12 results on '"Pavlin, Natasha L."'
Search Results
2. Innovative Resources Could Help Improve Partner Notification for Chlamydia in Primary Care
- Author
-
Bilardi, Jade E., Hopkins, Carol A., Fairley, Christopher K., Hocking, Jane S., Tomnay, Jane E., Pavlin, Natasha L., Parker, Rhian M., Temple-Smith, Meredith J., Bowden, Francis J., Russell, Darren B., Pitts, Marian, and Chen, Marcus Y.
- Published
- 2009
3. Better than nothing? Patient-delivered partner therapy and partner notification for chlamydia: the views of Australian general practitioners
- Author
-
Bowden Francis J, Tomnay Jane E, Fairley Christopher K, Temple-Smith Meredith J, Hopkins Carol A, Piggin Anna K, Parker Rhian M, Pavlin Natasha L, Russell Darren B, Hocking Jane S, Pitts Marian K, and Chen Marcus Y
- Subjects
Infectious and parasitic diseases ,RC109-216 - Abstract
Abstract Background Genital chlamydia is the most commonly notified sexually transmissible infection (STI) in Australia and worldwide and can have serious reproductive health outcomes. Partner notification, testing and treatment are important facets of chlamydia control. Traditional methods of partner notification are not reaching enough partners to effectively control transmission of chlamydia. Patient-delivered partner therapy (PDPT) has been shown to improve the treatment of sexual partners. In Australia, General Practitioners (GPs) are responsible for the bulk of chlamydia testing, diagnosis, treatment and follow up. This study aimed to determine the views and practices of Australian general practitioners (GPs) in relation to partner notification and PDPT for chlamydia and explored GPs' perceptions of their patients' barriers to notifying partners of a chlamydia diagnosis. Methods In-depth, semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 40 general practitioners (GPs) from rural, regional and urban Australia from November 2006 to March 2007. Topics covered: GPs' current practice and views about partner notification, perceived barriers and useful supports, previous use of and views regarding PDPT. Transcripts were imported into NVivo7 and subjected to thematic analysis. Data saturation was reached after 32 interviews had been completed. Results Perceived barriers to patients telling partners (patient referral) included: stigma; age and cultural background; casual or long-term relationship, ongoing relationship or not. Barriers to GPs undertaking partner notification (provider referral) included: lack of time and staff; lack of contact details; uncertainty about the legality of contacting partners and whether this constitutes breach of patient confidentiality; and feeling both personally uncomfortable and inadequately trained to contact someone who is not their patient. GPs were divided on the use of PDPT - many felt concerned that it is not best clinical practice but many also felt that it is better than nothing. GPs identified the following factors which they considered would facilitate partner notification: clear clinical guidelines; a legal framework around partner notification; a formal chlamydia screening program; financial incentives; education and practical support for health professionals, and raising awareness of chlamydia in the community, in particular amongst young people. Conclusions GPs reported some partners do not seek medical treatment even after they are notified of being a sexual contact of a patient with chlamydia. More routine use of PDPT may help address this issue however GPs in this study had negative attitudes to the use of PDPT. Appropriate guidelines and legislation may make the use of PDPT more acceptable to Australian GPs.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Telling partners about chlamydia: how acceptable are the new technologies?
- Author
-
Parker Rhian M, Tomnay Jane E, Pavlin Natasha L, Fairley Christopher K, Temple-Smith Meredith J, Hopkins Carol A, Bowden Frank J, Russell Darren B, Hocking Jane S, and Chen Marcus Y
- Subjects
Infectious and parasitic diseases ,RC109-216 - Abstract
Abstract Background Partner notification is accepted as a vital component in the control of chlamydia. However, in reality, many sexual partners of individuals diagnosed with chlamydia are never informed of their risk. The newer technologies of email and SMS have been used as a means of improving partner notification rates. This study explored the use and acceptability of different partner notification methods to help inform the development of strategies and resources to increase the number of partners notified. Methods Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 40 people who were recently diagnosed with chlamydia from three sexual health centres and two general practices across three Australian jurisdictions. Results Most participants chose to contact their partners either in person (56%) or by phone (44%). Only 17% chose email or SMS. Participants viewed face-to-face as the "gold standard" in partner notification because it demonstrated caring, respect and courage. Telephone contact, while considered insensitive by some, was often valued because it was quick, convenient and less confronting. Email was often seen as less personal while SMS was generally considered the least acceptable method for telling partners. There was also concern that emails and SMS could be misunderstood, not taken seriously or shown to others. Despite these, email and SMS were seen to be appropriate and useful in some circumstances. Letters, both from the patients or from their doctor, were viewed more favourably but were seldom used. Conclusion These findings suggest that many people diagnosed with chlamydia are reluctant to use the new technologies for partner notification, except in specific circumstances, and our efforts in developing partner notification resources may best be focused on giving patients the skills and confidence for personal interaction.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Take the sex out of STI screening! Views of young women on implementing chlamydia screening in General Practice
- Author
-
Gunn Jane M, Fairley Christopher K, Parker Rhian, Pavlin Natasha L, and Hocking Jane
- Subjects
Infectious and parasitic diseases ,RC109-216 - Abstract
Abstract Background Australia is developing a chlamydia screening program. This study aimed to determine the attitudes of young women to the introduction of chlamydia screening in Australian General Practice. Methods In-depth face-to-face interviews with 24 young women from across Victoria, Australia, attending a randomly selected sample of general practices. Results Young women reported that they would accept age-based screening for chlamydia in general practice, during both sexual-health and non-sexual-health related consultations. Trust in their general practitioner (GP) was reported to be a major factor in the acceptability of chlamydia screening. The women felt chlamydia screening should be offered to all young women rather than targeted at "high risk" women based on sexual history and they particularly emphasised the importance of normalising chlamydia screening. The women reported that they did not want to be asked to provide a sexual history as part of being asked to have a chlamydia test. Some reported that they would lie if asked how many partners they had had Conclusion Women do not want a sexual history taken when being asked to have a chlamydia test while attending a general practitioner. They prefer the offer of chlamydia screening to be based on age rather than assessment of sexual risk. Chlamydia screening needs to be normalised and destigmatised.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature
- Author
-
Fairley Christopher K, Parker Rhian, Gunn Jane M, Pavlin Natasha L, and Hocking Jane
- Subjects
Public aspects of medicine ,RA1-1270 - Abstract
Abstract Background Chlamydia trachomatis is a common sexually transmitted infection that can have serious consequences. It is universally agreed that screening for chlamydia infection should be offered to sexually active young women. We undertook a literature review to document the views, attitudes and opinions of women about being screened, tested and diagnosed with Chlamydia trachomatis. Methods Online databases (MEDLINE, Meditext, PsycINFO, Web of Science) and reference lists searched up to August 2005. Search terms: chlamydia, attitude, attitude to health, interview, qualitative, women. Eligibility criteria: about chlamydia, included women, involved interviews/surveys/focus groups, looked at women's views/opinions/attitudes, published in English. Thematic analysis identified the main and recurrent themes emerging from the literature. We compared our thematic analysis with the Theory of Planned Behaviour to provide a model that could assist in planning chlamydia screening programs. Results From 561 identified articles, 25 fulfilled inclusion criteria and were reviewed. 22: USA, UK; 3: Holland, Sweden, Australia. Major themes identified: need for knowledge and information, choice and support; concerns about confidentiality, cost, fear, anxiety and stigma. Women are more likely to find chlamydia screening/testing acceptable if they think chlamydia is a serious, common condition which can cause infertility and if they understand that chlamydia infection can be asymptomatic. Women want a range of options for chlamydia testing including urine tests, self-administered swabs, pelvic exams and clinician-collected swabs, home-testing and community-based testing. Tests should be free, easy and quick. Women want support for dealing with the implications of a chlamydia diagnosis, they feel chlamydia diagnoses need to be normalised and destigmatised and they want assistance with partner notification. Women need to know that their confidentiality will be maintained. Conclusion Our review found that women from various countries and ethnic backgrounds share similar views regarding chlamydia screening, testing and diagnosis. The acknowledged importance of women's views in planning an effective chlamydia screening program is expanded in this review which details the nature and complexity of such views and considers their likely impact.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Telling partners about chlamydia: how acceptable are the new technologies?
- Author
-
Hopkins, Carol A, Temple-Smith, Meredith J, Fairley, Christopher K, Pavlin, Natasha L, Tomnay, Jane E, Parker, Rhian M, Bowden, Francis, Russell, Darren B, Hocking, Jane S, Chen, Marcus Y, Hopkins, Carol A, Temple-Smith, Meredith J, Fairley, Christopher K, Pavlin, Natasha L, Tomnay, Jane E, Parker, Rhian M, Bowden, Francis, Russell, Darren B, Hocking, Jane S, and Chen, Marcus Y
- Abstract
BACKGROUND Partner notification is accepted as a vital component in the control of chlamydia. However, in reality, many sexual partners of individuals diagnosed with chlamydia are never informed of their risk. The newer technologies of email and SMS have been used as a means of improving partner notification rates. This study explored the use and acceptability of different partner notification methods to help inform the development of strategies and resources to increase the number of partners notified. METHODS Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 40 people who were recently diagnosed with chlamydia from three sexual health centres and two general practices across three Australian jurisdictions. RESULTS Most participants chose to contact their partners either in person (56%) or by phone (44%). Only 17% chose email or SMS. Participants viewed face-to-face as the "gold standard" in partner notification because it demonstrated caring, respect and courage. Telephone contact, while considered insensitive by some, was often valued because it was quick, convenient and less confronting. Email was often seen as less personal while SMS was generally considered the least acceptable method for telling partners. There was also concern that emails and SMS could be misunderstood, not taken seriously or shown to others. Despite these, email and SMS were seen to be appropriate and useful in some circumstances. Letters, both from the patients or from their doctor, were viewed more favourably but were seldom used. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that many people diagnosed with chlamydia are reluctant to use the new technologies for partner notification, except in specific circumstances, and our efforts in developing partner notification resources may best be focused on giving patients the skills and confidence for personal interaction.
- Published
- 2010
8. Better than nothing? Patient-delivered partner therapy and partner notification for chlamydia: the views of Australian general practitioners
- Author
-
Pavlin, Natasha L, Parker, Rhian M, Piggin, Anna K, Hopkins, Carol A, Temple-Smith, Meredith J, Fairley, Christopher K, Tomnay, Jane E, Bowden, Francis, Russell, Darren B, Hocking, Jane S, Pitts, Marian K, Chen, Marcus Y, Pavlin, Natasha L, Parker, Rhian M, Piggin, Anna K, Hopkins, Carol A, Temple-Smith, Meredith J, Fairley, Christopher K, Tomnay, Jane E, Bowden, Francis, Russell, Darren B, Hocking, Jane S, Pitts, Marian K, and Chen, Marcus Y
- Abstract
BACKGROUND Genital chlamydia is the most commonly notified sexually transmissible infection (STI) in Australia and worldwide and can have serious reproductive health outcomes. Partner notification, testing and treatment are important facets of chlamydia control. Traditional methods of partner notification are not reaching enough partners to effectively control transmission of chlamydia. Patient-delivered partner therapy (PDPT) has been shown to improve the treatment of sexual partners. In Australia, General Practitioners (GPs) are responsible for the bulk of chlamydia testing, diagnosis, treatment and follow up. This study aimed to determine the views and practices of Australian general practitioners (GPs) in relation to partner notification and PDPT for chlamydia and explored GPs' perceptions of their patients' barriers to notifying partners of a chlamydia diagnosis. METHODS In-depth, semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 40 general practitioners (GPs) from rural, regional and urban Australia from November 2006 to March 2007. Topics covered: GPs' current practice and views about partner notification, perceived barriers and useful supports, previous use of and views regarding PDPT.Transcripts were imported into NVivo7 and subjected to thematic analysis. Data saturation was reached after 32 interviews had been completed. RESULTS Perceived barriers to patients telling partners (patient referral) included: stigma; age and cultural background; casual or long-term relationship, ongoing relationship or not. Barriers to GPs undertaking partner notification (provider referral) included: lack of time and staff; lack of contact details; uncertainty about the legality of contacting partners and whether this constitutes breach of patient confidentiality; and feeling both personally uncomfortable and inadequately trained to contact someone who is not their patient. GPs were divided on the use of PDPT--many felt concerned that it is not best clinical practice b
- Published
- 2010
9. Better than nothing? Patient-delivered partner therapy and partner notification for chlamydia: the views of Australian general practitioners
- Author
-
Pavlin, Natasha L, primary, Parker, Rhian M, additional, Piggin, Anna K, additional, Hopkins, Carol A, additional, Temple-Smith, Meredith J, additional, Fairley, Christopher K, additional, Tomnay, Jane E, additional, Bowden, Francis J, additional, Russell, Darren B, additional, Hocking, Jane S, additional, Pitts, Marian K, additional, and Chen, Marcus Y, additional
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Telling partners about chlamydia: how acceptable are the new technologies?
- Author
-
Hopkins, Carol A, primary, Temple-Smith, Meredith J, additional, Fairley, Christopher K, additional, Pavlin, Natasha L, additional, Tomnay, Jane E, additional, Parker, Rhian M, additional, Bowden, Frank J, additional, Russell, Darren B, additional, Hocking, Jane S, additional, and Chen, Marcus Y, additional
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Take the sex out of STI screening! Views of young women on implementing chlamydia screening in General Practice
- Author
-
Pavlin, Natasha L, primary, Parker, Rhian, additional, Fairley, Christopher K, additional, Gunn, Jane M, additional, and Hocking, Jane, additional
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature
- Author
-
Pavlin, Natasha L, primary, Gunn, Jane M, additional, Parker, Rhian, additional, Fairley, Christopher K, additional, and Hocking, Jane, additional
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.