Search

Emerging evidences prove that the ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is strictly linked to coagulopathy even if pneumonia appears as the major clinical manifestation. The exact incidence of thromboembolic events is largely unknown, so that a relative significant number of studies have been performed in order to explore thrombotic risk in COVID-19 patients. Cytokine storm, mediated by pro-inflammatory interleukins, tumor necrosis factor α and elevated acute phase reactants, is primarily responsible for COVID-19-associated hypercoagulopathy. Also comorbidities, promoting endothelial dysfunction, contribute to a higher thromboembolic risk. In this review we aim to investigate epidemiology and clarify the pathophysiological pathways underlying hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients, providing indications on the prevention of thromboembolic events in COVID-19. Furthermore we aim to reassume the pathophysiological paths involved in COVID-19 infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background COVID-19 may induce a coagulation dysregulation resulting in a prothrombotic state with a higher risk of arterial and venous thrombosis. This abnormal thrombotic diathesis can lead to pulmonary embolism, stroke, and intracardiac thrombosis. Case summary We present two cases of unusual intracardiac thrombosis in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. In both cases, imaging tests (such as transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), computed tomography scan of the chest, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging) showed evidence of unusual intracardiac thrombosis with thrombi adherent to regularly contracting walls. Discussion This evidence confirms that COVID-19 induces a hypercoagulable state which can result in intracardiac thrombosis. Therefore, TTE is indicated in all COVID-19 patients for early diagnosis, and prompt anticoagulant therapy is to be considered as a thromboprophylaxis strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: In the latest years an emerging interest has risen towards the role of endothelial dysfunction (ED) in the pathogenesis of heart failure (HF) since the very first steps of the disease. Since the prevalent etiology of HF is ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), it is still not clear whether the connection with ED is linked to HF itself or to atherosclerosis. The aim is to determine the presence of ED in subjects with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM) compared to ICM., Methods: In this observational study 107 patients were enrolled, 65 of them suffering from IDCM and 42 from ICM. ED was assessed as peripheral arterial tonometry by means of EndoPAT device. The Reactive Hyperaemia Index (RHI) was calculated, ED being established with RHI values ≤1.67 and normal endothelial function >2.00 (grey area between 1.67 and 2.00)., Results: ED, expressed both as RHI ≤1.67 and RHI ≤2.00, showed a similar prevalence in the two groups. However, they differed as regards sex, dyslipidemia and statin use., Conclusion: Endothelial function, evaluated through peripheral artery tonometry, seems equally compromised in patients with IDCM and ICM., Competing Interests: None., (AJCD Copyright © 2022.)

Background: The multiple beneficial effects of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction are vastly known, but still no or few mentions have been made regarding its effects on endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffness., Patients and Methods: To understand more deeply if sacubitril/valsartan may have a role on endothelial function and arterial stiffness, 15 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were evaluated through transthoracic echocardiography, peripheral arterial tonometry (EndoPAT ® ) and applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor ® Px system). These noninvasive exams were performed at the beginning of the study and after 6 months of sacubitril/valsartan treatment., Results: Aortic stiffness parameters didn't differ after 6 months of treatment. Augmentation pressure (P=0.889), augmentation index (P=0.906) and sphygmic wave velocity (P=0.263) increased slightly, but they weren't found to be statistically significant. Systolic, diastolic, and differential central arterial pressure didn't differ at the beginning and at the end of the study. RHI (reactive hyperemia index) increased significantly after 6 months (P=0.001) as well as augmentation index corrected for 75 bpm. Ejection fraction (32.21% ± 5.7 to 38.43% ± 8.4; P=0.010) and diastolic dysfunction degree (P=0.021) improved. There was an improvement in mitral regurgitation that wasn't statistically significant (P=0.116). TAPSE didn't change while pulmonary systolic arterial pressure increased, although not significantly (22.83 mmHg ± 4 to 27.33 mmHg ± 6; P=0.068) and within the normal range values., Conclusions: Even though in a study with a limited number of patients, sacubitril/valsartan improved endothelial function, left ventricular function, MR, and diastolic function significantly in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and reduced LVEF. It showed no effects on vascular stiffness., Competing Interests: None., (AJCD Copyright © 2022.)