Search

The maintenance of physical distance, the absence of relatives and the relocation of registered nurses to COVID-19 units presumably affects nursing care at non-COVID-19 units. Using a qualitative design, this study explored registered nurses' experiences of how COVID-19 influenced nursing care in non-COVID-19 units at a Danish university hospital during the first wave of the virus. The study is reported using the COREQ checklist. The analysis offered two findings: (1) the challenge of an increased workload for registered nurses remaining in non-COVID-19 units and (2) the difficulty of navigating the contradictory needs for both closeness to and distance from patients. The study concluded that several factors challenged nursing care in non-COVID-19 units during the COVID-19 pandemic. These may have decreased the amount of contact between patients and registered nurses, which may have contributed to a task-oriented approach to nursing care, leading to missed nursing care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses how existential phenomenology may serve as a frame in a mixed‐methods study of changes in weight and body composition among women in adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. In accordance with ontologically and epistemologically fundamental assumptions in nursing, we link mixed‐methods and existential phenomenology from the perspective of the French philosopher Maurice Merleau‐Ponty and his notion of a unified body subject. Letting this perspective permeate our philosophy, methodology and issues at the method level in mixed‐method research undermines the distinction between first‐ and third‐person perspective when applying and integrating different data sources in a mixed‐methods study. Applying Merleau‐Ponty's third way, the women's bodily experiences appear as gestalt; a 'figure' against a ground of existential threats that are grasped through insight from data integrating in joint displays, which revealed the women's experiences on a deep existential level. Existential phenomenology as a frame in mixed‐method studies can speak not only to nurses but also to a multidisciplinary audience in a shared attempt to deepen the understanding of a patient's healthcare problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cancer treatment is often given on an outpatient basis. An oncological emergency telephone line has been established to improve access to cancer care and prevent life-threatening side effects. However, healthcare professionals need to make clinical decisions without being able to assess patients face-to-face, which may be problematic. This study explores how healthcare professionals experience clinical decision-making in oncological emergency telephone consultations. Methods: An exploratory qualitative approach applying three focus groups with healthcare professionals from a Danish university hospital were undertaken. Data were analysed using inductive content analysis. Results: An overall theme elucidated how healthcare professionals ended up deciding during each call whether the problem could be solved on the phone or the patient had to come for a face-to-face consultation or to wait and see whether the condition changed. Some decisions were easy to make, while others were moderate or diffi- cult. The decision was influenced by several factors that could be structured into three themes: reliance on one's own knowledge and experience, consideration of different perspectives and the influence of context. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that clinical decisionmaking in oncological emergency telephone consultations includes three types of decisions that are intertwined with intra-personal, inter-professional and contextual factors such as personal knowledge, collaboration and workload. These factors are essential for the timely referral of patients to the right level of service. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Telephone consultations are common in supporting patients and caregivers in managing symptoms from cancer diseases and side effects from cancer treatment. In connection with telephone consultations, it may be a challenge that healthcare professionals have to rely on their auditory sense alone when they assess whether the problem can be solved over the telephone, or whether patients need an examination face to face. Objective: To explore how healthcare professionals identify patients' essential concerns and assess serious conditions in calls to an oncological emergency telephone without face‐to‐face contact. Methods: From a phenomenological‐hermeneutical frame of reference, the analysis of three focus groups with a total of 16 healthcare professionals was guided by content analysis. Ethics: The study follows the ethical guidelines for research. Results: Two themes emerged. To identify patients in serious conditions, healthcare professionals kept focus on: (1) 'Reaching a mutual understanding without the clinical eye'. Before making a decision regarding a face‐to‐face examination, the healthcare providers were as follows: (2) 'Listening to an inner voice – attention on clues and signs'. Limitations: The transferability of the findings is limited to healthcare professionals who perform telephone‐mediated care in a team of nurses and physicians. Conclusion: Staying open for diverse perspectives and integrating nonanalytical as well as analytical illness scripts, healthcare professionals were able to identify patients that needed further examination face to face. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]