1. Abiotic immobilization of nitrate in two soils of relic Abies pinsapo-fir forests under Mediterranean climate
- Author
-
Ekaterina Bulygina, Eric A. Davidson, Roberto García-Ruiz, José A. Carreira, and Patricia Torres-Cañabate
- Subjects
inorganic chemicals ,Hydrology ,Abiotic component ,food and beverages ,Soil type ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Deposition (aerosol physics) ,chemistry ,Nitrate ,Environmental chemistry ,Soil water ,Environmental Chemistry ,Ammonium ,Ecosystem ,Nitrogen cycle ,Geology ,Earth-Surface Processes ,Water Science and Technology - Abstract
Evidence for abiotic immobilization of nitrogen (N) in soil is accumulating, but remains controversial. Identifying the fate of N from atmospheric deposition is important for understanding the N cycle of forest ecosystems. We studied soils of two Abies pinsapo fir forests under Mediterranean climate seasonality in southern Spain—one with low N availability and the other with symptoms of N saturation. We hypothesized that biotic and abiotic immobilization of nitrate (NO3 −) would be lower in soils under these forests compared to more mesic temperate forests, and that the N saturated stand would have the lowest rates of NO3 − immobilization. Live and autoclaved soils were incubated with added 15NO3 − (10 μg N g−1 dry soil; 99% enriched) for 24 h, and the label was recovered as total dissolved-N, NO3 −, ammonium (NH4 +), or dissolved organic-N (DON). To evaluate concerns about possible iron interference in analysis of NO3 − concentrations, both flow injection analysis (FIA) and ion chromatography (IC) were applied to water extracts, soluble iron was measured in both water and salt extracts, and standard additions of NO3 − to salt extracts were analyzed. Good agreement between FIA and IC analysis, low concentrations of soluble Fe, and 100% (±3%) recovery of NO3 − standard additions all pointed to absence of an interference problem for NO3 − quantification. On average, 85% of the added 15NO3 − label was recovered as 15NO3 −, which supports our hypothesis that rates of immobilization were generally low in these soils. A small amount (mean = 0.06 μg N g−1 dry soil) was recovered as 15NH4 + in live soils and none in sterilized soils. Mean recovery as DO15N ranged from 0.6 to 1.5 μg N g−1 dry soil, with no statistically significant effect of sterilization or soil type, indicating that this was an abiotic process that occurred at similar rates in both soils. These results demonstrate a detectable, but modest rate of abiotic immobilization of NO3 − to DON, supporting our first hypothesis. These mineral soils may not have adequate carbon availability to support the regeneration of reducing microsites needed for high rates of NO3 − reduction. Our second hypothesis regarding lower expected abiotic immobilization in soils from the N-saturated site was not supported. The rates of N deposition in this region may not be high enough to have swamped the capacity for soil NO3 − immobilization, even in the stand showing some symptoms of N saturation. A growing body of evidence suggests that soil abiotic NO3 − immobilization is common, but that rates are influenced by a combination of factors, including the presence of plentiful available carbon, reduced minerals in anaerobic microsites and adequate NO3 − supply.
- Published
- 2008