Search

Federated learning (FL) is an emerging machine learning (ML) training paradigm where clients own their data and collaborate to train a global model, without revealing any data to the server and other participants. Researchers commonly perform experiments in a simulation environment to quickly iterate on ideas. However, existing open-source tools do not offer the efficiency required to simulate FL on larger and more realistic FL datasets. We introduce pfl-research, a fast, modular, and easy-to-use Python framework for simulating FL. It supports TensorFlow, PyTorch, and non-neural network models, and is tightly integrated with state-of-the-art privacy algorithms. We study the speed of open-source FL frameworks and show that pfl-research is 7-72$\times$ faster than alternative open-source frameworks on common cross-device setups. Such speedup will significantly boost the productivity of the FL research community and enable testing hypotheses on realistic FL datasets that were previously too resource intensive. We release a suite of benchmarks that evaluates an algorithm's overall performance on a diverse set of realistic scenarios. The code is available on GitHub at https://github.com/apple/pfl-research.

While federated learning (FL) has recently emerged as a promising approach to train machine learning models, it is limited to only preliminary explorations in the domain of automatic speech recognition (ASR). Moreover, FL does not inherently guarantee user privacy and requires the use of differential privacy (DP) for robust privacy guarantees. However, we are not aware of prior work on applying DP to FL for ASR. In this paper, we aim to bridge this research gap by formulating an ASR benchmark for FL with DP and establishing the first baselines. First, we extend the existing research on FL for ASR by exploring different aspects of recent $\textit{large end-to-end transformer models}$: architecture design, seed models, data heterogeneity, domain shift, and impact of cohort size. With a $\textit{practical}$ number of central aggregations we are able to train $\textbf{FL models}$ that are \textbf{nearly optimal} even with heterogeneous data, a seed model from another domain, or no pre-trained seed model. Second, we apply DP to FL for ASR, which is non-trivial since DP noise severely affects model training, especially for large transformer models, due to highly imbalanced gradients in the attention block. We counteract the adverse effect of DP noise by reviving per-layer clipping and explaining why its effect is more apparent in our case than in the prior work. Remarkably, we achieve user-level ($7.2$, $10^{-9}$)-$\textbf{DP}$ (resp. ($4.5$, $10^{-9}$)-$\textbf{DP}$) with a 1.3% (resp. 4.6%) absolute drop in the word error rate for extrapolation to high (resp. low) population scale for $\textbf{FL with DP in ASR}$., Comment: Under review

In this paper, we start by training End-to-End Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) models using Federated Learning (FL) and examining the fundamental considerations that can be pivotal in minimizing the performance gap in terms of word error rate between models trained using FL versus their centralized counterpart. Specifically, we study the effect of (i) adaptive optimizers, (ii) loss characteristics via altering Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) weight, (iii) model initialization through seed start, (iv) carrying over modeling setup from experiences in centralized training to FL, e.g., pre-layer or post-layer normalization, and (v) FL-specific hyperparameters, such as number of local epochs, client sampling size, and learning rate scheduler, specifically for ASR under heterogeneous data distribution. We shed light on how some optimizers work better than others via inducing smoothness. We also summarize the applicability of algorithms, trends, and propose best practices from prior works in FL (in general) toward End-to-End ASR models., Comment: In Proceedings of the IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU) 2023

Federated learning (FL) combined with differential privacy (DP) offers machine learning (ML) training with distributed devices and with a formal privacy guarantee. With a large population of devices, FL with DP produces a performant model in a timely manner. However, for applications with a smaller population, not only does the model utility degrade as the DP noise is inversely proportional to population, but also the training latency increases since waiting for enough clients to become available from a smaller pool is slower. In this work, we thus propose expanding the population based on domain adaptation techniques to speed up the training and improves the final model quality when training with small populations. We empirically demonstrate that our techniques can improve the utility by 13% to 30% on real-world language modeling datasets.

Chemotherapy treatment for cancer is a complex optimisation problem with a large number of interacting variables and constraints. A number of different probabilistic algorithms have been applied to it with varying success. In this paper we expand on this by applying two estimation of distribution algorithms to the problem. One is UMDA, which uses a univariate probabilistic model similar to previously applied EDAs. The other is hBOA, the first EDA using a multivariate probabilistic model to be applied to the chemotherapy problem. While instinct would lead us to predict that the more sophisticated algorithm would yield better performance on a complex problem like this, we show that it is outperformed by the algorithms using the simpler univariate model. We hypothesise that this is caused by the more sophisticated algorithm being impeded by the large number of interactions in the problem which are unnecessary for its solution., Comment: Tech report, originally published at Missouri EDA Lab, in support of extended abstract (poster) with same title presented at GECCO 2008

We show that if two monic polynomials with integer coefficients have square-free resultant, then all positive divisors of the resultant arise as the greatest common divisor of the values of the two polynomials at a suitable integer., Comment: 6 pages