Search

Background: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a radical procedure involving multi-visceral resection for locally advanced pelvic malignancies. Such radical surgery is associated with prolonged operating theater time and hospital stay, as well as a substantial risk of postoperative complications, and therefore significant financial cost. This study aimed to comprehensively detail the inpatient cost of PE at a specialist center in the Australian public sector., Methods: A retrospective costing review of consecutive PE operations at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Sydney between March 2014 and June 2022 was performed. Clinical data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database, and in-hospital costing data were provided by the hospital Performance Unit. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS., Results: Pelvic exenteration was performed for 461 patients, of whom 283 (61 %) had primary or recurrent rectal cancer, 160 (35 %) had primary or recurrent non-rectal cancer, and 18 (4 %) had a benign indication. The median admission cost was $108,259.4 ($86,620.8-$144,429.3) (Australian dollars [AUD]), with the highest costs for staffing followed by the operating room. Overall, admission costs were higher for complete PE (p < 0.001), PE combined with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) (p < 0.001), and older patients (p = 0.006)., Discussion: The total admission cost for patients undergoing PE reflects the complexity of the procedure and the multidisciplinary requirement. Patients of advanced age undergoing complete PE and PE combined with CRS incurred greater costs, but the requirement of a sacrectomy, vertical rectus abdominal flap reconstruction, major nerve or vascular excision, or repair were not associated with higher overall cost in the multivariate analysis., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aim: Rising costs in health care are of progressively growing interest and a major factor affecting hospitalization costs is represented by postoperative complications. Complications of Major Abdominal Surgery (MAS) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study estimates the costs of postoperative care associated with complications. Material and Methods: We performed a retrospective study on 254 patients admitted to the 1st General and Oncological Surgery Clinic of the Bucharest Oncology Institute who were submitted to MAS. The total hospitalization, complications and treatment costs were analysed. Results: For a patient undergoing MAS, the average costs for surgery without complications are 5,791.3 RON and reach an average of 20,806 RON after major complications., Conclusion: The results provide insight into the costs of hospitalization for oncology patients submitted to surgical interventions. Complications occur in 20.86% of patients undergoing MAS and account for 50% of total care costs. Establishing and implementing a protocol aimed at early diagnosis and treatment of specific complications could lead to a decrease in morbidity and mortality, as well as of the costs of hospitalization., (Celsius.)

Objective: Robotic surgical techniques are known to be expensive, but they can decrease the cost of hospitalization and improve patients' outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the costs and clinical outcomes of conventional laparoscopy vs robotic-assisted laparoscopy in the gynecologic oncologic indications., Methods: Between 2007 and 2010, 312 patients referred for gynecologic oncologic indications (endometrial and cervical cancer), including 226 who underwent conventional laparoscopy and 80 who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopy, were included in this prospective multicenter study. The direct costs, operating theater costs, and hospital costs were calculated for both surgical strategies using the microcosting method., Results: Based on an average number of 165 surgical cases performed per year with the robot, the total extra cost of using the robot was €1456 per intervention. The robot-specific costs amounted to €2213 per intervention, and the cost of the robot-specific surgical supplies was €957 per intervention. The cost of the surgical supplies specifically required by conventional laparoscopy amounted to €1432, which is significantly higher than that of the robotic supplies (P < 0.001). Hospital costs were lower in the case of the robotic strategy (€2380 vs €2841, P < 0.001) because these patients spent less time in intensive care (0.38 vs 0.85 days). Operating theater costs were higher in the case of the robotic strategy (€1490 vs €1311, P = 0.0004) because the procedure takes longer to perform (4.98 hours vs 4.38 hours)., Conclusions: The main driver of additional costs is the fixed cost of the robot, which is not compensated by the lower hospital room costs. The robot would be more cost-effective if robotic interventions were performed on a larger number of patients per year or if the purchase price of the robot was reduced. A shorter learning curve would also no doubt decrease the operating theater costs, resulting in financial benefits to society.

Rationale and Objectives: This study summarizes the literature on the detection of cancer among indeterminate extracolonic findings on computed tomographic (CT) colonography in five targeted organs., Materials and Methods: We searched PubMed for English-language literature published between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2010. We describe extracolonic findings in the kidney, lung, liver, pancreas, and ovary suspect for malignancy as they are associated with high mortality. For each organ, we calculated the median prevalence, positive predictive value (PPV), and false positive rate of malignancy and a pooled false-positive rate across studies., Results: Of 91 publications initially identified, 24 were eligible for review. Indeterminate renal masses on CT colonography had 20.5% median PPV and low pooled false positive rate of 1.3% (95% confidence interval 0.6-2.0). In contrast, indeterminate masses of the lung, liver, pancreas, and ovary had low PPV (median values ranged from 0% to 3.8%). Indeterminate masses of the ovary resulted in the highest pooled false-positive rate of 2.2%. Results were similar in studies of both screening and nonscreening populations. We estimated the probability of false positive results through the detection of significant extracolonic findings as 46 per 1000 for men and 68 per 1000 for women., Conclusions: Indeterminate renal masses newly detected on CT colonography have an estimated one in five chance of malignancy and therefore warrant further follow-up to provide a definitive diagnosis. Conversely, indeterminate masses of the lung, liver, pancreas, and ovary are associated with high false positive rates and merit more conservative clinical follow-up., (Copyright © 2013 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To present the methodology for the evaluation of cost-effectiveness of the quality assurance protocol modifications associated with increasing demands on accuracy and reliability in radiotherapy and to present results on cost-effectiveness of in-vivo dosimetry as the chosen example of a technical procedure., Material and Methods: In-vivo dosimetry was used as an example of a quality assurance procedure, whose modifications have an impact on several procedures in the QA system and thus on the cost of radiotherapy. An analysis of 6864 patients, treated between 2001 and 2005 for tumours in the head and neck, breast, pelvis, or lung, was performed. The quality of radiotherapy was expressed as the accuracy of dose delivery and the cost was estimated from labour, equipment and materials., Results: Modifications implemented in the quality assurance protocol have gradually improved the quality of irradiation. Mean deviations between measured and calculated doses, recorded for several groups of treatment sites, were reduced from -1.5% to 0.5%, 3.4% to 1.4%, 3.9% to 0.1% and -2.1% to 1.8% for head and neck, breast, pelvis and lung respectively. The standard deviations of the measured values decreased also consistently. Total monthly cost in radiotherapy (related to in-vivo dosimetry) increased from euro 4376 to euro 10,696 while the unitary cost of radiotherapy procedures remained at the same level. The predominant cost component of in-vivo dosimetry was labour, limited at first to physics staff and later extended to quality assurance personnel and technicians., Conclusion: The application of the presented methodology revealed cost-effectiveness relationships in tested technical procedures.

In this report on the therapeutic results in patients with moderate and severe endometriosis treated by operative laser laparoscopy, we also present a comparative analysis of cost and duration of hospitalization and of convalescence in comparable patients treated by laparoscopy versus laparotomy. Sixty patients treated by the same surgeon with operative laser laparoscopy were followed for a period of at least one year to calculate cumulative pregnancy rates, monthly fecundity rates, and monthly probability of pregnancy. The mean duration of hospitalization and incapacitation as well as physician and hospital costs incurred by the laparoscopy treated patients were compared with those incurred by 60 patients with similar degrees of endometriosis but treated by microsurgery at laparotomy. In the laparoscopy group, 36 patients had stage III and 24, stage IV endometriosis. Monthly fecundity rates (6.7%), monthly probability of pregnancy (12.6%) and cumulative pregnancy rates (70.5%) did not differ between patients with stage III and IV disease. The total number of hospital days required by the 60 laparoscopy patients was 72 versus 258 for the laparotomy patients (P less than .001). The total number of days' incapacitation for laparoscopy patients was 216 versus 1,284 for the laparotomy group (P less than .001). The total cost of medical care was $223,260 for the laparoscopy group and $424,500 for the laparotomy group (P less than .001). Our results validate the therapeutic efficacy of operative laparoscopy in the treatment of moderate and severe endometriosis and confirm the substantial economic and social benefits of laparoscopy surgery over laparotomy.