1. Improving surgical technical skills for emergency fixation of unstable pelvic ring fractures: an experimental study using a pelvic ring fracture simulator.
- Author
-
Klingebiel, Felix Karl-Ludwig, Sawauchi, Kenichi, Mittlmeier, Anne, Kalbas, Yannik, Berk, Till, Halvachizadeh, Sascha, Teuben, Michel, Neuhaus, Valentin, Mauffrey, Cyril, Pape, Hans-Christoph, and Pfeifer, Roman
- Subjects
- *
SCALE analysis (Psychology) , *MULTITRAIT multimethod techniques , *PELVIC bones , *HUMAN anatomical models , *ACADEMIC medical centers , *DIAGNOSTIC imaging , *FRACTURE fixation , *ORTHOPEDIC implants , *QUESTIONNAIRES , *FISHER exact test , *EMERGENCY medical services , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *CONFIDENCE , *MANN Whitney U Test , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *WORK experience (Employment) , *SIMULATION methods in education , *EXPERIMENTAL design , *PRE-tests & post-tests , *PELVIC fractures , *ABILITY , *MEMORY , *CONCEPTUAL structures , *DATA analysis software , *TRAINING , *FLUOROSCOPY , *TIME , *PROFESSIONAL competence - Abstract
Background: The management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic ring injuries necessitates surgical intervention, often involving procedures such as external fixation and percutaneous screw placement. Given the infrequent performance of these procedures, regular training is imperative to ensure readiness for emergencies. Our pre- post simulation study aimed to adapt and validate a realistic simulation model for stabilizing unstable pelvic ring injuries, facilitating participants' knowledge retention and procedural confidence enhancement. Methods: A standardized simulator of an unstable pelvic ring utilizing synthetic pelvic bones featuring complete disruption of the symphysis and sacroiliac joint was developed. Trauma surgeons of a level one academic hospital were invited to perform external fixation and emergency sacroiliac screw application under C-arm guidance. Prior to and following the simulation session, participants completed a subjective questionnaire assessing their confidence in emergency interventions on a 10-point Likert scale (10-LS). Objective parameters, such as intraoperative imaging quality, reduction accuracy, and the positioning of screws, wires, and external fixators, were also evaluated as secondary outcome measures. Results: Fifteen trauma surgeons (10 residents, 5 consultants) participated in the simulation over the course of one day. The mean total operation time was 20.34 ± 6.06 min, without significant differences between consultants and residents (p = 0.604). The confidence for emergency SI-Screw placement increased significantly after the simulator (10-LS: Before = 3.8 ± 3.08 vs. After = 5.67 ± 2.35; p = 0.002) as well as after external fixation (10-LS: Before = 3.93 ± 2.79 vs. After = 6.07 ± 2.52; p = 0.002). In addition, confidence in (intraoperative) pelvic imaging increased significantly (10-LS: Before = 4.60 ± 3.0 vs. After = 6.53 ± 2.39; p = 0.011). Overall, the model was rated as a realistic simulation of clinical practice (10-LS = 7.87 ± 1.13). Conclusions: Our unstable pelvis fracture model is a tool to practice emergency interventions such as external fixation and percutaneous techniques. Participants benefitted from this in terms of technical instrumentation as well as intraoperative imaging. Further studies are required to validate the objective benefits and improvements that participants undergo through frequent training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF