Search

Purpose/Objective: There have been few randomized controlled studies on the effectiveness of clinical hypnotic analgesia. The authors' goal was to improve on previous methodologies and gain a better understanding of the effects of hypnosis on different components of pain in a clinical setting. Research Method/Design: This study used a randomized controlled design in which the nurses and data collectors were unaware of treatment condition to compare hypnotic analgesia with an attention-only placebo for burn pain during wound debridements. Data were analyzed on a total of 46 adult participants. Results: The authors found that the group receiving hypnosis had a significant drop in pain compared with the control group when measured by the McGill Pain Questionnaire but not when measured by other pain rating scales. Conclusion: The McGill Pain Questionnaire total score reflects multiple pain components, such as its affective component and various qualitative components, and is not merely a measure of pain intensity. Thus, the findings suggest that hypnosis affects multiple pain domains and that measures that assess these multiple domains may be more sensitive to the effects of hypnotic analgesia treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Thirty-three adults with chronic pain and a disability were treated with hypnotic analgesia. Analyses showed significant pre- to posttreatment changes in average pain intensity that was maintained at 3-month follow-up. Significant changes were also found in pain unpleasantness and perceived control over pain but not in pain interference or depressive symptoms. Hypnotizability, concentration of treatment (e.g., daily vs. up to weekly), and initial response to treatment were not significantly associated with treatment outcome. How-ever, treatment-outcome expectancy assessed after the first session showed a moderate association with treatment outcome. The findings support the use of hypnotic analgesia for the treatment of pain in per-sons with disabilities for some patients but not the use of pretreatment measures of hypnotizability or treatment-outcome expectancy for screening patients for treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of a biopsychosocial model to predict long-term adjustment to lower-limb amputation and phantom limb pain (PLP). METHOD: One month after lower-limb amputation, 70 participants completed measures of PLP intensity, cognitions (catastrophizing, perceived control over pain), coping (pain-contingent rest), social environment (social support, solicitous responding), and functioning (pain interference, depressive symptoms). The measures of functioning were administered again at 1- and 2-years post-amputation. Multiple regression analyses were used to examine the ability of the psychosocial variables at 1-month post-amputation to predict changes in the functioning measures over time. RESULTS: The psychosocial variables at 1-month post-amputation, controlling for initial PLP intensity, accounted for 21% of the variance in change in depressive symptoms at 1-year (p < 0.05), and 27% and 22% (p's < 0.01 and 0.05, respectively) of the variance in change in pain interference and depressive symptoms, respectively, at 2-years post-amputation. Catastrophizing and social support were associated with decreases (improvement) in both criterion measures, while solicitous responding was associated with increases (worsening) in both measures. DISCUSSION: The findings support a biopsychosocial model of long-term adjustment to amputation and PLP. In addition, results suggest that some psychosocial variables are more important than others for predicting adjustment, providing important implications for early interventions after amputation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sleep disorders are a frequent but under-addressed complication of burn injuries. Burn injuries can potentially disrupt sleep for a variety of reasons, including the physiological effects of trauma as well as ramifications of treatment (ie, intensive care unit environment, pain, itching, medications). The literature on sleep disorders and burn injuries is reviewed, and suggestions for treatment are provided. Treatment is divided into two major types: nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic. Nonpharmacologic treatment, also referred to as behavioral techniques, may include any one or combination of the following: sleep hygiene, stimulus control, sleep restriction, relaxation techniques, cognitive, and light therapy. Pharmacologic therapies may include hypnotics (benzodiazepine, nonbenzodiazepine, or benzodiazepine receptor agonists), antidepressants, over-the-counter preparations, hormone replacement therapy, herbs, and melatonin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The presence of psychiatric problems in burn patients has been found to have an impact on their burn care and long-term adjustment. This study investigated rates of previous mental health symptoms in a sample of 199 hospitalized burn patients screened for previous psychiatric diagnoses. Patients were instructed to fill out a questionnaire about their mental health functioning on the Rand Inventory for the month preceding their burn injury. Scores compared with a national normative sample on the Rand Mental Health Inventory revealed that burn patients scored higher on psychological distress, anxiety, depression, and loss of behavioral and emotional control. These results reflect other studies in the literature, indicating that burn patients are premorbidly more psychologically vulnerable than the general population, a factor that likely contributes to many of them sustaining their injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) and the Sutter Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory (SESBI) are widely used to measure disruptive behavior problems in children and adolescents (e.g., oppositional defiant disorder symptoms, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms, and conduct disorder symptoms). Previous normative studies on the ECBI and SESBI, however, suffer from a variety of limitations. This article addresses these limitations by providing more useful normative information on the ECBI (parent) and SESBI (teacher) rating scales. Study one provides normative information on the ECBI for 2,527 2-to 17-year-old children and adolescents. Study two provides normative information on the SESBI for 1,286 kindergarten through sixth grade children. Clinicians and researchers should find this new normative information on the ECBI and SESBI useful for screening purposes. This new normative information will also help to determine the clinical significance of treatments for disruptive behavior problems where the ECBI and SESBI are used as outcome measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]