Search

We retrospectively evaluated outcomes after radiation therapy for patients with oligoprogression on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).We identified patients irradiated to ≤5 progressive lesions while receiving ICI between 2010 and 2020. We excluded patients whose systemic therapy was switched after radiation but before progression. We evaluated predictors of local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).We screened 1423 patients and identified 120 who were eligible; the most common histologies were lung cancer (n = 59) and melanoma (n = 36). The median number of oligoprogressive lesions was 1. For the median LC of irradiated oligoprogressive lesions, PFS and OS were not reached at 6.41 (4.67-7.66) and 29.80 (22.54-43.33) months, respectively. Tumor histology, radiated site, or radiation modality were not associated with LC, PFS, or OS. Local response to radiation (P.0001) and radiation of newly developed lesions (P = .02) were associated with LC. Predictors of PFS on univariate and multivariate analyses were best response to radiation (P = .006) and high programmed death ligand 1 tumor proportion score (P = .02). On multivariate analyses, OS was associated with cumulative oligoprogressive lesion volumes (P = .02) and duration of ICI before oligoprogression (P = .03).Promising outcomes were observed among patients irradiated for oligoprogression on ICI, especially those with a favorable local response, high tumor programmed death ligand 1 expression, and those receiving ICI for longer periods before oligoprogression. These data can help identify patients well suited for radiation therapy versus those who should switch systemic treatment.

Despite improvements made with checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy, a need for new approaches to improve outcomes for patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma remains. EVX-01, a personalized neoepitope vaccine, combined with pembrolizumab treatment, holds the potential to fulfill this need. Here we present the rationale and novel design behind the KEYNOTE - D36 trial: an open label, single arm, phase II trial aiming to establish the clinical proof of concept and evaluate the safety of EVX-01 in combination with pembrolizumab in CPI naive patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. The primary objective is to evaluate if EVX-01 improves best overall response after initial stable disease or partial response to pembrolizumab treatment, in patients with advanced melanoma. The novel end points ensure a decisive readout which may prove helpful before making major investments in phase III trials with limited phase I data.Drugs targeting the immune system have improved the outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma. However, a significant proportion of patients do not benefit and there is a need for better therapeutic agents to be used alone or in combination with immune modulating agents. This article summarizes the rationale and design of a new trial with a personalized vaccine (EVX-01) that may improve outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma (unresectable stage III or IV melanoma). The EVX-01 vaccine aims to stimulate the patient's immune system to generate T cells that target specific molecules that can only be found on the surface of the individual patients' cancer cells (i.e. neoepitopes), resulting in cancer cell death. The trial will investigate if the personalized EVX-01 vaccine together with checkpoint inhibitor therapy works better for patients with advanced melanoma, than checkpoint inhibitor therapy alone.

Treatment options for advanced vulvar cancer are limited. We evaluated pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with advanced vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) enrolled in the phase 2 multicohort, open-label KEYNOTE-158 study (NCT02628067).Eligible patients had histologically or cytologically documented advanced vulvar SCC with prior treatment failure, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG performance status 0-1, and a tumor sample available for biomarker analysis. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was administered intravenously Q3W for up to 35 cycles (approximately 2 years). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by independent central radiologic review in all patients and subgroups based on PD-L1 combined positive score (≥1 [PD-L1-positive] versus1 [PD-L1-negative]).101 patients were enrolled. Median time from first dose to data cutoff was 36.0 months. The ORR (95% CI) was 10.9% (5.6%-18.7%) among all patients, 9.5% (4.2%-17.9%) among the 84 patients with PD-L1-positive tumors, and 28.6% (3.7%-71.0%) among the 7 patients with PD-L1-negative tumors. Among patients with a response, median DOR was 20.4 (range, 2.1+ to 28.0) months. Median (95% CI) PFS and OS were 2.1 (2.0-2.1) and 6.2 (4.9-9.4) months, respectively. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 50.5% of patients (grade 3-5, 11.9%) and led to discontinuation of treatment in 5.0% of patients. Two deaths were considered treatment-related (hepatitis, n = 2).Pembrolizumab monotherapy was associated with durable responses in a subset of patients with vulvar SCC. Responses occurred regardless of tumor PD-L1 status. No new safety signals emerged; overall, pembrolizumab was well tolerated.

Supplementary Fig 2

Overlapping peptides covering the entire NY-ESO-1 protein

Descriptions of Supplementary Figures 1, 2, and 3, and supplementary table 1

Supplementary Fig 1

Given its ability to induce both humoral and cellular immune responses, NY-ESO-1 has been considered a suitable antigen for a cancer vaccine. Despite promising results from early-phase clinical studies in patients with melanoma, NY-ESO-1 vaccine immunotherapy has not been widely investigated in larger trials; consequently, many questions remain as to the optimal vaccine formulation, predictive biomarkers, and sequencing and timing of vaccines in melanoma treatment. We conducted an adjuvant phase I/II clinical trial in high-risk resected melanoma to optimize the delivery of poly-ICLC, a TLR-3/MDA-5 agonist, as a component of vaccine formulation. A phase I dose-escalation part was undertaken to identify the MTD of poly-ICLC administered in combination with NY-ESO-1 and montanide. This was followed by a randomized phase II part investigating the MTD of poly-ICLC with NY-ESO-1 with or without montanide. The vaccine regimens were generally well tolerated, with no treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events. Both regimens induced integrated NY-ESO-1–specific CD4+ T-cell and humoral responses. CD8+ T-cell responses were mainly detected in patients receiving montanide. T-cell avidity toward NY-ESO-1 peptides was higher in patients vaccinated with montanide. In conclusion, NY-ESO-1 protein in combination with poly-ICLC is safe, well tolerated, and capable of inducing integrated antibody and CD4+ T-cell responses in most patients. Combination with montanide enhances antigen-specific T-cell avidity and CD8+ T-cell cross-priming in a fraction of patients, indicating that montanide contributes to the induction of specific CD8+ T-cell responses to NY-ESO-1.

Supplementary Fig 3

Supplementary Figure Legends and Figures

PDOTS Movie

4 tables included. FDA Approvals for ICIs. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V4.0. for selected irAEs. Additional subanalysis.

PDOTS Movie 2

In vitro kinase inhibitory activity of Compound 1

Supplementary Figure 1: Post-progresion survival based on initial PFS (6, 9, 12, and 15 months). Supplementary Figure 2: Radiographic example of isolated progression in one patient with acquired resistance to anti-PD-1. Supplementary Figure 3: Overall survival in the entire cohort

Immune-related adverse events (irAE) have been described with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), but the incidence and relative risk (RR) of irAEs associated with these drugs remains unclear. We selected five key irAEs from treatments with approved cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors (ipilimumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab, respectively) to better characterize their safety profile. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized phase II/III immunotherapy trials, with non-ICI control arms, conducted between 1996 and 2016. We calculated the incidence and RR of selected all-grade and high-grade gastrointestinal, liver, skin, endocrine, and pulmonary irAEs across the trials using random-effect models. Twenty-one trials were included, totaling 11,454 patients, of whom 6,528 received an ICI (nivolumab, 1,534; pembrolizumab, 1,522; atezolizumab, 751; and ipilimumab, 2,721) and 4,926 had not. Compared with non-ICI arms, ICIs were associated with more all-grade colitis (RR 7.66, P < 0.001), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (RR 1.80; P = 0.020), rash (RR 2.50; P = 0.001), hypothyroidism (RR 6.81; P < 0.001), and pneumonitis (RR 4.14; P = 0.012). Rates of high-grade colitis (RR 5.85; P < 0.001) and AST elevation (RR 2.79; P = 0.014) were higher in the ICI arms. Ipilimumab was associated with a higher risk of all-grade rash (P = 0.006) and high-grade colitis (P = 0.021) compared with PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs. Incidence of fatal irAE was < 1%. This meta-analysis offers substantial evidence that ICIs are associated with a small but significant increase in risk of selected all-grade irAEs and high-grade gastrointestinal and liver toxicities. Although fatal irAEs remain rare, AEs should be recognized promptly as early interventions may alleviate future complications. Cancer Immunol Res; 5(4); 312–8. ©2017 AACR.

Device loading, media addition, media extraction

Anti–PD-1 therapy has improved clinical outcomes in advanced melanoma, but most patients experience intrinsic resistance. Responding patients can develop acquired resistance to anti–PD-1. We retrospectively reviewed 488 patients treated with anti–PD-1 from three academic centers and identified 36 patients with acquired resistance, defined as disease progression following objective response. The incidence, timing, disease sites, post-progression survival (PPS), and outcomes were evaluated descriptively. The acquired resistance cohort consisted of 67% with more than 1 feature of poor prognosis (stage M1c, elevated LDH, or brain metastasis), and 67% had previously received ipilimumab. Partial and complete responses were achieved in 89% (n = 32) and 11% (n = 4) of patients, respectively, and median time to resistance (progression-free survival; PFS) was 11.1 months (range 4.3–32.8 months). Most progression was isolated (78% of patients, n = 28) and occurred while receiving therapy (78%, n = 28). The median PPS was 12.8 months (range 0.1–51.8 months), and the median overall survival was 33.7 months. Among isolated progressors, 15 received localized therapy (12 with surgery, 3 with radiation). Patients with isolated versus systemic progression exhibited a trend for improved PPS (P = 0.081), and patients with an initial PFS ≥ 15 months showed significant PPS improvement (P = 0.036). Two patients experienced subsequent responses to anti–PD-1 resumption. In conclusion, acquired resistance to anti–PD-1 was frequently associated with excellent clinical outcomes and often presented as isolated progression amenable to localized therapy (surgery or radiation) or systemic progression sensitive to therapy resumption. Cancer Immunol Res; 5(5); 357–62. ©2017 AACR.

Supplementary Table 2

redacted protocol

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table 3

Purpose:In advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC), there is a need to identify biomarkers of response to therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors.Patients and Methods:In post hoc exploratory analyses from CheckMate 032 (GC/GEJC cohort), we evaluated associations between nivolumab ± ipilimumab (NIVO ± IPI) efficacy and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, defined by tumor cells (% TC) or combined positive score (CPS; sum of PD-L1–staining TCs + immune cells, divided by total viable TCs, × 100) using the Dako PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx assay, or inflammatory gene expression.Results:There was a trend toward increased efficacy (objective response and overall survival) when PD-L1 expression was determined by CPS compared with % TC at higher cutoffs of ≥5 and ≥10 in the pooled analysis of all treatment regimens. In this analysis, 19% and 26% of patients with PD-L1–positive tumors at a CPS cutoff of ≥5 and ≥10, respectively, had an objective response compared with 8% and 9% of patients at the equivalent % TC cutoffs. Longer survival was demonstrated in patients with PD-L1–positive (defined by CPS cutoffs of ≥5 and ≥10) versus PD-L1–negative status. Similar results were observed in the NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg subgroup. Multiple inflammatory gene signatures/transcripts, including a signature consisting of four genes (CD274, CD8A, LAG3, and STAT1), showed associations with response to NIVO ± IPI.Conclusions:This study suggests a greater association of PD-L1 expression by CPS with NIVO ± IPI efficacy compared with % TC PD-L1 expression in patients with GC/GEJC. Inflammatory signatures were also associated with NIVO ± IPI response, warranting further investigation.See related commentary by Moutafi and Rimm, p. 3812

Gene expression levels by cohort

Supplemental Methods, Figures, and Tables

Purpose:Multisite stereotactic body radiotherapy followed by pembrolizumab (SBRT+P) has demonstrated safety in advanced solid tumors (ASTs). However, no studies have examined the relationships between irradiated tumor response, SBRT-induced tumor gene expression, and overall survival (OS).Patients and Methods:Patients with AST received SBRT (30–50 Gy in 3–5 fractions) to two to four metastases followed by pembrolizumab (200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks). SBRT was prescribed to a maximum tumor volume of 65 mL. Small metastases received the complete prescribed coverage (complete-Rx), while larger metastases received partial coverage (partial-Rx). Treated metastasis control (TMC) was defined as a lack of progression for an irradiated metastasis. Landmark analysis was used to assess the relationship between TMC and OS. Thirty-five biopsies were obtained from 24 patients: 19 pre-SBRT and 16 post-SBRT (11 matched) prior to pembrolizumab and were analyzed via RNA microarray.Results:Sixty-eight patients (139 metastases) were enrolled with a median follow-up of 10.4 months. One-year TMC was 89.5% with no difference between complete-Rx or partial-Rx. On multivariable analysis, TMC was independently associated with a reduced risk for death (HR, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.17–0.75; P = 0.006). SBRT increased expression of innate and adaptive immune genes and concomitantly decreased expression of cell cycle and DNA repair genes in the irradiated tumors. Elevated post-SBRT expression of DNASE1 correlated with increased expression of cytolytic T-cell genes and irradiated tumor response.Conclusions:In the context of SBRT+P, TMC independently correlates with OS. SBRT impacts intratumoral immune gene expression associated with TMC. Randomized trials are needed to validate these findings.

Supplementary Methods, Tables, and Figures

Corresponding % TC and CPS with response and OS

Additional details on CPS scoring done by Agilent-certified pathologists

Purpose: Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (ASCC) accounts for 2% to 4% of gastrointestinal malignancies in the United States and is increasing in incidence; however, genomic features of ASCC are incompletely characterized. Primary treatment of ASCC involves concurrent chemotherapy and radiation (CRT), but the mutational landscape of resistance to CRT is unknown. Here, we aim to compare mutational features of ASCC in the pre- and post-CRT setting.Experimental Design: We perform whole-exome sequencing of primary (n = 31) and recurrent (n = 30) ASCCs and correlate findings with clinical data. We compare genomic features of matched pre- and post-CRT tumors to identify genomic features of CRT response. Finally, we investigate the mutational underpinnings of an extraordinary ASCC response to immunotherapy.Results: We find that both primary and recurrent ASCC tumors harbor mutations in genes, such as PIK3CA and FBXW7, that are also mutated in other HPV-associated cancers. Overall mutational burden was not significantly different in pre- versus post-CRT tumors, and several examples of shared clonal driver mutations were identified. In two cases, clonally related pre- and post-CRT tumors harbored distinct oncogenic driver mutations in the same cancer gene (KRAS or FBXW7). A patient with recurrent disease achieved an exceptional response to anti-programmed death (PD-1) therapy, and genomic dissection revealed high mutational burden and predicted neoantigen load.Conclusions: We perform comprehensive mutational analysis of ASCC and characterize mutational features associated with CRT. Although many primary and recurrent tumors share driver events, we identify several unique examples of clonal evolution in response to treatment. Clin Cancer Res; 23(12); 3214–22. ©2016 AACR.

Purpose: We investigated the safety and antitumor activity of the anti–programmed death 1 monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab in patients with estrogen receptor–positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer with programmed death ligand 1–positive (PD-L1–positive) tumors in the phase Ib open-label, multicohort KEYNOTE-028 (NCT02054806) study.Patients and Methods: Patients with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer with PD-L1–positive tumors (combined positive score ≥1) received pembrolizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) up to 2 years or until confirmed progression/intolerable toxicity. Primary endpoints were safety and overall response rate (ORR), based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1 (RECIST v1.1) as assessed by investigator review.Results: Between April 2014 and January 2015, 25 patients were enrolled. Median number of prior therapies for breast cancer, including endocrine agents, was 9 (range, 3–15). Median follow-up was 9.7 months (range, 0.7–31.8 months). Three patients experienced partial response (PR) and none experienced complete response (CR), resulting in an ORR of 12.0% (95% CI, 2.5%–31.2%); 16% of patients had stable disease (SD) and clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + [SD for ≥24 weeks]) was 20% (95% CI, 7–41). Median duration of response was 12.0 months (range, 7.4–15.9 months). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was 64%; nausea (20%) and fatigue (12%) were most common and were predominantly grade 1/2. No treatment-related discontinuations or deaths occurred.Conclusions: Pembrolizumab was well tolerated with modest but durable overall response in certain patients with previously treated, advanced, PD-L1–positive, ER+/HER2− breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 24(12); 2804–11. ©2018 AACR.

BackgroundIvuxolimab (PF-04518600) and utomilumab (PF-05082566) are humanized agonistic IgG2 monoclonal antibodies against OX40 and 4-1BB, respectively. This first-in-human, multicenter, open-label, phase I, dose-escalation/dose-expansion study explored safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of ivuxolimab+utomilumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.MethodsDose-escalation: patients with advanced bladder, gastric, or cervical cancer, melanoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were unresponsive to available therapies, had no standard therapy available or declined standard therapy were enrolled into five dose cohorts: ivuxolimab (0.1–3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W)) intravenously plus utomilumab (20 or 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W)) intravenously. Dose-expansion: patients with melanoma (n=10) and NSCLC (n=20) who progressed on prior anti-programmed death receptor 1/programmed death ligand-1 and/or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (melanoma) received ivuxolimab 30 mg Q2W intravenously plus utomilumab 20 mg Q4W intravenously. Adverse events (AEs) were graded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.4.03 and efficacy was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) V.1.1 and immune-related RECIST (irRECIST). Paired tumor biopsies and whole blood were collected to assess pharmacodynamic effects and immunophenotyping. Whole blood samples were collected longitudinally for immunophenotyping.ResultsDose-escalation: 57 patients were enrolled; 2 (3.5%) patients with melanoma (0.3 mg/kg+20 mg and 0.3 mg/kg+100 mg) achieved partial response (PR), 18 (31.6%) patients achieved stable disease (SD); the disease control rate (DCR) was 35.1% across all dose levels. Dose-expansion: 30 patients were enrolled; 1 patient with NSCLC achieved PR lasting >77 weeks. Seven of 10 patients with melanoma (70%) and 7 of 20 patients with NSCLC (35%) achieved SD: median (range) duration of SD was 18.9 (13.9–49.0) weeks for the melanoma cohort versus 24.1 (14.3–77.9+) weeks for the NSCLC cohort; DCR (NSCLC) was 40%. Grade 3–4 treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 28 (49.1%) patients versus 11 (36.7%) patients in dose-escalation and dose-expansion, respectively. There were no grade 5 AEs deemed attributable to treatment. Ivuxolimab area under the concentration–time curve increased in a dose-dependent manner at 0.3–3 mg/kg doses.ConclusionsIvuxolimab+utomilumab was found to be well tolerated and demonstrated preliminary antitumor activity in selected groups of patients.Trial registration numberNCT02315066.

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) agents and adoptive cell transfer (ACT) of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) are prominent immunotherapies used for the treatment of advanced melanoma. Both therapies rely on activation of lymphocytes that target shared tumor antigens or neoantigens. Recent analysis of patients with metastatic melanoma who underwent treatment with TIL ACT at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) demonstrated decreased responses in patients previously treated with anti PD-1 agents. We aimed to find a basis for the difference in response rates between anti PD-1 naïve and experienced patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We examined the tumor mutational burden (TMB) of resected tumors and the repertoire of neoantigens targeted by autologous TIL in a cohort of 112 anti PD-1 naïve and 69 anti PD-1 experienced patients. RESULTS: Anti-PD-1 naïve patients were found to possess tumors with higher TMBs (352.0 vs. 213.5, p = 0.005) and received TIL reactive with more neoantigens (2 vs. 1, p = 0.003) compared to anti-PD-1 experienced patients. Among patients treated with TIL ACT, TMB and number of neoantigens identified were higher in ACT responders than ACT non-responders in both anti-PD-1naïve and experienced patients. Among patients with comparable TMBs and predicted neoantigen loads, treatment products administered to anti-PD-1 naïve patients were more likely to contain T-cells reactive against neoantigens than treatment products for anti-PD-1 experienced patients (2.5 vs. 1, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that decreases in TMB and targeted neoantigens partially account for the difference in response to ACT and that additional factors likely influence responses in these patients.