Search

Simple Summary: Over the past years, the introduction of various anti-HER2 therapies has significantly improved the outcome for patients with HER2-positive breast and gastroesophageal carcinomas. HER2 protein overexpression is investigated using immunohistochemistry, gene amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization, and gene mutation using next-generation sequencing. This review evaluated the predictive and prognostic role of HER2 status in various types of epithelial malignant cancers beyond breast and gastroesophageal cancers, focusing on the published studies, the scoring systems, and assays used and analyzing the clinical parameters and therapeutic approaches used. The evidence about prognostic and predictive roles of HER2 in carcinomas other than breast and gastroesophageal remains investigational but is increasing due to a tumor site-related prognostic and predictive value of the different types of HER2 alterations. The major limitation was that standardized and validated scoring system assays are not well-established for many organs. The oncogene ERBB2, also known as HER2 or c-ERB2, is located on chromosome 17 (q12). It encodes a tyrosine kinase receptor, the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), involved in neoplastic proliferation, tumor angiogenesis, and invasiveness. Over the past years, the introduction of various anti-HER2 therapies has significantly improved outcomes for patients with HER2-positive breast and gastroesophageal carcinomas. More recently, the introduction of a new antibody–drug conjugate, that is trastuzumab deruxtecan, expanded the therapeutic options to low-HER2 breast and gastroesophageal tumors. HER2 protein overexpression is investigated using immunohistochemistry, gene amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization, and gene mutation using next-generation sequencing. This review evaluated the predictive and prognostic role of HER2 status in various types of epithelial malignant cancers beyond breast and gastroesophageal cancers. We critically analyzed the key published studies, focusing on utilized scoring systems and assays used, and analyzed clinical parameters and therapeutic approaches. Although the evidence about prognostic and predictive roles of HER2 in carcinomas other than breast and gastroesophageal has been widely increasing over the last decade, it still remains investigational, revealing a tumor site-related prognostic and predictive value of the different types of HER2 alterations. However, standardized and validated scoring system assays have not been well-established for many organs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Even today, melanoma is a highly aggressive neoplasm with a high mortality rate. The nodular type is very aggressive and has cerebroid nests of melanocytes (CNMs) at the growth edge, morphologically similar to the poorly differentiated neoplastic epithelial cell clusters described in colorectal, breast, and endometrioid endometrial cancers. Patients and methods: We selected 25 nodular melanomas (NMs) with known molecular profiles, of which the entire paraffin-embedded lesion was available. We counted CNMs under a microscopic at a magnification of 20x (i.e., a microscopic field with a major axis of 1 mm). Based on the number of CNMs in the area, melanomas were classified into three groups: G1 (CNMs ranging from 0 to 4), G2 (CNMs ranging from 5 to 9), and G3 (CNMs ≥ 10). The presence of CNMs and their counts were compared with molecular and histopathological data. Results: Seventeen (NMs) were grouped as G1 (68%), 5 as G2 (20%), and 3 as G3 (12%) based on CNMs count. The presence of CNMs correlated with epithelioid cell morphology (p < 0.05), Clark IV and V levels (p < 0.05), vascular invasion (p < 0.05), and biological mutants (p < 0.05). Melanomas with ≥ 10 CNMs more frequently show ulceration (p < 0.02) and the BRAF V600E mutation (p < 0.02). Conclusion: CNMs count has a predictive role regardless of tumor size; their association with the BRAF V600E mutation suggests their predictive significance in response to biologics. However, further investigations are needed to strengthen this hypothesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation has entered pathology routine practice as the first-line screening method to identify patients with MMR deficient (MMRd)/microsatellite instability (MSI) colorectal cancer (CRC), and its misdiagnosis may significantly impact the personalization of CRC patient care. To determine the prevalence of MMR protein intratumor heterogeneity in real-world practice, we collected a series of 8282 CRCs tested for MMR proteins in the setting of Lynch syndrome universal screening. Four heterogenous cases were also investigated for tumor infiltrating lymphocytes count, MSI status, and consensus molecular subtypes by Nanostring nCounter® Platform. Overall, 1056 (12.8%) CRCs showed a MMR altered status, with 46 cases showing a heterogeneous MMR profile (0.56% of the total, and 4.36% of all MMRd cases). To conclude, the authors make some critical remarks regarding the approach to MMR heterogeneity in clinical practice and routine diagnostics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Very early‐onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEO‐IBD) is a clinical umbrella term referring to IBD‐like symptoms arising in children before the age of 6 years, encompassing both 'pure' IBD, such as ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) and monogenic diseases (MDs), the latter often involving genes associated with primary immunodeficiencies. Moreover, histological features in gastrointestinal (GI) biopsies in MD can also have IBD‐like morphology, making differential diagnosis difficult. Correct diagnosis is fundamental, as MDs show a more severe clinical course and their inadequate/untimely recognition leads to inappropriate therapy. Methods and results: Biopsy samples from the lower and upper GI tract of 93 clinically diagnosed VEO‐IBD children were retrospectively selected in a multicentre cohort and histologically re‐evaluated by 10 pathologists blinded to clinical information. Each case was classified according to morphological patterns, including UC‐like; CD‐like; enterocolitis‐like; apoptotic; eosinophil‐rich; and IBD‐unclassified (IBD‐U). Nine (69%) MD children showed IBD‐like morphology; only the IBD‐U pattern correlated with MD diagnosis (P = 0.02) (available in 64 cases: 51 non‐MD, true early‐onset IBD/other; 13 MD cases). MD patients showed earlier GI symptom onset (18.7 versus 26.9 months) and were sent to endoscopy earlier (22 versus 37 months), these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Upper GI histology was informative in 37 biopsies. Conclusions: The diagnosis of the underlying cause of VEO‐IBD requires a multidisciplinary setting, and pathology, while being one of the fundamental puzzle pieces, is often difficult to interpret. A pattern‐based histological approach is therefore suggested, thus aiding the pathologist in VEO‐IBD reporting and multidisciplinary discussion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system is a highly preserved protein complex recognizing short insertions, short deletions, and single base mismatches during DNA replication and recombination. MMR protein status is identified using immunohistochemistry. Deficit in one or more MMR proteins, configuring deficient MMR status (dMMR), leads to frameshift mutations particularly clustered in microsatellite repeats. Thus, microsatellite instability (MSI) is the epiphenomenon of dMMR. In colorectal cancer (CRC), MMR/MSI status is a biomarker with prognostic and predictive value of resistance to 5-fluorouracil and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Summary: In this Review, we describe the challenges the practicing pathologist may face in relation to the assessment of MMR/MSI status and any open issues which still need to be addressed, focusing on pre-analytic issues, pitfalls in the interpretation, and technical aspects of the different assays. Key Messages: The current methods of detecting dMMR/MSI status have been optimized for CRCs, and whether these techniques can be applied to all tumor and specimen types is still not fully understood. Following the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), tissue/site agnostic drug approval of pembrolizumab for advanced/metastatic MSI tumors, MMR/MSI status in gastrointestinal tract is a common request from the oncologist. In this setting, several issues still need to be addressed, including criteria for sample adequacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]