Search

Buerger's disease (BD) remains a debilitating condition. Despite multiple published diagnostic criteria for BD, none is universally accepted as a gold standard.We conducted a 2-round modified Delphi consensus study to establish a consensus on the diagnostic. The questionnaire included statements from several commonly used diagnostic criteria for BD. Qualitative and quantitative analysis methods were performed. An agreement level of 70% was applied.Twenty nine experts from 18 countries participated in this study. Overall, 75 statements were circulated in Round 1. Of these, 28% of statements were accepted. Following comments, 21 statements were recirculated in Round 2 and 90% were accepted. Although more than 90% of the experts did not agree that the diagnosis of BD can be based only on clinical manifestation, none of the nonclinical manifestations of BD were agreed as a part of the diagnostic criteria. There was an agreement that a history of tobacco consumption in any form, not necessarily confined to the current use, should be a part of the diagnostic criteria of BD. The history of thrombophlebitis migrans, even if not present at presentation, was accepted as a clue for BD diagnosis. It was also agreed that discoloration of the toes or fingers could be included in the diagnostic criteria of BD. Experts agreed that histology results could differentiate BD from atherosclerosis obliterans and other types of vasculitis. The presence of corkscrew collaterals on imaging and burning pain reached the agreement at the first round but not at the second. There was no consensus regarding age cut-off, the requirement of normal lipid profile, and normal blood glucose for BD diagnosis.The present study demonstrated discrepancies in the various published diagnostic criteria for BD and their selective utilization in routine clinical practice worldwide. We propose that all published diagnostic criteria for BD be re-evaluated for harmonization and universal use.

© 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved., Jolobe supports that screening for asymptomatic carotid stenosis (AsxCS) should be extended to patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Indeed, a 2021 meta-analysis (n = 20 studies; 49,070 patients) demonstrated that the pooled prevalence of >50% AsxCS inpatients with NVAF was 12.4% (range: 4.4–24.3%). Although this issue was not discussed in our manuscript, the optimal management of patients presenting with a recent transient ischemic attack [TIA]/ischemic stroke with an ipsilateral 50–99% carotid stenosis and concomitant NVAF was addressed by the 2023 European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) carotid guidelines. It was recognized that although no guidelines have provided recommendations regarding the management of these patients, a pragmatic approach is warranted.

Summary: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at very high risk of cardiovascular events, but risk factor management is usually suboptimal. This Joint Task Force from the European Atherosclerosis Society and the European Society of Vascular Medicine has updated evidence on the management on dyslipidaemia and thrombotic factors in patients with PAD. Guidelines recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) goal of more than 50% reduction from baseline and

The functional capacity of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) represents an important indicator of patient health and quality of life. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the validity of a walking impairment questionnaire (WIQ) compared with walking tests for the estimation of the therapeutic effect of lower limb revascularization. The study included 36 patients with PAD in whom successful percutaneous revascularization of a lower limb was performed due to disabling intermittent claudication. Before the revascularization procedure and 4–6 weeks after successful revascularization, clinical examination, ankle brachial index (ABI) measurement, 6-min walk test, treadmill test, and WIQ were performed. After revascularization, significant improvement in walking capacity was shown by both 6-min walk test and treadmill exercise test as well as with WIQ. However, the increase in ABI was borderline. Significant correlations between improvement of 6-min walk test and treadmill exercise test results and the sum of WIQ points were found. The ABI was significantly correlated with treadmill maximal walking distance only. According to our results, the WIQ correlates well with walking tests and is a reliable indicator of effective revascularization of lower limb arterial occlusions, even in patients with a nonsignificant improvement of the ABI.

Background: The optimal antithrombotic (antiplatelet or anticoagulant) treatment of patients undergoing extracranial carotid artery interventions is a subject of debate. The aim of this multidisciplinary document was to critically review the recommendations of current guidelines, taking into consideration the results of recently published studies. Methods: The various antithrombotic strategies reported were evaluated for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients undergoing extracranial carotid artery interventions (endarterectomy, transfemoral carotid artery stenting [CAS] or transcarotid artery revascularization [TCAR]). Based on a critical review, a series of recommendations were formulated by an international expert panel. Results: For asymptomatic patients, we recommend low-dose aspirin (75–100 mg/day) or clopidogrel (75 mg/day) with the primary goal to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular event rates rather than to reduce the risk of stroke. For symptomatic patients, we recommend dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) initiated within 24 h of the index event to reduce the risk of recurrent events. We suggest that following transfemoral CAS or TCAR, patients continue DAPT for 1 month after which a single antiplatelet agent is used. High level of evidence to support anticoagulant treatment for patients with carotid artery disease is lacking. Conclusions: The antithrombotic treatment offered to carotid patients should be individualized, taking into account the presence of symptoms, the type of intervention and the goal of the treatment. The duration and type of DAPT (ticagrelor instead of clopidogrel) should be evaluated in future trials.

This position paper, written by members of International Union of Angiology (IUA) Youth Committee and senior experts, shows an overview of therapeutical approaches for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and absence of 'standard' solutions for revascularization. The aim was to demonstrate the accurate management of the 'no-option' CLTI patient including the wound treatment and the rehabilitation, considering always the goal of the increase of quality of life of the patients.

© 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved., ackground: Current guidelines do not recommend screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (AsxCS). The rationale behind this recommendation is that detection of AsxCS may lead to an unnecessary carotid intervention. In contrast, screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms is strongly recommended. Methods: A critical analysis of the literature was performed to evaluate the implications of detecting AsxCS. Results: Patients with AsxCS are at high risk for future stroke, myocardial infarction and vascular death. Population-wide screening for AsxCS should not be recommended. Additionally, screening of high-risk individuals for AsxCS with the purpose of identifying candidates for a carotid intervention is inappropriate. Instead, selective screening for AsxCS should be considered and should be viewed as an opportunity to identify individuals at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and future cardiovascular events for the timely initiation of intensive medical therapy and risk factor modification. Conclusions: Although mass screening should not be recommended, there are several arguments suggesting that selective screening for AsxCS should be considered. The rationale supporting such selective screening is to optimize risk factor control and to initiate intensive medical therapy for prevention of future cardiovascular events, rather than to identify candidates for an intervention.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been shown to be strongly associated with increased risk for venous thromboembolism events (VTE) mainly in the inpatient but also in the outpatient setting. Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis has been shown to offer significant benefits in terms of reducing not only VTE events but also mortality, especially in acutely ill patients with COVID-19. Although the main source of evidence is derived from observational studies with several limitations, thromboprophylaxis is currently recommended for all hospitalized patients with acceptable bleeding risk by all national and international guidelines. Recently, high quality data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) further support the role of thromboprophylaxis and provide insights into the optimal thromboprophylaxis strategy. The aim of this statement is to systematically review all the available evidence derived from RCTs regarding thromboprophylaxis strategies in patients with COVID-19 in different settings (either inpatient or outpatient) and provide evidence-based guidance to practical questions in everyday clinical practice. Clinical questions accompanied by practical recommendations are provided based on data derived from 20 RCTs that were identified and included in the present study. Overall, the main conclusions are: (i) thromboprophylaxis should be administered in all hospitalized patients with COVID-19, (ii) an optimal dose of inpatient thromboprophylaxis is dependent upon the severity of COVID-19, (iii) thromboprophylaxis should be administered on an individualized basis in post-discharge patients with COVID-19 with high thrombotic risk, and (iv) thromboprophylaxis should not be routinely administered in outpatients. Changes regarding the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variants, the wide immunization status (increasing rates of vaccination and reinfections), and the availability of antiviral therapies and monoclonal antibodies might affect the characteristics of patients with COVID-19; thus, future studies will inform us about the thrombotic risk and the optimal therapeutic strategies for these patients.

The inflammatory process is strongly involved in the pathophysiology of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and has a significant role in disease prediction. Inflammation most probably represents a common denominator through which classical and nonclassical risk factors stimulate thrombotic process. Inflammation of the venous wall promotes the release of tissue factor, inhibits the release of anticoagulant factors, and hampers endogenous fibrinolysis. Systemic inflammatory response also inhibits restoration of blood flow in the occluded vessel. Recent studies indicate that increased inflammatory response (“cytokine storm”) is related to prothrombotic state and thromboembolic events in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The growing evidence of involvement of inflammation in the pathogenesis of VTE indicates the importance of anti-inflammatory treatment and prevention of VTE. While aspirin was shown to be effective in prevention of recurrent venous thrombosis after treatment with anticoagulant drugs, some other anti-inflammatory drugs like nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents may have prothrombotic effect, thus potentially increasing the risk of VTE. Recently, new specific anti-inflammatory drug inhibitors of inflammatory markers that have been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of VTE are being searched. As thrombogenesis is based on activation of coagulation provoked by inflammation, then prevention and treatment of VTE should include both anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory agents. Combined treatment is related to increased risk of bleeding complications, therefore subtherapeutic doses of both drugs should be used to improve the efficacy of management of VTE without increasing the risk of bleeding.

Background The presence of a left ventricular thrombus (LVT) poses a risk of thromboembolic complications and excludes patients from undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation without the aid of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography are used to detect LVT in patients with heart disease; however, the detection validity of these imaging studies has not been definitively elucidated. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients with end-stage heart failure who underwent LVAD implantation from May 2012 to August 2018 in a single center was completed. To be included, patients’ medical records had to have presurgical TTE and transesophageal echocardiographic images, as well as intraoperative digital and visual exploration observations. A total of 301 patients underwent LVAD implantation; 239 of these patients had an LVAD implanted with the use of CPB. A total of 230 patients had complete data sets and were included in the analysis. Results Preoperative TTE identified LVT in 23 of the 230 patients (10%); 15 patients (6.5%) had LVT confirmed by surgical intraventricular visualization. Of the patients with visual LVT confirmation, preoperative TTE identified an LVT in all but 1 case (93%; 14 of 15). Preoperative TTE of LVT had a high sensitivity (94%) and specificity (96%), as well as high negative predictive value (99%). Conclusions The results of this study show that preoperative TTE is highly accurate for LVT detection. The high negative predictive value could have significant implications for the choice of surgical procedure because with TTE, surgeons can reasonably determine whether LVAD placement procedure can be attempted without CPB support.

International guidelines strongly recommend statins alone or in combination with other lipid-lowering agents to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels for patients with asymptomatic/symptomatic carotid stenosis (AsxCS/SCS). Lowering LDL-C levels is associated with significant reductions in transient ischemic attack, stroke, cardiovascular (CV) event and death rates. The aim of this multi-disciplinary overview is to summarize the benefits and risks associated with lowering LDL-C with statins or non-statin medications for Asx/SCS patients. The cerebrovascular and CV beneficial effects associated with statins, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and other non-statin lipid-lowering agents (e.g. fibrates, ezetimibe) are reviewed. The use of statins and PCSK9 inhibitors is associated with several beneficial effects for Asx/SCS patients, including carotid plaque stabilization and reduction of stroke rates. Ezetimibe and fibrates are associated with smaller reductions in stroke rates. The side-effects resulting from statin and PCSK9 inhibitor use are also highlighted. The benefits associated with lowering LDL-C with statins or non-statin lipid lowering agents (e.g. PCSK9 inhibitors) outweigh the risks and potential side-effects. Irrespective of their LDL-C levels, all Asx/SCS patients should receive high-dose statin treatment±ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors for reduction not only of LDL-C levels, but also of stroke, cardiovascular mortality and coronary event rates.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality and disability in developed countries. According to WHO, an estimated 17.9 million people died from CVDs in 2019, representing 32% of all global deaths. Of these deaths, 85% were due to major adverse cardiac and cerebral events. Early detection and care for individuals at high risk could save lives, alleviate suffering, and diminish economic burden associated with these diseases. Carotid artery disease is not only a well-established risk factor for ischemic stroke, contributing to 10%-20% of strokes or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), but it is also a surrogate marker of generalized atherosclerosis and a predictor of cardiovascular events. In addition to diligent history, physical examination, and laboratory detection of metabolic abnormalities leading to vascular changes, imaging of carotid arteries adds very important information in assessing stroke and overall cardiovascular risk. Spanning from carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) measurements in arteriopathy to plaque burden, morphology and biology in more advanced disease, imaging of carotid arteries could help not only in stroke prevention but also in ameliorating cardiovascular events in other territories (e.g. in the coronary arteries). While ultrasound is the most widely available and affordable imaging methods, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), their combination and other more sophisticated methods have introduced novel concepts in detection of carotid plaque characteristics and risk assessment of stroke and other cardiovascular events. However, in addition to robust progress in usage of these methods, all of them have limitations which should be taken into account. The main purpose of this consensus document is to discuss pros but also cons in clinical, epidemiological and research use of all these techniques.

© The Author(s) 2022. Sage Publications, Despite the publication of several national/international guidelines, the optimal management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (AsxCS) remains controversial. This article compares 3 recently released guidelines (the 2020 German-Austrian, the 2021 European Stroke Organization [ESO], and the 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery [SVS] guidelines) vs the 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines regarding the optimal management of AsxCS patients.The 2017 ESVS guidelines defined specific imaging/clinical parameters that may identify patient subgroups at high future stroke risk and recommended that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) should or carotid artery stenting (CAS) may be considered for these individuals. The 2020 German-Austrian guidelines provided similar recommendations with the 2017 ESVS Guidelines. The 2021 ESO Guidelines also recommended CEA for AsxCS patients at high risk for stroke on best medical treatment (BMT), but recommended against routine use of CAS in these patients. Finally, the SVS guidelines provided a strong recommendation for CEA+BMT vs BMT alone for low-surgical risk patients with >70% AsxCS. Thus, the ESVS, German-Austrian, and ESO guidelines concurred that all AsxCS patients should receive risk factor modification and BMT, but CEA should or CAS may also be considered for certain AsxCS patient subgroups at high risk for future ipsilateral ischemic stroke.

The recommendations of international guidelines for the management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) often vary considerably and extend from a conservative approach with risk factor modification and best medical treatment (BMT) alone, to a more aggressive approach with a carotid intervention plus BMT. The aim of the current multispecialty position statement was to reconcile the conflicting views on the topic. A literature review was performed with a focus on data from recent studies. Several clinical and imaging high-risk features have been identified that are associated with an increased long-term ipsilateral ischemic stroke risk in patients with ACS. Such high-risk clinical/imaging features include intraplaque hemorrhage, impaired cerebrovascular reserve, carotid plaque echolucency/ulceration/ neovascularization, a lipid-rich necrotic core, a thin or ruptured fibrous cap, silent brain infarction, a contralateral transient ischemic attack/stroke episode, male patients

The endothelium plays a crucial role in maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis. Shear stress generated by flowing blood regulates the release of substances that provide adequate tissue perfusion. The extent of damage to endothelial cells depends on locally disturbed shear stress caused by the deteriorated flow. Patients with heart failure have reduced cardiac output, which results in reduced blood flow and negative shear stress. Reduced shear stress also affects microcirculation and reduces tissue perfusion. Consequently, the production of free oxygen radicals is increased and bioavailability of nitric oxide is additionally decreased. Therefore, endothelial dysfunction is involved in the progression of heart failure and cardiovascular events. Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are used for the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure. Older pulsatile flow LVADs were mostly substituted by continuous-flow LVADs (cf-LVADs). Despite the advantages of the cf-LVADs, the loss of pulsatility leads to different complications on the micro- and macrovascular levels. One of the pathogenetic mechanisms of cardiovascular complications with cf-LVADs may be endothelial dysfunction, which after the implantation of the device does not improve and may even deteriorate. In contrast, the pulsatile pattern of LVADs on blood flow could preserve endothelial function.

After 3 decades of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), the infrarenal neck is considered the most important determining factor for an uncomplicated and sustainable outcome. As the envelope has been pushed toward treating more challenging infrarenal necks with standard endografts, there are numerous publications regarding hostile aortic neck criteria.1–4 During preoperative planning and sizing, aortic neck length, diameter, suprarenal and infrarenal angulation, shape, and occurrence of calcium and thrombus are measured by most endovascular specialists, using dedicated software. Moreover, all endograft manufacturers have defined specific instructions for use (IFU) concerning infrarenal neck characteristics. Infrarenal neck length seems to be one of the most important criteria to consider, with a minimum of 10 or 15 mm, according to the IFU of most commercially available ndografts.3 According to most CoreLab definitions, the infrarenal neck ends when the aortic diameter increases >10% compared with baseline (ie, the diameter just below the lower margin of the lowest renal artery).5,6 Although the determination of the pre-EVAR neck characteristics gives the treating physicians a handle in the sizing and planning process, it does not always match with the actual circumferential seal of the endograft in the aortic neck after deployment. Oversizing the endograft’s main body often extends the seal compared with the predefined aortic neck length. However, especially in hostile necks, this does not always have the anticipated and desired effect.7 It seems reasonable to assume that the post-EVAR achieved circumferential apposition between the endograft and the aortic wall is a better indicator for outcome than the pre-EVAR determined aortic neck characteristics alone. The so-called sealing zone in the infrarenal aortic neck has received less attention in EVAR literature so far. A possible explanation for this might be that it is harder to define than the well-known aortic neck criteria. It also depends on the positioning of the endograft during the procedure. Moreover, the circumferential apposition between the endograft and the aortic wall has to be determined on the post- EVAR computed tomography (CT) scan, which is not a standard measurement so far.8 A Delphi method is often used to orchestrate expert opinions systematically when evidence is scarce or lacking, and research questions cannot simply be studied with experimental and epidemiological methods.9 In this study, the Delphi method is used to propose a consensus definition of the infrarenal sealing zone. Furthermore, it provides an algorithm to determine when and if adjunctive procedure(s) or reintervention should be considered in case of potential proximal sealing failure of the endograft.

Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at very high risk of cardiovascular events, but risk factor management is usually suboptimal. This Joint Task Force from the European Atherosclerosis Society and the European Society of Vascular Medicine has updated evidence on the management on dyslipidaemia and thrombotic factors in patients with PAD. Guidelines recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) goal of more than 50% reduction from baseline and1.4 mmol/L (55 mg/dL) in PAD patients. As demonstrated by randomized controlled trials, lowering LDL-C not only reduces cardiovascular events but also major adverse limb events (MALE), including amputations, of the order of 25%. Addition of ezetimibe or a PCSK9 inhibitor further decreases the risk of cardiovascular events, and PCSK9 inhibition has also been associated with reduction in the risk of MALE by up to 40%. Furthermore, statin-based treatment improved walking performance, including maximum walking distance, and pain-free walking distance and duration. This Task Force recommends strategies for managing statin-associated muscle symptoms to ensure that PAD patients benefit from lipid-lowering therapy. Antiplatelet therapy, either daily clopidogrel 75 mg or the combination of aspirin 100 mg and rivaroxaban (2 × 2.5 mg) is also indicated to prevent cardiovascular events. Dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and rivaroxaban) may be considered following revascularization, taking into account bleeding risk. This Joint Task Force believes that adherence with these recommendations for lipid-lowering and antithrombotic therapy will improve the morbidity and mortality in patients with PAD.

Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at very high risk of cardiovascular events, but risk factor management is usually suboptimal. This Joint Task Force from the European Atherosclerosis Society and the European Society of Vascular Medicine has updated evidence on the management on dyslipidaemia and thrombotic factors in patients with PAD. Guidelines recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) goal of more than 50% reduction from baseline and

1School of Medicine, Division of Inflammation and Inflammatory Diseases, Immunology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; 2Slovenia Academic Research Center, Slovenian Medical Academy, Medical Association of Slovenia and SMA, Ljubljana, Slovenia; 3Department of Vascular Surgery, Apollo-CVHF Hospital, Ahmedabad, India; 4Clinic of Angiology, Zentrum f iota ir Innere Medizin II, Ernst von Bergmann Klinikum, Potsdam, Germany; 5Unit of Angiology, Department of Biomedical Science, Research Center on Vascular Disease, L. Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; 6Department of Vascular Surgery, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman; 7Division of Vascular Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; 8Varicose Veins and Vascular Polyclinic (VVVC), Damascus, Syria; 9National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh; 10Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; 11Department of Vascular Surgery, St. James's Hospital/Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; 12Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Mekur, Zagreb, Croatia; 13Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Ramaiah Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India; 14Unit of Vascular Surgery, Third Department of Internal Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; 15Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey; 16Department of Angiology, St. Imre University Teaching Hospital, Budapest, Hungary; 17Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, UK; 18Hematology and Thrombosis Center, Hopitaux Universitaires de l'Est Parisien, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Faculty of Medicine

Introduction Little is known about pathogenetic mechanisms of superficial venous thrombosis (SVT). We aimed to investigate the systemic inflammatory response in the acute phase of SVT, the time course of inflammatory markers and involvement of inflammation in resolution of thrombus in SVT. Material and methods The circulatory inflammatory parameters high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukins 6, 8 and 10 (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10), and markers of fibrinolytic activity tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and fibrinogen were determined in 68 patients with acute SVT of lower limbs, who were allocated to two groups, dalteparin 5000 IU once daily or 10 000 IU once daily. Recanalization of occluded veins was monitored by ultrasonography at regular intervals. Blood was drawn in the acute phase and after 12 weeks. Results In the acute phase a majority of the measured inflammatory markers were increased, while after 12 weeks most of them significantly dropped: hsCRP: 13.6 ±11.9 vs. 7.4 ±4.4, p < 0.001; IL-6: 3.8 ±3.1 vs. 2.6 ±1.9, p = 0.007. Significant changes in endogenic fibrinolytic parameters were also observed: t-PA activity decreased (0.81 ±0.35 vs. 0.68 ±0.34, p = 0.003), while PAI-1 levels increased (5.6 ±5.1 vs. 8.8 ±8.5, p < 0.001). Levels of inflammatory markers at inclusion and after 12 weeks were related to less effective thrombus resolution: CRP: r = 0.386, p = 0.001; IL-6: r = 0.384; TNF-α: r = 0.255, p = 0.037. Conclusions In the acute phase of SVT, most of the circulating inflammatory markers were increased and most of their levels decreased after 12 weeks. Levels of inflammatory markers were negatively correlated with the recanalization rate.

Atherosclerosis is a systemic disease with different faces. Despite identical or similar pathogenetic mechanisms, atherosclerotic lesions and their clinical manifestations vary in different parts of the vascular system. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) represents one of the most frequent clinical manifestations of atherosclerosis with predominant location in the superficial femoral artery (SFA). Morphological characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques in peripheral arteries differ from lesions in the coronary and carotid arteries. Plaques in SFA have more fibrotic components, less lipids and inflammatory cells, which makes them more stable and less prone to rupture. Factors that determine the different structure of plaques in SFA compared to coronary arteries include hemodynamic forces, vasa vasorum and calcification. Low shear stress in SFA in the adductor canal is one of the factors which determines frequent atherosclerotic lesions in this region. Lower lipid content and fewer inflammatory cells explain higher stability of SFA plaques. The specific structure of SFA plaques may require preventive and therapeutic measures, which to some extent differ from prevention of coronary atherosclerosis and may include inhibition of fibrotic proliferation in SFA plaques and calcification. Revascularization of PAD differs from procedures used in coronary arteries and requires specific technical expertise and devices.

The optimal management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) is the subject of extensive debate. According to the 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines, carotid endarterectomy should (Class IIa; Level of Evidence: B) or carotid artery stenting may be considered (Class IIb; Level of Evidence: B) in the presence of one or more clinical/imaging characteristics that may be associated with an increased risk of late ipsilateral stroke (e.g., silent embolic infarcts on brain computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, progression in the severity of ACS, a history of contralateral transient ischemic attack/stroke, microemboli detection on transcranial Doppler, etc.), provided documented perioperative stroke/death rates are 5 years. Besides these clinical/imaging characteristics, there are additional individual, ethnic/racial or social factors that should probably be evaluated in the decision process regarding the optimal management of these patients, such as individual patient needs/patient choice, patient compliance with best medical treatment, patient sex, culture, race/ethnicity, age and comorbidities, as well as improvements in imaging/operative techniques/outcomes. The present multispecialty position paper will present the rationale why the management of patients with ACS may need to be individualized.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is one of the most frequent manifestations of atherosclerosis with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Platelets and coagulation are involved in the progression of atherosclerosis and thromboembolic complications. PAD patients have increased prothrombotic potential, which includes platelet hyperaggregability and increased pro-coagulant state. Therefore, antithrombotic treatment is of utmost importance for the prevention of cardiovascular events in this group of patients. Aspirin is the basic antiplatelet drug, but with limited efficacy in PAD. In contrast to coronary artery disease, its effect on the prevention of cardiovascular events in PAD has been limited proven. Particularly in asymptomatic PAD, there is no evidence for risk reduction with aspirin. Clopidogrel and ticagrelor are more effective than aspirin. Clopidogrel is thus an effective alternative to aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular events in symptomatic PAD. In patients who are non-responders to clopidogrel, ticagrelor is indicated. Dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) with aspirin and ticagrelor in patients with coronary artery disease and concomitant PAD significantly decreased the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, including adverse limb events. However, in the CHARISMA Trial, aspirin and clopidogrel were not more effective than aspirin alone and increased bleeding complications. Therefore, DAPT seems effective only in PAD accompanied by coronary artery disease. Anticoagulant treatment for symptomatic PAD with vitamin K antagonists alone or in combination with aspirin is not more effective than single antiplatelet treatment but increases the rate of major bleeding. Low dose rivaroxaban combined with aspirin in PAD patients significantly reduces cardiovascular events, including limb-threatening ischemia and limb amputations. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet treatment after percutaneous or surgical revascularization of PAD improve the patency of treated vessels. Aspirin with or without dipyridamole improved patency of infra-inguinal by-pass grafts at one year. The combination of clopidogrel with aspirin was more effective than aspirin alone in the prevention of prosthetic graft occlusions in patients undergoing below-knee by-pass-grafting. Oral vitamin K antagonists were not more effective than aspirin in the prevention of infra-inguinal by-pass occlusion. The combination of low dose rivaroxaban and aspirin was effective in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events and adverse limb events after infrainguinal endovascular or surgical revascularization in patients with intermittent claudication. However, the data on antithrombotic treatment after revascularization for limb-threatening ischemia is scanty and inconclusive. In conclusion: Antithrombotic treatment of PAD is a cornerstone for the management of these patients. Antiplatelet drugs prevent the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis and are effective also in the prevention of thromboembolic events. Simultaneous use of antiplatelet and anticoagulation drugs is accompanied by an increased risk of bleeding. However, combined treatment with aspirin and low-dose rivaroxaban is more effective than single antithrombotic treatment and safer than full-dose combined treatment.

Summary: Background: A significant consequence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an impaired functional capacity and deteriorated quality of life. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate the usefulness of a symptom questionnaire and walk tests for the determination of the functional capacity of patients with intermittent claudication. Patients and methods: The study included 53 patients (38 males) with stable claudication distance (50–300m). A detailed history and physical examination, ankle-brachial index (ABI), treadmill exercise test, and 6-minute walk test were performed and compared to walking impairment questionnaire (WIQ). Results: Claudication distance reported from patients’ history and 6-minute walk test were significantly correlated with ABI (p=0.033, p=0.044). There were no significant correlations between ABI and treadmill walk test or WIQ. Results of WIQ were significantly correlated with the history and the most of performed walk tests: treadmill initial and maximal claudication distance (p=0.004 and 0.012, respectively) and 6-minute walk test (p=0.026). 6-minute walk test was correlated with maximal claudication distance of treadmill (p=0.018), but not with an initial claudication distance. Conclusions: The validity of WIQ is comparable to walk tests and represents the useful technique for the investigation of the functional capacity of patients with PAD. A self-report based on WIQ enables a longer period of observation. It should be routinely used as a basic diagnostic tool for the estimation of the functional capacity of PAD patients with stable intermittent claudication.

Our study aimed to investigate the levels and time-course of systemic inflammatory and hemostasis markers in the early postoperative period in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR). The study included 70 patients of both sexes, average age 68.4 ± 10.9 years. Levels of inflammatory and hemostasis markers were measured before surgery (POD 0), a day after the surgery (POD 1) and 5 days after surgery (POD 5). In the postoperative period inflammatory markers increased. The operation provoked a significant increase of CRP on POD 1 in comparison to POD 0 (68.5 ± 5.4 vs 6.8 ± 2.2 μg/mL, p < 0.001) and the additional increase was registered on POD 5 (87.5 ± 8.1 vs 68.5 ± 5.4 μg/mL, p < 0.001). Interleukin-6 significantly increased on POD 1 (251.5 ± 21.6 vs 14.6 ± 7.1 μg/mL, p < 0.001) and after that (POD 5) decreased. After surgery leukocyte count, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio were significantly higher compared to POD 0. Activation of coagulation in the postoperative period was shown by increased peak thrombin on POD 5 in comparison to POD 0 (185 ± 27 vs. 124 ± 31 nM, p < 0.001). D-dimer was increased on POD 1 and an additional rise was observed on POD 5. vWF also progressively increased in the observed period. Results of our study showed that after THR systemic inflammatory markers increased and coagulation function was enhanced. Determination of inflammatory and procoagulant markers could help identify patients at risk for cardiovascular thromboembolic events.

Endothelial dysfunction (ED) plays a substantial role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and some other vascular diseases. ED has been demonstrated in patients with hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, and in patients with atherosclerotic disease. Besides classical risk factors, ED is affected by chronic inflammatory diseases and acute infections, particularly viral diseases. Causes of ED include oxidative stress, inflammation, and shear stress, which decrease the bioavailability of nitric oxide. Markers of ED have been sought, particularly circulating markers. Using these tests, it is possible to evaluate the response to harmful effects of risk factors and the effects of treatment on vessel wall function. Endothelial dysfunction is significantly and directly correlated with the occurrence of cardiac events and the risk of cardiac events increase as ED worsens. Because endothelial function plays a central role in atherogenesis it became a therapeutic target. Endothelial dysfunction is reversible and its improvement may be achieved by elimination of risk factors, inhibitors of endothelium-derived contracting factors (angiotensin-converting enzyme), smoking cessation, lipid-lowering drugs, diet, and physical exercise. By reversing ED, it is possible to restore vascular function.

Atherosclerosis is a systemic disease affecting multiple arterial territories. Patients with clinical atherosclerotic disease in one vascular bed are likely to have asymptomatic or symptomatic atherosclerotic lesions in other vascular beds. Specifically, peripheral arterial disease (PAD) often coexists with coronary and carotid disease. With progression of atherosclerotic disease in one vascular bed, the risk of clinical manifestations in other territories increases and the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events increases substantially with the number of affected vascular beds. Classical risk factors are associated with the development of polyvascular atherosclerotic disease (PVD) in different territories; however, to a different extent. Risk modification represents basic treatment of patients with PVD. All modifiable risk factors should be aggressively controlled by lifestyle modification and medication. Particular attention should be directed to patients with PAD who are often undertreated in spite of the proven benefits of guideline-based approach. There is currently no proof that identification of asymptomatic atherosclerosis and PVD improves clinical outcomes in patients who are already in prevention programs. Revascularization should be performed only in symptomatic vascular beds, using the least aggressive method according to consensual decision of a multidisciplinary vascular team.

Carotid atherosclerotic plaques represent a risk for ischemic stroke. The data indicate that the risk for distal embolization from atherosclerotic lesions in internal carotid arteries is not related only to the degree of stenosis but also to the composition of plaques. The stability of atherosclerotic plaque depends on the thickness of the fibrous cap and plaque hemorrhage. Recent research indicated that the inflammatory activity of atherosclerotic lesions is pivotal in the progression of atherosclerotic plaques. It also promotes the development of unstable atherosclerotic lesions and is related to thromboembolic cerebrovascular complications. Inflammation destabilizes atherosclerotic plaques through the degradation of their fibrotic structure. Inflammation of atherosclerotic plaques was confirmed by histopathologic findings and levels of circulating inflammatory markers which were correlated to the intensity of the inflammation in atherosclerotic lesions. Recently, new techniques like fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18-FDG PET) were developed for the identification of inflammation of atherosclerotic lesions in the vessel wall in vivo. Systemic inflammatory markers, particularly interleukins, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and metalloproteinases were shown to be related to the intensity of the inflammatory process in atherosclerotic lesions and the cerebrovascular events. Identification of inflamed atherosclerotic plaques may help to identify unstable atherosclerotic lesions and subjects at high risk for cerebrovascular incidents who need intensive preventive measures including anti-inflammatory medication.

Critical limb ischemia represents the most severe pattern of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) associated with the high risk of major amputation, cardiovascular events and death. The diagnosis and management of critical limb ischemia (CLI) is often challenging. Systolic ankle and toe pressure measurements are considered to be the basic techniques for the identification of PAD. However, they provide rough insight into the dependent local tissue perfusion. Furthermore, those techniques do not enable investigation of microcirculation which has crucial role in the pathogenesis of CLI. Some patients with mild deterioration of macrocirculation develop CLI if microcirculation is affected. Investigation of perfusion on macro- and local microcirculatory level enables more effective treatment - revascularization of the angiosome- related artery. The technologies capable of assessing limb tissue oxygenation or perfusion on microcirculatory level enable direct assessment of distant tissue oxygenation. Transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO2) measurement which was introduced in clinical practice represents one of the objective criteria for the diagnosis of CLI. Main weakness of this technique as well as laser Doppler flow measurement is low penetrance from the skin surface. Measurement of tissue blood flow on microcirculatory level can be performed with indocyanine green fluorescent imaging (ICG), contrast- enhanced magnetic resonance and vital microscopy. ICG is promising method which provides excellent informative image of tissue perfusion. However, it offers little quantitative information. In conclusion: investigation of microcirculation in patients with CLI is of outmost importance because it enables insight in local tissue perfusion and oxygenation, which represents the basis of identification of most ischemic regions and provide more successful - angiosome related revascularization of an affected artery.

Summary: In patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), the ability to perform physical exercise is an essential and most important indicator of a patient’s health and quality of life. In many cases, there exists a discrepancy between lower extremity blood flow, the extent of arterial occlusion shown by morphological investigation and functional impairment. Reversal of lower extremity arterial obstruction with revascularization does not always reverse functional impairment of diseased leg. Further, training exercise and drug treatment can improve functional performance although they are not associated with an improvement in arterial obstruction. Therefore, the determination of functional impairment and its recovery after different therapeutic procedures should be determined using objective tests. The most frequently used functional tests are treadmill exercise testing and a 6-minute walk test. The constant load test, in which results are expressed as a walked distance, does not always permit an accurate assessment of the full range of functional impairment of PAD patients. Recently, as a substitute for a constant-load test, the graded treadmill test is used. With this test, it is possible to identify those individuals with exercise limitations who are not caused only by deterioration of the blood flow of lower limbs. The 6-minute walk test is simple to perform and requires minimal equipment. However, the correlation between the 6-minute walk test and the graded treadmill test is relatively weak, indicating that peak performance on a graded treadmill may reflect different pathophysiological mechanisms of limitations. In conclusion: for the determination of limitations of mobility and quality of life in patients with PAD, objective measures of functional impairment are needed. The determination of functional capacity is related to the quality of life and is a useful tool for investigation of the success of revascularization of peripheral arteries and conservative treatment.