Search

Image Quality of MRI brain scans is strongly influenced by within scanner head movements and the resulting image artifacts alter derived measures like brain volume and cortical thickness. Automated image quality assessment is key to controlling for confounding effects of poor image quality. In this study, we systematically test for the influence of image quality on univariate statistics and machine learning classification. We analyzed group effects of sex/gender on local brain volume and made predictions of sex/gender using logistic regression, while correcting for brain size. From three large publicly available datasets, two age and sex-balanced samples were derived to test the generalizability of the effect for pooled sample sizes of n=760 and n=1094. Results of the Bonferroni corrected t-tests over 3747 gray matter features showed a strong influence of low-quality data on the ability to find significant sex/gender differences for the smaller sample. Increasing sample size and more so image quality showed a stark increase in detecting significant effects in univariate group comparisons. For the classification of sex/gender using logistic regression, both increasing sample size and image quality had a marginal effect on the Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve for most datasets and subsamples. Our results suggest a more stringent quality control for univariate approaches than for multivariate classification with a leaning towards higher quality for classical group statistics and bigger sample sizes for machine learning applications in neuroimaging.

Machine learning (ML) models benefit from large datasets. Collecting data in biomedical domains is costly and challenging, hence, combining datasets has become a common practice. However, datasets obtained under different conditions could present undesired site-specific variability. Data harmonization methods aim to remove site-specific variance while retaining biologically relevant information. This study evaluates the effectiveness of popularly used ComBat-based methods for harmonizing data in scenarios where the class balance is not equal across sites. We find that these methods struggle with data leakage issues. To overcome this problem, we propose a novel approach PrettYharmonize, designed to harmonize data by pretending the target labels. We validate our approach using controlled datasets designed to benchmark the utility of harmonization. Finally, using real-world MRI and clinical data, we compare leakage-prone methods with PrettYharmonize and show that it achieves comparable performance while avoiding data leakage, particularly in site-target-dependence scenarios.

In our study, we explored the properties of a spatially homogeneous and anisotropic Bianchi type V I0 Universe. Our investigation centered on integrating cosmic domain walls into the f(R, T) theory of gravitation, initially proposed by Harko et al. in 2011. To tackle the field equations, we employed the relationship between the expansion scalar ({\theta}) and the shear scalar ({\sigma}). Our analysis encompassed both the dynamic and cosmological aspects of the Universe. By comparing our findings to the {\Lambda}CDM model, specifically focusing on the evolution of the jerk parameter, we found a striking agreement between the two models. A noteworthy discovery was the verification of accelerated expansion in our described model, consistent with the prevailing observational data. Finally, we examine the energy condition criteria and determine that the violation of the Strong Energy Condition (SEC), while the Null Energy Condition (NEC), Weak Energy Condition (WEC) and Dominant Energy Condition (DEC) continue to meet the requirements for positivity., Comment: 19 pages

The paper explores a plane symmetric cosmological model within the framework of the Lyra manifold, incorporating interactions among various fields. These fields include a charged perfect fluid, a mass-less scalar field, and an electromagnetic field. The study focuses on deriving relativistic field equations and exact solutions for this complex system. The relationships between the scalar field (\b{eta}) and the average scale factor (a(t)), as well as between the metric potentials, are assumed to solve the nonlinear field equations. Two specific expansion models are examined: 1) Exponential expansion and 2) Power law expansion. The research delves into the dynamic parameters behavior, observing changes in pressure, density, and cosmological parameters across different models. The findings indicate that while the Universe is expanding, the rate of expansion can vary among the different models. The investigation also involves kinematic parameters, such as jerk and snap parameters derived from the scale factor variation, and compares them to the {\Lambda}CDM model., Comment: 19 pages

Mutation validation (MV) is a recently proposed approach for model selection, garnering significant interest due to its unique characteristics and potential benefits compared to the widely used cross-validation (CV) method. In this study, we empirically compared MV and $k$-fold CV using benchmark and real-world datasets. By employing Bayesian tests, we compared generalization estimates yielding three posterior probabilities: practical equivalence, CV superiority, and MV superiority. We also evaluated the differences in the capacity of the selected models and computational efficiency. We found that both MV and CV select models with practically equivalent generalization performance across various machine learning algorithms and the majority of benchmark datasets. MV exhibited advantages in terms of selecting simpler models and lower computational costs. However, in some cases MV selected overly simplistic models leading to underfitting and showed instability in hyperparameter selection. These limitations of MV became more evident in the evaluation of a real-world neuroscientific task of predicting sex at birth using brain functional connectivity.

Machine learning (ML) provides powerful tools for predictive modeling. ML's popularity stems from the promise of sample-level prediction with applications across a variety of fields from physics and marketing to healthcare. However, if not properly implemented and evaluated, ML pipelines may contain leakage typically resulting in overoptimistic performance estimates and failure to generalize to new data. This can have severe negative financial and societal implications. Our aim is to expand understanding associated with causes leading to leakage when designing, implementing, and evaluating ML pipelines. Illustrated by concrete examples, we provide a comprehensive overview and discussion of various types of leakage that may arise in ML pipelines., Comment: second draft

The fast-paced development of machine learning (ML) methods coupled with its increasing adoption in research poses challenges for researchers without extensive training in ML. In neuroscience, for example, ML can help understand brain-behavior relationships, diagnose diseases, and develop biomarkers using various data sources like magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography. The primary objective of ML is to build models that can make accurate predictions on unseen data. Researchers aim to prove the existence of such generalizable models by evaluating performance using techniques such as cross-validation (CV), which uses systematic subsampling to estimate the generalization performance. Choosing a CV scheme and evaluating an ML pipeline can be challenging and, if used improperly, can lead to overestimated results and incorrect interpretations. We created julearn, an open-source Python library, that allow researchers to design and evaluate complex ML pipelines without encountering in common pitfalls. In this manuscript, we present the rationale behind julearn's design, its core features, and showcase three examples of previously-published research projects that can be easily implemented using this novel library. Julearn aims to simplify the entry into the ML world by providing an easy-to-use environment with built in guards against some of the most common ML pitfalls. With its design, unique features and simple interface, it poses as a useful Python-based library for research projects., Comment: 13 pages, 5 figures