11 results on '"Peltomaki, Timo"'
Search Results
2. Management of orofacial manifestations of juvenile idiopathic arthritis : Interdisciplinary consensus-based recommendations.
- Author
-
Stoustrup, Peter, Resnick, Cory M, Abramowicz, Shelly, Pedersen, Thomas K, Michelotti, Ambra, Küseler, Annelise, Koos, Bernd, Verna, Carlalberta, Nordal, Ellen B, Granquist, Eric J, Halbig, Josefine Mareile, Kristensen, Kasper D, Kaban, Leonard B, Arvidsson, Linda Z, Spiegel, Lynn, Stoll, Matthew L, Lerman, Melissa A, Glerup, Mia, Defabianis, Patrizia, Frid, Paula, Alstergren, Per, Cron, Randy Q, Ringold, Sarah, Nørholt, Sven Erik, Peltomaki, Timo, Larheim, Tore A, Herlin, Troels, Peacock, Zachary S, Kellenberger, Christian J, Twilt, Marinka, Stoustrup, Peter, Resnick, Cory M, Abramowicz, Shelly, Pedersen, Thomas K, Michelotti, Ambra, Küseler, Annelise, Koos, Bernd, Verna, Carlalberta, Nordal, Ellen B, Granquist, Eric J, Halbig, Josefine Mareile, Kristensen, Kasper D, Kaban, Leonard B, Arvidsson, Linda Z, Spiegel, Lynn, Stoll, Matthew L, Lerman, Melissa A, Glerup, Mia, Defabianis, Patrizia, Frid, Paula, Alstergren, Per, Cron, Randy Q, Ringold, Sarah, Nørholt, Sven Erik, Peltomaki, Timo, Larheim, Tore A, Herlin, Troels, Peacock, Zachary S, Kellenberger, Christian J, and Twilt, Marinka
- Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Involvement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is common in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). TMJ arthritis can lead to orofacial symptoms, dysfunction and dentofacial deformity with negative impact on quality of life. Management involves interdisciplinary collaboration. No current recommendations exist to guide clinical management. OBJECTIVES: 1) To develop consensus-based interdisciplinary recommendations for management of orofacial manifestations of JIA. 2) To create a future research agenda related to management of TMJ arthritis in children with JIA. METHODS: The recommendations were developed using online surveying of relevant stakeholders, systematic literature review, evidence-informed generation of recommendations during two consensus-meetings, and Delphi study iterations involving external experts. The process included disciplines involved in the care of orofacial manifestations of JIA: Pediatric rheumatology, radiology, orthodontics, oral and maxillofacial surgery, orofacial pain specialists and pediatric dentistry. Recommendations were accepted if agreement was >80% during a final Delphi study. RESULTS: Three overarching management principles and 12 recommendations for interdisciplinary management of orofacial manifestations of JIA were outlined. The 12 recommendations pertained to: diagnosis (n=4), treatment of TMJ arthritis (active TMJ inflammation) (n=2), treatment of TMJ dysfunction and symptoms (n=3), treatment of arthritis-related dentofacial deformity (n=2), and other related aspects to JIA (n=1). Additionally, a future interdisciplinary research agenda was developed. CONCLUSIONS: These are the first interdisciplinary recommendations to guide clinical management of TMJ JIA. The 3 overarching principles and 12 recommendations fill an important gap in current clinical practice. They emphasize the importance of an interdisciplinary approach to diagnosis and management of orofacial manifestations of JIA. This article is protected by
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Management of Orofacial Manifestations of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis : Interdisciplinary Consensus-Based Recommendations
- Author
-
the Temporomandibular Joint Juvenile Arthritis Working Group, Stoustrup, Peter, Resnick, Cory M., Abramowicz, Shelly, Pedersen, Thomas K., Michelotti, Ambra, Küseler, Annelise, Koos, Bernd, Verna, Carlalberta, Nordal, Ellen B., Granquist, Eric J., Halbig, Josefine Mareile, Kristensen, Kasper D., Kaban, Leonard B., Arvidsson, Linda Z., Spiegel, Lynn, Stoll, Matthew L., Lerman, Melissa A., Glerup, Mia, Defabianis, Patrizia, Frid, Paula, Alstergren, Per, Cron, Randy Q., Ringold, Sarah, Nørholt, Sven Erik, Peltomaki, Timo, Larheim, Tore A., Herlin, Troels, Peacock, Zachary S., Kellenberger, Christian J., Twilt, Marinka, Tampere University, Clinical Medicine, and Department of Otology and Oral Diseases
- Subjects
3121 Internal medicine ,313 Dentistry - Abstract
Involvement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is common in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). TMJ arthritis can lead to orofacial symptoms, orofacial dysfunction, and dentofacial deformity with negative impact on quality of life. Management involves interdisciplinary collaboration. No current recommendations exist to guide clinical management. We undertook this study to develop consensus-based interdisciplinary recommendations for management of orofacial manifestations of JIA, and to create a future research agenda related to management of TMJ arthritis in children with JIA. Recommendations were developed using online surveying of relevant stakeholders, systematic literature review, evidence-informed generation of recommendations during 2 consensus meetings, and Delphi study iterations involving external experts. The process included disciplines involved in the care of orofacial manifestations of JIA: pediatric rheumatology, radiology, orthodontics, oral and maxillofacial surgery, orofacial pain specialists, and pediatric dentistry. Recommendations were accepted if agreement was >80% during a final Delphi study. Three overarching management principles and 12 recommendations for interdisciplinary management of orofacial manifestations of JIA were outlined. The 12 recommendations pertained to diagnosis (n = 4), treatment of TMJ arthritis (active TMJ inflammation) (n = 2), treatment of TMJ dysfunction and symptoms (n = 3), treatment of arthritis-related dentofacial deformity (n = 2), and other aspects related to JIA (n = 1). Additionally, a future interdisciplinary research agenda was developed. These are the first interdisciplinary recommendations to guide clinical management of TMJ JIA. The 3 overarching principles and 12 recommendations fill an important gap in current clinical practice. They emphasize the importance of an interdisciplinary approach to diagnosis and management of orofacial manifestations of JIA. publishedVersion
- Published
- 2023
4. Treatment outcome with orthodontic aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review with meta-analyses
- Author
-
Papageorgiou, Spyridon N, Koletsi, Despina, Iliadi, Anna, Peltomaki, Timo, Eliades, Theodore, and University of Zurich
- Subjects
3505 Orthodontics ,610 Medicine & health ,Orthodontics ,10067 Clinic for Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry - Published
- 2020
5. Treatment outcome with orthodontic aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review with meta-analyses
- Author
-
Papageorgiou, Spyridon N; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1968-3326, Koletsi, Despina, Iliadi, Anna, Peltomaki, Timo; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7938-1701, Eliades, Theodore; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2313-4979, Papageorgiou, Spyridon N; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1968-3326, Koletsi, Despina, Iliadi, Anna, Peltomaki, Timo; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7938-1701, and Eliades, Theodore; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2313-4979
- Abstract
Background: The use of orthodontic aligners to treat a variety of malocclusions has seen considerable increase in the last years, yet evidence about their efficacy and adverse effects relative to conventional fixed orthodontic appliances remains unclear. Objective: This systematic review assesses the efficacy of aligners and fixed appliances for comprehensive orthodontic treatment. Search methods: Eight databases were searched without limitations in April 2019. Selection criteria: Randomized or matched non-randomized studies. Data collection and analysis: Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment was done independently in triplicate. Random-effects meta-analyses of mean differences (MDs) or relative risks (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were conducted, followed by sensitivity analyses, and the GRADE analysis of the evidence quality.Results: A total of 11 studies (4 randomized/7 non-randomized) were included comparing aligners with braces (887 patients; mean age 28.0 years; 33% male). Moderate quality evidence indicated that treatment with orthodontic aligners is associated with worse occlusal outcome with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (3 studies; MD = 9.9; 95% CI = 3.6-16.2) and more patients with unacceptable results (3 studies; RR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.2-2.0). No significant differences were seen for treatment duration. The main limitations of existing evidence pertained to risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision of included studies. Conclusions: Orthodontic treatment with aligners is associated with worse treatment outcome compared to fixed appliances in adult patients. Current evidence does not support the clinical use of aligners as a treatment modality that is equally effective to the gold standard of braces.
- Published
- 2020
6. Treatment outcome with orthodontic aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review with meta-analyses
- Author
-
Papageorgiou, Spyridon N, primary, Koletsi, Despina, primary, Iliadi, Anna, primary, Peltomaki, Timo, primary, and Eliades, Theodore, primary
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. The Importance of Vector Selection in Preoperative Planning of Unilateral Mandibular Distraction
- Author
-
Dec, Wojciech, primary, Peltomaki, Timo, additional, Warren, Stephen M., additional, Garfinkle, Judah S., additional, Grayson, Barry H., additional, and McCarthy, Joseph G., additional
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Molding of the Regenerate in Mandibular Distraction: Clinical Experience
- Author
-
McCarthy, Joseph G., primary, Hopper, Richard A., additional, Hollier, Larry H., additional, Peltomaki, Timo, additional, Katzen, Timothy, additional, and Grayson, Barry H., additional
- Published
- 2003
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Erratum.
- Author
-
Visnapuu, Vivian, Peltomaki, Timo, Isotupa, Kauko, Kantomaa, Tuomo, and Helenius, Hans
- Subjects
CELLS ,MANDIBULAR condyle - Abstract
Presents an erratum on the distribution and characterization of proliferative cells in the rat mandibular condyle during growth.
- Published
- 2001
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Management of Orofacial Manifestations of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Interdisciplinary Consensus-Based Recommendations.
- Author
-
Stoustrup P, Resnick CM, Abramowicz S, Pedersen TK, Michelotti A, Küseler A, Koos B, Verna C, Nordal EB, Granquist EJ, Halbig JM, Kristensen KD, Kaban LB, Arvidsson LZ, Spiegel L, Stoll ML, Lerman MA, Glerup M, Defabianis P, Frid P, Alstergren P, Cron RQ, Ringold S, Nørholt SE, Peltomaki T, Larheim TA, Herlin T, Peacock ZS, Kellenberger CJ, and Twilt M
- Subjects
- Child, Humans, Consensus, Quality of Life, Arthritis, Juvenile complications, Arthritis, Juvenile therapy, Arthritis, Juvenile diagnosis, Dentofacial Deformities, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders etiology, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders therapy
- Abstract
Involvement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is common in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). TMJ arthritis can lead to orofacial symptoms, orofacial dysfunction, and dentofacial deformity with negative impact on quality of life. Management involves interdisciplinary collaboration. No current recommendations exist to guide clinical management. We undertook this study to develop consensus-based interdisciplinary recommendations for management of orofacial manifestations of JIA, and to create a future research agenda related to management of TMJ arthritis in children with JIA. Recommendations were developed using online surveying of relevant stakeholders, systematic literature review, evidence-informed generation of recommendations during 2 consensus meetings, and Delphi study iterations involving external experts. The process included disciplines involved in the care of orofacial manifestations of JIA: pediatric rheumatology, radiology, orthodontics, oral and maxillofacial surgery, orofacial pain specialists, and pediatric dentistry. Recommendations were accepted if agreement was >80% during a final Delphi study. Three overarching management principles and 12 recommendations for interdisciplinary management of orofacial manifestations of JIA were outlined. The 12 recommendations pertained to diagnosis (n = 4), treatment of TMJ arthritis (active TMJ inflammation) (n = 2), treatment of TMJ dysfunction and symptoms (n = 3), treatment of arthritis-related dentofacial deformity (n = 2), and other aspects related to JIA (n = 1). Additionally, a future interdisciplinary research agenda was developed. These are the first interdisciplinary recommendations to guide clinical management of TMJ JIA. The 3 overarching principles and 12 recommendations fill an important gap in current clinical practice. They emphasize the importance of an interdisciplinary approach to diagnosis and management of orofacial manifestations of JIA., (© 2022 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Treatment outcome with orthodontic aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review with meta-analyses.
- Author
-
Papageorgiou SN, Koletsi D, Iliadi A, Peltomaki T, and Eliades T
- Subjects
- Adult, Dental Care, Duration of Therapy, Humans, Orthodontic Appliances, Treatment Outcome, Malocclusion, Orthodontic Appliances, Fixed adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: The use of orthodontic aligners to treat a variety of malocclusions has seen considerable increase in the last years, yet evidence about their efficacy and adverse effects relative to conventional fixed orthodontic appliances remains unclear., Objective: This systematic review assesses the efficacy of aligners and fixed appliances for comprehensive orthodontic treatment., Search Methods: Eight databases were searched without limitations in April 2019., Selection Criteria: Randomized or matched non-randomized studies., Data Collection and Analysis: Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment was done independently in triplicate. Random-effects meta-analyses of mean differences (MDs) or relative risks (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were conducted, followed by sensitivity analyses, and the GRADE analysis of the evidence quality., Results: A total of 11 studies (4 randomized/7 non-randomized) were included comparing aligners with braces (887 patients; mean age 28.0 years; 33% male). Moderate quality evidence indicated that treatment with orthodontic aligners is associated with worse occlusal outcome with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (3 studies; MD = 9.9; 95% CI = 3.6-16.2) and more patients with unacceptable results (3 studies; RR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.2-2.0). No significant differences were seen for treatment duration. The main limitations of existing evidence pertained to risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision of included studies., Conclusions: Orthodontic treatment with aligners is associated with worse treatment outcome compared to fixed appliances in adult patients. Current evidence does not support the clinical use of aligners as a treatment modality that is equally effective to the gold standard of braces., Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42019131589)., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.