Search

Background Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an effective tool to prevent infection with HIV. Patients seeking PEP after potential HIV exposure usually present to the emergency department (ED). Our study sought to determine the concordance of ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP with national guidelines (primary objective) and to assess the clinical relevance of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) between the HIV-PEP regimen and patients' concomitant medication (secondary objective). Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the ED of Hannover Medical School, Germany. Between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019, 113 of 11 246 screened patients presented to the ED after potential HIV exposure and were enrolled in the study. Results The median age of the patients (82.3% male) was 30 y (IQR 25–35.5), 85.8% of potential HIV exposures were characterised as sexual and 85.0% presented within 72 h. ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP were concordant with national guidelines in 93.8%. No clinically relevant DDIs were detected. Conclusions ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP were highly concordant with national guidelines. Approximately 1% of patient presentations to the ED were related to HIV exposure; therefore, training ED physicians on HIV transmission risk assessment and indications/contraindications for HIV-PEP is paramount. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sepsis is as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to an infection. The mortality of sepsis and particular of septic shock is very high. Treatment mostly focuses on infection control but a specific intervention that targets the underlying pathological host response is lacking to the present time. The investigators hypothesize that early therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) will dampen the maladaptive host response by removing injurious mediators thereby limiting organ dysfunction and improving survival in patients with septic shock. Although small prospective studies demonstrated rapid hemodynamic stabilization under TPE, no adequately powered randomized clinical trial has investigated hard outcomes. Methods: This is a randomized, prospective, multicenter, open-label, controlled, parallel-group interventional trial to test the adjunctive effect of TPE in patients with early septic shock. Patients with a refractory (defined as norepinephrine (NE) ≥ 0.4 μg/kg/min ≥ 30 min OR NE 0.3 μg/kg/min + vasopressin) and early (shock onset < 24 h) septic shock will be included. The intervention is a standard TPE with donor fresh frozen plasma (1.2 × individual plasma volume) performed within 6 h after randomization and will be compared to a standard of care (SOC) control arm. The primary endpoint is 28 days mortality for which the power analysis revealed a group size of 137 / arm (n = 274) to demonstrate a benefit of 15%. The key secondary objective will be to compare the extent of organ failure indicated by mean SOFA over the first 7 days as well as organ support-free days until day 28 following randomization. Besides numerous biological secondary, safety endpoints such as incidence of bleeding, allergic reactions, transfusion associated lung injury, severe thrombocytopenia, and other severe adverse events will be assessed during the first 7 days. For exploratory scientific analyses, biomaterial will be acquired longitudinally and multiple predefined scientific subprojects are planned. This study is an investigator-initiated trial supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, DA 1209/7–1), in which 26 different centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria will participate over a duration of 33 months. Discussion: This trial has substantial clinical relevance as it evaluates a promising adjunctive treatment option in refractory septic shock patients suffering from an extraordinary high mortality. A positive trial result could change the current standard of care for this septic subgroup. The results of this study will be disseminated through presentations at international congresses, workshops, and peer-reviewed publications. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05726825, Registered on 14 February 2023. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and study aims Perioperative hypothermia is associated with significant complications and can be prevented with forced-air heating systems (FAHS). Whether hypothermia occurs during prolonged endoscopic sedation is unclear and prevention measures are not addressed in endoscopic sedation guidelines. We hypothesized that hypothermia also occurs in a significant proportion of patients undergoing endoscopic interventions associated with longer sedation times such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP), and that FAHS may prevent it. Patients and methods In this observational study, each patient received two consecutive ERCPs, the first ERCP following current standard of care without FAHS (SOC group) and a consecutive ERCP with FAHS (FAHS group). The primary endpoint was maximum body temperature difference during sedation. Results Twenty-four patients were included. Median (interquartile range) maximum body temperature difference was -0.9°C (-1.2; -0.4) in the SOC and -0.1°C (-0.2; 0) in the FAHS group ( P < 0.001). Median body temperature was lower in the SOC compared with the FAHS group after 20, 30, 40, and 50 minutes of sedation. A reduction in body temperature of > 1°C ( P < 0.001) and a reduction below 36°C ( P = 0.01) occurred more often in the SOC than in the FAHS group. FAHS was independently associated with reduced risk of hypothermia ( P = 0.006). More patients experienced freezing in the SOC group ( P = 0.004). Hemodynmaic and respiratory stability were comparable in both groups. Conclusions Hypothermia occurred in the majority of patients undergoing prolonged endoscopic sedation without active temperature control. FAHS was associated with higher temperature stability during sedation and better patient comfort., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)