARM-T2D study, a multicenter prospective observational study on the use of pemafibrate versus conventional therapy for 52 weeks in subjects with T2DM complicated with hypertriglyceridemia. The subanalysis included participants who did not change their treatment for diabetes and did not receive insulin or insulin secretagogues during the study period. Changes in glucose metabolism markers, including homeostatic model assessment (HOMA2) scores and disposition index, were assessed. A total of 279 participants (141 in the pemafibrate group; 138 in the control group) met the criteria for the subanalysis. There were no significant changes in HbA1c during the 52-week study period in both groups. However, the pemafibrate group showed significant improvements versus the control group for insulin resistance assessed by HOMA2-R (−0.15 versus 0.08; estimated treatment difference −0.23 (95% confidence interval −0.44, −0.02); p = 0.03) and maintenance of β-cell function assessed by disposition index (0.015 versus −0.023; estimated treatment difference 0.037 (95% confidence interval 0.005, 0.069); p = 0.02). Correlation analyses showed that improvements in HOMA2-R and disposition index were significantly associated with improvements in lipid abnormalities and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase. In conclusion, pemafibrate reduced insulin resistance and maintained β-cell function in subjects with T2DM and hypertriglyceridemia, presumably by improving lipid profiles and lipid-related hepatocyte stress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recently, pemafibrate, a selective PPARα modulator, has been developed as a treatment for hypertriglyceridemia and has attracted much attention. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate in hypertriglyceridemia patients under clinical settings. We evaluated changes in lipid profiles and various parameters before and after 24-week pemafibrate administration in patients with hypertriglyceridemia who had not previously taken fibrate medications. There were 79 cases included in the analysis. 24 weeks after the treatment with pemafibrate, TG was significantly reduced from 312 ± 226 to 167 ± 94 mg/dL. In addition, lipoprotein fractionation tests using PAGE method showed a significant decrease in the ratio of VLDL and remnant fractionations, which are TG-rich lipoproteins. After pemafibrate administration, body weight, HbA1c, eGFR, and CK levels were not changed, but liver injury indices such as ALT, AST, and γ-GTP were significantly improved. In this study, pemafibrate improved the metabolism of atherosclerosis-induced lipoproteins in hypertriglyceridemia patients. In addition, it showed no off-target effects such as hepatic and renal damage or rhabdomyolysis. • Efficacy and safety of pemafibrate were evaluated in clinical settings. • Pemafibrate significantly reduced TG-rich lipoproteins and small dense LDL. • No off-target effects were observed after 24 weeks of pemafibrate administration. • Pemafibrate may have potential in the treatment of NAFLD/NASH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Both pemafibrate and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor can decrease serum transaminase levels in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) complicated with dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), respectively. However, the effectiveness of combined therapy has been rarely reported. Methods: This is a two-center retrospective observational study. NAFLD patients complicated with T2DM treated with pemafibrate for >1 year were included, in whom prior treatment with SGLT2 inhibitor > 1 year failed to normalize serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. Hepatic inflammation, function, and fibrosis were assessed by ALT, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, and Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) levels, respectively. Results: Seven patients were included. The median duration of prior treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors was 2.3 years. During the one year before starting pemafibrate therapy, the therapy did not significantly change hepatic enzymes. All patients received pemafibrate 0.1 mg twice daily without dose escalations. During one year of pemafibrate therapy, triglyceride, aspartate aminotransferase, ALT, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, ALBI score, and M2BPGi levels significantly improved (p < 0.05), although weight or hemoglobin A1c did not significantly change. Conclusions: One year of pemafibrate therapy improves markers of hepatic inflammation, function, and fibrosis in NAFLD patients in whom long-term SGLT2 inhibitor therapy failed to normalize serum ALT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: Recently, pemafibrate and a low‐carbohydrate diet (LCD) have each been reported to improve fatty liver disease. However, it is unclear whether their combination improves fatty liver disease and is equally effective in obese and non‐obese patients. Methods: In 38 metabolic‐associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) patients, classified by baseline body mass index (BMI), changes in laboratory values, magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and magnetic resonance imaging‐proton density fat fraction (MRI‐PDFF) were studied after 1 year of combined pemafibrate plus mild LCD. Results: The combination treatment resulted in weight loss (P = 0.002), improvement in hepatobiliary enzymes (γ‐glutamyl transferase, P = 0.027; aspartate aminotransferase, P < 0.001; alanine transaminase [ALT], P < 0.001), and improvement in liver fibrosis markers (FIB‐4 index, P = 0.032; 7 s domain of type IV collagen, P = 0.002; M2BPGi, P < 0.001). Vibration‐controlled transient elastography improved from 8.8 to 6.9 kPa (P < 0.001) and MRE improved from 3.1 to 2.8 kPa (P = 0.017) in the liver stiffness. MRI‐PDFF improved from 16.6% to 12.3% in liver steatosis (P = 0.007). In patients with a BMI of 25 or higher, improvements of ALT (r = 0.659, P < 0.001) and MRI‐PDFF (r = 0.784, P < 0.001) were significantly correlated with weight loss. However, in patients with a BMI below 25, the improvements of ALT or PDFF were not accompanied by weight loss. Conclusions: Combined treatment with pemafibrate and a low‐carbohydrate diet resulted in weight loss and improvements in ALT, MRE, and MRI‐PDFF in MAFLD patients. Although such improvements were associated with weight loss in obese patients, the improvements were observed irrespective of weight loss in non‐obese patients, indicating this combination can be effective both in obese and non‐obese MAFLD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines and 2021 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway recommend nonpharmacological interventions and initiation of statin therapy for patients with moderate hypertriglyceridemia and addition of fibrates or omega-3 fatty acids in severe hypertriglyceridemia. Although the association between triglyceride (TG) lowering and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk reduction remains controversial, patients with hypertriglyceridemia may represent a subgroup that require additional therapy to further reduce residual ASCVD risk. Moreover, medications that target novel pathways could provide alternative options for patients who are intolerant of existing therapies or doses needed to provide adequate triglyceride lowering. Objective: Assess recent evidence for TG-lowering agents including omega-3 fatty acid-based therapies, PPARα modulators, apoC-III mRNA antisense inhibitors, angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3) antibodies, and herbal supplements. Methods: A literature search was performed using PubMed with hypertriglyceridemia specified as a MeSH term or included in the title or abstract of the article along with each individual agent. For inclusion, trials needed to have a primary or secondary outcome of TG levels or TG lowering. Conclusion: Currently, the only US Food and Drug Administration approved medication for CV risk reduction in patients with hypertriglyceridemia is icosapent ethyl. Results from phase 3 trials for CaPre, pemafibrate, and volanesorsen as well as additional evidence for pipeline pharmacotherapies with novel mechanisms of action (e.g., ApoC-III mRNA antisense inhibitors and ANGPTL3 antibodies) will help to guide future pharmacotherapy considerations for patients with hypertriglyceridemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This retrospective, multicenter study evaluated the effect of pemafibrate treatment on liver function and fibrosis by liver function tests (LFTs) and various fibrotic biomarkers including FibroScan in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with hypertriglyceridemia. Methods: A total of 138 NAFLD patients treated with pemafibrate at three hospitals between September 2018 and April 2021 were included. To evaluate the effect of pemafibrate treatment, FibroScan-aspartate aminotransferase (FAST) score, a novel index of steatohepatitis that can be calculated based on the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) value, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) was used. Results: Serum TG levels were significantly decreased 4 weeks after pemafibrate treatment (p = 0.003). The levels of AST (p = 0.038), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (p = 0.003), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (p = 0.047) also significantly diminished 12 weeks after pemafibrate administration compared to before administration (p < 0.05). However, serum HDL-cholesterol (p = 0.193), LDL-cholesterol (p = 0.967), and eGFR (p = 0.909) levels were not significantly altered 12 weeks after pemafibrate administration. In addition, the fibrosis biomarkers' Type IV collagen (p = 0.753) and FIB-4 index (p = 0.333) did not significantly differ, while Autotaxin (p = 0.006) and the AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) (p = 0.003) significantly decreased 48 weeks after pemafibrate administration. No significant reductions in LSM (p = 0.959) and CAP (p = 0.266) were detected using FibroScan 48 weeks after pemafibrate administration. FAST score was significantly improved (p = 0.0475). Conclusion: Pemafibrate improved LFTs, including fibrotic biomarkers and FAST score, due to the hepatic anti-inflammatory effect, suggesting that pemafibrate may prevent disease progression in NAFLD patients with hypertriglyceridemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Statins, the intestinal cholesterol transporter inhibitor (ezetimibe), and PCSK9 inhibitors can reduce serum LDL-C levels, leading to a significant reduction in cardiovascular events. However, these events cannot be fully prevented even when maintaining very low LDL-C levels. Hypertriglyceridemia and reduced HDL-C are known as residual risk factors for ASCVD. Hypertriglyceridemia and/or low HDL-C can be treated with fibrates, nicotinic acids, and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Fibrates were demonstrated to be PPARα agonists and can markedly lower serum TG levels, yet were reported to cause some adverse effects, including an increase in the liver enzyme and creatinine levels. Recent megatrials of fibrates have shown negative findings on the prevention of ASCVD, which were supposed to be due to their low selectivity and potency for binding to PPAR α. To overcome the off-target effects of fibrates, the concept of a selective PPARα modulator (SPPARMα) was proposed. Kowa Company, Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan), has developed pemafibrate (K-877). Compared with fenofibrate, pemafibrate showed more favorable effects on the reduction of TG and an increase in HDL-C. Fibrates worsened liver and kidney function test values, although pemafibrate showed a favorable effect on liver function test values and little effect on serum creatinine levels and eGFR. Minimal drug–drug interactions of pemafibrate with statins were observed. While most of the fibrates are mainly excreted from the kidney, pemafibrate is metabolized in the liver and excreted into the bile. It can be used safely even in patients with CKD, without a significant increase in blood concentration. In the megatrial of pemafibrate, PROMINENT, for dyslipidemic patients with type 2 diabetes, mild-to-moderate hypertriglyceridemia, and low HDL-C and LDL-C levels, the incidence of cardiovascular events did not decrease among those receiving pemafibrate compared to those receiving the placebo; however, the incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease was lower. Pemafibrate may be superior to conventional fibrates and applicable to CKD patients. This current review summarizes the recent findings on pemafibrate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hypertriglyceridemia is increasingly considered a residual risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Pemafibrate—a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulator and a new treatment for hypertriglyceridemia in CKD patients—is reported to have fewer side effects in CKD patients than other fibrates. Appropriate control of hypertriglyceridemia can be expected to improve renal prognosis. However, data on the renal protective effect of pemafibrate are limited. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of pemafibrate on urinary protein excretion in CKD patients. Methods: The Pemafibrate, open-label, Randomized cOntrolled study to evaluate the renal protective eFfect In hyperTriglyceridemia patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (PROFIT-CKD) study is an investigator-initiated, multi-center, open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Participants are outpatients with hypertriglyceridemia aged 20 years and over, who have received the care of a nephrologist or a diabetologist for more than 3 months. Inclusion criteria include the following: proteinuria (urine protein/creatinine ratio of ≥ 0.15 g/gCr) within three months before allocation, and hypertriglyceridemia (triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL and < 1,000 mg/dL) at allocation. In the treatment group, pemafibrate is added to conventional treatment, while conventional treatment is continued with no additional treatment in the control group. Target patient enrollment is 140 patients. The primary endpoint is the change from baseline in the logarithmic urine protein/creatinine ratio at 12 months after study start. Conclusion: This study will provide new findings on the renal protective effect of pemafibrate in CKD patients. Clinical trial registration: This clinical trial was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Center (UMIN-CTR: UMIN000042284). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Although fibrates were developed as lipid‐lowering drugs, their efficacy against liver dysfunction in patients with cholestatic liver diseases, such as primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and fatty liver disease, has also been reported. Although fibrates act on some peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptors (PPARs), pemafibrate is a novel selective PPAR‐α modulator. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching from bezafibrate to pemafibrate in patients with chronic liver disease. Methods: We analyzed 58 patients with chronic liver disease who switched from bezafibrate to pemafibrate because of minor adverse effects and/or incomplete response. Results: This study included 41 patients with cholestatic liver disease and 17 patients with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease. Reasons for switching to pemafibrate were renal function decline in 31 patients, hemoglobin decline in 17 patients, creatine kinase (CK) elevation in 11 patients, incomplete response of liver dysfunction in 39 patients, and incomplete response of hyperlipidemia in 13 patients. After 3 months, although no significant change in CK was seen, hemoglobin and estimated glomerular filtration rate were significantly increased, and creatinine was significantly decreased. Significant decreases in hepatobiliary enzymes were seen in patients with cholestatic liver diseases, but not in patients with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease. No significant changes in serum lipids were observed. No patients discontinued pemafibrate due to adverse events. Conclusions: Switching to pemafibrate could improve adverse effects due to bezafibrate, and appeared effective against liver dysfunction in cholestatic liver disease patients with incomplete response to bezafibrate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/AimsPemafibrate is a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator that improves serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in dyslipidemia patients. Pemafibrate was reported to reduce ALT in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients, but efficacy was not clearly elucidated due to the small size of previous study populations. Therefore, we explored pemafibrate efficacy in NAFLD patients.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated pemafibrate efficacy on liver enzymes (n = 132) and liver shear wave velocity (SWV, n = 51) in NAFLD patients who had taken pemafibrate for at least 24 weeks.ResultsPatient ALT levels were decreased from 81.0 IU/L at baseline to 48.0 IU/L at week 24 (P < 0.0001). Serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP) and triglyceride (TG) were significantly decreased, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and platelet count were significantly increased, with no change in body weight being observed. Study participant SWV values decreased from 1.45 m/s at baseline to 1.32 m/s at week 48 (P < 0.001). Older age (P = 0.035) and serum TG levels (P = 0.048) were significantly associated with normalized ALT. Changes in AST, ALT, γ-GTP and body weight were significantly correlated with change in SWV.ConclusionPemafibrate significantly improves liver function, serum TG and liver stiffness in NAFLD patients. Pemafibrate is a promising therapeutic agent for NAFLD and may be a candidate for NAFLD patients with elevated TG.

Background. Pathological choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is one of the major causes of visual impairment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). CNV has been suppressed by using anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies. However, some clinical cases have demonstrated the failure of anti-VEGF therapies. Furthermore, anti-VEGF agents might induce the development of ocular atrophy. Recently, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) activation using pemafibrate treatment was suggested as one of the promising therapeutic targets in the prevention of ocular ischemia. However, the preventive role of pemafibrate remains unclear in CNV. We aimed to examine the preventive role of pemafibrate on laser-induced pathological CNV. Methods. Adult male C57BL/6 mice were orally supplied pemafibrate (0.5 mg/kg) for four days, followed by laser irradiation. Then, pemafibrate was consecutively given to mice with the same condition. CNV was visualized with isolectin-IB4. The eye (retina and/or retinal pigment epithelium [RPE]-choroid), liver, and serum were used for biomolecular analyses. Results. We found that pemafibrate administration suppressed CNV volumes. Pemafibrate administration activated PPARα downstream genes in the liver and eye (especially, RPE-choroid). Furthermore, pemafibrate administration elevated serum fibroblast growth factor 21 levels and reduced serum levels of triglycerides. Conclusions. Our data suggest a promising pemafibrate therapy for suppressing CNV in AMD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Pemafibrate (PEM) is a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulator that is effective for hypertriglyceridemia accompanying non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (HTG-NAFLD). This study aimed to identify the predictors of PEM efficacy for HTG-NAFLD in clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 88 HTG-NAFLD patients treated with PEM for 6 months for the analysis of routine blood and body composition testing. A PEM response was defined as a decrease in serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) of >30% compared with pre-treatment level. The clinical features related to PEM responsiveness were statistically tested between responders and non-responders. Results: All 88 patients completed the 6 month drug regimen without any adverse effects. PEM treatment significantly decreased liver enzymes, triglycerides, and total cholesterol levels, without any detectable impact on body weight or body composition. Comparisons of baseline clinical features revealed female and greater aspartate aminotransferase (AST), ALT, and fat mass % levels to be significantly associated with a PEM response. The optimal cut-off values to predict responders as determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis were AST 45 U/L, ALT 60 U/L, and fat mass 37%. Conclusions: Female HTG-NAFLD patients with higher transaminase and fat mass % levels may be preferentially indicated for PEM treatment. Additional large-scale prospective studies are warranted to verify our results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The Pemafibrate for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Diseases in Stroke (PPAR Stroke) study aimed to assess the effects of pemafibrate, a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulator, on the progression of cerebrovascular atherosclerosis in patients with stroke and hypertriglyceridemia., Methods: Ninety-nine patients (mean age, 65.6 years; male, 74.7%) with hypertriglyceridemia and a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack of non-cardioembolic origin were included in this prospective single-arm study. Hypertriglyceridemia was defined as a fasting serum triglyceride (TG) level ≥ 150 mg/dL. All patients were treated with pemafibrate (0.2 mg or 0.1 mg/day) for 2 years. The primary outcome was change in carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) from baseline at 2 years, as assessed using carotid ultrasonography. The secondary outcomes were changes in blood biomarker levels and progression of intracranial artery stenosis on magnetic resonance angiography., Results: The mean TG level significantly decreased from 269 mg/dL at baseline to 139 mg/dL at 2 years (P＜0.001) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level increased from 49 to 54 mg/dL (P＜0.001), whereas low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level remained unchanged. Significant reductions in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 levels were also observed (P=0.003 and P=0.002, respectively). With regard to mean IMT in the internal carotid arteries, the difference was significant for the left side (1.59 mm at baseline vs. 1.52 mm at 2 years; P=0.009) and borderline significant for the right side (1.32 mm at baseline vs. 1.28 mm at 2 years; P=0.053). Among the 48 stenotic lesions in the intracranial arteries, regression and progression was observed in 9 (18.8%) and 4 (8.3%) cases, respectively., Conclusions: Pemafibrate was observed to have TG-lowering and anti-inflammatory effects and could attenuate atherosclerosis progression in the intra- and extracranial arteries of patients with stroke and hypertriglyceridemia.

Aim: No pharmacotherapeutic treatment has been established for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). This trial compared the effects of pemafibrate and omega-3-acid ethyl ester on hepatic function in patients with hypertriglyceridemia complicated by MASLD., Methods: Patients with hypertriglyceridemia complicated by MASLD were enrolled, randomly assigned to the pemafibrate or omega-3-acid ethyl ester group, and followed for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) from baseline to week 24. The secondary endpoints included other hepatic enzymes, lipid profiles, and hepatic fibrosis biomarkers., Results: A total of 80 patients were enrolled and randomized. The adjusted mean change in ALT from baseline to week 24 was significantly lower in the pemafibrate group (-19.7±5.9 U/L) than in the omega-3-acid ethyl ester group (6.8±5.5 U/L) (intergroup difference, -26.5 U/L; 95% confidence interval, -42.3 to -10.7 U/L; p=0.001). Pemafibrate significantly improved the levels of other hepatic enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase), lipid profiles (triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), and hepatic fibrosis biomarkers (Mac-2 binding protein glycan isomer and Fibrosis-4 index). No cases of discontinuation due to adverse drug reactions were identified in either group, and there were no safety concerns., Conclusions: Pemafibrate is recommended over omega-3-acid ethyl ester for lipid management and MASLD treatment in patients with hypertriglyceridemia complicated by MASLD. The study results may contribute to the development of future treatment strategies for patients with MASLD/MASH.

Aims: Pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator that lowers serum triglyceride levels and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, is approved for treating dyslipidemia as twice-daily immediate-release (IR) tablets. A once-daily extended-release (XR) tablet has also been developed. We aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of XR (0.2 or 0.4 mg/day; once daily) to IR (0.2 mg/day; twice daily) in lowering triglyceride levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia., Methods: This phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study included patients with fasting triglycerides ≥ 200 mg/dL who received IR (0.2 mg/day) or XR (0.2 or 0.4 mg/day). The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage change in fasting triglyceride levels from baseline to 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Common treatment effects at weeks 4 through 12 were compared between groups using repeated analysis of covariance., Results: In 356 randomized patients, fasting triglyceride levels decreased by 48.0%, 43.8%, and 48.0% with IR 0.2, XR 0.2, and XR 0.4 mg/day, respectively, confirming the non-inferiority of both XR regimens to IR. The proportion of patients who achieved fasting triglycerides ＜150 mg/dL was 45.7%, 37.4%, and 51.7%, while the percentage change of triglycerides in the subgroup with baseline triglycerides ≥ 500 mg/dL was -59.3%, -52.2%, and -66.3% with IR 0.2, XR 0.2, and XR 0.4 mg/day, respectively., Conclusions: XR (0.2 and 0.4 mg/day) was non-inferior to IR (0.2 mg/day). XR 0.4 mg/day demonstrated a more potent triglyceride-lowering effect than XR 0.2 mg/day and should be considered for patients with high triglyceride levels.

BackgroundWe compared the lowering effects of pemafibrate and omega-3 fatty acid ethyl on fasting apolipoprotein (apo) B-48 (apoB-48), a marker that reflects postprandial hypertriglyceridemia, which is one of the residual risks for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) with statin treatment.MethodsThis prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel group trial was conducted at 4 medical institutions between April 2020 and May 2022. A total of 126 ambulatory patients with dyslipidemia receiving statin treatment for more than 4 weeks, aged 20–79 years with fasting triglyceride (TG) levels of ≥177 mg/dl were randomly assigned to 16-week pemafibrate 0.4 mg per day treatment group (PEMA, n = 63) or omega-3 fatty acid ethyl 4 g per day treatment group (OMEGA-3, n = 63). The primary endpoint was the percentage change in fasting apoB-48 from baseline to week 16.ResultsThe percentage changes in fasting apoB-48 in PEMA and OMEGA-3 were −50.8% (interquartile range −62.9 to −30.3%) and −17.5% (−38.3 to 15.3%) (P < 0.001), respectively. As the secondary endpoints, the changes in fasting apoB-48 in PEMA and OMEGA-3 were −3.10 μg/ml (−5.63 to −1.87) and −0.90 μg/ml (−2.95 to 0.65) (P < 0.001), respectively. Greater decreases with significant differences in the percentage changes in TG, remnant lipoprotein cholesterol, apoC-III, fasting plasma glucose, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase were observed in PEMA, compared with OMEGA-3. Greater increases with significant differences in those in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, apoA-I, and apoA-II were observed in PEMA, compared with OMEGA-3. PEMA showed anti-atherosclerotic lipoprotein profiles in gel-permeation high-performance liquid chromatography analyses, compared with OMEGA-3. Although adverse events occurred in 9 of 63 (14.3%) patients in PEMA and 3 of 63 (4.8%) patients in OMEGA-3, no serious adverse events associated with drug were observed in either group.ConclusionsThis is the first randomized trial to compare the lowering effects of pemafibrate and omega-3 fatty acid ethyl on fasting apoB-48. We concluded that pemafibrate was superior to omega-3 fatty acid ethyl in lowering effect of fasting apoB-48. Pemafibrate is expected to reduce the residual risk for ASCVD with statin treatment.Clinical trial registrationhttps://rctportal.niph.go.jp/en, identifier jRCTs071200011.

Introduction: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease in the world, with an increasing incidence. Pemafibrate is a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- a (PPAR-a) modulator which is expected to improve NAFLD. The aim of this study is to identify predictors of improvement of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis after pemafibrate therapy in patients with NAFLD. Material and methods: Seventy-one non-diabetic patients with NAFLD treated with pemafibrate for more than six months were included in this retrospective review. Hepatic inflammation and fibrosis were evaluated by alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) levels, respectively. Results: During six months of pemafibrate therapy, significant improvements were observed in ALT and M2BPGi levels regardless of the body mass index (BMI) compared to baseline. Lean NAFLD was identified as a significant positive predictor for > 50% reduction of ALT showing reduced hepatic inflammation. Subsequent multivariate analysis confirmed this result. Reduction of ALT in the lean NAFLD group (BMI < 25) was significantly greater than in the obese NAFLD group (BMI > 30) (p = 0.034). Lean NAFLD and age > 50 years were identified as significant positive predictors for > 20% reduction of M2BPGi showing reduced hepatic fibrosis. Subsequent multivariate analysis confirmed these results. Reduction of M2BPGi in the lean NAFLD group was significantly greater than in the obese NAFLD group (p = 0.022). Conclusions: Pemafibrate therapy improves markers of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis regardless of BMI. Patients with lean NAFLD have a greater response to pemafibrate therapy compared to those with obese NAFLD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Retinal ischemia–reperfusion (I/R) injury is a common cause of visual impairment. To date, no effective treatment is available for retinal I/R injury. In addition, the precise pathological mechanisms still need to be established. Recently, pemafibrate, a peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor α (PPARα) modulator, was shown to be a promising drug for retinal ischemia. However, the role of pemafibrate in preventing retinal I/R injury has not been documented. Here, we investigated how retinal degeneration occurs in a mouse model of retinal I/R injury by elevation of intraocular pressure and examined whether pemafibrate could be beneficial against retinal degeneration. Adult mice were orally administered pemafibrate (0.5 mg/kg/day) for 4 days, followed by retinal I/R injury. The mice were continuously administered pemafibrate once every day until the end of the experiments. Retinal functional changes were measured using electroretinography. Retina, liver, and serum samples were used for western blotting, quantitative PCR, immunohistochemistry, or enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Retinal degeneration induced by retinal inflammation was prevented by pemafibrate administration. Pemafibrate administration increased the hepatic PPARα target gene expression and serum levels of fibroblast growth factor 21, a neuroprotective molecule in the eye. The expression of hypoxia‐response and pro‐and anti‐apoptotic/inflammatory genes increased in the retina following retinal I/R injury; however, these changes were modulated by pemafibrate administration. In conclusion, pemafibrate is a promising preventive drug for ischemic retinopathies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background and Aim This retrospective study investigated the effect of 48‐week pemafibrate therapy in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with hypertriglyceridemia, as evaluated by the FibroScan‐aspartate aminotransferase (FAST) score. Methods A total of 31 NAFLD patients who were treated with pemafibrate in Gunma Saiseikai Maebashi Hospital and Kusunoki Hospital from September 2018 to April 2020 were included in the current study. We used the FAST score, which is a novel index of steatohepatitis that can be calculated based on the AST value, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), and liver stiffness measurement (LSM), to evaluate the effect of pemafibrate treatment. Results The median age was 64.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 55.0–75.0) years and 14 patients (45.2%) were male. Median body mass index was 26.8 (IQR 23.8–28.8). Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were detected in 14 (45.2%) and five (16.1%) patients, respectively. Fasting triglyceride and high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol were significantly improved (P

Background/Aims: The addition of a fibrate to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the standard treatment for asymptomatic primary biliary cholangitis (aPBC) with an incomplete response to UDCA. Among the fibrates, bezafibrate and fenofibrate increase the serum creatinine level and reduce the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Pemafibrate is an selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulator (SPPARM-α) mainly metabolized by the liver that was recently approved to treat dyslipidemia. This study confirmed the changes in the biochemical markers after switching from fenofibrate to pemafibrate in aPBC patients. Methods: This study examined the effects of switching treatment from fenofibrate to pemafibrate in 16 aPBC patients. The biological parameters of these patients were examined at the initiation of fenofibrate and after switching to pemafibrate, then at 24 and 48 weeks later, respectively. Results: Among patients with aPBC treated with UDCA and fenofibrate, the ALP, GGT, and serum IgM levels decreased significantly (p