Search

Nowadays, a multitude of scientific publications on health science are being developed that require correct bibliographic search in order to avoid the use and inclusion of retracted literature in them. The use of these articles could directly affect the consistency of the scientific studies and could affect clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the capacity of the main scientific literature search engines, both general (Gooogle Scholar) and scientific (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science), used in health sciences in order to check their ability to detect and warn users of retracted articles in the searches carried out. The sample of retracted articles was obtained from RetractionWatch. The results showed that although Google Scholar was the search engine with the highest capacity to retrieve selected articles, it was the least effective, compared with scientific search engines, at providing information on the retraction of articles. The use of different scientific search engines to retrieve as many scientific articles as possible, as well as never using only a generic search engine, is highly recommended. This will reduce the possibility of including retracted articles and will avoid affecting the reliability of the scientific studies carried out.

The hemodynamic response to amrinone was analyzed in 19 patients with severe heart failure (NYHA III or IV). In 17 patients, 2 bolus of amrinone (0.75 mg/kg) were administered with an interval of 30 minutes, while a single bolus only was administered in 2 patients. In all patients the initial bolus was followed by continuous perfusion of Amrinone (10 micrograms/kg/min in 17 patients; 7 and 5 micrograms/kg/min in the remaining two). Cardiac index increased from 1.8 +/- 0.2 to 2.5 +/- 0.4 l/min/m2 (p less than 0.01), and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and mean right atrial pressure decreased significantly (from 24 +/- 5.2 to 14 +/- 6 mmHg, p less than 0.01; and from 8.7 +/- 6.5 to 3.2 +/- 3.4, p less than 0.05 respectively). There were no significant changes in mean blood pressure (93 +/- 17 versus 88 +/- 13), heart rate (81 +/- 15 versus 84 +/- 14 beats per minute) and systolic work index (26.4 +/- 10.7 versus 37.7 +/- 12.3 g-m/m2). The maximum effect was obtained at 60 minutes and maintained throughout the period of monitoring (8 hours). In the 2 patients who received a single bolus of amrinone the maximum effect was reached at 30 minutes (cardiac index 1.3 +/- 0.1 versus 2.5 +/- 0.1 l/min/m2; pulmonary capillary pressure 24 +/- 5 versus 16.8 +/- 6.5 mmHg; mean right atrial pressure 11 +/- 1 versus 3.5 +/- 3.5 mmHg), and was followed by a progressive loss of efficiency, until effect had totally disappeared and situation basal returned, between the third and fourth hours.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)