Search

Introduction: There is a substantial risk of developing stenosis and dysfunction in the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in patients on hemodialysis (HD). Far infrared radiation (FIR) is a non-invasive local intervention with a potentially beneficial effect on AVF patency. The underlying mechanism is not clear. It was hypothesized that a single FIR treatment reduces factors of inflammation and promotes endothelial vasodilators in the AVF. Methods: Forty HD patients with an AVF were included in an open-label intervention study. Patients were randomized to receive either FIR (FIR group) or no FIR (control group). Blood samples were drawn directly from the AVF and from a peripheral vein in the non-AVF arm before (T0) and 40 min after (T40) treatment during a HD session. The changes [median (interquartile range)] in circulating factors of inflammation, endothelial function and vasoreactivity during FIR were measured. Results: In the AVF a single FIR treatment during dialysis resulted in a significantly diminished decrease in soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule, sVCAM [-31.6 (-54.3; 22.1) vs -89.9 (-121.6; -29.3), P =. 005] and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule, sICAM [-24.2 (-43.5; 25.3) vs -49 (-79.9; -11.6), P =. 02] compared with the control group. Other factors, such as interleukins, nitrite, nitrate and tumor necrosis factor 1, also declined during dialysis, but with no significant differences related to FIR in either the AVF or the non-AVF arm. Conclusion: A single FIR treatment attenuated the decrease in sVCAM and sICAM in the AVF compared with a control group during HD. Findings do not support the hypothesis of a vaso-protective effect of FIR. The long-term effects of FIR on the AVF are unknown.

Introduction: Measurement of systolic ankle and to some extent toe pressure in patients suffering from combined type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) face several obstacles due to complex changes in the vascular bed. The aim of this review was to address the current literature on blood flow during exercise in patients with PAD and T2DM and assess the feasibility of these methods to diagnose and grade arterial insufficiency. Evidence Acquisition: A systematic review of the PubMed and EMBASE databases, supplemented by hand searching was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Clinical studies evaluating methods to investigate peripheral blood flow in patients with PAD and T2DM during exercise were included. Evidence Synthesis: In total nine eligible studies consisting of 1105 non-diabetic PAD patients, 336 diabetic PAD patients, 161 diabetic patients without PAD and 69 healthy controls were included in the review. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was described in three studies, transcutaneous oxygen pressure measurement (TcpO 2 ) in two and the following methods described in single studies: thermodilution, contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), scintigraphy and TcpO 2 in combination with ultrasound. These studies shows that patients with PAD and T2DM compared with patients with only PAD suffers different atherosclerotic lesions characterised by increased arterial stiffness and microcirculation abnormalities, not well differentiated by pressure measurement alone. Investigating patients with PAD and T2DM during exercise reveals that NIRS, TcpO 2, CEUS, and scintigraphy have distinct advantages over ankle and toe-pressure. Conclusions: Using methods like NIRS, TcpO 2 , CEUS and scintigraphy, peripheral blood flow during exercise can be measured at a detailed level and potentially improve future severity grading in patients with combined T2DM and PAD.