Search

This study investigated the influence of several construction practices on the bond strength at the interface between pavement layers. These practices included the surface treatment, curing time, residual application rate, and equipment tracking. Three tests were performed for estimating the bond strength between an existing hot mix asphalt (HMA) and a newly constructed HMA overlay, namely the Florida Dept. of Transportation shear tester, the University of Texas at El Paso pull off test, and the torque bond test. Testing involved a CSS-1 type emulsion as the tack coat. The results from the three tests were statistically analyzed. Generally, milling provided a significantly better bond at the interface between the existing surface and the new overlay. Curing time had a minimal effect on the bond strength. The results indicated that the absence of tack coat did not significantly affect the bond strength at the interface for the milled sections, whereas it severely decreased the strength for the nonmilled sections. The results also showed that increasing the residual rate of tack coat did not generally affect the bond strength at the interface. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:3(154) CE Database subject headings: Bonding; Construction management; Statistics; Pavements; Interfaces.

This paper presents a methodology for analyzing the viscoelastic response of asphalt mixtures using the discrete-element method (DEM). Two unmodified (neat) and seven modified binders were mixed with the same aggregate blend in order to prepare the nine hot mix asphalt (HMA) mixtures used in this study. The HMA microstructure was captured using images of vertically cut sections of specimens. The captured grayscale images were processed into black and white images representing the mastic and the aggregate phases, respectively. These microstructure images were used to represent the DEM model geometry. Rheological data for the nine binders were obtained using the dynamic shear rheometer. These data were used to estimate the parameters of the viscoelastic contact models that define the interaction among the mix constituents. The DEM models were subjected to sinusoidal loads similar to those applied in the simple performance test (SPT). The DEM model predictions compared favorably with the SPT measurements. However, the simulation results tended to overpredict the dynamic modulus, E*, for mixtures made with neat binders and underpredict E* for those that consisted of modified binders. The DEM models gave mix phase angles, [lowercase_phi_synonym]mix, higher than the experimental measurements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]