Search

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Covera stent graft (SG) for the treatment of dysfunctional or thrombosed arteriovenous grafts (AVGs).Materials and Methods: Within 29 months (February 2016-August 2018), 79 patients underwent Covera SG placement in the authors' department for the treatment of dysfunctional AVGs. Data were available for 64 patients who underwent 64 procedures, using 64 devices. Minimum follow-up was 6 months, unless reintervention occurred. Mean follow-up was 277 days (6-923 days). Treatment characteristics were 51 cases with venous-graft anastomosis (VGA) stenosis (79.7%), 13 cases of puncture zone stenosis (20.3%), 14 cases of in SG stenosis (21.9%), 8 cases of pseudoaneurysm treatment (12.5%) (1 treatment area might have had more than 1 characteristic). Thirty-six patients presented with thrombosis (56.2%), and 31 of 64 case were de novo treatment areas (48.4%). Primary outcome measurements were technical success and post-intervention primary patency (PIPP) at 6 months, whereas secondary outcome measurements included factors influencing primary outcome.Results: Technical success was 100%. Median PIPP was 336 days, and 73.6% of treatment areas were patent at 6 months. There were no significant differences in terms of PIPP when de novo treatment areas were compared with restenotic areas (519 vs. 320 days, respectively; P = .1); patients who presented with versus those who presented without thrombosis (320 vs. 583 days, respectively; P = .07); puncture zone stenosis or elsewhere (329 vs. 686 days, respectively; P = .52); and VGA stenosis or elsewhere (336 vs. 335 days, respectively; P = .9).Conclusions: Use of the Covera SG for AVG treatment was safe and effective in every type of treatment area presented in this retrospective analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the clinically-assessed intervention-free period (IFP) of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) vs conventional balloon angioplasty (CBA) for the treatment of symptomatic central venous stenosis (CVS) in dialysis access.Materials and Methods: Within 20 months, 40 dialysis patients (19/40 arteriovenous fistulae [AVFs] and 21/40 arteriovenous grafts [AVGs]) were randomized to undergo angioplasty either with a PCB (PCB group, n = 20; 14/20 male; age: 56.7) or CBA (CBA group, n = 20; 15/20 male; age: 57). There were 15/20 restenotic lesions in PCB group and 12/20 in CBA group. In 25/40 cases, patients had an ipslateral catheter insertion in the past. Primary endpoint was clinically-assessed intervention-free period (IFP) of the treated segment at 6 months, while secondary endpoints included complication rates during follow-up period and identification of factors influencing IFP.Results: Median IFP was significantly better in PCB group (PCB group: 179 days, vs CBA group: 124.5 days, P = .026). Mean follow-up period was 180 days (range, 5-479). There was no significant difference between AVGs and AVFs (P = .17), treatment of de novo vs restenotic lesions (P = .33), or prior presence of catheter insertion (P = .21). No complications were observed. In restenotic lesions in PCB group, longitudinal comparison between treatments also showed a significant difference in favor of PCB treatment (median IFP in PCB* group 177 vs 91 days in CBA* group; P = .01).Conclusions: In this prospective study, PCB had significantly better results compared with CBA for the treatment of symptomatic central venous stenosis in dialysis access. Retrospective longitudinal comparison of treatments in the same patients also showed a significant difference in favor of PCBs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To report the incidence and long-term outcomes following endovascular treatment of symptomatic, atherosclerotic isolated popliteal artery disease (IPAD)., Materials and Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study included all patients who underwent endovascular treatment of IPAD between January 2010 and December 2016 because of intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia (CLI), in three tertiary University Hospitals. In total, 4717 peripheral arterial disease (PAD) procedures were analyzed. The study's primary outcome measures were: IPAD incidence, binary restenosis rate and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary outcome measures included technical success, limb salvage rate and the identification of predictors of outcomes., Results: The incidence of IPAD was 0.98% (46/4717 PAD procedures). In total, 46 patients (38 male; mean age 73 ± 12 years) underwent plain balloon (69.5%) or bail-out stenting (30.5%) procedures. Most patients suffered from CLI (65.2%). Mean lesion length was 52.5 ± 32.0 mm and 45.6% of the cases were occlusions. Severe calcifications were noted in 26.1%. Technical success was 100%. Mean time follow-up was 32.6 ± 25.6 months. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, restenosis was 15.8, 40.9, 45.8% and TLR-free rate was 90.5, 79.0, 74.1%, at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Survival and limb salvage rates were 73.6 and 88.1%, at 5 years, respectively. The major amputation rate for CLI patients was 10.0% (3/29 limbs), while no major amputations occurred in the claudication subgroup. Cox multivariable analysis detected baseline occlusion as an independent predictor of increased restenosis (HR 5.3; 95% CI 0.21-0.66, p = 0.02)., Conclusions: Isolated popliteal lesions requiring treatment appear in nearly 1% of patients with PAD. Balloon angioplasty and bail-out stenting resulted in acceptable long-term clinical outcomes. Treatment of occlusions was correlated with increased restenosis rate.

Introduction: Thrombosis is the most important access-related complication. Several declotting procedures have been suggested falling mainly into two categories; thrombolysis-dependent and thrombectomy-dependent., Areas Covered: Seventeen studies after 2001 have been published on percutaneous treatment of thrombosed vascular access. Authors performed a systematic review of these studies together with a parametric meta-analysis of data available investigating clinical success, postintervention assisted primary patency (PAPP) and independent factors that could influence outcome measures., Expert Commentary: A shift to thrombectomy-dependent procedures is observed with a view to diminishing complications from the use of thrombolytic agents. Arteriovenous fistulas provide significantly better PAPP, while newer studies show improved, non-significant results compared with older ones. The role of improvement of devices for subsequent angioplasty is of equal importance, if not more, for improved declotting results.

Background: This is a retrospective single-center analysis investigating the results of a percutaneous lysis-assisted balloon (LAB) thrombectomy procedure for the treatment of thrombosed arteriovenous dialysis grafts (AVGs)., Materials and Methods: Within 5 years (January 2012-December 2016), 291 declotting procedures were performed for the treatment of thrombosed dialysis arteriovenous fistulas or grafts. Data were available for 129 patients (75 men, 58.1%) with an AVG, undergoing 241 procedures [1.87 procedures/patient (1-10)]. Procedure includes initial lysis with 5 mg recombinant tissue plasminogen activator followed by thrombectomy with a high-pressure balloon for thrombus maceration using "facing sheaths" technique. 61 patients had ≥ 2 declotting procedures. In 80 cases (80/241; 33.2%), a stent graft (SG) was used for treatment of persistent stenosis. Main primary outcome measures were clinical success and postintervention assisted primary patency (PAPP). Secondary outcome measures included procedural complications and investigation of independent factors that could influence circuit survival., Results: Median PAPP was 434 days according to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Clinical success was 96.26%. In six cases (6/241, 2.49%) declotting failed and a catheter was placed. There were 16 minor (16/241, 6.64%) and no major complications. There was no significant difference in circuit survival regardless of SG use (No SG 406 days vs. SG 349 days; p = 0.24). There was a significant difference in favor of the second declotting compared to the first in 61 patients (first: 162 days vs. second: 447 days; p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: LAB thrombectomy resulted in high-circuit survival rates with increased technical success and minimum complications without the use of thrombectomy devices.