Search

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a finite element (FE) model of a sacral pedicle subtraction osteotomy (S1-PSO) and to compare biomechanical properties of various multi-rod configurations to stabilize S1-PSOs. METHODS: A previously validated FE spinopelvic model was used to develop a 30° PSO at the sacrum. Five multi-rod techniques spanning the S1-PSO were made using 4 iliac screws and a variety of primary rods (PR) and accessory rods (AR; lateral: Lat-AR or medial: Med-AR). All constructs, except one, utilized a horizontal rod (HR) connecting the iliac bolts to which PRs and Med-ARs were connected. Lat-ARs were connected to proximal iliac bolts. The simulation was performed in two steps with the acetabula fixed. For each model, PSO ROM and maximum stress on the PRs, ARs, and HRs were recorded and compared. The maximum stress on the L5-S1 disc and the PSO forces were captured and compared. RESULTS: Highest PSO ROMs were observed for 4-Rods (HR + 2 Med-AR). Constructs consisting of 5-Rods (HR + 2 Lat-ARs + 1 Med-AR) and 6-Rods (HR + 2 Lat-AR + 2 Med-AR) had the lowest PSO ROM. The least stress on the primary rods was seen with 6-Rods, followed by 5-Rods and 4-Rods (HR + 2 Lat-ARs). Lowest PSO forces and lowest L5-S1 disc stresses were observed for 4-Rod (Lat-AR), 5-Rod, and 6-Rod constructs, while 4-Rods (HR + Med-AR) had the highest. CONCLUSION: In this first FE analysis of an S1-PSO, the 4-Rod construct (HR + Med-AR) created the least rigid environment and highest PSO forces anteriorly. While 5- and 6-Rods created the stiffest constructs and lowest stresses on the primary rods, it also jeopardized load transfer to the anterior column, which may not be favorable for healing anteriorly. A balance between the constructs rigidity and anterior load sharing is essential.

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is effective for correcting spinal malalignment but is associated with high complication rates. The biomechanical effect of different PSO levels remains unclear, and no finite element (FE) analysis has compared L2-, L3-, L4-, and L5-PSOs. To assess the effects of PSO level on the spine's global range of motion, stresses on posterior instrumentation, load sharing with the anterior column, and proximal junctional stresses. A computational biomechanical analysis. A validated 3D spinopelvic FE model (T10-Pelvis) was used to perform PSOs at L2, L3, L4 and L5. Each model was instrumented with a 4-rod configuration (primary rods + in-line satellite rods) from T11-Pelvis. Simulation included a 2-step analysis; (1) applying 300 N to thoracic, 400 N to lumbar, and 400 N to sacrum, and (2) applying a 7.5 Nm moment to the top endplate of the T10 vertebral body. Acetabulum surfaces were fixed in all degrees of freedom. The range of motion, spinopelvic parameters (lumbar lordosis [LL], sacral slope [SS], pelvic incidence [PI], and pelvic tilt [PT]), PSO force, and von Mises stresses were measured. All models were compared with the L3-PSO model and percentage differences were captured. Compared to the intact alignment: LL increased by 48%, 45%, 59%, and 56% in the L2-, L3-, L4-, and L5-PSO models; SS increased by 25%, 15%, and 11% while PT decreased by 76%, 53%, and 45% in L2-, L3-, and L4-PSOs (SS and PT approximated intact model in L5-PSO); Lumbar osteotomy did not affect the PI. Compared to L3-PSO: L2-, L4-, and L5-PSOs showed up to 32%, 34%, and 34% lower global ROM. The least T10-T11 ROM was observed in L5-PSO. The left and right SIJ ROM were approximately similar in each model. Amongst all, the L5-PSO model showed the least ROM at the SIJ. Compared to L3-PSO, the L2-, L4-, and L5-PSO models showed up to 67%, 61%, and 78% reduced stresses at the UIV, respectively. Minimum stress at UIV+ was observed in the L3-PSO model. The L2-and L3-PSOs showed the maximum PSO force. The L5-PSO model showed the lowest stresses on the primary rods in all motions. Our FE investigation indicates that L5-PSO results in the greatest lumbar lordosis and lowest global, SIJ, and T10-T11 ROMs and stresses on the primary rods, suggesting potential mechanical benefits in reducing the risk of rod breakage. However, L4- and L5-PSOs led to the least force across the osteotomy site, which may increase the risk of pseudarthrosis. These findings provide biomechanical insights that may inform surgical planning, though further clinical investigation is essential to determine the optimal PSO level and validate these results. Understanding the biomechanical impact of PSO level is crucial for optimizing surgical outcomes and minimizing the risks of postoperative complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Rod fracture (RF) is the most common cause of revision in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, and various treatment strategies for preventing RF are reported in the literature. This retrospective study, involving 139 ASD patients (aged ≥65 years and a minimum 2-year follow-up) who underwent long-segment fixation from T10 to sacrum with pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), analyzed long-term results, including radiographical parameters and the incidence of recurrent RF (re-RF), to determine the most effective revision method for preventing RF. Methods: Patients were classified into three groups according to the revision method performed for RF: simple rod replacement (RR group, n = 17), lateral lumbar interbody fusion around the PSO site (RR + LLIF group, n = 8), and accessory rod insertion (RR + AR group, n = 22). Baseline characteristics and radiographical and clinical parameters were analyzed. Results: RF occurred in 47 patients (34%) at an average of 28 months following primary deformity correction. Re-RF occurred in six patients (13%) at an average of 37 months. Re-RF occurred most commonly in the RR group (p = 0.048). Every re-RF in the RR group occurred at the PSO site; none occurred in the RR + LLIF group, and one in the RR + AR group occurred near the L4–5. After both primary deformity correction and revision surgery, spinopelvic parameters had shown favorable results, and clinical outcomes had improved in all three groups without significant intergroup differences. Conclusions: Accessory rod insertion or an additional LLIF around the PSO site seems to provide greater strength and stability to the previously fused segments than a simple rod replacement, which demonstrates the need for additional support in revision surgery for RF after a PSO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design. A retrospective study. Objectives. To analyze factors associated with rod fracture (RF) in adult spinal deformity (ASD), and to assess whether the accessory rod (AR) technique can reduce RF occurrence in deformity correction in the setting of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). Summary of Background Data. Instrumentation failure is the most common reason for revision surgery in ASD. Several RF reduction methods have been introduced. However, there are insufficient studies on postoperative RF after deformity correction using minimally invasive LLIF. Materials and Methods. This study included 239 patients (average age 71.4 y and a minimum 2-year follow-up) with ASD who underwent long-segment fusion from T10 to sacrum with sacropelvic fixation. Patients were classified into the non-RF group and the RF group. After logistic regression analysis of the risk factors for RF, subgroup analyses were performed: pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) with two-rod (P2 group) versus PSO with two-rod and AR (P4 group), and LLIF with two-rod (L2 group) versus LLIF with two-rod and AR (L4 group). Results. RF occurred in 50 patients (21%) at an average of 25 months. RF occurred more frequently in patients who underwent PSO than in those who underwent LLIF (P = 0.002), and the use of the AR technique was significantly higher in the non-RF group (P< 0.05). Following logistic regression analysis, pre-operative PI-LL mismatch, PSO, and the AR technique were associated with RF. In subgroup analyses, RF incidence was 65% (24/37 cases) of the P2 group, 8% (4/51 cases) of the P4 group, and 21% (22/105 cases) of the L2 group. In the L4 group, there was no RF. Conclusion. Minimally invasive multilevel LLIF with the AR technique is capable of as much LL correction as conventional PSO and appears to be an effective method for reducing RF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Severe sagittal plane deformity with loss of L4-S1 lordosis is disabling and can be improved through various surgical techniques. However, data are limited on the differing ability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) to achieve alignment goals in severely malaligned patients. Severe adult spinal deformity patients with preoperative PI-LL >20°, L4-S1 lordosis <30°, and full body radiographs and PROMs at baseline and 6-week postoperative visit were included. Patients were grouped into ALIF (1–2 level ALIF at L4-S1), PSO (L4/L5 PSO), and TLIF (1–2 level TLIF at L4-S1). Comparative analyses were performed on demographics, radiographic spinopelvic parameters, complications, and PROMs. Among the 96 included patients, 40 underwent ALIF, 27 underwent PSO, and 29 underwent TLIF. At baseline, cohorts had comparable age, sex, race, Edmonton frailty scores, and radiographic spinopelvic parameters (P > 0.05). However, PSO was performed more often in revision cases (P < 0.001). Following surgery, L4-S1 lordosis correction (P = 0.001) was comparable among ALIF and PSO patients and caudal lordotic apex migration (P = 0.044) was highest among ALIF patients. PSO patients had higher intraoperative estimated blood loss (P < 0.001) and motor deficits (P = 0.049), and in-hospital ICU admission (P = 0.022) and blood products given (P = 0.004), but were otherwise comparable in terms of length of stay, blood transfusion given, and postoperative admission to rehab. Likewise, 90-day postoperative complication profiles and 6-week PROMs were comparable as well. ALIF can restore L4-S1 sagittal alignment as powerfully as PSO, with fewer intraoperative and in-hospital complications. When feasible, ALIF is a suitable alternative to PSO and likely superior to TLIF for correcting L4-S1 lordosis among patients with severe sagittal malalignment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Osteotomy can correct kyphosis, restore the spinal sequence, and restore the healthy appearance of a patient. However, the aorta is stretched during pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), and some surgeons are concerned about aortic injury. We used finite element analysis to construct an aortic model to simulate hemodynamic changes during osteotomy. 16 patients with ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis who had undergone a two-level osteotomy at the L1 and L3 levels was included in this study. Aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed, and a 3D image model was constructed. The length, transverse diameter, and curvature of the aorta were used to evaluate morphological changes. Finite element analysis was used to analyze the changes in aortic fluid dynamics. Blood pressure, wall shear stress, and blood flow velocity were compared pre- and postoperatively. The overall length of the aorta before surgery was 424.3 ± 42.9 mm, and the overall length of the aorta after surgery was 436.2 ± 54.8 mm. The aortic curvature decreased from 0.27 ± 0.13 to 0.17 ± 0.09. The mean transverse diameter of the aorta did not change (19.3 ± 6.6 vs. 19.2 ± 7.4 mm, P > 0.05). The blood flow velocity (2.8 ± 1.1 vs. 1.5 ± 0.8 m/s, P

Purpose: To evaluate different patterns of coronal deformity secondary to ankylosing spondylitis (AS), to propose relevant treatment strategies, and to assess efficacy of asymmetrical pedicle subtraction osteotomy (APSO). Methods: Coronal deformity was defined as coronal Cobb angle over 20º or coronal balance distance (CBD) more than 3 cm. 65 consecutive AS patients with concomitant coronal and sagittal deformity who underwent PSO were included. The average follow-up time was 40.4 months. Radiographic evaluation included coronal Cobb angle and CBD. Furthermore, sagittal parameters were used to assess magnitude and maintenance of kyphosis correction. Results: Based on curve characteristics, coronal deformity caused by AS included four different radiologic patterns: Pattern I: lumbar scoliosis; Pattern II: C-shaped thoracolumbar curve; Pattern III: trunk shift without major curve; Pattern IV: proximal thoracic scoliosis. APSO was performed for patients in Pattern I to III while conventional PSO was applied for patients in Pattern IV. Significant improvement in all the sagittal parameters were noted in 65 patients without obvious correction loss at the last follow-up. Besides, significant and sustained correction of coronal mal-alignment was identified in 59 APSO-treated patients. Rod fracture occurred in four cases and revision surgery was performed for one case. Conclusion: According to radiologic manifestations, coronal deformity caused by AS could be categorized into four patterns. APSO proved to be a feasible and effective procedure for correction of Pattern I to III patients. Coronal deformity pattern, apex location, sagittal profile of lumbar spine and preoperative hip function should be considered for osteotomy level selection in APSO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy has been thoroughly described and studied over the past 2 decades, being applied mainly in the lumbar spine, followed by the thoracic spine. Our better understanding of alignment biomechanics, and the progressive refinements of the surgical technique over time made it a very efficient procedure for the management of fixed sagittal malalignment. However, a long learning curve is mandatory to mitigate the associated risks particularly neurological deficits and achieve satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes with an acceptable rate of complications.

PurposeTo assess biomechanics of a lumbar PSO stabilized with different multi-rod constructs (4-, 5-, 6-rods) using satellite and accessory rods.MethodsA validated spinopelvic finite element model with a L3 PSO was used to evaluate the following constructs: 2 primary rods T10-pelvis ("Control"), two satellite rods (4-rod), two satellite rods + one accessory rod (5-rod), or two satellite rods + two accessory rods (6-rod). Data recorded included: ROM T10-S1 and L2-L4, von Mises stresses on primary, satellite, and accessory rods, factor of safety yield stress, and force across the PSO surfaces. Percent differences relative to Control were calculated.ResultsCompared to Control, 4-rods increased PSO flexion and extension. Lower PSO ROMs were observed for 5- and 6-rods compared to 4-rods. However, 4-rod (348.6 N) and 5-rod (343.2 N) showed higher PSO forces than 2-rods (336 N) and 6-rods had lower PSO forces (324.2 N). 5- and 6-rods led to the lowest rod von Mises stresses across the PSO. 6-rod had the maximum factor of safety on the primary rods.ConclusionsIn this finite element analysis, 4-rods reduced stresses on primary rods across a lumbar PSO. Although increased rigidity afforded by 5- and 6-rods decreased rod stresses, it resulted in less load transfer to the anterior vertebral column (particularly for 6-rod), which may not be favorable for the healing of the anterior column. A balance between the construct's rigidity and anterior load sharing is essential.

Abstract Introduction A disorder causes congenital kyphosis in the last stages of ossification and cartilage formation during embryonic development. The main treatment for this disease is surgery with various methods. The present study was performed to evaluate the results of the posterior surgery. Methods This study was a descriptive study comparing the results before and after surgery which was performed in 2022 on 14 patients with the congenital kyphosis referred to Al-Zahra Hospital in Isfahan. Initial assessments were performed, and the patient underwent surgery. The patients were re-evaluated immediately after surgery which were followed up and evaluated two years after surgery. Data were collected by a checklist and described and analyzed in SPSS software version 22. Results The mean age of the patients was 23.15 ± 13.24 years, 7 patients (50%) were male, and the mean duration of surgery was 405.85 ± 123.99 min. Seven patients (50%) were under 18 years old. No disease died and the highest T12 involvement was in 5 patients (35.8%). Sagittal Vertical Axis, Kyphosis Angle and Lumbar Lordosis decreased in two stages immediately after surgery and follow-up, which were statistically significant (P 0.05). The mean Kyphosis Angle were significantly different in adults, and children at follow-up stages (P

Study Design: Basic science (finite element analysis). Objectives: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) at L5 is an effective treatment for sagittal imbalance, especially in select cases of patients showing kyphosis with the apex at L4-L5 but has been scarcely investigated. The aim of this study was to simulate various "high-demand" instrumentation approaches, including varying numbers of rods and sacropelvic implants, for the stabilization of a PSO at L5. Methods: A finite element model of T10-pelvis was modified to simulate posterior fixation with pedicle screws and rods from T10 to S1, alone or in combination with an L5 PSO. Five additional configurations were then created by employing rods and novel porous fusion/fixation implants across the sacroiliac joints, in varying numbers. All models were loaded using pure moments of 7.5 Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Results: The osteotomy resulted in a general increase in motion and stresses in posterior rods and S1 pedicle screws. When the number of rods was varied, three- and four-rod configurations were effective in limiting the maximal rod stresses; values approached those of posterior fixation with no osteotomy. Maximum stresses in the accessory rods were similar to or less than those observed in the primary rods. Multiple sacropelvic implants were effective in reducing range of motion, particularly of the SIJ. Conclusions: Multi-rod constructs and sacropelvic fixation generally reduced maximal implant stresses and motion in comparison with standard posterior fixation, suggesting a reduced risk of rod breakage and increased joint stability, respectively, when a high-demand construct is utilized for the correction of sagittal imbalance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: A disorder causes congenital kyphosis in the last stages of ossification and cartilage formation during embryonic development. The main treatment for this disease is surgery with various methods. The present study was performed to evaluate the results of the posterior surgery. Methods: This study was a descriptive study comparing the results before and after surgery which was performed in 2022 on 14 patients with the congenital kyphosis referred to Al-Zahra Hospital in Isfahan. Initial assessments were performed, and the patient underwent surgery. The patients were re-evaluated immediately after surgery which were followed up and evaluated two years after surgery. Data were collected by a checklist and described and analyzed in SPSS software version 22. Results: The mean age of the patients was 23.15 ± 13.24 years, 7 patients (50%) were male, and the mean duration of surgery was 405.85 ± 123.99 min. Seven patients (50%) were under 18 years old. No disease died and the highest T12 involvement was in 5 patients (35.8%). Sagittal Vertical Axis, Kyphosis Angle and Lumbar Lordosis decreased in two stages immediately after surgery and follow-up, which were statistically significant (P < 0.05). No associated neurologic abnormalities was found during a physical examination or magnetic resonance imaging. In three phases (before, immediately after surgery, and follow-up), the mean of the Sagittal Vertical Axis, and Lumbar Lordosis in adults (over 18 years) and children (under 18 years) was not substantially different (P > 0.05). The mean Kyphosis Angle were significantly different in adults, and children at follow-up stages (P < 0.05). Because one of the children had a device filler in the follow-up stage. Conclusions: PSO can be used as a safe and effective technique to treat and correct Sagittal Vertical Axis, Kyphosis angle, Lumbar lordosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this retrospective study we compared clinicoradiologic outcomes and complication profiles of the traditional 2-rod construct versus the 4-rod construct in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) who underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). We performed a retrospective review of 208 ASD patients at 2 referral centers who underwent lumbar PSO and long fusion from thoracic to the pelvis. Two different techniques, including the 4-rod construct and the traditional 2-rod technique, were used at the PSO level. Clinicoradiologic outcomes and complication profiles of the patients were documented and compared statistically between the groups. The 4-rod construct was associated with statistically lower rates of rod fracture (44.8% vs. 26.4%, P < 0.01), pedicular screw loosening at the PSO level (25.3% vs. 14.0%, P = 0.04), and reoperation (49.4% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.02). Radiologically, the 4-rod construct was associated with higher degree of lumbar lordosis (LL) (–37.4°vs. –26.8°; P < 0.01) and improved pelvic tilt (PT) (–17.2° vs. –9.9°; P < 0.01) and sacral vertical axis (SVA) corrections (–211.5° vs. –192.2°; P = 0.04). Overall, the 4-rod construct was associated with improved quality of life (P = 0.04) and statistically lower Oswestry Disability Index score at 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.01). Our results showed that the 4-rod construct was associated with statistically lower rates of rod fracture and pedicular screw loosening at the osteotomy level, higher degree of LL correction and improved PT and SVA than the 2-rod technique. The 4-rod construct was also associated with improved quality of life and Oswestry Disability Index and lower complication profiles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chin-on-chest deformity is a rare and severely disabling condition characterized by kyphotic deformity in the cervicothoracic spine. To treat this deformity, various osteotomy techniques were described. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of biomedical databases including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus (via Elsevier), Embase (via Elsevier), and Cochrane Library in English from 1/1/1990 to 3/31/2022 was conducted using a combination of text and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Results: The final analysis included 16 studies. All the studies were assigned a level of evidence of four. Except for two articles, all of the articles were non-comparative studies. A total of 288 patients were included in this review. Of the 288 patients, 107 underwent posterior column extension osteotomy (PCEO), 108 underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), and 33 underwent vertebral column resection osteotomy (VCRO). The most common osteotomy level in fifteen of the studies was C7/T1. The studies included in this review described several techniques for cervical sagittal balance correction. The range of preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores was 5.5–8.6 to 1.7–4.91, respectively. The range of preoperative and postoperative neck disability index (NDI) was 34.2–65.4 to 22.1–51.3, respectively. The most common complications were upper extremity paresthesia and hand numbness through the C8 dermatome distribution. Conclusions: Corrective osteotomies provide satisfactory results in patients with chin-on-chest deformity; however, the quality of the included studies limits the evidence.

Objective The surgical treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and severe thoracolumbar kyphosis combined with hip flexion contracture is very difficult for all the surgeons. The femoral neck osteotomy (FNO) is the first step to break the ice. The evaluation of a new modified FNO method is very important to improve the curative effect. Methods Five male patients with nine bone‐fused hips who underwent the new femoral neck osteotomy were included from October 2021 to March 2022. The FNO was designed that the saw blade was manipulated from the lateral femoral neck base to the inferior part of the femoral head, keeping Pauwels' angle less than 30° on the coronal plane. On the transverse plane, the angle between the saw blade and the coronal plane was more than 15°. On the sagittal plane, the saw blade cut through the femoral neck. They accepted pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) after FNO according to the patient’ recovery. Then, 2 weeks later, the patients underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). The visual analogue scale (VAS), Harris hip score (HHS) and passive hip flexion‐extension range of motion (ROM) were used to evaluate hip function. The data were analyzed by paired t‐test. Results The average operation time and blood loss of FNO, the average interval between FNO and THA were collected. The average angle of the trunk and lower limb (ATL) was 36.33° ± 16.36° pre‐FNO, 82.89° ± 13.51° post‐FNO and 175.22° ± 3.42° post‐THA. The average VAS scores were 0 pre‐FNO, 5 ± 1.58 post‐FNO and 2.6 ± 0.55 post‐THA. The average HHS was 43.56 ± 1.59 preoperatively and 83.89 ± 2.21 postoperatively. The average hip extension ROM was 23.89° ± 12.69° pre‐FNO, −22.67° ± 14.18° post‐FNO and − 3.33° ± 2.50 post‐THA°. The average hip flexion ROM was 23.89° ± 12.69° pre‐FNO, 35.56° ± 12.11° post‐FNO and 104.44° ± 5.27° post‐THA. The differences among them were significant (p

Background: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a powerful tool for sagittal plane correction in patients with rigid adult spinal deformity (ASD); however, it is associated with high intraoperative blood loss and the increased risk of durotomy. The objective of the present study was to identify intraoperative techniques and baseline patient factors capable of predicting intraoperative durotomy. Methods: A tri-institutional database was retrospectively queried for all patients who underwent PSO for ASD. Data on baseline comorbidities, surgical history, surgeon characteristics and intraoperative maneuvers were gathered. PSO aggressiveness was defined as conventional (Schwab 3 PSO) or an extended PSO (Schwab type 4). The primary outcome of the study was the occurrence of durotomy intraoperatively. Univariable analyses were performed with Mann–Whitney U tests, Chi-squared analyses, and Fisher's exact tests. Statistical significance was defined by p < 0.05. Results: One hundred and sixteen patients were identified (mean age 61.9 ± 12.6 yr; 44.8% male), of whom 51 (44.0%) experienced intraoperative durotomy. There were no significant differences in baseline comorbidities between those who did and did not experience durotomy, with the exception that baseline weight and body mass index were higher in patients who did not suffer durotomy. Prior surgery (OR 2.73; 95% CI [1.13, 6.58]; p = 0.03) and, more specifically, prior decompression at the PSO level (OR 4.23; 95% CI [1.92, 9.34]; p < 0.001) was predictive of durotomy. A comparison of surgeon training showed no statistically significant difference in durotomy rate between fellowship and non-fellowship trained surgeons, or between orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons. The PSO level, PSO aggressiveness, the presence of stenosis at the PSO level, nor the surgical instrument used predicted the odds of durotomy occurrence. Those experiencing durotomy had similar hospitalization durations, rates of reoperation and rates of nonroutine discharge. Conclusions: In this large multisite series, a history of prior decompression at the PSO level was associated with a four-fold increase in intraoperative durotomy risk. Notably the use of extended (versus) standard PSO, surgical technique, nor baseline patient characteristics predicted durotomy. Durotomies occurred in 44% of patients and may prolong operative times. Additional prospective investigations are merited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The surgical treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and severe thoracolumbar kyphosis combined with hip flexion contracture is very difficult for all the surgeons. The femoral neck osteotomy (FNO) is the first step to break the ice. The evaluation of a new modified FNO method is very important to improve the curative effect. Methods: Five male patients with nine bone‐fused hips who underwent the new femoral neck osteotomy were included from October 2021 to March 2022. The FNO was designed that the saw blade was manipulated from the lateral femoral neck base to the inferior part of the femoral head, keeping Pauwels' angle less than 30° on the coronal plane. On the transverse plane, the angle between the saw blade and the coronal plane was more than 15°. On the sagittal plane, the saw blade cut through the femoral neck. They accepted pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) after FNO according to the patient' recovery. Then, 2 weeks later, the patients underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). The visual analogue scale (VAS), Harris hip score (HHS) and passive hip flexion‐extension range of motion (ROM) were used to evaluate hip function. The data were analyzed by paired t‐test. Results: The average operation time and blood loss of FNO, the average interval between FNO and THA were collected. The average angle of the trunk and lower limb (ATL) was 36.33° ± 16.36° pre‐FNO, 82.89° ± 13.51° post‐FNO and 175.22° ± 3.42° post‐THA. The average VAS scores were 0 pre‐FNO, 5 ± 1.58 post‐FNO and 2.6 ± 0.55 post‐THA. The average HHS was 43.56 ± 1.59 preoperatively and 83.89 ± 2.21 postoperatively. The average hip extension ROM was 23.89° ± 12.69° pre‐FNO, −22.67° ± 14.18° post‐FNO and − 3.33° ± 2.50 post‐THA°. The average hip flexion ROM was 23.89° ± 12.69° pre‐FNO, 35.56° ± 12.11° post‐FNO and 104.44° ± 5.27° post‐THA. The differences among them were significant (p < 0.05). Only one hip (11.11%) displaced completely after FNO. Conclusion: A new modified FNO was developed, which can provide osteotomy with a certain degree of stability and greater ease for performing PSO and THA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study designRetrospective cohort study.ObjectiveThoracolumbar 3-column osteotomy (3CO) is a powerful technique for correction of rigid adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, it can be associated with high-volume blood loss. This study seeks to investigate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) in 3CO ASD patients.MethodsASD patients who underwent 3CO from 2006 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes were compared between TXA and non-TXA patients, and TXA doses.ResultsA total of 365 ASD patients were included: 181 TXA and 184 non-TXA. The mean age was 64.6 years and 60.5% were female. Operative time was shorter in the TXA group (295.6 vs 320.2 minutes, P < .001). However, TXA was not associated with shorter operative time (β = -6.5 minutes, 95% CI -29.0 to 15.9, P = .567) after accounting for surgeon experience. There was no difference in blood loss (2020.2 vs 1914.1 mL, P = .437) between groups. Overall complications (37.0% vs 33.2%, P = .439), including hypercoagulable (2.2% vs 3.8%, P = .373) and cardiac (13.3% vs 7.1%, P = .050) complications were similar between groups. TXA was not independently associated with blood loss or TXA-related complications. Both groups had comparable intensive care unit (2.5 vs 2.0 days, P = .060) and hospital (8.9 vs 8.2 days, P = .190) stays. There were no differences in outcomes between TXA dosing subgroups.ConclusionsSystemic TXA use during 3CO for ASD surgery was not associated with decreased blood loss. TXA patients had shorter operative times, but this was driven mainly by surgeon experience on multivariate analysis. Routine use of TXA is safe and does not increase the incidence of hypercoagulable complications even at high doses.

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a surgical technique to restore lumbar lordosis in patients with rigid sagittal deformity. Herein, we report on outcomes of a surgical technique utilizing a 4-rod PSO with satellite rods. A retrospective study was performed for a cohort of patients who underwent 4-rod PSO revision surgery for sagittal deformity. Procedures were performed by one surgeon at 2 different academic centers between 2004–2018. Alignment outcomes and complications specifically for revision surgeries in previously fused spines were assessed. 40 patients underwent PSO with the satellite rod technique (n = 29 at L3, 72.5%; n = 7 at L4, 17.5%). Mean PSO angle was 28.7 ± 7.6°. Two patients (5%) had rod fracture necessitating revision surgery at 32 and 34 months. Three patients (7.5%) developed proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), but none required revision. No patients developed pseudoarthrosis. Mean preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was 13.5 ± 7.3 cm, which decreased to 4.8 ± 7.3 cm (P = 0.002) postoperatively. Mean preoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch improved from 35.9 ± 16.6° preoperatively to 11.8 ± 14.6° postoperatively (P < 0.001). Mean preoperative pelvic tilt (PT) improved from 34.7 ± 9.8° preoperatively to 30.1 ± 9.0° (P = 0.026) postoperatively. Mean global alignment and proportion (GAP) score improved from 10 ± 2 preoperatively to 8 ± 2 postoperatively (P < 0.001), which was still considered severely disproportioned. Rod failure rate after PSO with the 4-rod satellite configuration was low. SVA, PI-LL mismatch, and PT significantly improved for these previously-fused patients. Mean GAP score also improved, but was still considered severely disproportioned, likely due to the inability of PSO to correct low LL or PT in previously-fused spines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) as an invasive procedure with high reoperation and complication rates in an often elderly population has often been questioned. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the impact of PSO for sagittal imbalance (SI) on patient-reported outcomes including self-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life 2 years postoperatively. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent correction of their spinal deformity by thoracolumbar PSO were assessed using self-reporting questionnaires 2 years postoperatively. Outcome was measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EQ-5D scores. Additionally, a Patient Satisfaction Index (PSI) rated in four grades (A: very satisfied to D: not satisfied), walking range, and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test were evaluated. Results: Sixty-five patients were included, and each parameter was assessed preoperatively and 24 months postoperatively. The intervention led to significant improvements in back pain (8.1 ± 1.2 vs. 2.9 ± 1.9; p < 0.001), as well as ODI scores (57.7 ± 13.9 vs. 32.6 ± 18.9; p < 0.001), walking range (589 ± 1676 m vs. 3265 ± 3405 m; p < 0.001), and TUG (19.2 s vs. 9.7 s; p < 0.05). 90.7% of patients (n = 59/65) reported a PSI grade "A" or "B" 24 months postoperatively. Conclusion: Patient satisfaction 24 months after PSO for SI is high. Quality of life improved significantly by restoring sagittal balance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• AS patients have different patterns due to different PI. • The correction of SVA, GK in the high PI group was the smallest. • A single-level PSO is effective for AS patients with low and moderate PI. • Complementary corrections may be required for AS patients with high PI. To investigate the influence of pelvic incidence (PI) on the kyphosis curve patterns and clinical outcomes in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis and to construct a classification of AS according to the PI value for surgical decision-making. 107 AS patients underwent single-level lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and finished a minimal of 2-year follow-up. All patients were divided into three groups: low PI (PI ≤ 40°), moderate PI (40° < PI ≤ 60°), and high PI (PI > 60°). Standing lateral radiographs were taken to evaluate the location of kyphotic apex, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), spino-sacral angle (SSA), global kyphosis (GK), PI, sacral slope (SS), and pelvic tilt (PT). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) were used to evaluate quality of life. Before surgery, a significant difference was shown in the average LL and the mean GK in high PI group was the largest among the three groups. Correction of SVA, GK and LL in high PI group was the smallest among the three group. No significant difference in clinical outcomes was found among the three groups before surgery and at the final follow-up. Regarding the preoperative sagittal profile, the kyphosis curve pattern of moderate PI group is similar to that of low PI group. For AS patients in these two groups, harmonious sagittal alignment can be restored by a single-level PSO. However, the sagittal imbalance is insufficiently realigned by a single-level PSO in a patient with high PI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Finite element (FE) study. Objective: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a surgical method to correct sagittal plane deformities. In this study, we aimed to investigate the biomechanical effects of lumbar disc degeneration on the instrumentation following PSO and assess the effects of using interbody spacers adjacent to the PSO level in a long instrumented spinal construct. Methods: A spinopelvic model (T10-pelvis) with PSO at the L3 level was used to generate 3 different simplified grades of degenerated lumbar discs (mild (Pfirrmann grade III), moderate (Pfirrmann grade IV), and severe (Pfirrmann grade V)). Instrumentation included eighteen pedicle screws and bilateral primary rods. To investigate the effect of interbody spacers, the model with normal disc height was modified to accommodate 2 interbody spacers adjacent to the PSO level through a lateral approach. For the models, the rods' stress distribution, PSO site force values, and the spine range of motion (ROM) were recorded. Results: The mildly, moderately, and severely degenerated models indicated approximately 10%, 26%, and 40% decrease in flexion/extension motion, respectively. Supplementing the instrumented spinopelvic PSO model using interbody spacers reduced the ROM by 22%, 21%, 4%, and 11% in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively. The FE results illustrated lower von Mises stress on the rods and higher forces at the PSO site at higher degeneration grades and while using the interbody spacers. Conclusions: Larger and less degenerated discs adjacent to the PSO site may warrant consideration for interbody cage instrumentation to decrease the risk of rod fracture and PSO site non-union. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since its proposal, the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score has been the topic of several external validation studies, which have yielded conflicting results. Given the lack of consensus regarding this prognostic tool, the authors aim to assess the accuracy of GAP scores for predicting mechanical complications following adult spinal deformity correction surgery. A systematic search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for the purpose of identifying all studies evaluating the GAP score as a predictive tool for mechanical complications. GAP scores were pooled using a random-effects model to compare patients reporting mechanical complications after surgery versus those reporting no complications. Where receiver operator curves were provided, the area under the curve (AUC) was pooled. A total of 15 studies featuring 2092 patients were selected for inclusion. Qualitative analysis using Newcastle-Ottawa criteria revealed moderate quality among all included studies (5.99/9). With respect to sex, the cohort was predominantly female (82%). The pooled mean age among all patients in the cohort was 58.55 years, with a mean follow-up of 33.86 months after surgery. Upon pooled analysis, we found that mechanical complications were associated with higher mean GAP scores, albeit minimal (mean difference = 0.571 [ 95% confidence interval: 0.163–0.979]; P = 0.006, n = 864). Additionally, age (P = 0.136, n = 202), fusion levels (P = 0.207, n = 358), and body mass index (P = 0.616, n = 350) were unassociated with mechanical complications. Pooled AUC revealed poor discrimination overall (AUC = 0.69; n = 1206). GAP scores may have a minimal-to-moderate predictive capability for mechanical complications associated with adult spinal deformity correction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Aims The commonly used treatments of adult degeneration scoliosis (ADS) were posterior long segment screw fixation with osteotomies. Recently, lateral lumbar intervertebral fusion combined two-stage posterior screw fixation (LLIF + PSF) as a new strategy without osteotomy. Herein, this study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes among LLIF + PSF and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), posterior column osteotomies (PCO). Methods Totals of 139 ADS patients underwent operation with 2 years longer follow-up visit between January 2013 and January 2018 in Ningbo No.6 Hospital were enrolled into this study. 58 patients were included in PSO group, 45 in PCO group and 36 in LLIF + PSF group, The clinical and radiological data were reviewed from medical records. Baseline characteristic, perioperative radiological data (sagittal vertical axis (SVA), coronal balance (CB), Cobb angle of Mian curve (MC), Lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT) and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL)), clinical outcomes (VAS of back and leg, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Scoliosis Research Society 22-question Questionnaire (SRS-22)) and complications were evaluated and compared. Result There were no significantly difference in baseline characteristics, preoperative radiological parameters and clinical outcomes among three groups. LLIF + PSF group was significantly shorter in operation time than other two groups (P

IntroductionOsteotomies are commonly performed to correct sagittal malalignment in cervical deformity (CD). However, the risks and benefits of performing a major osteotomy for cervical deformity correction have been understudied. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the risks and benefits of performing a major osteotomy for CD correction.MethodsPatients stratified based on major osteotomy (MAJ) or minor (MIN). Independent t-tests and Chi-squared tests were used to assess differences between MAJ and MIN. A sub-analysis compared patients with flexible versus rigid CL.Results137 CD patients were included (62 years, 65% F). 19.0% CD patients underwent a MAJ osteotomy. After propensity score matching for cSVA, 52 patients were included. About 19.0% CD patients underwent a MAJ osteotomy. MAJ patients had more minor complications (P = 0.045), despite similar surgical outcomes as MIN. At 3M, MAJ and MIN patients had similar NDI, mJOA, and EQ5D scores, however by 1 year, MAJ patients reached MCID for NDI less than MIN patients (P = 0.003). MAJ patients with rigid deformities had higher rates of complications (79% vs. 29%, P = 0.056) and were less likely to show improvement in NDI at 1 year (0.95 vs. 0.54, P = 0.027). Both groups had similar sagittal realignment at 1 year (all P > 0.05).ConclusionsCervical deformity patients who underwent a major osteotomy had similar clinical outcomes at 3-months but worse outcomes at 1-year as compared to minor osteotomies, likely due to differences in baseline deformity. Patients with rigid deformities who underwent a major osteotomy had higher complication rates and worse clinical improvement despite similar realignment at 1 year.

Purpose: To determine the clinical- and surgical-related factors of hip joint structural changes in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis who underwent PSO. Methods: Hip involvement was assessed by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Hip Index (BASRI-h) and defined by a score of at least 2. 52 patients with BASRI-h scores maintained and 78 patients with BASRI-h scores increased during follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data were recorded. Radiological assessment was performed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. Results: No significant difference existed in age, gender and follow-up time between the groups, but earlier onset of AS, longer disease and kyphotic duration, and worse Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) scores at the final follow-up were observed in patients with BASRI-h scores increased (P < 0.05). Besides, global kyphosis (GK), T1-pelvic angle (TPA), pelvic tilt (PT) and anterior pelvic plane angle (APPA) were always larger in patients with BASRI-h scores increased, accompanied with more sacral fixation (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistics regression showed that earlier onset of AS, longer kyphotic duration, larger preoperative GK, sacral fixation and larger APPA during follow-up were independent risk factors. Conclusion: Earlier onset of AS and longer kyphotic duration were the clinical risk factors of hip joint structural changes in AS patients following PSO, while larger preoperative GK, sacral fixation in PSO and larger APPA during follow-up were the surgical-related factors. Surgeons should inform patients with risk factors of the possibility for severe hip joint structural changes after PSO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cervical kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis is a debilitating disease for the patient as well as a complex deformity for the surgeon to treat. Ankylosing spondylitis patients should be assessed clinically and radiologically to determine their indications for surgery. Thorough preoperative evaluation of the patient and surgical planning are critical to the success of the corrective surgery. Various kyphotic deformities and osteotomy classifications can be taken into consideration for surgical planning. There are various types of corrective procedures for the treatment of cervical kyphosis. For patients with ankylosing spondylitis and chin-on-chest deformity, pedicle subtraction osteotomy offers the largest angle of correction. However, pedicle subtraction osteotomy is highly technically demanding and associated with a substantial risk for neurovascular complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Various osteotomy techniques have been proposed to correct the kyphotic deformities caused by ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, no technique could cater to all AS-related deformities well regarding the various mobility of calcified discs and the severity of deformities. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the strength and weaknesses of each method is essential. Then, a strategic approach could be formulated to select the most appropriate technique for a specific patient so as to have a correction operation with effectiveness, safety, and surgical simplicity. Among all preoperative examinations, the evaluation of disc mobility and the severity of kyphotic deformity is mandatory, which constitutes the base for the selection of osteotomy techniques. Since posterior column osteotomy (PCO) is the simplest technique, it should be used as much as possible. If up to three mobile discs are preserved, and the severity of the deformity is only moderate, e.g. the global thoracolumbar angle is less than 6 0 ∘ , contemporary poly-segmental PCO is selected. Staged PCO (SPCO), proposed by the authors, is the enhanced PCO with more excellent correction capability. If the disc mobility is not favorable enough, SPCO can be considered instead. PSO is the most versatile technique, capable of correcting all kinds of deformities regardless of disc mobility and severity of the kyphosis. This technique can be used in every case if surgical complexity is not a concern to the operator. Especially, PSO is the exclusive indication for those firmly ankylosed deformities without any mobile disc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: The current evidence regarding how level of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) influences correction of sagittal alignment is limited. This study sought to investigate the relationship of lumbar level and segmental angular change (SAC) of PSO with the magnitude of global sagittal alignment correction. Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated 53 consecutive patients with adult spinal deformity who underwent lumbar PSO at a single institution. Radiographs were evaluated to quantify the effect of PSO on lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), T1-spinopelvic inclination (T1SPI), T1-pelvic alignment (TPA), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Results: Significant correlations were found between PSO SAC and the postoperative increase in LL (r = 0.316, P =.021) and PT (r = 0.352, P =.010), and a decrease in TPA (r = −0.324, P =.018). PSO level significantly correlated with change in T1SPI (r = −0.305, P =.026) and SVA (r = −0.406, P =.002), with more caudal PSO corresponding to a greater correction in sagittal balance. On multivariate analysis, more caudal PSO level independently predicted a greater reduction in T1SPI (β = −3.138, P =.009) and SVA (β = −29.030, P =.001), while larger PSO SAC (β = −0.375, P =.045) and a greater number of fusion levels (β = −1.427, P =.036) predicted a greater reduction in TPA. Conclusion: This study identified a gain of approximately 3 degrees and 3 cm of correction for each level of PSO more caudal to L1. Additionally, a larger PSO SAC predicted greater improvement in TPA. While further investigation of these relationships is warranted, these findings may help guide preoperative PSO level selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adult cervical deformity (ACD) has been shown to have a substantial impact on quality of life and overall health, with moderate to severe deformities resulting in significant disability and dysfunction. Fortunately, surgical management and correction of cervical sagittal imbalance can offer significant benefits and improvement in pain and disability. ACD is a heterogenous disease and specific surgical correction strategies should reflect deformity type (driver of deformity) and patient-related factors. Spinal rigidity is one of the most important considerations as soft tissue releases and osteotomies play a crucial role in cervical deformity correction. For ankylosed, fixed, and severe deformity, 3-column osteotomy (3CO) is often warranted. A 3CO can be done through combined anteriorposterior (vertebral body resection) and posterior-only approaches (open or closed wedge pedicle subtraction osteotomies [PSOs]). This article reviews the literature for currently published studies that report results on the use of 3CO for ACD, with a special concentration on posterior based 3CO (open and closed wedge PSO). More specifically, this review discusses the indications, radiographic corrective ability, and associated complications.

INTRODUCTION: Classical instrumentation may be insufficient in the surgical treatment of rigid spinal deformities with structural changes in bone tissue. Many different types of osteotomy have been described to correct such rigid deformities. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) applied at the thoracic level in patients with coronal and/or sagittal plane spinal deformity. METHODS: 61 of the 123 cases, who underwent PSO for spinal deformity between 2010 and 2013, were included in the study. Pre- and post-operative ortho-radiography was performed; angles (scoliosis, kyphosis, and lordosis angles) and global sagittal balance were measured. Duration of operation, bleeding and complications were noted. SF-36 scoring was used for clinical outcome. RESULTS: This study was consist of 30 male and 31 female patients including 28 scoliosis, 23 kyphosis and 10 ankylosing spondylitis cases. Post-operative mean Cobb angle was 62%, sagittal balance was 42%, kyphosis angle was 38%, thoracic kyphosis angle was 61%, and lordosis angle was 19.44% corrected (p

Objective According to the literature, there are no clinical reports documenting the use of the satellite rod technique in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcome of patients with ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis who adopted satellite rods versus those who did not. Methods Patients with ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis who underwent one or two‐level pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) were reviewed, and total of 119 patients (112 males and seven females, average age 39.89 ± 6.61 years) were eligible and included in this present study. Anterior–posterior and lateral full‐length spine X‐ray films were performed preoperatively and at the two‐year follow‐up visit. Global kyphosis (GK), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and osteotomy angle (OA) were measured. The complications of every group of patients were collected. Pre‐ and postoperative health‐related quality of life instruments, including the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (Basfi) and Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument‐22 (SRS‐22), were recorded. The patients were divided into three groups based on features of their osteotomy including PSO levels and whether the satellite rod technique was applied. Patients who underwent one‐level PSO without the satellite rod technique were categorized in the one‐level group. Patients who underwent one‐level PSO with the satellite rod technique were classified in the satellite rod group. Patients who underwent two‐level PSO without the satellite rod technique were included in the two‐level group. The paired sample t test was used to compare pre‐ and postoperative parameters. One‐way ANOVA was performed for multiple group comparisons. Results The average follow‐up time is 29.31 ± 3.66 months. The patients' GK were significantly improved from 46.84 ± 20.37 degree to 3.31 ± 15.09 degree. OS achieved through each osteotomy segment of one‐level group (39.78 ± 12.29 degree) and satellite rods group (42.23 ± 9.82 degree), was larger than that of two‐level group (34.73 ± 7.54 and 28.85 ± 7.26 degree). There was no significant difference between the one‐level group and the satellite rod group in achieving the OS. Thirteen patients experienced different complications (10.92%). Three patients experienced rod fracture in the one‐level group. There was no rod fracture or screw failure in the satellite rod group or the two‐level group. Conclusion The satellite rod technique is also recommended for patients who undergo PSO osteotomy to correct ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis deformities.

Aims: The commonly used treatments of adult degeneration scoliosis (ADS) were posterior long segment screw fixation with osteotomies. Recently, lateral lumbar intervertebral fusion combined two-stage posterior screw fixation (LLIF + PSF) as a new strategy without osteotomy. Herein, this study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes among LLIF + PSF and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), posterior column osteotomies (PCO). Methods: Totals of 139 ADS patients underwent operation with 2 years longer follow-up visit between January 2013 and January 2018 in Ningbo No.6 Hospital were enrolled into this study. 58 patients were included in PSO group, 45 in PCO group and 36 in LLIF + PSF group, The clinical and radiological data were reviewed from medical records. Baseline characteristic, perioperative radiological data (sagittal vertical axis (SVA), coronal balance (CB), Cobb angle of Mian curve (MC), Lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT) and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL)), clinical outcomes (VAS of back and leg, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Scoliosis Research Society 22-question Questionnaire (SRS-22)) and complications were evaluated and compared. Result: There were no significantly difference in baseline characteristics, preoperative radiological parameters and clinical outcomes among three groups. LLIF + PSF group was significantly shorter in operation time than other two groups (P < 0.05), whereas significant longer hospital stay was observed in LLIF + PSF group (P < 0.05). As for radiological parameters, LLIF + PSF group had significantly improvement in SVA, CB, MC, LL and PI-LL (P < 0.05). Moreover, LLIF + PSF group achieved significantly less correction loss in SVA, CB and PT than PSO and PCO group (1.5 ± 0.7 VS 2.0 ± 0.9 VS 2.2 ± 0.8, P < 0.05; 1.0 ± 0.4 VS 1.3 ± 0.5 VS 1.1 ± 0.7, P < 0.05 and 4.2 ± 2.8 VS 7.2 ± 3.1 VS 6.0 ± 2.8, P < 0.05). Significantly recovery in VAS of back and leg, ODI score and SRS-22 were found among all groups, however, LLIF + PSF shown significant better clinical therapy maintain at follow-up visit than other two groups (P < 0.05). There were no significantly difference in complications among groups (P = 0.66). Conclusion: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion combined two-stage posterior screw fixation (LLIF + PSF) can achieve comparable clinical therapy for adult degeneration scoliosis as osteotomy strategies. However, furthermore more studies need be taken for verifying the effect of LLIF + PSF in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Different techniques have been previously described to close the pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) site for correction of sagittal malalignment; the use of a side-to-side domino connector as a correction tool in the thoracic spine has not been specifically studied. Methods: Twenty adult patients who underwent single-level thoracic PSO from T1 to T12 were included and retrospectively reviewed (two centers). Preoperative and postoperative full-body X-rays, perioperative data, clinical data and complications were recorded with a minimum 2 years of follow-up. Surgical technique and the nuances in using the domino connector were described in detail. Results: Patients had a mean age of 40y; 40% were female. Two different techniques involving the domino were applied for closure of the PSO site depending on the type of kyphosis (smooth vs. angular deformity). Both techniques provided significant correction of the local kyphosis (from 48° to 18°) with reciprocal reduction of compensatory cervical lordosis (from 37.6° to 18.6°, p < 0.01) in upper thoracic PSO or lumbar lordosis (from 74.5° to 46.6°, p < 0.01) in lower thoracic PSO. Four patients presented postoperative complications that resolved (hemothorax, GI bleeding), and two patients presented transient neurological deficit. Oswestry Disability Index score improved in the majority of the patients (from 32.7 to 22.5, p < 0.05). There were no pseudarthroses, symptomatic instrumentation breakage, or surgical site infection. Conclusion: Use of a side-to-side domino connector in combination with two different rod cantilever techniques is effective for the reduction of thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy achieving satisfactory radiological and clinical outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective study. Objectives: To analyze the change in acetabular anteversion (AA) after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis who have already undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: AS patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis following lumbar PSO from January 2005 to January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Only the patients performed with THA prior to the PSO were included. AA was measured on the full-length standing posterior-anterior radiographs using the ellipse method. Results: Twenty patients (34 hips) with a mean age of 36.8 years (range, 22 to 63 years) were included. After lumbar PSO, AA was reduced from 18.59° to 5.85° (P < 0.001). Postoperative change in AA was correlated with the spinal deformity correction. Additionally, the change in AA postoperatively was correlated with pelvic incidence (PI) (R = 0.346, P = 0.045). Although the postoperative change in sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was larger in the patients after L2 or L3 PSO (153.97 mm vs 70.03 mm, P = 0.006), no difference was found in the postoperative change in AA (12.83° vs 10.96°, P = 0.540) compared with the patients following L1 PSO. Conclusions: AA was significantly decreased following lumbar PSO and the postoperative change in AA was correlated with the magnitude of spinal deformity correction. Notably, the effect of osteotomy level on the postoperative change in AA was limited in the AS patients underwent 1-level PSO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objective To evaluate the sagittal parameters and clinical outcome of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) combined with thoracolumbar kyphosis. Methods The clinical data of 38 patients with AS combined with thoracolumbar kyphosis who underwent PSO were enrolled and divided into the lumbar lordosis group and the lumbar kyphosis group according to the preoperative sagittal morphology. They were subdivided into the lumbar lordosis T12 group, lordosis L1 group, kyphosis L2 group, and kyphosis L3 group. The spine sagittal parameters were compared between the preoperative and the postoperative. Outcome evaluation was performed by the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results A total of 38 patients with AS combined with thoracolumbar kyphosis were successfully treated by PSO, with a mean follow-up time of 26.9 ± 11.9 months. There were 30 males and 8 females with a mean age of 41.6 ± 7.1 years. Twenty patients consisted in the lumbar lordosis group and 18 patients in the lumbar kyphosis group. GK, SVA, and CBVA were improved significantly (P 0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in three cases. Conclusion PSO was a practical method for the treatment of patients with AS combined with thoracolumbar kyphosis. PSO at L3 was recommended to be selected for the lumbar kyphosis to obtain greater SVA correction. CBVA of single-segment PSO may be significantly lower than the two-segment PSO in the management of patients with kyphosis of lower CBVA.

BackgroundPedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) can be used to treat rigid sagittal plane deformities. Nonunions and rod breakages are known complications of PSO.ObjectiveTo assess outcomes of 2 methods of posterior instrumentation for PSO, traditional 2 rods vs a novel 4-rod technique in which 2 additional rods span only the osteotomy level.MethodsThis study was a retrospective, radiographic review of consecutive PSOs performed at 2 centers. The primary difference in technique between the centers was the use of 4 rods including 2 independent rods attached only to the vertebral levels immediately adjacent to the PSO (group 1, n = 29 patients) vs the traditional 2-rod technique (group 2, n = 20 patients).ResultsDemographics and preoperative to postoperative radiographic measurements were similar between the study groups, including the PSO wedge resection angle (P = .56). The rod breakage rate was 25% with 2 rods and 0% with 4 rods (P = .008), and the pseudarthrosis rate with 2 rods was 25% and with 4 rods was 3.4% (P = .035). The patient with pseudarthrosis from group 1 had an infection and developed pseudarthrosis only after instrumentation removal. Rates of other complications did not differ significantly between the study groups.ConclusionThis study provides a comparison between 2 techniques for rod placement across a PSO and suggests that the described novel 4-rod technique may help to reduce the rates of pseudarthrosis and rod failure. It will be important to confirm these findings in a prospectively designed study with multiple institutions in order to better control for potentially confounding factors.

Objective To describe spinal osteotomy in lateral position, which might be a new strategy for correcting thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity combined with severe hip flexion contracture, and to present two cases in which this method was successfully performed. Methods Spinal osteotomies in lateral position were performed in two patients with severe thoracolumbar kyphosis combined with hip flexion contracture, which was not suitable for operation in the prone position. Case 1: a 33‐year‐old female AS patient still had severe hip flexion contracture due to poor rehabilitation after total hip replacement (THR). The range of movement of the hip was only about 15° in right and 10° in left. Pre‐operativethoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), lumbar lordosis (LL), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were 52.4°, 49.1°, 42.7°, and 315 mm, respectively. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) at L3 was performed in the lateral position. The eggshell procedure was used during osteotomy. Case 2: a 45‐year‐old male AS patient presented coexisting rigid thoracolumbar kyphosis and hip flexion contracture. The range of movement of the hip was only about 20° in right and 25° in left. Pre‐operativeTK, TLK, LL and SVA were 34.9°, 66.8°, 58.8° and 290.8 mm, respectively. PSO at L2 was performed in lateral position. The eggshell procedure was also used. Results Sagittal malalignments of both patients were greatly improved. For case 1, the total operation time was 5.5 h. The blood loss was 1500 mL and the amount of allogeneic blood transfusion was 1580 mL during the operation. SVA was reduced to 127 mm and LL decreased from preoperative 42.7° to −28.4°. The correction angle through L3 was 34.7° and the correction angle through the osteotomy segment was 62.9°. For case 2, the duration of surgery was 6.5 h. The operative blood loss was 2000 mL and the total amount of blood transfusion was 2020 mL. SVA was reduced to 209.8 mm and LL decreased from preoperative 58.8° to 9.2°.The correction angle through L2 was 37.1° and the correction angle through the osteotomy segment was 55°. No intra‐operative or post‐operative complications were observed. Six months after PSO, case 1 had good posture for standing and sitting. The case 2 underwent bilateral THRs nine months after PSO. Conclusion PSO could be performed in the lateral position successfully. For AS patients who cannot be placed in the prone position due to coexisting severe thoracolumbar kyphosis and hip flexion contracture, performing spinal osteotomy in the lateral position as the first step is an alternative.

Objective To compare the radiological and functional outcomes and complications of adult spinal deformity patients who underwent a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) below L2 but categorized according to their construct where either 2-rod or multiple-rod construct is applied. Methods Sixty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria, and were categorized into 3 groups: 2 rods (2R), multiple rods around the PSO (MRP), multiple rods around the PSO and lumbosacral junction (MRL). Demographic data, operative parameters, spinopelvic parameters, functional outcomes, and complications were collected. Results Health-related quality of life scores showed a better outcome at 6 months and last follow-up visits in the MRP and MRL groups which were noted on different domains of Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire, 36-item Short Form Health Surve, and Oswestry Disability Index scores (p

Purpose: Multi-rod constructs are used commonly to stabilize pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO). This study aimed to evaluate biomechanical properties of different satellite rod configurations and effects of screw-type spanning a PSO. Methods: A validated 3D spinopelvic finite element model with a L3 PSO (30°) was used to evaluate 5 models: (1) Control (T10–pelvis + 2 rods); (2) lateral satellite rods connected via offsets to monoaxial screws (LatSat-Mono) or (3) polyaxial screws (LatSat-Poly); (4) in-line satellite rods connected to monoaxial screws (InSat-Mono) or (4) polyaxial screws (InSat-Poly). Global and PSO range of motions (ROM) were recorded. Rods' von Mises stresses and PSO forces were recorded and the percent differences from Control were calculated. Results: All satellite rods (save InSat-Mono) increased PSO ROM and decreased primary rods' von Mises stresses at the PSO. Lateral rods increased PSO forces (LatSat-Mono:347.1 N; LatSat-Poly:348.6 N; Control:336 N) and had relatively lower stresses, while in-line rods decreased PSO forces (InSat-Mono:280.1 N; InSat-Poly:330.7 N) and had relatively higher stresses. Relative to polyaxial screws, monoaxial screws further decreased PSO ROM, increased satellite rods' stresses, and decreased PSO forces for in-line rods, but did not change PSO forces for lateral rods. Conclusion: Multi-rod constructs using in-line and lateral satellite rods across a PSO reduced primary rods' stresses. Subtle differences in biomechanics suggest lateral satellite rods, irrespective of screw type, increase PSO forces and lower rod stresses compared to in-line satellite rods, which had a high degree of posterior instrumentation stress shielding and lower PSO forces. Clinical studies are warranted to determine if these findings influence clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Bosphorus Medical Journal / Boğaziçi Tıp Dergisi is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Adjacent level degeneration is a precursor to construct failure in adult spinal deformity surgery, but whether construct design affects adjacent level degeneration risk remains unclear. Here we present a biomechanical profile of common deformity correction constructs and assess adjacent level biomechanics. Standard nondestructive flexibility tests (7.5 Nm) were performed on 21 cadaveric specimens: 14 pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSOs) and 7 anterior column realignment (ACR) constructs. The ranges of motion (ROM) at the adjacent free level in flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending were measured and analyzed. ACR constructs had a lower ROM change on flexion at the proximal adjacent free level than constructs with PSO (1.02 vs. 1.32, normalized to the intact specimen, P < 0.01). Lateral lumbar interbody fusion adjacent to PSO and 4 rods limits ROM at the free level more effectively than transforaminal interbody fusion and 2 rods in correction constructs with PSO. Use of 2 screws to anchor the ACR interbody further decreased ROM at the proximal adjacent free level on flexion, but adding 4 rods in this setting added no further limitation to adjacent segment motion. ACR constructs have less ROM change at the adjacent level compared to PSO constructs. Among constructs with ACR, anchoring the ACR interbody with 2 screws reduces motion at the proximal adjacent free level. When PSOs are used, lateral lumbar interbody fusion adjacent to the PSO level has a greater reduction in adjacent-segment motion than transforaminal interbody fusion, suggesting that deformity construct configuration influences proximal adjacent-segment biomechanics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: According to the literature, there are no clinical reports documenting the use of the satellite rod technique in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcome of patients with ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis who adopted satellite rods versus those who did not. Methods: Patients with ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis who underwent one or two‐level pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) were reviewed, and total of 119 patients (112 males and seven females, average age 39.89 ± 6.61 years) were eligible and included in this present study. Anterior–posterior and lateral full‐length spine X‐ray films were performed preoperatively and at the two‐year follow‐up visit. Global kyphosis (GK), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and osteotomy angle (OA) were measured. The complications of every group of patients were collected. Pre‐ and postoperative health‐related quality of life instruments, including the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (Basfi) and Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument‐22 (SRS‐22), were recorded. The patients were divided into three groups based on features of their osteotomy including PSO levels and whether the satellite rod technique was applied. Patients who underwent one‐level PSO without the satellite rod technique were categorized in the one‐level group. Patients who underwent one‐level PSO with the satellite rod technique were classified in the satellite rod group. Patients who underwent two‐level PSO without the satellite rod technique were included in the two‐level group. The paired sample t test was used to compare pre‐ and postoperative parameters. One‐way ANOVA was performed for multiple group comparisons. Results: The average follow‐up time is 29.31 ± 3.66 months. The patients' GK were significantly improved from 46.84 ± 20.37 degree to 3.31 ± 15.09 degree. OS achieved through each osteotomy segment of one‐level group (39.78 ± 12.29 degree) and satellite rods group (42.23 ± 9.82 degree), was larger than that of two‐level group (34.73 ± 7.54 and 28.85 ± 7.26 degree). There was no significant difference between the one‐level group and the satellite rod group in achieving the OS. Thirteen patients experienced different complications (10.92%). Three patients experienced rod fracture in the one‐level group. There was no rod fracture or screw failure in the satellite rod group or the two‐level group. Conclusion: The satellite rod technique is also recommended for patients who undergo PSO osteotomy to correct ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis deformities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of rod fractures (RFs) after a single-level lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) using a side-tightening (ST) pedicle screw system. Fifty-seven consecutive patients who underwent a single-level lumbar PSO for the degenerative sagittal imbalance at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon using an ST pedicle screw system. Demographic, surgical, and radiographic data were analyzed to investigate the incidence and risk factors for RF. Seven (12.3%) patients showed RF after PSO. Four patients had bilateral RFs, and 3 patients had unilateral RFs. The location of the RF was at the PSO level in 6 of 7 patients. The ratio of adjacent interbody fusion was significantly different between the group with RF and the group without RF (16.7% vs. 74.0%, P = 0.004). The preoperative segmental angle at the PSO vertebra (−6.1° ± 5.5° vs. −1.7° ± 4.6°, P = 0.049) and postsurgical change in lumbar lordosis (48.4° ± 8.8° vs. 37.8° ± 11.9°, P = 0.033) were significantly different between the 2 groups. Risk factor analysis using stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that the absence of an adjacent interbody cage (odds ratio = 0.011, 95% confidence interval = 0.000–0.390, P = 0.013) was a significant risk factor. The incidence of RF after a single-level lumbar PSO using the ST pedicle screw system was 12.3% in our cohort. The absence of an adjacent interbody cage was a significant risk factor for RF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the radiological outcomes and complications of adult spinal deformity patients who underwent a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) below L2 but categorized according to their construct where either a domino connector was applied for osteotomy correction or not.Methods: Retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter adult spinal deformity database (5 sites). Inclusion criteria were adult patients who underwent PSO between L3 and L5 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Among 1243 patients in the database, 79 met the inclusion criteria, 41 in the no-domino (ND) group and 38 in the domino (D) group. The domino technique consisted of using 2 parallel rods connected by a domino on one side of the PSO in order to achieve gradual and controlled compression at the osteotomy site. Demographic data, operative parameters, spinopelvic parameters and complications were collected.Results: Demographic data and operative parameters were globally similar between both groups, and they showed a comparable preoperative sagittal malalignment. Segmental lordosis improved by 22° and 31° (p < 0.05) and L1S1 lordosis improved by 23° and 32° (p < 0.05) in the ND and D group, respectively. The use of multiple rods was similar between the groups (58% vs. 57%). Also, mechanical complications rate was globally similar between both groups with no statistically significant difference (22% vs. 28.9%).Conclusion: Domino connector is a safe, powerful and efficient tool for pedicle subtraction osteotomy site closure. It improved the lumbar lordosis correction angle with an acceptable rate of complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To validate the authors kyphosis correction formula for pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) cases. Additionally, to use the formula to evaluate the safety of PSO by determining if there is anterior lengthening.Methods: Twenty-two patients with primarily kyphosis corrected by PSO and with clear landmarks on preoperative and postoperative x-rays were selected. Several anatomical lines and angle measurements were utilized as depicted previously in the Vertebral Column Resection formula (see below). Two approximations were calculated: the geometric approximation (G) = (tanG°*2 + 1)*15° and the rough approximation (R) which is about the same amount of actual shortening (x), if parallel length (y) ≥ 40; twice of x, if y < 40. For each patient, the change of segmental kyphosis angle (K°) was measured and compared with G° and R°, and the correlation between each value was analyzed.Results: The absolute Mean ± SE for K - G and K - R was 2.33° ± 0.34 and 6.09° ± 0.58, respectively. K - G is < 3° (p = 0.03). K - R is < 8° (p = 0.001). In other words, K was close to G and R and thus can be predicted by these approximations. Average posterior shortening, anterior shortening, and kyphosis correction at each level were 20.8 ± 2.0 mm, - 3.64 ± 1.5 mm (which equates to anterior lengthening), and 31.05° ± 2.0, respectively. Anterior lengthening occurred in 13 cases (in 4 cases, both at the body as well as at the disc above and below.) The correlation between posterior and anterior shortening was 0.03 (p = 0.88). There were 3 cage insertion cases: 1 had anterior lengthening, while 2 had anterior shortening even with the cage.Conclusion: This study validated the geometric and rough approximations originally used in PVCR patients, for PSO patients. Additionally, this study found that anterior lengthening may occur in PSOs usually at the discs, but occasionally at the osteotomized body. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]