Thomas Grinda, Marc Debled, Thomas Bachelot, Magali Lacroix-Triki, Paul-Henri Cottu, Audrey Mailliez, Anne Patsouris, Lionel Uwer, Thierry Petit, Isabelle Desmoulins, M. Robain, A. Gonçalves, Etienne Brain, Florence Dalenc, D. Perol, C. Courtinard, Suzette Delaloge, Véronique Diéras, C. Levy, Elise Deluche, C. Blaye, M.-A. Mouret-Reynier, Christelle Jouannaud, William Jacot, Alison Antoine, J-M Ferrero, Florian Clatot, Institut Gustave Roussy (IGR), Centre Léon Bérard [Lyon], Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Institut Bergonié [Bordeaux], UNICANCER, Institut Curie [Paris], Centre Eugène Marquis (CRLCC), Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC), Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest [Angers/Nantes] (UNICANCER/ICO), Centre Jean Perrin [Clermont-Ferrand] (UNICANCER/CJP), Centre Régional de Lutte contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret [Lille] (UNICANCER/Lille), Université Lille Nord de France (COMUE)-UNICANCER, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Henri Becquerel Normandie Rouen (CLCC Henri Becquerel), Centre Régional de Lutte contre le Cancer François Baclesse [Caen] (UNICANCER/CRLC), UNICANCER-Tumorothèque de Caen Basse-Normandie (TCBN)-Normandie Université (NU), Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer Antoine Lacassagne [Nice] (UNICANCER/CAL), Université Côte d'Azur (UCA)-UNICANCER, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine - Alexis Vautrin [Nancy] (UNICANCER/ICL), Centre Paul Strauss, CRLCC Paul Strauss, Institut Jean Godinot [Reims], Bordeaux population health (BPH), Université de Bordeaux (UB)-Institut de Santé Publique, d'Épidémiologie et de Développement (ISPED)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Département de médecine oncologique [Gustave Roussy], Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC)-Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Lille-UNICANCER, Normandie Université (NU)-UNICANCER-Tumorothèque de Caen Basse-Normandie (TCBN), and UNICANCER-Université Côte d'Azur (UCA)
Background Treatment strategies for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have made great strides over the past 10 years. Real-world data allow us to evaluate the actual benefit of new treatments. ESME (Epidemio-Strategy-Medico-Economical)-MBC, a nationwide observational cohort (NCT03275311), gathers data of all consecutive MBC patients who initiated their treatment in 18 French Cancer Centres since 2008. Patients and methods We evaluated overall survival (OS) in the whole cohort (N = 20 446) and among subtypes: hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 negative (HR+/HER2−; N = 13 590), HER2+ (N = 3919), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC; N = 2937). We performed multivariable analyses including year of MBC diagnosis as one of the covariates, to assess the potential OS improvement over time, and we described exposure to newly released drugs at any time during MBC history by year of diagnosis (YOD). Results The median follow-up of the whole cohort was 65.5 months (95% CI 64.6-66.7). Year of metastatic diagnosis appears as a strong independent prognostic factor for OS [Year 2016 HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.97); P = 0.009, using 2008 as reference]. This effect is driven by the HER2+ subcohort, where it is dramatic [Year 2016 HR 0.52 (95% CI 0.42-0.66); P < 0.001, using 2008 as reference]. YOD had, however, no sustained impact on OS among patients with TNBC [Year 2016 HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.77-1.11); P = 0.41, using 2008 as reference] nor among those with HR+/HER2– MBC [Year 2016 HR 1.02 (95% CI 0.91-1.13); P = 0.41, using 2008 as reference]. While exposure to newly released anti-HER2 therapies appeared very high (e.g. >70% of patients received pertuzumab from 2016 onwards), use of everolimus or eribulin was recorded in less than one-third of HR+/HER2– and TNBC cohorts, respectively, whatever YOD. Conclusion OS has dramatically improved among HER2+ MBC patients, probably in association with the release of several major HER2-directed therapies, whose penetrance was high. This trend was not observed in the other subtypes, but the impact of CDK4/6 inhibitors cannot yet be assessed., Highlights • OS of HER2+ MBC patients keeps improving over time [Year 2016 HR 0.52 (95% CI 0.42-0.66); P < 0.001, using 2008 as reference]. • This effect seems timely related to the release of drugs demonstrated to improve survival in clinical trials. • OS gains observed in real life among HER2+ MBC patients are at least equivalent to those observed in clinical trials. • YOD had no sustained impact on OS among patients with TNBC and luminal MBC. • The impact of CDK4/6 inhibitors cannot yet be assessed in this cohort.