Search

Background: There is limited research on the relationship between side of insertion of central venous catheter (CVAD) and bloodstream infection risk in patients with cancer.Aim: To conduct an exploratory analysis of data from a randomized control trial (RCT) and data from a prospective cohort study to compare infection rates for right- and left-sided insertions.Methods: The study populations were patients aged >14 years with cancer from two tertiary hospitals in Brisbane, Australia. The primary endpoint was catheter-associated bloodstream infection (CABSI) adjudicated by blinded assessors. For the RCT, randomized intention-to-treat comparisons were conducted between left- and right-side allocated insertion for early (≤14 days) and late (>14 days) infection using Cox proportional hazards regression. The RCT data were also combined with cohort study data collected from one of the hospitals prior to the RCT and non-randomized comparisons conducted between left- and right-sided insertions.Findings: In 634 randomly allocated CVADs there were 141 CABSIs. Analysis showed strong evidence of right-side allocated insertions having an increased risk of early infection by 2.5 times (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-4.7); however, there was no evidence of increased risk for late infection (hazard ratio: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.71-1.59). Results from analysis of the RCT and cohort study data combined (2786 CVADs and 385 CABSIs) were similar.Conclusion: There appears to be an increased risk of CABSI in patients with cancer for CVAD inserted into the right-side for around two weeks after line insertion. The mechanism underpinning the increased risk is unknown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is a complication of central venous access devices (CVADs). Evidence is variable regarding the significance of the side of catheter insertion. The role of the patient's hand dominance in predisposition to CRT remains uncertain., Objectives: In a prospective randomised controlled trial, adult cancer patients were randomly allocated to either dominant or non-dominant side CVAD insertion. The primary endpoint of this trial examined the incidence of catheter-associated blood stream infection. Here, we report the secondary endpoint of the incidence of CRT., Methods: 640 CVADs were randomised to the dominant (n=322) or non-dominant (n=318) side of insertion. Only symptomatic patients underwent ultrasound imaging to evaluate for CRT., Results: The median patient age was 58, 60% of patients had haematological malignancies and 40% had solid tumours. CVADs used were peripherally-inserted central catheter line (PICC)(67%), tunnelled CVAD (23%) or non-tunnelled CVAD (10%). The CRT incidence rate was 0.65 vs 0.82 per 1000 line days in the dominant vs non-dominant group (HR 1.2; 95% CI 0.58-2.48, P=0.63). There was no significant difference in CRT incidence rate between left and right sided insertions (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.30-1.32, P=0.22). The CRT incidence rate was lower in right-handed versus left-handed line inserters (HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.12-0.71, P=0.007)., Conclusions: The rate of CRT was not associated with whether CVAD insertion was on the patient's dominant or non-dominant side or the side of insertion. The role of inserter hand dominance requires further investigation., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm (HAP) is a rare vascular complication following liver transplantation (LTx) with treatment choice frequently driven by institutional experience. Approximately, 10% of hepatic grafts are lost from this complication, requiring re-transplantation and placing further demand on the already present organ shortage. Secondly, patients with HAP can present with catastrophic bleeding, with reported mortality of up to 78%. We aim to identify risk factors associated with HAP and assess the survival benefit of different treatment modalities used (endovascular and open surgical techniques). Early detection may facilitate semi-elective management of this condition. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Medline and Embase up to 1 October 2023. Case series with ≥5 patients focusing on adult patients who developed extrahepatic pseudoaneurysm following LTx were included. A total of 11 studies were pooled, comprising of 118 patients with survival data available in 61 patients. The most common presentation was haemorrhagic shock or luminal haemorrhage (75.5%). Bile leak was documented in 66.7% (28/42), 15.2% (18/118) associated foregut pathologies and 28.6% (14/49) of microbiology cultures grew a fungal organism. Flow preserving strategies (stenting, revascularization) trended towards better survival at 120 months compared to non-flow preserving strategies (embolization, HAL); however, this was not statistically significant following log rank (Mantel-Cox) analysis (P 0.169). Any patient following LTx presenting with haemorrhagic shock or luminal bleeding needs HAP excluded urgently. HAP management is complex, requiring careful consideration of patient specific presentation, anatomic factors and associated pathologies., (© 2024 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.)

Background: The 2018 anatomic physiologic (AP) classification American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) Guidelines for Adults with Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD) encompasses both native and post-operative anatomy and physiology to guide care management. As some physiologic conditions and post-operative states lack specific International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9- Clinical Modification (CM) and 10-CM codes, an ICD code-based classification approximating the ACHD AP classification is needed for population-based studies., Methods: A total of 232 individuals, aged ≥ 18 years at the time of a health encounter between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019 and identified with at least one of 87 ICD codes for a congenital heart defect were validated through medical chart review. Individuals were assigned one of 4 mutually exclusive modified AP classification categories: (1) severe AB, (2) severe CD, (3) non-severe AB, or (4) non-severe CD, based on native anatomy "severe" or "non-severe" and physiology AB ("none" or "mild") or CD ("moderate" or "severe") by two methods: (1) medical record review, and (2) ICD and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code-based classification. The composite outcome was defined as a combination of a death, emergency department (ED) visits, or any hospitalizations that occurred at least 6 months after the index date and was assessed by each modified AP classification method., Results: Of 232 cases (52.2% male, 71.1% White), 28.4% experienced a composite outcome a median of 1.6 years after the index encounter. No difference in prediction of the composite outcome was seen based on modified AP classification between chart review and ICD code-based methodology., Conclusion: Modified AP classification by chart review and ICD codes are comparable in predicting the composite outcome at least 6 months after classification. Modified AP classification using ICD code-based classification of CHD native anatomy and physiology is an important tool for population-based ACHD surveillance using administrative data., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest No authors have a financial conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The T 1 Mapping and Extracellular volume (ECV) Standardization (T1MES) program explored T 1 mapping quality assurance using a purpose-developed phantom with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Conformité Européenne (CE) regulatory clearance. We report T 1 measurement repeatability across centers describing sequence, magnet, and vendor performance., Methods: Phantoms batch-manufactured in August 2015 underwent 2 years of structural imaging, B 0 and B 1 , and "reference" slow T 1 testing. Temperature dependency was evaluated by the United States National Institute of Standards and Technology and by the German Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt. Center-specific T 1 mapping repeatability (maximum one scan per week to minimum one per quarter year) was assessed over mean 358 (maximum 1161) days on 34 1.5 T and 22 3 T magnets using multiple T 1 mapping sequences. Image and temperature data were analyzed semi-automatically. Repeatability of serial T 1 was evaluated in terms of coefficient of variation (CoV), and linear mixed models were constructed to study the interplay of some of the known sources of T 1 variation., Results: Over 2 years, phantom gel integrity remained intact (no rips/tears), B 0 and B 1 homogenous, and "reference" T 1 stable compared to baseline (% change at 1.5 T, 1.95 ± 1.39%; 3 T, 2.22 ± 1.44%). Per degrees Celsius, 1.5 T, T 1 (MOLLI 5s(3s)3s) increased by 11.4 ms in long native blood tubes and decreased by 1.2 ms in short post-contrast myocardium tubes. Agreement of estimated T 1 times with "reference" T 1 was similar across Siemens and Philips CMR systems at both field strengths (adjusted R 2 ranges for both field strengths, 0.99-1.00). Over 1 year, many 1.5 T and 3 T sequences/magnets were repeatable with mean CoVs < 1 and 2% respectively. Repeatability was narrower for 1.5 T over 3 T. Within T1MES repeatability for native T 1 was narrow for several sequences, for example, at 1.5 T, Siemens MOLLI 5s(3s)3s prototype number 448B (mean CoV = 0.27%) and Philips modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) 3s(3s)5s (CoV 0.54%), and at 3 T, Philips MOLLI 3b(3s)5b (CoV 0.33%) and Siemens shortened MOLLI (ShMOLLI) prototype 780C (CoV 0.69%). After adjusting for temperature and field strength, it was found that the T 1 mapping sequence and scanner software version (both P < 0.001 at 1.5 T and 3 T), and to a lesser extent the scanner model (P = 0.011, 1.5 T only), had the greatest influence on T 1 across multiple centers., Conclusion: The T1MES CE/FDA approved phantom is a robust quality assurance device. In a multi-center setting, T 1 mapping had performance differences between field strengths, sequences, scanner software versions, and manufacturers. However, several specific combinations of field strength, sequence, and scanner are highly repeatable, and thus, have potential to provide standardized assessment of T 1 times for clinical use, although temperature correction is required for native T 1 tubes at least.