Search

IntroductionCOVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) poses significant challenges in resource-limited settings. This case series explores the role of bronchoscopy and molecular techniques in identifying superimposed infections in CARDS patients during the second wave of the pandemic in Ecuador.MethodsNine critically ill CARDS patients underwent bronchoscopy and molecular testing to detect co-infections and superinfections. Clinical presentations, diagnostic findings, and outcomes were analyzed.ResultsBronchoscopy and molecular techniques identified a range of secondary infections, including multidrug-resistant pathogens such as Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The case series highlights the complexities of managing severe COVID-19 cases in resource-constrained environments.DiscussionEarly identification of microorganisms using PCR methods allows for rapid and accurate diagnosis, facilitating targeted management of critically ill CARDS patients. The study underscores the importance of advanced diagnostic tools and adaptable strategies in pandemic situations, particularly in low-resource settings.

Background: Existing clinical guidelines do not offer an efficient alternative for the collection of data on relevant clinical traits during history and physical of the patient with chronic urticaria. Objective: Our aim was to provide a clinical data checklist together with its guide to allow for thorough information to be obtained and for a physical exam that identifies the main features and triggering factors of the disease to be carried out. Methods: A search was conducted for relevant literature on chronic urticaria in Medline, the Cochrane library and PubMed. Results: We developed an easy-to-use clinical data checklist with its corresponding clinical guide, comprised by 42 items based on two components: essential clues for history taking and chronic urticaria diagnosis (typical symptoms according to subgroups, etiology and laboratory results). Some components are the time of disease onset, wheals’ duration, shape, size, color and distribution, associated angioedema, atopy, triggering factors and others. Conclusions: The clinical data checklist and its guide constitute a tool to focus, guide and save time in medical consultation, with the main purpose to aid physicians in providing better diagnosis and management of the disease.

Abstract Background Existing guidelines do not offer a quick, efficient alternative to the patient’s recollection of relevant clinical features during anamnesis and physical examination for chronic urticaria (CU). This study aimed to identify specific items reflecting the main characteristics of CU that should be included in a comprehensive medical history for patients with CU. We also aimed to clarify possible eliciting factors for CU to support accurate diagnosis of the disease. Methods A panel of postgraduate dermatologists conducted a literature search for relevant studies on CU using Medline, the Cochrane database, and PubMed. Results We identified82 articles from which we drew a collection of items to inform development of an easy-to-use checklist and collection of items that should be included in a correct medical history. The final version of the checklist included42 items across two areas: essential clues for anamnesis and diagnosis of CU; and typical symptoms/parameters or characteristics according to subtype, etiology, and laboratory findings. Items included time of disease onset; duration, shape, size, color, and distribution of wheals; associated angioedema; atopy; and triggering factors. Conclusions Our guide provides an easy-to-use tool to support clinicians to focus, orient themselves, and save time in medical consultations for CU, allowing better diagnosis and management of this disease.