Search

To investigate crural diaphragm (CD) function in systemic sclerosis (SSc) using high-resolution manometry and standardized inspiratory maneuvers.Eight SSc volunteers (average age, 40.1 years; one male) and 13 controls (average age, 32.2 years; six males) participated in the study. A high-resolution manometry/impedance system measured the esophagus and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) pressure profile during swallows and two respiratory maneuvers: sinus arrhythmia maneuver (SAM; the average of six EGJ peak pressures during 5-s deep inhalations) and threshold maneuver (TM; the EGJ peak pressures during forced inhalation under 12 and 24 cmH2O loads). Inspiratory diaphragm lowering (IDL) was taken as the displacement of the EGJ high-pressure zone during the SAM.SSc patients had lower mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure than controls during normal breathing (19.7±2.8 mmHg vs 32.2±2.7 mmHg, P=0.007). Sinus arrhythmia maneuver pressure was higher in SSc patients than in controls (142.6±9.4 mmHg vs 104.6±13.8 mmHg, P=0.019). Sinus arrhythmia maneuver pressure normalized to IDL was also higher in SSc patients than in controls (83.8±13.4 mmHg vs 37.5±6.9 mmHg, P=0.005). Threshold maneuver pressures normalized to IDL were also greater in SSc patients than in controls (TM 12 cmH2O: 85.1±16.4 mmHg vs 43.9±6.3 mmHg, P=0.039; TM 24 cmH2O: 85.2±16.4 mmHg vs 46.2±6.6 mmHg, P=0.065). Inspiratory diaphragm lowering in SSc patients was less than in controls (2.1±0.3 cm vs 3±0.2 cm, P=0.011).SSc patients had increased inspiratory EGJ pressure. This is an add-on to EGJ pressure and indicates that the antireflux barrier can be trained.

Background: Through rhythmic variations, the diaphragm influence lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure acting as an external sphincter. LES pressure recording is characterized by increased pressure in inspiration due to contraction of the diaphragmatic crura that involves the sphincter. Aim: To describe a method of measuring LES pressure during standardized inspiratory maneuvers with increasing loads. Methods: The study population comprised of eight healthy female volunteers (average age of 31.5 years). An esophageal high-resolution manometry and impedance system was used for measuring the LES pressure during 3-second inspiratory efforts under 12, 24 and 48 cm H2O loads (Threshold maneuvers). Results: There was a significant difference between the average maximum LES pressure and the average maximum basal LES pressure during the first (76.19±17.92 difference, p=0.0008), second (86.92±19.01 difference, p=0.0004), and third seconds of the maneuver (90.86±17.93 difference, p=0.0002), with 12, 24 and 48 cmH2O loads. Conclusion: This maneuver is a standardization of the inspiratory LES pressure and may better differentiate patients with reflux disease from healthy individuals, and may also be useful for monitoring the treatment of these patients through inspiratory muscle training. Racional: Através de variações rítmicas, o diafragma influencia a pressão do EEI, atuando como um esfíncter externo. O registro manométrico da sua pressão caracteriza-se por aumento de pressão na inspiração resultante da contração da crura diafragmática que envolve o esfíncter. Objetivo: Descrever um método de medida da pressão do esfíncter esofágico inferior (EEI) durante manobras inspiratórias padronizadas, com cargas crescentes. Métodos: Oito voluntários sadios (sexo feminino, média de idade de 31,5 anos) participaram do estudo. Uma manometria esofágica de alta resolução e impedanciometria mediram a pressão do EEI durante manobras inspiratórias com o Threshold sob cargas de 12, 24 e 48 cm H2O. Resultados: Comparando-se as médias houve diferença significativa entre a pressão máxima do EEI e a sua pressão basal máxima durante o primeiro (diferença de 76,19±17,92, p=0,0008), segundo (diferença 86,92±19,01, p=0,0004) e terceiro segundos da manobra (diferença 90,86±17,93, p=0,0002), tanto com carga de 12 cm de H2O, quanto com 24 e 48 cm. Conclusão: Esta manobra é uma padronização da pressão inspiratória do EEI e pode diferenciar melhor pacientes com doença do refluxo de indivíduos sadios, podendo também ser útil na monitorização do tratamento desses pacientes por meio do treinamento muscular inspiratório.

Background Inspiratory esophagogastric junction (EGJ) pressure is lower in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and patients fail to increase EGJ pressure during the inspiratory effort. The aim of this study was to assess the EGJ activity during inspiratory maneuvers (high-resolution manometry, HRM) and the crural diaphragm (CD) thickness (endoscopic ultrasound, EUS) in GERD. Methods Twenty esophagitis patients (average age 45 years, 7 grade A, 13 grade B) had HRM and EUS. Forty-three controls were recruited; 30 had HRM (average age 33 years), and 13 had EUS (average age 40 years). The EGJ contractility index (EGJ-CI) (mm Hg×cm) was measured during normal respiration and two inspiratory maneuvers: without and with inspiratory loads of 12, 24, and 48 cmH2O (TH-maneuvers). A composite metric for TH-maneuvers (“EGJ total activity”) was defined as the product of the maximal EGJ pressure and the length of its aboral excursion during the maneuver (mm Hg×cm). The CD thickness (cm) was measured during expiration (12 MHz). Key Results Expiratory lower esophageal sphincter pressure and integrated relaxation pressure were lower in GERD. The EGJ-CI and the “EGJ total activity” were lower in GERD during TH-maneuvers (48-cmH2O load: 168.4 ± 13.8 vs 114.8 ± 9.6, P=.006). Patients failed to sustain the inspiratory CD activity across the 12 and 48-cmH2O efforts. The CD was thinner in GERD patients (0.37 ± 0.03 vs 0.49 ± 0.04, P=.02). The CD thickness correlated with the increment in the “EGJ total activity” in GERD without a hiatal hernia (r=.702, P=.016, n=11). Conclusions & Inferences There are anatomical changes and functional failure of the CD in esophagitis patients supporting the possibility of a skeletal muscle deficiency in GERD.