Search

Introduction: Ovarian cancer is a disease that presents in advanced stage, due to the absence of any specific or overtly dramatic symptoms. The standard of care is primary debulking surgery, followed by chemotherapy. Ovarian cancer recurrence treatment is very challenging and there is always a debate between cytoreduction vs chemotherapy. Methods: The electronic medical records of all patients who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer between January 2011 and December 2019 were retrieved the patients with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery in our department during this time period were included. Results: A total of 52 patients underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer during the study period. Median treatment free interval after primary treatment was 20 months (range 6–132). The secondary cytoreductive surgery was highly complex in 4(8 %) patients,19 (37 %) had intermediate surgical complexity score, 29 (55 %) had low surgical complexity score according to the Aletti complexity score. Secondary cytoreductive surgery was complete (no macroscopic residual disease) in 31(60 %); Optimal (R1) in 17 (33 %) and suboptimal in only 4 (7 %) of the patients. Out of the 52 patients,8 expired, 16 had a second recurrence, and 10 were lost to follow up over time. Conclusion: Successful surgery is possible in well selected patients, which in turn can lead to a meaningful progression free and overall survival benefit. Meticulous individualisation of cases should be done keeping in mind the patient’s performance status, prior treatment history & toxicity; distribution & extent of disease, and the patient’s overall life goals.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been questioned in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with/without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancies. This survey was performed to study clinicians’ practice about ERAS in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC.

Introduction: Cervical cytology has limited sensitivity to detect cervical pre-cancerous lesions. High-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) DNA testing has high sensitivity but its specificity is limited. This study was done to assess the utility of p16INK4a/ki-67 dual stained cytology in improving the predictive value for high-grade cervical (CIN2+) lesions. Aim/Objective: To assess the significance of P16/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry in improving the predictive value for high-grade cervical intraepithelial (≥CIN 2+) lesions on Pap smear. Material and Methods: This was a prospective diagnostic study that included 93 patients with ASC-US/LSIL/ASC-H and HSIL on thin prep cervical smears and who also underwent hr-HPV DNA test and colposcopy-guided biopsy. Biopsy was the gold standard against which the performance of P16INK4a/Ki-67 and hr-HPV results were compared. Results: In women of all ages, sensitivity of (96.8%) hr-HPV test and p16/Ki-67 dual immunocytochemistry (≥1 positive cell) were similar and negative predictive value (NPV) was (97.1% vs. 97.9%) but the latter test showed better specificity (69.4% vs. 53.2%) and positive predictive value (PPV, 61.2% vs. 50.8%) for ≥CIN 2 lesions. A higher cut off of at least 10 positive cells gives a higher specificity and PPV, with slightly decreased sensitivity and NPV. Conclusion: Because high-risk HPV test has a high sensitivity and NPV, whereas P16/Ki-67 dual immunocytochemistry (≥10 positive cells) has a high specificity and PPV, the latter can be recommended as an ancillary test in hr-HPV-positive women to reduce the number of women going for colposcopy and biopsies.

Since majority (80%) of ovarian cancer patients present at an advanced stage, imaging performed on these patients have numerous findings. The combination of multiple findings on imaging, complexity of anatomical structures which are involved in ovarian cancer, and the need to perceive certain subtle imaging features which would impact management often makes it challenging to systematically review images of these patients. Similarly, it is difficult to effectively communicate these findings in radiology reports. Structured reporting that is geared toward clinical decision-making has been an area of recognized need. An understanding of the review areas, which aid clinical decision-making in a multidisciplinary team setting at our institution led us to the proposed structured reporting template for ovarian cancer. Through this review, the authors would like to share this reporting template with examples.

Jacob Peedicayil Department of Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, IndiaCorrespondence: Jacob PeedicayilDepartment of Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, IndiaTel/Fax +91-0416-2284237Email jpeedi@cmcvellore.ac.inAbstract: There is increasing evidence that abnormalities in epigenetic mechanisms of gene expression contribute to the pathogenesis of anxiety disorders (ADs). This article discusses the role of epigenetic mechanisms of gene expression in the pathogenesis of ADs. It also discusses the data so far obtained from preclinical and clinical trials on the use of epigenetic drugs for treating ADs. Most drug trials investigating the use of epigenetic drugs for treating ADs have used histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi). HDACi are showing favorable results in both preclinical and clinical drug trials for treating ADs. However, at present the mode of action of HDACi in ADs is not clear. More work needs to be done to elucidate how epigenetic dysregulation contributes to the pathogenesis of ADs. More work also needs to be done on the mode of action of HDACi in alleviating the signs and symptoms of ADs.Keywords: anxiety disorders, epigenetic, histone deacetylase, histone deacetylase inhibitor

Environmental factors are known to interact with the genome by altering epigenetic mechanisms regulating gene expression and contributing to the pathogenesis of psychiatric disorders. This article is a narrative review of how the major environmental factors contribute to the pathogenesis of common psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder this way. The cited articles were published between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2022 and were obtained from PubMed and Google Scholar. The search terms used were as follows: gene or genetic; genome; environment; mental or psychiatric disorder; epigenetic; and interaction. The following environmental factors were found to act epigenetically on the genome to influence the pathogenesis of psychiatric disorders: social determinants of mental health, maternal prenatal psychological stress, poverty, migration, urban dwelling, pregnancy and birth complications, alcohol and substance abuse, microbiota, and prenatal and postnatal infections. The article also discusses the ways by which factors such as drugs, psychotherapy, electroconvulsive therapy, and physical exercise act epigenetically to alleviate the symptoms of psychiatric disorders in affected patients. These data will be useful information for clinical psychiatrists and those researching the pathogenesis and treatment of psychiatric disorders.