Search

Introduction: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) reflects the most common inherited bleeding disorder, arising from defects or deficiencies in the von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD treatment mostly relies on the replacement of missing or defective VWF, but additional ('adjunct') therapies are useful in select patients/situations. Patients with VWD are often misdiagnosed and therefore non-optimally managed., Areas Covered: We provide a narrative review, following relevant literature searches in PubMed related to the topic up to September 2024. After an overview of VWF, VWD, and current treatments, we explore the use of nonstandard or emerging therapies for VWD. For example, FVIII replacement or antibody-based FVIII bypassing strategies (e.g. emicizumab) may prove useful in some cases or in initial treatment of certain VWD patients, including those with type 2N or 3 VWD, or those with inhibitors. Additional emerging therapies may also be useful, including hemostasis rebalancing agents., Expert Opinion: Just as hemophilia is experiencing a renaissance of treatment options, so too will the landscape of VWD treatment change over time. This will be fueled by the concept of personalized treatment, meaning potentially different treatments for different VWD patients, or for given patients according to treatment aims.

Competing Interests: None declared.

Objective: Recent advances in large language models (LLM) offer opportunities to automate health coaching. With zero-shot learning ability, LLMs could revolutionize health coaching by providing better accessibility, scalability, and customization. The aim of this study is to compare the quality of responses to clients' sleep-related questions provided by health coaches and an LLM., Design, Setting, and Participants: From a de-identified dataset of coaching conversations from a pilot randomized controlled trial, we extracted 100 question-answer pairs comprising client questions and corresponding health coach responses. These questions were entered into a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)-enabled open-source LLM (LLaMa-2-7b-chat) to generate LLM responses. Out of 100 question-answer pairs, 90 were taken out and assigned to three groups of evaluators: experts, lay-users, and GPT-4. Each group conducted two evaluation tasks: (Task 1) a single-response quality assessment spanning five criteria-accuracy, readability, helpfulness, empathy, and likelihood of harm-rated on a five-point Likert scale, and (Task 2) a pairwise comparison to choose the superior response between pairs. A suite of inferential statistical methods, including the paired and independent sample t-tests, Pearson correlation, and chi-square tests, were utilized to answer the study objective. Recognizing potential biases in human judgment, the remaining 10 question-answer pairs were used to assess inter-evaluator reliability among the human evaluators, quantified using the interclass correlation coefficient and percentage agreement metrics., Results: Upon exclusion of incomplete data, the analysis included 178 single-response evaluations (Task 1) and 83 pairwise comparisons (Task 2). Expert and GPT-4 assessments revealed no discernible disparities in health coach and LLM responses across the five metrics. Contrarily, lay-users deemed LLM responses significantly more helpful than that of human coaches (p < 0.05). LLM responses were preferred in the majority (62.25 %, n = 155) of the aggregate 249 assessments, with all three evaluator groups favoring LLM over health coach inputs. While GPT-4 rated both health coach and LLM responses significantly higher than experts in terms of readability, helpfulness, and empathy, its ratings on accuracy and likelihood of harm aligned with those of experts. Response length positively correlated with accuracy and empathy scores, but negatively affected readability across all evaluator groups. Expert and lay-user evaluators demonstrated moderate to high inter-evaluator reliability., Conclusion: Our study showed encouraging findings by demonstrating that RAG-enabled LLM has comparable performance to health coaches in the domain tested. Serving as an initial step towards the creation of more sophisticated, adaptive, round-the-clock automated health coaching systems, our findings call for more extensive evaluation which could assist in the development of the model that could in the future lead to potential clinical implementation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Frederick Sundram is on the Clinical Advisory Board for Clearhead, a digital ecosystem for promoting mental wellbeing. All other authors declared no known competing financial interests and personal relationships with individuals or organizations that could inappropriately influence the reported work., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13), also called von Willebrand factor (VWF) cleaving protease, acts as a moderator of VWF activity. ADAMTS13 cleaves VWF multimers, thereby reducing VWF activity in blood. When ADAMTS13 is absent (e.g., in patients with TTP [thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura]), accumulation of VWF in plasma can occur, particularly as "ultra-large" VWF multimers, with this leading to adverse outcomes such as thrombosis. Relative ADAMTS13 deficiencies also occur in several other conditions, including secondary thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA), cancer, and with severe infections such as in COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019). These situations might therefore be accompanied with relative loss of ADAMTS13, thereby potentially also leading to pathological VWF accumulation, with this then generating a prothrombotic milieu, thus contributing to enhance the risk of thrombosis. Laboratory testing for ADAMTS13 can aid in the diagnosis of such disorders (i.e., TTP, TMA), and help guide their management, with testing now accomplished using various assays. As most presentations of TTP reflect an acquired condition due to anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies, there may also be a need to test for these, as this will also influence clinical management. We herein provide an overview of TTP, note other conditions in which low levels of ADAMTS13 may be present, and then detail laboratory testing for both ADAMTS13 and associated inhibitors., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

The term 'routine coagulation' typically applies to hemostasis tests routinely performed in hematology laboratories, often available 24/7, and potentially ordered urgently. These tests would comprise of the prothrombin time (PT), the PT converted to an international normalized ratio, the activated partial thromboplastin time (often called partial thromboplastin time in North American laboratories) and potentially the thrombin time, the D-dimer assay, and fibrinogen assays. Although other tests could feasibly be offered (testing feasible), there are good reasons for not including all of these other tests in all routine coagulation laboratories., (Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Enoxaparin is dosed according to actual body weight in treatment of arterial and venous thrombosis. Due to its hydrophilic nature, it distributes according to lean body mass which may be problematic when dosing obese patients as this may increase the risk of bleeding events in this population. The aim was to evaluate current therapeutic enoxaparin dosing strategies, including Antifactor Xa (AFXa) level monitoring, in obese patients and to identify factors that contribute to treatment failure and excess anticoagulation. A retrospective cohort study was conducted reviewing patients administered therapeutic enoxaparin between May 2020 and April 2021. Data were collected on patient characteristics, enoxaparin therapy, AFXa monitoring, and outcomes. Regression models were constructed to assess variables of interest to estimate any association with AFXa levels. In total 762 patients were included in the analysis. The mean initial weight-based dose was 0.95 mg/kg twice daily (SD: ± 0.12, IQR 0.92-1.01) and 1.04 mg/kg once daily (SD: ± 0.26, IQR 0.93-1.12) and 14.4% of patients had AFXa monitoring. Treatment failure was experienced by 2.2%, 5% experienced bleeding. There was no association between the mean actual milligram per kilogram weight-based twice daily doses and subtherapeutic, therapeutic and supratherapeutic AFXa levels (P = 0.135). Obesity was not included in the final regression models due to lack of significance. At a mean therapeutic enoxaparin dose of 0.95 mg/kg twice daily and 1.04 mg/kg once daily no excess in treatment failure or bleeding events were observed in obese patients compared to the product information. Obesity was not an independent variable that affected the achievement of target AFXa levels., (© 2024. Crown.)

Objectives: Our objective was to maintain low interlaboratory variation and bias in international normalized ratio (INR) results following a network change in instrumentation and reagents, using a process of ongoing standardization and harmonization., Methods: Network-wide standardization to new common instrument and reagent platforms followed by network-wide application of a simple novel process of verification of international sensitive index and mean normal prothrombin time values for each new lot of prothrombin time (PT) reagent that does not require use of World Health Organization reference thromboplastin or INR calibration/certified plasma., Results: The network transitioned from mechanical hemostasis detection instruments with associated PT reagent (Diagnostica Stago; NeoPTimal) to optical detection (ACL TOPs) with associated PT reagent (Werfen; RecombiPlasTin 2G). Comparing 3 years of data for each situation, the network (n = 27 laboratories) maintained low INR variability and bias relative to general mechanical and optical groups and other laboratories., Conclusions: Harmonized support for patient management of vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin was continuously maintained in our geography, with potentially positive implications for other coagulation laboratories and geographies. For the United States in particular, paucity of US Food and Drug Administration-cleared INR certified plasmas potentially compromises INR test accuracy; our novel approach may provide workable alternatives for other laboratories/networks., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pathology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Viscoelastic testing is increasingly being used in clinical and research settings to assess hemostasis. Indeed, there are potential situations in which viscoelastic testing is reportedly superior to standard routine laboratory testing for hemostasis. We report the current testing platforms and terminology, as well as providing a concise narrative review of the published evidence to guide its use in various clinical settings. Notably, there is increasing evidence of the potential utility of viscoelastic testing for assessment of direct oral anticoagulants, and bleeding associated with chronic liver disease, orthotopic liver transplantation, cardiac surgery, trauma, obstetrics and pediatrics.

Objective: This review aims to systematically summarize the available data on efficacy and safety of therapeutic enoxaparin in obese patients and to identify gaps to guide future research., Data Sources: Medline and Embase were systematically searched for eligible studies (last searched December 20, 2023). Studies were included if they reported on therapeutic dosing regimens, adverse bleeding, thrombotic outcomes, or antifactor Xa (AFXa) monitoring in obese adult patients., Study Selection and Data Extraction: The systematic review management tool Covidence was used to manage the study selection and data extraction process. The reference list from eligible studies was screened to determine any additional eligible studies., Data Synthesis: Sixteen studies were included in the analysis. Studies used a variety of doses, indications, and study designs making comparison difficult. Twelve studies reported the incidence of thrombotic events (median = 1.3% [interquartile range [IQR] = 0.3%-2.3%]) and all studies reported the incidence of bleeding events (median = 5.7% [IQR = 2.4%-14.5%]). Two of the 8 studies analyzing the influence of weight/body mass index (BMI) or dose per kg on AFXa levels reported statistically significant results. One study concluded that BMI did not affect achievement of target AFXa levels. However, the second study found that dosing using actual body weight was an independent predictor of supratherapeutic AFXa levels in the obese population., Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This is the first comprehensive review with a focus on therapeutic dosing of enoxaparin in obesity and has been conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Seven of the included studies were published since 2018 indicating that new evidence on this topic is emerging., Conclusion: There was inadequate evidence to support an optimal dosing strategy in obese patients due to the heterogeneity of the studies. The AFXa monitoring may be appropriate to guide dosing in this population. Further research is required to determine a suitable dosing regimen., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Competing Interests: None declared.

Competing Interests: None declared.

Background: Reduced effect of antiplatelet therapy has been reported in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Multiple factors may concur to explain this, including increased amount of highly reactive immature platelets., Objectives: To investigate the association between immature platelets and reactivity determined with multicolour flow cytometry using the SYTO-13 dye in STEMI patients., Methods: We conducted an observational study of 59 patients with acute STEMI. Blood samples were obtained within 24 h after admission and after loading doses of dual antiplatelet therapy. For comparison, samples were obtained from 50 healthy individuals. Immature platelets and platelet reactivity were investigated using multicolour flow cytometry including the SYTO-13 dye that binds to platelet RNA and thus provides a method for subdividing platelets into immature and mature platelets. Additionally, we assessed platelet aggregation, serum-thromboxane B 2 levels and standard immature platelet markers., Results: Immature platelets were more reactive than mature platelets in both STEMI patients and healthy individuals (p-values < 0.05). STEMI patients had lower platelet aggregation and thromboxane B 2 levels than healthy individuals. We found a positive association between automatically determined immature platelet markers and CD63 expression on activated platelets (Spearman's rho: 0.27 to 0.58, p-values < 0.05)., Conclusions: Our study shows that immature platelets identified with a multicolour flow cytometric method using the SYTO-13 dye are more reactive than mature platelets in patients with acute STEMI and in healthy individuals. The presence of immature platelets may be important for the overall platelet reactivity, which may have implications for the effect of antiplatelet therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None related to the present study. The authors report the following general conflict. ELG has received speaker honoraria or consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Novo Nordisk, MSD, Lundbeck Pharma and Organon. He is investigator in clinical studies sponsored by AstraZeneca, Idorsia or Bayer and has received unrestricted research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim. AMH has received unrestricted research support from CSL Behring. SDK is coordinating national investigator in a clinical trial sponsored by Idorsia. OBP, PHN and LP have no conflicts to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) serves as a commonly used anticoagulant. It is widely utilized for a variety of reasons, including to 1) anticoagulate patients and help treat and / or prevent thrombosis, 2) maintain patency in artificial blood flow circuits, and 3) anticoagulate blood samples collected for laboratory testing (typically for biochemical assays or blood gas analysis). As such, the presence of UFH is nearly ubiquitous in a hospital setting. Therefore, in laboratory practice, UFH may be present in samples intended for monitoring patients on UFH therapy or intended for biochemical tests, or it may interfere with other (hemostasis) laboratory tests. The aim of this manuscript is to review the role of UFH from the perspective of optimizing laboratory testing to monitor UFH therapy and to avoid or overcome unwanted interference with other laboratory tests.

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) represents 1 of the laboratory criteria for classification of patients as having definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The other 2 laboratory criteria are anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies. At least 1 of these antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) tests need to be positive, with evidence of persistence, together with evidence of at least 1 clinical criterion for APS, before a patient can be classified as having definite APS. LA and other aPL assays are also important for diagnosis or exclusion of APS, as well as for risk stratification, with triple-positive patients carrying the greatest risk. Whereas LA is identified through "uncalibrated" clot-based assays, the other aPL assays (anticardiolipin and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies) represent immunological assays, identified using calibrated solid-phase methods. Because LA is identified using clot-based assays, it is subject to considerable preanalytical and analytical issues that challenge accurate detection or exclusion of LA. In this narrative review, we take a look at the good, the bad, and the ugly of LA testing, primarily focusing on the last 10 years. Although harmonization of LA testing as a result of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis guidance documents and other international activities has led to improvements in LA detection, many challenges remain. In particular, several anticoagulants, especially direct oral anticoagulants and also vitamin K antagonists, given as therapy to treat the pathophysiological consequences of aPL, especially thrombosis, interfere with LA assays and can generate false-positive or false-negative LA findings. Overcoming these diagnostic errors will require a multifaceted approach with clinicians and laboratories working together., (Crown Copyright © 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Background:  Reduced effect of antiplatelet therapy has been reported in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). MicroRNAs (miRs) may influence platelet function and maturity, and subsequently the effect of antiplatelet therapy., Objectives:  We aimed to explore the association between miR expression and platelet function and maturity in patients with acute STEMI and healthy individuals., Methods:  We performed an observational study of STEMI patients admitted directly to primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were treated with antiplatelet therapy according to guidelines. Within 24 hours after admission, blood samples were obtained to measure: the expression of 10 candidate miRs, platelet function markers using advanced flow cytometry, platelet aggregation, serum thromboxane B 2 , and platelet maturity markers. Furthermore, blood samples from healthy individuals were obtained to determine the normal variation., Results:  In total, 61 STEMI patients and 50 healthy individuals were included. STEMI patients had higher expression of miR-21-5p, miR-26b-5p, and miR-223-3p and lower expression of miR-150-5p, miR423-5p, and miR-1180-3p than healthy individuals. In STEMI patients, the expression of miR-26b-5p showed the most consistent association with platelet function (all p -values <0.05, Spearman's rho ranging from 0.27 to 0.41), while the expression of miR-150-5p and miR-223-3p showed negative associations with platelet function. No association between miR expression and platelet maturity markers was observed., Conclusion:  In patients with STEMI, the expression of six miRs was significantly different from healthy individuals. The expression of miR-26b-5p may affect platelet function in acute STEMI patients and potentially influence the effect of antiplatelet therapy., Competing Interests: E.L.G. has received speaker honoraria or consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, MSD, Novo Nordisk, Lundbeck Pharma, and Organon. He is an investigator in clinical studies sponsored by AstraZeneca, Idorsia, or Bayer and has received unrestricted research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim. A.-M.H. has received unrestricted research support from CSL Behring. S.D.K. is a coordinating national investigator in a clinical trial sponsored by Idorsia. O.B.P., P.H.N., and L.P. have no conflicts to declare., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare but potentially fatal microangiopathy, with an untreated mortality rate of around 90%. TTP is caused by severe deficiency in ADAMTS13, which results in accumulation of ultra large von Willebrand factor multimers, triggering a consumptive thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and end-organ dysfunction and damage. Demonstration of severe ADAMTS13 deficiency is diagnostic for TTP, but long turnaround times for quantitative activity testing often necessitates empirical plasma exchange and/or caplacizumab treatment., Methods: Multisite (n = 4) assessment of the Technoscreen ADAMTS13 activity assay (semi-quantitative flow through screening assay) for diagnosis/exclusion of TTP compared to current standard practice of quantitative assays (ELISA or chemiluminescence AcuStar)., Results: A total of 128 patient samples were analyzed, with quantitative ADAMTS13 values ranging from 0% to 150%. The Technoscreen assay demonstrated high sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for ADAMTS13 deficiency, but low specificity and positive predictive value (PPV), especially with one lot of reagent. Good inter-observer reliability was demonstrated. Excluding one possibly compromised batch and other test failures, results of 80 samples yielded sensitivity of 100% (95% CI = 84-100), specificity of 90% (80-95), PPV 77% (58-89) and NPV 100% (93-100)., Conclusion: The Technoscreen assay appears to be a reliable screening test for ADAMTS13 activity to exclude TTP in routine clinical practice. However, the assay falsely identified ADAMTS13 deficiency in many cases, partially batch related, which mandates confirmation with a quantitative assay, as well as initial assessment of kits as 'fit for purpose' prior to use for patient testing., (© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Laboratory Hematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Cardioembolic stroke (CS) has emerged as a leading cause of ischaemic stroke (IS); distinguished by thrombi embolising to the brain from cardiac origins; most often from the left atrial appendage (LAA). Contemporary therapeutic options are largely dependent on systemic anticoagulation as a blanket preventative strategy, yet this does not represent a nuanced or personalised solution. Contraindications to systemic anticoagulation create significant unmedicated and high-risk cohorts, leaving these patients at risk of significant morbidity and mortality. Atrial appendage occlusion devices are increasingly used to mitigate stroke risk from thrombi emerging from the LAA in patients ineligible for oral anticoagulants (OACs). Their use, however, is not without risk or significant cost, and does not address the underlying aetiology of thrombosis and CS. Viral vector-based gene therapy has emerged as a novel strategy to target a spectrum of haemostatic disorders, achieving success through the adeno-associated virus (AAV) based therapy of haemophilia. Yet, thrombotic disorders, such as CS, have had limited exploration within the realm of AAV gene therapy approaches-presenting a gap in the literature and an opportunity for further research. Gene therapy has the potential to directly address the cause of CS by localised targeting of the molecular remodelling that serves to promote thrombosis., (Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is considered the most common bleeding disorder and arises from deficiency and/or defect in the adhesive plasma protein von Willebrand factor (VWF). Diagnosis of VWD requires clinical assessment and is facilitated by laboratory testing. Several guidelines for VWD diagnosis exist, with the latest American Society of Hematology, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, National Hemophilia Foundation, and World Federation of Hemophilia 2021 guidelines presenting 11 recommendations, some of which have drawn controversy. In the current narrative review, we provide additional context around difficulties in laboratory diagnosis/exclusion/typing of VWD, with a focus on developing countries/resource-poor settings. In particular, there are many variations in assay methodology, and some methods express high assay variability and poor low-level VWF sensitivity that compromises their utility. Although we favor an initial 4-test assay panel, comprising factor (F) VIII coagulant activity, VWF antigen, VWF glycoprotein Ib binding (VWF:GPIbR or VWF:GPIbM favored over VWF Ristocetin cofactor) and VWF collagen binding, we also provide strategies for laboratories only able to incorporate an initial 3-test assay panel, as favored by the latest guidelines, to improve diagnostic accuracy., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Background:  New biomarkers are warranted to identify patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) at high risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. It has been reported that the expression of microRNAs (miRs) may influence the development of CAD., Objectives:  We aimed to investigate whether the expression of selected candidate miRs is a predictor of cardiovascular events in a cohort of stable CAD patients., Methods:  We performed a single-center prospective study of 749 stable CAD patients with a median follow-up of 2.8 years. We investigated the expression of nine candidate miRs and their relation to cardiovascular events in this cohort. The primary endpoint was the composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular death. The composite of nonfatal MI and ST was analyzed as a secondary endpoint. Furthermore, nonfatal MI, ST, ischemic stroke, and all-cause mortality were analyzed as individual endpoints., Results:  Employing receiver operating characteristic curves, it was shown that compared with traditional cardiovascular risk factors alone, combining the expression of miR-223-3p with existing traditional cardiovascular risk factors increased the predictive value of ST (area under the curve: 0.88 vs. 0.77, p  = 0.04), the primary composite endpoint (0.65 vs. 0.61, p  = 0.049), and the secondary endpoint of the composite of nonfatal MI and ST (0.68 vs. 0.62, p  = 0.04)., Conclusion:  Among patients with CAD, adding miR-223-3p expression to traditional cardiovascular risk factors may improve prediction of cardiovascular events, particularly ST. Clinical trials confirming these findings are warranted., Competing Interests: E.L.G. has received speaker honoraria or consultancy fees from Abbott, Alexion Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lundbeck Pharma, Pfizer, MSD, Mundipharma, Organon, Portola Pharmaceuticals, and Roche. He is an investigator in studies sponsored by AstraZeneca and has received unrestricted research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim. A.-M.H. has received speaker's fees from CSL Behring, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Leo Pharma and unrestricted research support from Octapharma and CSL Behring. O.B.P., S.B.L., L.P., S.D.K., and P.H.N. have no conflicts to declare., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: None declared.

Newly produced immature platelets are larger, contain higher amounts of residual RNA, and are more reactive than mature platelets. Flow cytometry using the SYTO-13 dye is a method for the subdivision of immature platelets from mature platelets based on the labelling of intracellular platelet RNA, enabling the simultaneous investigation of the reactivity of each platelet population. This method provides detailed information on several aspects of platelet physiology using a combination of platelet surface markers and agonists. Currently, no standardized protocol exists across laboratories. Here, we describe a flow cytometry protocol in detail to investigate platelet reactivity and its relation to platelet maturity. We analyzed 20 healthy individuals with the protocol and compared the platelet subpopulation with the highest SYTO-13 labelling (in the first quintile, "SYTO-high") corresponding to the most immature platelets (highest RNA content) with the platelet subpopulation with the lowest SYTO-13 labelling (in the fifth quintile, "SYTO-low") corresponding to the mature platelets with the lowest RNA content. SYTO-high platelets had overall significantly increased platelet reactivity compared with that of SYTO-low platelets. The presented method may be a valuable research tool for the analysis of platelet reactivity and its relation to platelet maturity.

Harmonization and standardization of laboratory tests and procedures carry a variety of benefits. For example, within a laboratory network, harmonization/standardization provides a common platform for test procedures and documentation across different laboratories. This enables staff to be deployed across several laboratories, if required, without additional training, since test procedures and documentation are the "same" in the different laboratories. Streamlined accreditation of laboratories is also facilitated, as accreditation in one laboratory using a particular procedure/documentation should simplify the accreditation of another laboratory in that network to the same accreditation standard. In the current chapter, we detail our experience regarding the harmonization and standardization of laboratory tests and procedures related to hemostasis testing in our laboratory network, NSW Health Pathology, representing the largest public pathology provider in Australia, with over 60 separate laboratories., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

There are typically three phases identified as contributing to the total testing process. The preanalytical phase starts with the clinician and the patient, when laboratory testing is being considered. This phase also includes decisions about which tests to order (or not), patient identification, blood collection, blood transport, sample processing, and storage to name a few. There are many potential failures that may occur in this preanalytical phase, and these are the topic of another chapter in this book. The second phase, the analytical phase, represents the performance of the test, which is essentially covered in various protocols in this book and the previous edition. The third is the post-analytical phase, which is what occurs after sample testing, and is the topic of the current chapter. Post-analytical issues are generally related to reporting and interpretation of test results. This chapter provides a brief description of these events, as well as guidance for preventing or minimizing post-analytical issues. In particular, there are several strategies for improved post-analytical reporting of hemostasis assays, with this providing the final opportunity to prevent serious clinical errors in patient diagnosis or management., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Hemostasis laboratories play a crucial role in the diagnosis and treatment of individuals with bleeding or thrombotic disorders. Routine coagulation assays, including the prothrombin time (PT)/international normalized ratio (INR), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), are used for various purposes. These include as a screen of hemostasis function/dysfunction (e.g., possible factor deficiency) and for monitoring of anticoagulant therapy, such as vitamin K antagonists (PT/INR) and unfractionated heparin (APTT). Clinical laboratories are also under increasing pressure to improve services, especially response (test turnaround) times. There is also a need for laboratories to try to reduce error rates and for laboratory networks to standardize/harmonize processes and policies. Accordingly, we describe our experience with the development and implementation of automated processes for reflex testing and validation of routine coagulation test results. This has been implemented in a large pathology network compromising 27 laboratories and is under consideration for expansion to our larger network (of 60 laboratories). These rules have been custom-built within our laboratory information system (LIS), perform reflex testing of abnormal results, and fully automate the process of routine test validation for appropriate results. These rules also permit adherence to standardized pre-analytical (sample integrity) checks, automate reflex decisions, automate verification, and provide an overall alignment of network practices in a large network of 27 laboratories. In addition, the rules enable clinically significant results to be quickly referred to hematopathologists for review. We also documented an improvement in test turnaround times, with savings in operator time and thus operating costs. Finally, the process was generally well received and determined to be beneficial for most laboratories in our network, in part identified by improved test turnaround times., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a prothrombotic condition caused by a deficiency of ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13). In turn, ADAMTS13 (also called von Willebrand factor (VWF) cleaving protease (VWFCP)) acts to cleave VWF multimers and thus reduce plasma VWF activity. In the absence of ADAMTS13 (i.e., in TTP), plasma VWF accumulates, in particular as "ultra-large" VWF multimers, and this leads to thrombosis. In most patients with confirmed TTP, ADAMTS13 deficiency is an acquired disorder due to the development of antibodies against ADAMTS13, which either promote clearance of ADAMTS13 from circulation or cause inhibition of ADAMTS13 activity. The current report describes a protocol for assessment of ADAMTS13 inhibitors, being antibodies that inhibit ADAMTS13 activity. The protocol reflects the technical steps that help identify inhibitors to ADAMTS13, whereby mixtures of patient plasma and normal plasma are then tested for residual ADAMTS13 activity in a Bethesda-like assay. The residual ADAMTS13 activity can be assessed by a variety of assays, with a rapid test able to be performed within 35 minutes on the AcuStar instrument (Werfen/Instrumentation Laboratory) used as an example in this protocol., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Antiphospholipid (antibody) syndrome (APS) is a prothrombotic condition with increased risk for thrombosis and pregnancy-related morbidity. In addition to clinical criteria related to these risks, APS is characterized by the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), as detected in the laboratory using a potentially wide variety of assays. The three APS criteria-related assays are lupus anticoagulant (LA), as detected using clot-based assays, and the solid-phase assays of anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI), with immunoglobulin subclasses of IgG and/or IgM. These tests may also be used for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In particular, APS diagnosis/exclusion remains challenging for clinicians and laboratories because of the heterogeneity of clinical presentations in those being evaluated and the technical application and variety of the associated tests used in laboratories. Although LA testing is affected by a wide variety of anticoagulants, which are often given to APS patients to prevent any associated clinical morbidity, detection of solid-phase aPL is not influenced by these anticoagulants, and this thus represents a potential advantage to their application. On the other hand, various technical issues challenge accurate laboratory detection or exclusion of aPL. This report describes protocols for the assessment of solid-phase aPL, specifically aCL and aβ2GPI of IgG and IgM class by means of a chemiluminescence-based assay panel. These protocols reflect tests able to be performed on the AcuStar instrument (Werfen/Instrumentation Laboratory). Certain regional approvals may also allow this testing to be performed on a BIO-FLASH instrument (Werfen/Instrumentation Laboratory)., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) represent a group of autoantibodies directed against phospholipids. These antibodies may arise in a number of autoimmune conditions, of which the antiphospholipid (antibody) syndrome (APS) is best recognized. aPL can be detected by various laboratory assays, essentially comprising both solid-phase (immunological) assays and "liquid-phase" clotting assays identifying so-called lupus anticoagulants (LA). aPL are associated with various adverse pathologies, including thrombosis and placental/fetal morbidity and mortality. The type of aPL present, as well as the pattern of reactivity, is variously associated with the severity of the pathology. Thus, laboratory testing for aPL is indicated to help assess the future risk of such events, as well as representing certain "classification" criteria for APS, also used as surrogates for diagnostic criteria. The current chapter overviews the laboratory tests available to measure aPL and their potential clinical utility., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) represents an autoimmune process whereby antibodies are formed against heparin in complex with platelet factor 4 (PF4) after heparin administration. These antibodies can be detected by a variety of immunological assays, including ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and by chemiluminescence on the AcuStar instrument. However, pathological HIT antibodies are those that activate platelets in a platelet activation assay and cause thrombosis in vivo. We would tend to call this condition heparin-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (HITT), although some workers instead use the truncated abbreviation HIT. Vaccine-induced (immune) thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) instead reflects an autoimmune process whereby antibodies are formed against PF4 after administration of a vaccine, most notably adenovirus-based vaccines directed against COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019). Although both VITT and HITT reflect similar pathological processes, they have different origins and are detected in different ways. Most notable is that anti-PF4 antibodies in VITT can only be detected immunologically by ELISA assays, tending to be negative in rapid assays such as that using the AcuStar. Moreover, functional platelet activation assays otherwise used for HITT may need to be modified to detect platelet activation in VITT., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most commonly reported inherited bleeding disorder and may alternatively occur as an acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS). VWD/AVWS develops from defects and/or deficiency in the adhesive plasma protein von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD/AVWS diagnosis/exclusion remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of VWF defects and the technical limitations of many VWF tests, as well as the VWF test panels (number and type of tests) chosen by many laboratories. Laboratory testing for these disorders utilizes evaluation of VWF level and activity, with activity assessment needing several tests due to the many functions performed by VWF in order to help counteract bleeding. This report explains procedures for evaluating VWF level (antigen; VWF:Ag) and activity by means of a chemiluminescence-based panel. Activity assays comprise collagen binding (VWF:CB) and a ristocetin-based recombinant glycoprotein Ib-binding (VWF:GPIbR) assay that reflects a contemporary alternative to classical ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo). This 3-test VWF panel (Ag, CB, GPIbR [RCo]) reflects the only such composite panel available on a single platform and is performed on an AcuStar instrument (Werfen/Instrumentation Laboratory). Certain regional approvals may also allow this 3-test VWF panel to be performed on the BioFlash instrument (Werfen/Instrumentation Laboratory)., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a prothrombotic condition caused by a significant deficiency of the enzyme, ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13). In the absence of adequate levels of ADAMTS13 (i.e., in TTP), plasma VWF accumulates, in particular as "ultra-large" VWF multimers, and this leads to pathological platelet aggregation and thrombosis. In addition to TTP, ADAMTS13 may be mildly to moderately reduced in a range of other conditions, including secondary thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) such as those caused by infections (e.g., hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS)), liver disease, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), and sepsis, during acute/chronic inflammatory conditions, and sometimes also in COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019)). ADAMTS13 can be detected by a variety of techniques, including ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) and by chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). The current report describes a protocol for assessment of ADAMTS13 by CLIA. This protocol reflects a rapid test able to be performed within 35 min on the AcuStar instrument (Werfen/Instrumentation Laboratory), although certain regional approvals may also permit this testing to be performed on a BioFlash instrument from the same manufacturer., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Activated protein C resistance (APCR) reflects a hemostatic state defined by a reduced ability of activated protein C (APC) to affect an anticoagulant response. This state of hemostatic imbalance is characterized by a heightened risk of venous thromboembolism. Protein C is an endogenous anticoagulant that is produced by the hepatocytes and undergoes proteolysis-mediated activation to APC. APC in turn degrades activated Factors V and VIII. APCR describes a state of resistance by activated Factors V and VIII to APC-mediated cleavage of these factors, thereby promoting amplified thrombin production and a potentially procoagulant state. This resistance of APC may be inherited or acquired. Mutations in Factor V are responsible for the most frequent form hereditary APCR. The predominant mutation, a G1691A missense mutation at Arginine 506, the so-called Factor V Leiden [FVL], causes a deletion of an APC-targeted cleavage site in Factor Va, thereby rendering it resistant to inactivation by APC. There are a variety of laboratory assays for APCR, but this chapter focuses on a procedure using a commercially available clotting assay that utilizes a snake venom and ACL TOP analyzers., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a large adhesive plasma protein that expresses several functional activities. One of these activities is to bind coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) and to protect it from degradation. Deficiency of, and/or defects in, VWF can give rise to a bleeding disorder called von Willebrand disease (VWD). The defect in VWF that affects its ability to bind to and protect FVIII is captured within type 2N VWD. In these patients, FVIII is produced normally; however, plasma FVIII quickly degrades as it is not bound to and protected by VWF. These patients phenotypically resemble those with hemophilia A, where instead, FVIII is produced in lower amount. Both hemophilia A and 2N VWD patients therefore present with reduced levels of plasma FVIII relative to VWF level. However, therapy differs, since patients with hemophilia A are given FVIII replacement products, or FVIII mimicking products; instead, patients with 2N VWD require VWF replacement therapy, since FVIII replacement will only be effective for a short term, given this replacement product will quickly degrade in the absence of functional VWF. Thus, 2N VWD needs to be differentiated from hemophilia A. This can be achieved by genetic testing or by use of a VWF:FVIII binding assay. The current chapter provides a protocol for the performance of a commercial VWF:FVIII binding assay., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Hemostasis is a complex but balanced process that permit normal blood flow, without adverse events. Disruption of the balance may lead to bleeding or thrombotic events, and clinical interventions may be required. Hemostasis laboratories typically offer an array of tests, including routine coagulation and specialized hemostasis assays used to guide clinicians for diagnosing and managing patients. Routine assays may be used to screen patients for hemostasis-related disturbances but may also be used for drug monitoring, measuring efficacy of replacement or adjunctive therapy, and other indications, which may then be used to guide further patient management. Similarly, "specialized" assays are used for diagnostic purposes or may be used to monitor or measure efficacy of a given therapy. This chapter provides an overview of hemostasis and thrombosis, with a focus on laboratory testing that may be used to diagnose and help manage patients suspected of hemostasis- and thrombosis-related disorders., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Hemostasis reflects a homeostatic mechanism that aims to balance out pro-coagulant and anti-coagulant forces to maintain blood flow within the circulation. Simplistically, a relative excess of procoagulant forces can lead to thrombosis, and a relative excess of anticoagulant forces can lead to bleeding. There are a wide variety of congenital disorders associated with bleeding or thrombosis. In addition, there exist a vast array of autoimmune diseases that can also lead to either bleeding or thrombosis. For example, autoantibodies generated against clotting factors can lead to bleeding, of which acquired hemophilia A is the most common. As another example, autoimmune-mediated antibodies against phospholipids can generate a prothrombotic milieu in a condition known as antiphospholipid (antibody) syndrome (APS). Moreover, there exist various autoimmunity promoting environments that can lead to a variety of antibodies that affect hemostasis. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represents perhaps the contemporary example of such a state, with potential development of a kaleidoscope of such antibodies that primarily drive thrombosis, but may also lead to bleeding on rarer occasions. We provide here a narrative review to discuss the interaction between various autoimmune diseases and hemostasis.

Coagulation factor testing is commonly performed within haemostasis laboratories, either to assess for bleeding disorders, such as haemophilia, or to investigate unexplained prolongation in routine coagulation assays. The aim of this evaluation was to harmonize procedures and normal reference ranges (NRRs) for investigation of coagulation factors on the ACL TOP 50 family of instruments in a large laboratory network. We employed comparative evaluations using newly installed ACL TOPs 550 and 750 and HemosIL reagents vs. existing 'reference' instrumentation and reagents, predominantly Stago and Siemens, as well as assessment of factor sensitivity in routine coagulation assays, prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Also, establishment of coagulation factor NRRs using normal plasma samples. HemosIL factor assays showed good comparability with the existing reference methods ( R > 0.9). Factor sensitivity for PT and APTT assays were acceptable at around 30 U/dl. NRRs were established and harmonized across the laboratory network. This evaluation of factor testing on ACL TOP 50 Family instruments identified overall acceptable performance using Werfen reagents and enabled harmonization of coagulation factor testing in our large network., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The platelet function analyzer (PFA) is a popular platelet function screening instrument, highly sensitive to von Willebrand disease (VWD) and to aspirin therapy, with moderate sensitivity to defects in platelet function and/or deficiencies in platelet number. There are two models, the original PFA-100 and the contemporary PFA-200. Normal reference ranges (NRRs) provided by the manufacturer are the same for both models, instead being based on the type of test cartridge, for which there are two main ones: collagen/epinephrine (C/Epi) and collagen/adenosine diphosphate (C/ADP)., Methods: Comparative evaluations of PFA testing and reporting in six different sites of a large pathology network, aiming to harmonize NRRs and test reporting across all network sites. A separate comparative study of testing a range of samples (n > 150) on a PFA-100 versus that on a PFA-200. Review of contemporary literature., Results: Each site was identified to have a different reporting NRR, which after consolidating data permitted establishment of an agreed harmonized NRR for use across the network (C/Epi: 90-160; C/ADP: 70-124; based on n > 180). Similarly, each site reported and interpreted results in different ways, and after discussion and consolidation, a harmonized approach to interpretation and reporting was achieved. The separate comparative study of PFA-100 versus PFA-200 testing confirmed instrument equivalence., Conclusion: We achieved harmonized NRRs and reporting for PFA testing across a large pathology network. Our approach may be useful for other laboratory networks wishing to harmonize PFA testing., (© 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Laboratory Hematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is reportedly the most common inherited bleeding disorder, and can also arise as an acquired (von Willebrand) syndrome (AVWS). The hemostasis laboratory plays a key role in the diagnosis or exclusion of VWD/AVWS, which may otherwise be suspected due to the patient's clinical (bleeding) history. VWD/AVWS arise from deficiency and/or defects in the adhesive plasma protein, von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWF undertakes various roles within hemostasis, but principally acts within primary hemostasis to anchor platelets to sites of vascular damage, thereby facilitating thrombus formation to arrest bleeding. The diagnosis or exclusion of VWD/AVWS requires laboratory testing for both VWF level and activity, with the latter potentially comprising several of a potential plethora of different assays. Complete diagnosis of VWD also requires the differentiation of VWD type, with six types comprising the current classification (i.e., qualitative [types 2A, 2B, 2M, 2N VWD] vs. quantitative [types 1 and 3 VWD] deficiency/defects). Although appropriate diagnosis and type classification hold important therapeutic consequences, these remain problematic and sometimes elusive for some laboratories to achieve. This report reviews the laboratory aided diagnosis or exclusion of VWD from a geographic perspective, and focuses on the disparities of approaches and methods in different regions of the world. This is primarily done from the perspective of data available from published reports related to external quality assessment (or proficiency testing) from different geographic localities. Moreover, differences in approaches between laboratories may arise due to differential adherence of particular guidelines, as well as regulatory aspects and predominance of local manufacturers and suppliers., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)