1. Spontaneous Path Tracing in Task-Irrelevant Mazes: Spatial Affordances Trigger Dynamic Visual Routines.
- Author
-
Wong, Kimberly W. and Scholl, Brian J.
- Abstract
Given a maze (e.g., in a book of puzzles), you might solve it by drawing out paths with your pencil. But even without a pencil, you might naturally find yourself mentally tracing along various paths. This "mental path tracing" may intuitively seem to depend on your (overt, conscious, voluntary) goal of wanting to get out of the maze, but might it also occur spontaneously—as a result of simply seeing the maze, via a kind of dynamic visual routine? Here, observers simply had to compare the visual properties of two probes presented in a maze. The maze itself was entirely task irrelevant, but we predicted that simply seeing the maze's visual structure would "afford" incidental mental path tracing (à la Gibson). Across four experiments, observers were slower to compare probes that were further from each other along the paths, even when controlling for lower level properties (such as the probes' brute linear separation, ignoring the maze "walls"). These results also generalized beyond mazes to other unfamiliar displays with task-irrelevant circular obstacles. This novel combination of two prominent themes from our field—affordances and visual routines—suggests that at least some visual routines may not require voluntary goals; instead, they may operate in an automatic (incidental, stimulus-driven) fashion, as a part of visual processing itself. Public Significance Statement: What goes on in your mind when you solve a maze, for example in a book of puzzles? Normally, this might involve tracing through the paths with a pencil or finger. But not necessarily: You can also solve a maze just by looking. Here we show that this mental path tracing also occurs when you are not trying to solve such puzzles (and with unfamiliar sorts of mazes, without entrances or exits): Even when just passively viewing such displays, your mind automatically and spontaneously traces the paths between salient points. We demonstrated this by showing that the time it takes to compare two small probes that appear in a maze (which is itself entirely irrelevant to the task) is a function of how long the path between them is (as opposed to the brute linear distance between them). This reveals how even such simple stimuli may engage surprisingly sophisticated dynamic visual processing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF