Search

Objective: We previously validated uHear™ to screen for hearing loss in older patients with cancer without a known hearing loss, as part of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). In view of low specificity, we tested a new modified uHear™ scoring system as described by Handzel. Methods: Patients, aged ≥70 years, were evaluated by uHear™ and conventional audiometry, which is considered the gold standard, as part of a CGA. The pass or fail screening cut-off for uHear™ was defined as having ≥2 consecutive hearing grades starting from the moderate– severe threshold zone ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 kHz (modified Handzel-uHear™ scoring system). To accept the modified Handzel-uHear™ as screening tool, it was predefined that the combined sensitivity (S) and specificity (Sp) of the test (S + Sp/2) was at least 80% and that an actual combined (S + Sp)/2 of 90% would be found. Results: Ninety ears (45 subjects) were tested. Of those ears, 24.4% were identified as impaired by conventional audiometry. Modified Handzel-uHear™ identified 26.7% of tested ears as impaired. The combined (S + Sp)/2 of the modified Handzel-uHear™ was calculated as 77.5%, while in previous cohort, this was retrospectively calculated as 94.6%. A new uHear™ scoring system was proposed and tested in current and previous cohort. A (S + Sp)/2 of 80.2 and 78.8%, respectively, were obtained. Conclusion: uHear™ is a feasible tool for use within the CGA and shows promising results. However, further research is warranted to optimize the cut-off method before it could be routinely implemented within geriatric oncology.

Objectives: Research has indicated that cancer-related cognitive impairments (CRCI) may be influenced by psychosocial factors such as distress, worry and fatigue. Therefore, we aimed to validate the distress thermometer (DT) as a screening tool to detect CRCI six months post-treatment-initiation in a group of general cancer patients. Methods: Patients (≥18 years, n = 125) with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of a solid cancer or hematological malignancy, scheduled for a curative treatment, were evaluated at baseline (T0) and six months post-treatment-initiation (T1) for CRCI by a neuropsychological assessment, including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Assessed cognitive domains included premorbid intelligence, attention, processing speed, flexibility, verbal and visual episodic memory and verbal fluency. PROMs entailed distress (DT, cut-off ≥4, range 0–10), anxiety and depression, fatigue (FACIT-fatigue scale) and subjective cognitive complaints. Results: At T0, 60.4% of patients showed a DT score of ≥4, whereas 50% met this criterion at T1. According to the definition of the International Cognition and Cancer Task Force, 25.5% and 28.3% of patients presented with a CRCI at T0 and T1, respectively. When evaluating the DT as a screening tool for CRCI at T1, data showed an inverse relationship between the DT and CRCI. ROC-curve analysis revealed an AUC

Individual patients' survival varies greatly in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Retrospective analysis of 368 patients treated with docetaxel and starting abiraterone acetate revealed 5 adverse prognostic factors: hemoglobin < 12 g/dL, > 10 metastases, ECOG performance status >= 2, radiographic progression, and time since diagnosis < 90 months. A prognostic model stratifies patients into 3 groups with different estimated survival, which can aid in patient counseling.Abiraterone acetate (AA) increases overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with docetaxel. However, survival time varies substantially between individuals. Our goal was to identify prognostic factors that better estimate OS. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective multicentric analysis of 368 patients with mCRPC starting AA with prednisone after docetaxel. Cox proportional hazards statistics were applied. A multivariate model was constructed based on significant univariate predictors by using a manual stepwise forward and backward selection strategy. Model performance was determined by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Univariate analysis identified 20 significant OS predictors. A multivariate model was constructed, based on 220 patients, incorporating 5 independent risk factors for decreased OS at the time of AA initiation: hemoglobin 10 metastases (HR 1.80), ECOG performance status >= 2 (HR 1.88), radiographic progression (HR 1.50), and time since diagnosis < 90 months (HR 1.66, all P

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the proportion of "fit" versus "vulnerable" older patients with cancer included in phase II and III oncology registration trials, as compared to the proportions in a real life oncology setting. METHODS: Trial and patient characteristics of older (≥70years) patients treated at the OECI-designated clinical cancer centre in Kortrijk and included in a phase II or III oncology registration trial were collected retrospectively. These patients were matched individually with randomly-selected patients from the general oncology setting, based on gender, age, tumour type, tumour stage, and treatment intent. Patients' fitness, based on routine Geriatric-8 (G8) screening, was retrieved from prospectively constructed databases. RESULTS: Between November 2012 and October 2018, 218 older patients with cancer were included in a phase II or III oncology registration trial. Of those, 41 cases with a mean age of 76.0years were included in the analyses. A Fisher's Exact Test revealed a statistical significant difference between cases and matched controls, with a higher proportion of "fit" patients included in phase II or III oncology registration trials compared to the proportion in the matched control group (respectively 70.7% and 41.5%, p

Purpose Tasquinimod, a novel oral therapy targeting the tumor microenvironment, significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in a randomized, placebo-controlled phase II trial in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This phase III study was conducted to confirm the phase II results and to detect an overall survival (OS) benefit. Patients and Methods Men with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC and evidence of bone metastases were assigned (2:1) to receive tasquinimod once per day or placebo until progression or toxicity. The primary end point was radiographic PFS (rPFS; time from random assignment to radiologic progression or death) per Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria and RECIST 1.1. The study had 99.9% power to detect an rPFS hazard ratio (HR) of 0.6 with a two-sided alpha error of .05 and 80% power to detect a target HR of 0.8 for OS, the key secondary end point. Results In all, 1,245 patients were randomly assigned to either tasquinimod (n = 832) or placebo (n = 413) between March 2011 and December 2012 at 241 sites in 37 countries. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups: median age, 71 years; Karnofsky performance status ≥ 90%, 77.3%; and visceral metastases, 21.1%. Estimated median rPFS by central review was 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.8 to 8.2 months) with tasquinimod and 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 5.5 months) with placebo (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.75; P < .001). Median OS was 21.3 months (95% CI, 19.5 to 23.0 months) with tasquinimod and 24.0 months (95% CI, 21.4 to 26.9 months) with placebo (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.28; P = .25). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were more frequent with tasquinimod (42.8% v 33.6%), the most common being anemia, fatigue, and cancer pain. Conclusion In chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC, tasquinimod significantly improved rPFS compared with placebo. However, no OS benefit was observed.

Introduction: Recent research in the field of cancer-related cognitive impairments (CRCI) has shown CRCI presentation prior to treatment initiation. Some have attributed these problems to worry and fatigue, whereas others have suggested an influence of age, IQ, and other psychosocial and medical factors. Methods: Patients (>= 18 years) with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of a solid cancer or hematological malignancy, scheduled for a curative treatment, were evaluated with a baseline neuropsychological assessment including Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). PROMs entailed distress, anxiety and depression, fatigue, and cognitive complaints. The neuropsychological assessment comprised several cognitive domains such as premorbid IQ, attention, processing speed, flexibility, verbal and visual episodic memory, and verbal fluency. Results: Cross-sectional data of 125 patients were collected. Patients had a mean age of 60.9 years (range: 30.0-85.0) and comprised primarily females (65.6%). Patients presented with cancer of following sites: breast (44.0%), digestive (28.8%), urological (11.2%), gynecologic (8.0%), hematologic malignancy (4.8%), and lung (3.2%). Patients presented with a premorbid IQ of 105.3 (range: 79.0-124.0). In 29.6% of patients, a CRCI was detected. Binary logistic regression analyses showed that a lower premorbid IQ (beta = -.084, P < .01) and a higher level of fatigue (beta = -.054, P < .05) predicted baseline CRCI. Premorbid IQ also predicted performance on individual cognitive domains. Some domains were also influenced by age, gender, having a breast cancer diagnosis, and an active treatment for hypertension. Conclusion: Premorbid IQ and fatigue are important predictors of baseline CRCI. Therefore, we advise researchers to implement a short IQ test when conducting clinical trials on CRCI.

Cognitive complaints, of objective or subjective nature, may negatively impact cancer patients' quality of life (QoL). Further, the early detection of cognitive alterations may lead to an improved QoL. However, the content of such screening is yet unclear. This paper presents long-term QoL data of cancer patients treated with curative intent and its relation with objective and subjective cognitive complaints, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).QoL data, measured by the EORTC QLQ C-30, were obtained at baseline, 6 (T1), 12 (T2), and 24 months (T3) after treatment start, and compared between patients with and without objective and subjective cognitive complaints. The predictive value of PROMs was also examined.QoL data at baseline was collected in 125 patients. Response rates at T1, T2, and T3 were 84.7%, 81.5%, and 83.1%, respectively. Eighty-nine patients returned their QoL questionnaires at all times. Baseline subjective cognitive complaints had a stronger association with worse scores on patients' overall QoL and QoL subscale scores than objective cognitive complaints. An exploratory analysis into the value of PROMs in predicting long-term QoL at T3 revealed a significant effect for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression and FACIT Fatigue scale.Self-perceived cognitive alterations are negatively associated with patients' overall QoL. As these troubles may already be present at baseline, oncology nurses should screen for the early signs of subjective cognitive complaints by use of PROMs, in order to refer the patient to proper intervention programs which may lead to an improved long-term QoL and faster reintegration into society.

Purpose A phase 2 study of enzalutamide monotherapy in patients with hormone naïve prostate cancer demonstrated high prostate specific antigen response rates at 25 weeks, 1 year and 2 years with minimal effects on total body bone mineral density and favorable safety. In this followup analysis we evaluated enzalutamide antitumor activity and safety at 3 years. Materials and Methods In a single arm analysis 67 patients with hormone naïve prostate cancer and noncastrate testosterone (230 ng/dl or greater) received enzalutamide 160 mg per day orally until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was the prostate specific antigen response (80% or greater decline from baseline). Results No patients discontinued treatment during year 3. Of 42 patients with prostate specific antigen assessments at 3 years 38 (90.5%, 95% CI 77.4–97.3) maintained a prostate specific antigen response. Of 26 patients with metastases at baseline 17 (65.4%) had a complete or partial response as the best overall response during 3 years. In patients who completed the 3-year visit minimal mean changes from baseline were observed in total body bone mineral density or bone mineral density of the femoral neck, trochanter, spine L1–L4 or forearm (range –2.7% to –0.1%). At 3 years total body fat had increased a mean of 16.5%, total lean body mass had decreased a mean of –6.5% and global health status had minimally decreased from baseline. Common adverse events were gynecomastia, fatigue, hot flush and nipple pain. Conclusions Enzalutamide antitumor activity was maintained in patients with hormone naïve prostate cancer at 3 years. Overall bone mineral density, global health status and safety results were similar to those at 2 years.

Enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone, which target the androgen receptor axis, have expanded the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Retrospective analyses suggest some cross-resistance between these two drugs when used sequentially, but robust, prospective studies have not yet been reported.To fulfil a regulatory postregistration commitment by evaluating the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who progressed following abiraterone acetate plus prednisone treatment.Multicentre, single-arm, open-label study, enrolled patients with progressing mCRPC after ≥24 wk of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone treatment. All patients maintained castration therapy during the trial. Prior chemotherapy was allowed but not required.Patients received enzalutamide 160mg/d orally.The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and time-to-PSA progression. Safety data were also assessed. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to descriptively analyse time-to-event endpoints.Overall, 214 patients received enzalutamide treatment, 145 of whom were chemotherapy-naïve. Median radiographic progression-free survival was 8.1 mo (95% confidence interval: 6.1-8.3); median overall survival had not been reached. Unconfirmed PSA response rate was 27% (48 of 181). Median time-to-PSA progression was 5.7 mo (95% confidence interval: 5.6-5.8). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue (32%), decreased appetite (25%), asthenia (18%), back pain (17%), and arthralgia (16%). No seizures were reported.Enzalutamide showed antitumour activity in some patients with mCRPC who had previously progressed following ≥24 wk of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone treatment.Patients with mCRPC who progressed on previous abiraterone acetate plus prednisone treatment, with or without prior chemotherapy, received enzalutamide. Although cross-resistance between the two agents was observed in a majority of patients, some still benefited from enzalutamide treatment.

BACKGROUND: The androgen receptor inhibitor enzalutamide is approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that has progressed on docetaxel. Our aim was to assess the activity and safety of enzalutamide monotherapy in men with hormone-naive prostate cancer. METHODS: This trial is an ongoing open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, done across 12 European sites. Men aged over 18 years, with hormone-naive prostate cancer for whom hormone therapy was indicated, and who had non-castration levels of testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 2 ng/mL or greater at screening, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0, received oral enzalutamide 160 mg/day. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with an 80% or greater decline in PSA at week 25. All analyses included all patients who had received at least one dose of the study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01302041. FINDINGS: 67 men were enrolled into the study. 62 patients (92.5%, 95% CI 86.2-98.8) had a decline in PSA of 80% or greater at week 25. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events up to week 25 were gynaecomastia (n=24), fatigue (n=23), nipple pain (n=13), and hot flush (n=12), all of which were of mild to moderate severity. Nine patients had a treatment-emergent adverse event of grade 3 or higher, most of which were reported in one patient each, except for pneumonia (grade 3, two patients) and hypertension (grade 3, four patients). Five patients reported serious adverse events, none of which were deemed to be treatment related. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that enzalutamide monotherapy in men with hormone-naive prostate cancer of varying severity provides a level of disease suppression, and was generally well tolerated. These findings provide a rationale for further investigation of clinical response and outcomes with enzalutamide in non-castrate men with prostate cancer.

Objective: We aimed to validate the Freund Clock Drawing Test (CDT), with its predefined cutoff score of ≤4, as a screening tool to detect elderly cancer patients in need of a more in-depth cognitive evaluation within a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Methods: Patients aged 70 years or older with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of cancer were evaluated with a full CGA, including CDT and Folstein Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) as gold standard. Validation of the Freund CDT was defined in terms of diagnostic accuracy of the test through receiver operating characteristics (ROC)-analysis. To accept the Freund CDT as a screening tool, we estimated that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) had to differ significantly from 0.70 with an AUC of at least 0.85. Results: Two hundred elderly cancer patients with a mean age of 79.0 years were included. Four patients were excluded from the analyses because of invalid results. Potential cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤23) was observed in 27.0% of patients. Based on of the AUC±SE, the Freund CDT showed excellent diagnostic performance (0.95±0.17). Furthermore, it provided excellent sensitivity (94.3%) and high specificity (87.4%). Conclusions: Our results indicate that the Freund CDT can be used as an initial screening tool to detect elderly cancer patients in need of a more in-depth cognitive assessment within CGA, instead of the MMSE. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA) is licensed for treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Real-world data on oncological outcome after AA are scarce. The current study assesses efficacy and safety of AA in mCRPC patients previously treated with docetaxel who started treatment during the Belgian compassionate use program (January 2011 July 2012). Patients and methods: Records from 368 patients with mCRPC from 23 different Belgian hospitals who started AA 1000 mg per day with 10 mg prednisone or equivalent were retrospectively reviewed (September 2013 December 2014). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (decrease >= 50%), time to PSA progression (increase >50% over PSA nadir in case of PSA response/ >25% in absence of PSA response), time to radiographic progression (on bone scans or for soft tissue lesions using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1), overall survival and adverse event rate (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03) were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier statistics were applied. Results: Overall, 92 patients (25%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status >= 2. Median age was 73 years, median PSA was 103 ng/dl. PSA response was observed in 131 patients (37.4%). Median time to PSA and radiographic progression was 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.6 /1.6) and 5.8 months (5.3-6.4), respectively. Median overall survival was 15.1 months (13.6-16.6). Most common grade 3 to 4 adverse events were anemia (13.9%), hypokalemia (7.3%), fatigue (6.8%), and pain (6.3%). Median duration of AA treatment was 5.3 months (interquartile range: 2.8-10.3). The main study limitation is its retrospective design. Conclusions: These real-world data on post-docetaxel AA efficacy are in line with the COU-AA-301 trial. Importantly, incidence of severe anemia and hypokalemia is up to 50% higher than reported in previous studies. (c) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Recent research in the field of cancer-related cognitive impairments (CRCI) has shown CRCI presentation prior to treatment initiation. Some have attributed these problems to worry and fatigue, whereas others have suggested an influence of age, IQ, and other psychosocial and medical factors.Patients (≥18 years) with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of a solid cancer or hematological malignancy, scheduled for a curative treatment, were evaluated with a baseline neuropsychological assessment including Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). PROMs entailed distress, anxiety and depression, fatigue, and cognitive complaints. The neuropsychological assessment comprised several cognitive domains such as premorbid IQ, attention, processing speed, flexibility, verbal and visual episodic memory, and verbal fluency.Cross-sectional data of 125 patients were collected. Patients had a mean age of 60.9 years (range: 30.0-85.0) and comprised primarily females (65.6%). Patients presented with cancer of following sites: breast (44.0%), digestive (28.8%), urological (11.2%), gynecologic (8.0%), hematologic malignancy (4.8%), and lung (3.2%). Patients presented with a premorbid IQ of 105.3 (range: 79.0-124.0). In 29.6% of patients, a CRCI was detected. Binary logistic regression analyses showed that a lower premorbid IQ (β = -.084, P .01) and a higher level of fatigue (β = -.054, P .05) predicted baseline CRCI. Premorbid IQ also predicted performance on individual cognitive domains. Some domains were also influenced by age, gender, having a breast cancer diagnosis, and an active treatment for hypertension.Premorbid IQ and fatigue are important predictors of baseline CRCI. Therefore, we advise researchers to implement a short IQ test when conducting clinical trials on CRCI.

Background Locoregional lymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor in patients with bladder cancer. Multimodal treatment, depending on preoperative stage, may improve survival. The standard imaging modalities for staging (computed tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) have an accuracy range of 70–90% for lymph node staging. A more accurate preoperative diagnostic test could improve survival rates even more. Objective To determine whether the use of 2-deoxy-2 [F] fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in combination with CT (FDG-PET/CT) can increase the reliability of preoperative lymph node staging in patients with nonmetastatic invasive bladder cancer (T2 or higher, M0) or recurrent high-risk superficial disease (T1G3 with or without Tis, M0). Design, setting, and participants Fifty-one patients underwent a preoperative FDG-PET/CT between April 2004 and December 2007. Independent of the result for lymph node status, all patients underwent a radical cystectomy and an extended lymphadenectomy. The FDG-PET/CT and CT results were compared with the definitive pathologic results. Measurements Among the 51 patients, 13 patients had metastatically involved locoregional lymph nodes, diagnosed on histopathology. In six patients, these nodes demonstrated increased FDG uptake on PET. In seven patients, PET/CT did not diagnose the positive lymph nodes. PET/CT was false positive in one patient. Results and limitations For the diagnosis of node-positive disease, the accuracy, the sensitivity, and the specificity of FDG-PET/CT were 84%, 46%, and 97%, respectively. When analysing the results of CT alone, there was accuracy of 80%, sensitivity of 46%, and specificity of 92%. The use of FDG-PET/CT is hampered by technical limitations. Conclusions We found no advantage for combined FDG-PET/CT over CT alone for lymph node staging of invasive bladder cancer or recurrent high-risk superficial disease.

Introduction: This study evaluates the outcome of orthotopic neobladder construction in a regional hospital setting. Material and Methods: Orthotopic ileal neobladders were constructed in 51 patients between 1990 and 2001. All complications were reported systematically and continence was evaluated in a standardized manner. Results: One patient died perioperatively (2%). Early complications occurred in 56.9%. They were related to the neobladder in 21.6% and unrelated to the neobladder in 47.1%. 31.4% experienced complications in the late postoperative period. In 25.5%, these complications were neobladder related and in 11.8% they were not. After 1 year, daytime continence was 91.7% and nighttime continence 80.6%. Our results are comparable to those reported by others. Conclusion: We conclude that the construction of a Hautmann neobladder can be performed with acceptable results in a regional hospital. The democratization of recent bladder replacement techniques may offer more patients a better quality of life and prevent the formation of waiting lists. Radical treatment may then be opted for sooner and thus improve cancer-related survival.

BACKGROUND: Enzalutamide is an androgen receptor inhibitor with a demonstrated overall survival benefit in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. A phase 2 study of enzalutamide monotherapy in patients with hormone-naïve prostate cancer (HNPC) showed a high response rate for the prespecified primary endpoint (ie, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] response at week 25), regardless of metastases at baseline, and favorable tolerability. OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term efficacy and safety of enzalutamide monotherapy at 1 and 2 yr. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Open-label, single-arm study in patients with HNPC and noncastrate testosterone (≥230 ng/dl). INTERVENTION: Oral enzalutamide 160mg/d until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND ANALYSIS: PSA response (≥80% decline from baseline) assessed at 1 yr (49 wk) and 2 yr (97 wk). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median (range) age was 73 (48-86) yr and 26 patients (39%) presented with metastases at study entry. Of 67 patients enrolled, 45 (67%) remained on enzalutamide at week 97. For patients remaining on therapy, the PSA response rate at week 97 was 100% (95% confidence interval 92-100%). Of 26 patients with metastases at baseline, 13 (50%) had a complete and four (15.4%) had a partial response as best overall tumor response up to 97 wk on treatment. There was overall maintenance of total-body bone mineral density (BMD) and moderate changes in lean and fat body mass at 49 and 97 wk. The most common adverse events were gynecomastia, nipple pain, fatigue, and hot flushes. The study limitations include lack of a control group and of endocrine, glycemic, and lipid data at 97 wk. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term enzalutamide monotherapy in men with noncastrate HNPC is associated with large sustained reductions in PSA, signals indicating a favorable tumor response, and favorable safety/tolerability profile, with relatively small negative effects on total-body BMD. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this long-term follow-up of the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide monotherapy in patients with hormone-naïve prostate cancer, enzalutamide maintained long-term reductions in prostate-specific antigen, with a minimal impact on total-body bone mineral density., BACKGROUND: Enzalutamide is an androgen receptor inhibitor with a demonstrated overall survival benefit in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. A phase 2 study of enzalutamide monotherapy in patients with hormone-naïve prostate cancer (HNPC) showed a high response rate for the prespecified primary endpoint (ie, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] response at week 25), regardless of metastases at baseline, and favorable tolerability. OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term efficacy and safety of enzalutamide monotherapy at 1 and 2 yr. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Open-label, single-arm study in patients with HNPC and noncastrate testosterone (≥230 ng/dl). INTERVENTION: Oral enzalutamide 160mg/d until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND ANALYSIS: PSA response (≥80% decline from baseline) assessed at 1 yr (49 wk) and 2 yr (97 wk). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median (range) age was 73 (48-86) yr and 26 patients (39%) presented with metastases at study entry. Of67 patients enrolled, 45 (67%) remained on enzalutamide at week 97. For patients remaining on therapy, the PSA response rate at week 97 was 100% (95% confidence interval 92-100%). Of 26 patients with metastases at baseline, 13 (50%) had a complete and four (15.4%) had a partial response as best overall tumor response up to 97 wk on treatment. There was overall maintenance of total-body bone mineral density (BMD) and moderate changes in lean and fat body mass at 49 and 97 wk. The most common adverse events were gynecomastia, nipple pain, fatigue, and hot flushes. The study limitations include lack of a control group and of endocrine, glycemic, and lipid data at 97 wk. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term enzalutamide monotherapy in men with noncastrate HNPC is associated with large sustained reductions in PSA, signals indicating a favorable tumor response, and favorable safety/tolerability profile, with relatively small negative effects on total-body BMD. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this long-term follow-up of the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide monotherapy in patients with hormone-naïve prostate cancer, enzalutamide maintained long-term reductions in prostate-specific antigen, with a minimal impact on total-body bone mineral density. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01302041.

220 Background: A phase 2 study of the androgen receptor inhibitor ENZ as monotherapy in patients with HNPC [NCT01302041] showed a high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, regardless of baseline metastases, and favorable tolerability. In a 1- and 2-year follow-up, ENZ maintained long-term reductions from baseline in PSA, with minimal impact on total-body bone mineral density (BMD). Herein, results from a pre-specified 3-year follow-up are reported. Methods: A total of67 patients with HNPC and non-castrate testosterone ( ≥ 230 ng/dL) received ENZ 160 mg/day until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point of PSA response ( ≥ 80% decline from baseline) was analyzed at week 25 and 1, 2, and 3 years. Other end points were best overall tumor response, BMD, body composition, quality of life, and safety. Results: At the 3-year visit, 42 (62.7%) patients remained on the study medication. Of those, 38 (90.5%; 95% confidence interval 77.4%, 97.3%) maintained a PSA response. Of the 26 patients with metastases at baseline, 17 (65.4%) had a complete or partial response as best overall response at 3 years. In patients who completed the 3-year visit, minimal changes from baseline were observed in total-body BMD or in BMD of the femoral neck, trochanter, spine L1–L4, or forearm (median and mean changes ranged from –3.6% to 1.3% and –2.7% to –0.1%, respectively). The EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status results showed a small decrease at 3 years versus baseline (–3.96 points), consistent with the 2-year results. At 3 years, measurements for total body fat increased (median, 14.7%; mean, 16.5%) and total body lean decreased (median, –6.3%; mean, –6.5%) from baseline. Physical functioning, fatigue, and dyspnea worsened ( > 10 points) at 3 years, similar to results at 2 years. The most frequently reported adverse events ( > 10%) were gynecomastia, fatigue, hot flush, nipple pain, hypertension, diarrhea, nausea, pain in extremity, back pain, and constipation. Conclusions: In patients with HNPC treated with ENZ for 3 years, the efficacy of ENZ as monotherapy was maintained. Overall, BMD, global health status, and safety results were similar to those at 2 years. Clinical trial information: NCT01302041.

165 Background: This phase 4, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ENZA in patients (pts) with progressing mCRPC previously treated with Abi. Methods: All pts maintained castration therapy with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone for the duration of the trial or had a bilateral orchiectomy. Pts were required to have progressive disease at study entry and ≥ 24 weeks of Abi treatment prior to receiving 160 mg/day ENZA. Prior chemotherapy was allowed. The primary end point was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). The secondary end points were overall survival (OS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and time to PSA progression. Safety was also assessed. Results: A total of215 pts were enrolled; 214 were treated with ENZA (median age, 73 years). The analysis was performed on data up to 48 weeks after the last pt started ENZA treatment. Median duration of prior Abi therapy was 54 weeks. The median duration of ENZA treatment was 5.7 months: 12 months in PSA responders and 4.6 months in non-PSA responders. 16% of pts received treatment for ≥ 1 year. The most common reason for treatment discontinuation was disease progression (65%). Median rPFS was 8.1 months (95% CI 6.1, 8.3). Median OS was not reached in the overall population and 75% of pts were alive 1 year after treatment initiation. PSA response (confirmed or unconfirmed) rate was 26.5% (48/181). The median time to PSA progression was 5.7 months (95% CI 5.6, 5.8). The overall objective response rate in pts with measurable disease at study entry was 12%. The most common treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were fatigue (32%), decreased appetite (25%), asthenia (18%), back pain (17%), and arthralgia (16%). ENZA was primarily discontinued due to TEAEs in 8% of pts. No seizures were reported. Conclusions: In this study, ENZA remained active in pts with mCRPC previously treated with Abi. Median rPFS in pts with prior chemotherapy was consistent with previously reported data of ENZA in pts with mCRPC and prior chemotherapy/Abi therapy.Reported TEAEs were consistent with the known safety profile of ENZA. Clinical trial information: NCT02116582.

Purpose: We investigated the effect of neoadjuvant treatment before radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.Materials and Methods: A total of 130 patients with stages T2b and T3 prostate cancer was randomized in a multicenter study: 62 underwent immediate radical prostatectomy and 65 received 560 mg. estramustine phosphate daily for 6 weeks preoperatively.Results: For clinical stage T2b tumors the neoadjuvant treatment resulted in a significant decrease in positive surgical margins compared to the nonpretreated group. This difference was not found for clinical stage T3 tumors. The impact on progression and survival still must be analyzed.Conclusions: Neoadjuvant treatment can be beneficial for clinical stage T2 prostate cancer. Optimal treatment for stage T3 tumors remains controversial.

261 Background: AA is approved for mCRPC, coadministered with prednisone (P) (5 mg BID) to prevent adverse events (AEs) associated with mineralocorticoid excess (ME). Lower GC doses had not previously been formally evaluated in combination with AA. Methods: This was an open-label, multicenter, phase 2 trial (NCT01867710) of asymptomatic chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC pts randomized 1:1:1:1 to AA (1000 mg QD) plus P 5 mg BID or P 5 mg QD or P 2.5 mg BID or dexamethasone (DEX) 0.5 mg QD. Pts who had previously received GC or ketoconazole were excluded. The primary end point was no ME (% of pts experiencing neither hypokalemia nor hypertension during the first 24 weeks of treatment).Secondary end points included additional safety, as well as response rate in the first 24 weeks, defined as a decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 50% confirmed after 4 weeks. Results: 164 pts were randomized; 133 (81.6%) completed 24 weeks’ treatment. Median age: 70 years. Table 1 shows the rates of ME, hypertension, hypokalemia and PSA response. Changes in HbA1c values were minimal and observed in 16 (10.7%) pts. Conclusions: These data suggest that P 5 mg BID, which is approved in combination with AA, and DEX 0.5 mg QD, are effective in preventing ME-associated AEs, and that P 2.5 mg BID and P 5 mg QD can be safely used with appropriate monitoring. The suggestion of a higher PSA response rate with DEX 0.5 mg QD arm warrants further validation. Clinical trial information: NCT01867710. [Table: see text]

e16057 Background: To assess efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate (AA) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with docetaxel who started treatment during the AA compassionate use program (January 2011 - July 2012). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed records from 368 patients from 23 different Belgian hospitals. All patients had mCRPC, received prior chemotherapy and started AA at the standard dose of 1000mg per day with 10mg prednisone or equivalent. Principal outcomes measured were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (defined as a decrease ≥ 50%), time to PSA progression (defined as an increase > 50% over PSA nadir in case of PSA response or > 25% in the absence of PSA response), time to radiographic progression (according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria), overall and cancer-specific survival and occurrence of adverse events (according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03). Kaplan-Meier stati...

Aim: Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is the first-choice treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PC). Enzalutamide (ENZ) is approved for the treatment of post-docetaxel metastatic castration-resistant PC. In previous analyses of a Phase 2 study in pts with hormone-naive PC (HNPC) eligible for ADT, ENZ monotherapy after 6 mos and 1 yr (49 wks) was associated with a high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate regardless of presence of metastatic disease at baseline, and with stable bone mineral density (BMD) and quality of life (QoL) on treatment. Here we report long-term efficacy and safety in pts treated up to 2 yrs (wk 97). Methods: 67 patients with HNPC and noncastrate testosterone (≥230 ng/dL) were enrolled in this open-label single-arm study (NCT01302041) and received ENZ 160 mg/d until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary variable of PSA response (≥80% decline from baseline) was assessed at 6 mos, 1 yr, and 2 yrs. Additional endpoints included best overall objective tumour response, BMD, body composition, QoL and safety. Results: 67 pts were treated. Median age was 73.0 yrs (range 48-86); 26 (38.8%) had metastatic disease at baseline, and 24 (35.8%) and 16 (23.9%) had prior prostatectomy and radiation, respectively. 4 pts discontinued during the second year of follow-up and 45 remained on ENZ at 2 yrs. PSA response rate in pts remaining on ENZ at 2 yrs was 100% (95% CI 92, 100). Of 26 pts with metastases at baseline, 13 (50%) had complete response and 4 (15.4%) partial response as best overall tumour response over 2 yrs. There were decreases in mean (SD) total body BMD of -0.39% (2.24) and lean body mass -5.27% (3.66) at 2 yrs. EORTC-QLQ C30 QoL data showed maintenance of global health status through 2 yrs, though there were clinically meaningful deteriorations (≥10 points) on the fatigue, and role functioning scales. Most common adverse events (AEs) were gynaecomastia, fatigue, nipple pain and hot flush. Conclusions: ENZ monotherapy was associated with significant long-term PSA reductions and good tumour response in men with HNPC. This was achieved without adversely affecting total body BMD or global health status. Disclosure: B. Tombal: has received consultancy fees from Astellas, Medivation, Amgen, and Sanofi Aventis; payment for speaker bureaus from Amgen, Sanofi Aventis, Ferring, and Bayer (for whom he is also a board member); and travel support from Astellas and Medivation; M. Borre: has received payment for speaker bureaus from Astellas and Janssen; is a member of a Medivation study Steering committee and has received consultancy fees from Astellas, Ferring and Sanofi Aventis; P. Rathenborg: has received research grant support paid to his institution from Astellas and Medivation; A. Heidenreich: has received consultancy fees and payment for speaker bureaus from Amgen, Jansen, Ipsen, Sanofi Aventis, and Takeda (for whom he is also a board member); research and travel support from Astellas, and a research grant from Sanofi Aventis; P. Iversen: Research grant support from Astellas and Medivation; travel support for meetings related to the study from Astellas and Medivation; honoraria from Astellas and Medivation; and consultancy fees from Janssen, Ferring and Sanofi-Aventis; J. Braeckman: has received payment for speaker bureaus from Amgen and Eli Lilly; E. Baskin-Bey, T. Ouatas, F.G. Perabo, D. Phung and B. Baron: Employee of Astellas; M. Hirmand: is an employee of Medivation and owns stock in Medivation; M.R. Smith: has received consultancy fees from Astellas, Medivation, Janssen, Aragon, and Millenium. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

We report on a 24-year-old woman with a clinically and histologically benign mixed epithelial-mesenchymal tumor of the kidney. Since the epithelial component was by far the most predominant, we found the term 'embryonal adenoma' suitable. To our knowledge this is the first case reported in the literature.

5001 Background: In locally-advanced prostate cancer, the antiandrogen bicalutamide (Bic) is used to maintain quality of life relative to castration therapy (LHRHa), but efficacy as a monotherapy is limited. ENZA is an oral androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor with higher AR–binding affinity vs Bic, and it prevents nuclear translocation, shows no DNA binding, and induces apoptosis. ENZA was approved in the US after prolonging overall survival in post-docetaxel metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. This phase 2 study assessed ENZA monotherapy in patients (pts) with HNPC and noncastrate testosterone (T) ≥230 ng/dL. Methods: Pts with any stage HNPC (ECOG PS 0, life expectancy >1 y) requiring hormonal therapy received ENZA 160 mg/d for 25 wks. Primary endpoint was PSA response (≥80% decline at wk 25). Other endpoints were endocrine levels, pharmacokinetics, safety, and metabolic changes (body composition, bone biomarkers, lipids, and glycemic profiles). Results: 67 pts were enrolled. Median age was 73 y; 39% had metastases, 36% and 24% had prior prostatectomy and radiation, respectively. ENZA levels reached steady state after ~4 wks. Mean changes in metabolic outcomes at wk 25 included: –0.24% total body bone mineral density (BMD), –4.15% lean body mass, 6.85% fat body mass, 14.75% bone alkaline phosphatase, 4.55% total cholesterol, 6.48% triglycerides, –1.98% A1c, –0.10% fasting glucose, and 45.06% HOMA-IR. At wk 25, PSA response was 93% (62/67; 95% CI, 86%–99%); median PSA decrease was –99.6%. Mean T and estrogen increased 114% and 72%, respectively; other endocrine increases were observed, the highest was 185% for luteinizing hormone. Most common treatment-emergent AEs were grade 1 and included gynecomastia (36%), fatigue (34%), nipple pain (19%), and hot flush (18%). Five pts had serious AEs (none drug related). Conclusions: ENZA monotherapy achieved a high PSA response rate and marked PSA decline with efficacy similar to castration. In contrast to castration, BMD remained stable and metabolic variables (fat body mass, lipid and glycemic profiles) were not substantially impacted with ENZA monotherapy over the 6 month study period. Endocrine changes and AEs were consistent with potent AR inhibition. Clinical trial information: NCT01302041.

18 Background: Enzalutamide (ENZA) is an oral androgen receptor inhibitor that has been approved in the US and shown to increase overall survival by 4.8 months over a placebo (HR, 0.63) in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) previously treated with docetaxel (Scher et al, N Engl J Med 2012;367:1187). Compared with bicalutamide in nonclinical studies, enzalutamide had higher androgen receptor–binding affinity, prevented nuclear translocation, showed no DNA binding, and induced apoptosis (Tran et al, Science 2009;324:787). In contrast to previous phase II and III studies that exclusively enrolled patients with CRPC receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ie, testosterone (T) levels ≤50 ng/dL), this phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of ENZA monotherapy in patients who had never received hormone therapy; presenting with non-castrate T levels (≥230 ng/dL). Methods: This was a 25-wk, open-label, single-arm study of patients with hormone-naïve, histologically confirmed prostate cancer (all stages) requiring hormonal treatment, an ECOG PS score of 0, and a life expectancy >1 y. All patients received ENZA 160 mg/d without concomitment castration. Primary endpoint was PSA response (>80% decrease at wk 25). Secondary endpoints included changes in endocrine levels and safety/tolerability. Results: Among 67 men enrolled, the median (range) age was 73 (48, 86) y; 39% had metastases; 36% and 24% had undergone prostatectomy or radiotherapy before study entry. The PSA response rate (>80% PSA decline at wk 25) was 93%, with a median (range) decrease of −99% (−100, −57) at wk 25. Serum T and estrogen levels increased by a median (range) of 113% (−32, 300) and 58% (−49, 321) at wk 25, respectively, compared with baseline. 82% of men reported drug-related AEs (mostly Grade 1 or 2). Most frequent treatment-emergent AEs included gynaecomastia (36%), fatigue (34%), and hot flush (18%). 7% of men experienced SAEs; none were drug-related. Conclusions: ENZA monotherapy (160 mg) was associated with significant PSA response in nearly all men with hormone-naïve prostate cancer. Endocrine level changes and most common AEs (gynecomastica, fatigue and hot flush) were consistent with potent AR inhibition. Clinical trial information: NCT01302041.

62 Background: The efficacy and safety of enzalutamide (ENZA) monotherapy was assessed in hormone-naive men with prostate cancer (PC; any stage) eligible for androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). The primary end point of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (80% or more decline), assessed at 25 weeks (wks), was 92.5% with a median (range) maximum decrease of –99% (–100, –86.5) (Tombal et al. ASCO-GU 2013). Here we present data from the extended follow-up at 49 wks. Methods: In an open-label, single-arm phase II study, men age 18 or older with histologically confirmed PC requiring ADT, non-castrate testosterone (8 nmol/L or more), PSA 2 ng/mL or more at screening and a life expectancy of 12 months or more, received 160 mg ENZA once daily (NCT01302041). Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Secondary end points included changes in endocrine levels, metabolic parameters, bone mineral density (BMD), quality of life, and safety. Results: Sixty seven men were enrolled. Median (range) age was 73 (48 to 86); 38.8% had prior metastases; 35.8% and 23.94% had undergone prior prostatectomy and radiotherapy, respectively. Fifty nine men continued treatment beyond wk 25, and 54 completed wk 49. PSA response rate (80% or more reduction from baseline) at wk 49 was 80.6%, with a median (range) maximum decrease of –100% (–100, –86.5). Luteinizing hormone and testosterone were increased from baseline to wk 49 by 215.2% and 101.7%, respectively. Mean changes from baseline for metabolic outcomes at wk 49 were: +5.02% (total cholesterol), +8.86% (triglycerides), –3.54% (HbA1c), and +19.72% (HOMA-IR). Total body BMD was maintained at 49 wks (–0.30% from baseline). The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were gynecomastia (47.8%) and fatigue (38.8%). Seven men had serious AEs, none of which were drug related. Data on patient reported outcomes will be presented. Conclusions: ENZA monotherapy was associated with significant PSA reductions after 49 wks of treatment in men with hormone-naive PC. Endocrine changes and AEs were consistent with potent AR inhibition. Outcomes for all end points at 49 wks were consistent with those reported at 25 wks. Clinical trial information: NCT01302041.