Search

Loncastuximab tesirine (Lonca) and chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) have been assessed in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL), but direct evidence from head-to-head randomized clinical trials is not available.Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was used to evaluate the efficacy of Lonca versus CIT-era treatment in R/R DLBCL. The analysis used individual patient data from the phase II LOTIS-2 trial of Lonca (NCT03589469) and pooled aggregated data from 2 extension studies of the CORAL trial for CIT. The LOTIS-2 trial included 145 patients who had relapsed or progressed following 2 or more multi-agent systemic treatment regimens; the CORAL extension studies included 203 patients who received 2 prior lines of therapy and 75 patients who relapsed after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. MAIC analyses were performed to adjust for cross-trial differences in inclusion/exclusion criteria and the distribution of observed baseline characteristics. Overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the balanced trial populations.A total of 80 patients in LOTIS-2 were included in the analysis. After matching to the characteristics of 278 patients from the pooled CORAL extension studies, the ORR was significantly higher for Lonca compared with CIT-era treatment (53.4% vs. 40.3%, P.05). Lonca was also associated with a significantly improved OS compared with CIT-era treatment (median OS 10.8 vs. 6.4 months; adjusted hazard ratio: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.48, 0.92], P.05).This study indicates that Lonca was associated with significantly improved efficacy compared with CIT-era treatments for R/R DLBCL.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T cell) therapy directed at CD19 produces durable remissions in the treatment of relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Nonetheless, many patients receiving CD19 CAR-T cells fail to respond for unknown reasons. To reveal changes in 4-1BB–based CD19 CAR-T cells and identify biomarkers of response, we used single-cell RNA sequencing and protein surface marker profiling of patient CAR-T cells pre- and postinfusion into patients with NHL. At the transcriptional and protein levels, we note the evolution of CAR-T cells toward a nonproliferative, highly differentiated, and exhausted state, with an enriched exhaustion profile in CAR-T cells of patients with poor response marked by TIGIT expression. Utilizing in vitro and in vivo studies, we demonstrate that TIGIT blockade alone improves the antitumor function of CAR-T cells. Altogether, we provide evidence of CAR-T cell dysfunction marked by TIGIT expression driving a poor response in patients with NHL. Significance: This is the first study investigating the mechanisms linked to CAR-T patient responses based on the sequential analysis of manufactured and infused CAR-T cells using single-cell RNA and protein expression data. Furthermore, our findings are the first to demonstrate an improvement of CAR-T cell efficacy with TIGIT inhibition alone. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1825

Supplementary Data from Sequential Single-Cell Transcriptional and Protein Marker Profiling Reveals TIGIT as a Marker of CD19 CAR-T Cell Dysfunction in Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T cell) therapy directed at CD19 produces durable remissions in the treatment of relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Nonetheless, many patients receiving CD19 CAR-T cells fail to respond for unknown reasons. To reveal changes in 4-1BB–based CD19 CAR-T cells and identify biomarkers of response, we used single-cell RNA sequencing and protein surface marker profiling of patient CAR-T cells pre- and postinfusion into patients with NHL. At the transcriptional and protein levels, we note the evolution of CAR-T cells toward a nonproliferative, highly differentiated, and exhausted state, with an enriched exhaustion profile in CAR-T cells of patients with poor response marked by TIGIT expression. Utilizing in vitro and in vivo studies, we demonstrate that TIGIT blockade alone improves the antitumor function of CAR-T cells. Altogether, we provide evidence of CAR-T cell dysfunction marked by TIGIT expression driving a poor response in patients with NHL.Significance:This is the first study investigating the mechanisms linked to CAR-T patient responses based on the sequential analysis of manufactured and infused CAR-T cells using single-cell RNA and protein expression data. Furthermore, our findings are the first to demonstrate an improvement of CAR-T cell efficacy with TIGIT inhibition alone.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1825

Approximately, a third of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have refractory or relapsed disease after initial treatment. Despite recent regulatory approval of several new agents, including CAR-T cell therapy, polatuzumab vedotin and tafasitamab, there is still a need for additional therapies that expand the therapeutic alternatives and improve outcomes for patients with DLBCL that progresses after first line therapy.Studies of recently approved agents for relapsed DLBCL are reviewed. The relevance of CD19 as an immunotherapeutic target. The pharmacologic composition of loncastuximab tesirine and its cytotoxic payload, a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer. Phase I and phase 2 data for loncastuximab tesirine in non-Hodgkin lymphoma, showing the safety profile of this drug and the emerging efficacy results in DLBCL.Loncastuximab tesirine is an antiCD19 antibody drug conjugate with a novel cytotoxic payload. Early studies showed this drug is tolerable, with a safety profile that is different from other antibody drug conjugates approved for lymphoid malignancies. Efficacy data shows activity in different non-Hodgkin lymphoma entities, and a phase 2 study has been completed in DLBCL showing durable responses, including in high-risk subgroups. Loncastuximab tesirine will be an important addition to the treatment alternatives for DLBCL.

Monoclonal antibody treatment initially heralded an era of molecularly targeted therapy in oncology and is now widely applied in modulating anti-cancer immunity by targeting programmed cell receptors (PD-1, PD-L1), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and, more recently, lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG3). Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) recently proved to be a valid approach to inducing anti-cancer immunity by directly modifying the host’s immune cells. However, such cell-based therapy requires extensive resources such as leukapheresis, ex vivo modification and expansion of cytotoxic T-cells and current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) laboratories and presents significant logistical challenges. Bi-/trispecific antibody technology is a novel pharmaceutical approach to facilitate the engagement of effector immune cells to potentially multiple cancer epitopes, e.g., the recently approved blinatumomab. This opens the opportunity to develop ‘off-the-shelf’ anti-cancer agents that achieve similar and/or complementary anti-cancer effects as those of modified immune cell therapy. The majority of bi-/trispecific antibodies target the tumor-associated antigens (TAA) located on the extracellular surface of cancer cells. The extracellular antigens represent just a small percentage of known TAAs and are often associated with higher toxicities because some of them are expressed on normal cells (off-target toxicity). In contrast, the targeting of intracellular TAAs such as mutant RAS and TP53 may lead to fewer off-target toxicities while still achieving the desired antitumor efficacy (on-target toxicity). Here, we provide a comprehensive review on the emerging field of bi-/tri-specific T-cell engagers and potential therapeutic opportunities.

There is an increased risk of congestive heart failure (CHF) following anthracycline-based chemotherapy in patients with Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Little is known about risk factors of CHF, other cardiovascular events (CVE), and CVE effect on outcomes. We conducted a retrospective review of 463 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients treated between 2002 and 2016 with anthracycline containing regimens. At a median follow up of 71.3 months, 10.4% patients developed new CHF, 4.97% had new atrial fibrillation and 3.2% had new coronary artery disease. Age over 65, advanced stage DLBCL and diabetes were associated with increased cumulative incidence of CVE. Patients with prior diabetes had decreased progression-free survival and overall survival in comparison to non-diabetics. Patients who had a CVE in the first year had significant worse OS then patients who did not have a CVE (Hazard Ratio 10.0, 95% CI, 7.24-13.88). A risk score incorporating age at DLBCL diagnosis, baseline lymphocyte count, disease stage and diabetes stratified into groups with low, intermediate and high risk for CVE, with 1-year cumulative incidence of CVE of 5.3%, 7.9% and 13.4%. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with anthracycline containing regimens have high incidence of CVE, which are not limited to CHF. Clinical variables at the time of diagnosis can identify the group of DLBCL patients at highest risk of CVE, for whom preventive interventions should be considered.

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR T) has demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy in hematological malignancies. However, compromised T cell effector function, proliferation, and persistence can limit CAR T from reaching their full curative potential. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) is a potent stimulator of T cells, however therapeutic use of IL-2 is limited by systemic toxicity due its pleiotropy. Therefore, to provide a selective IL-2 signal to engineered T cells, we have developed a human orthogonal ligand/receptor system consisting of a half-life extended pegylated IL-2 mutein (STK-009) and a mutated IL-2 Receptor Beta (hoRb) that responds to STK-009 but not wild type IL-2. SYNCAR-001 is an autologous CAR T co-expressing a CD19 CAR and hoRb on the T cell surface. In mouse models of refractory lymphoma, STK-009 treatment led to expansion and activation of SYNCAR-001 cells with a maintenance of stem cell memory and effector T cell phenotypes. When added to SYNCAR-001, STK-009 increased complete response rate and durable responses in a dose dependent manner. In non-human primate studies, STK-009 alone demonstrated no significant biological activity in IL-2 sensitive populations (T cells or NK cells) and was tolerable without toxicity. Methods: This is a first-in-human, open-label, dose escalation study of combination SYNCAR-001 + STK-009 in adults with relapsed or refractory (r/r) CD19+ hematologic malignancies. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety, preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics of SYNCAR-001 + STK-009. Dose escalation follows a standard 3+3 design with STK-009 being escalated while SYNCAR-001 is held at a single fixed dose. A dose extension will enroll a cohort of patients treated at a selected dose level and indication based on dose escalation findings. SYNCAR-001 is dosed intravenously (IV) once at Day 0 and STK-009 is dosed subcutaneously (SC) over the course of the study. Participants receive a single safety lead-in dose of STK-009 prior to lymphodepletion and subsequent SYNCAR-001 infusion. After SYNCAR-001 initiation, STK-009 is dosed SC weekly for 12 weeks and then monthly for 3 months. Eligible participants include individuals with r/r chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and selected r/r B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL subtypes of large B cell, mantle cell, and indolent lymphoma). Prior CD19 CAR use is excluded. The primary endpoint of safety includes outcomes such as adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary endpoints include assessments of response, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Exploratory endpoints include assessment of immune cell populations, and relevant gene/protein expression, as well as persistence, phenotype, and functionality of SYNCAR-001 in the peripheral blood and/or bone marrow in response to STK-009. Citation Format: Maria Lia Palomba, Matthew G. Mei, Paolo F. Caimi, Matthew Cortese, Marco Davila, Greg Yadnik, Nestor Huang, David Mou, Martin Oft, Paul-Joseph Aspuria, Anita Mehta-Damani, Navneet Ratti, Naiyer Rizvi, Alex Azrilevich, Ran Reshef. A Phase 1 study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a combination autologous CD19 CAR T cell therapy (SYNCAR-001) and orthogonal IL-2 (STK-009) in subjects with relapsed or refractory CD19 expressing hematologic malignancies (NCT05665062) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT125.

Prophylaxis is commonly used to prevent central nervous sy stem (CNS) relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with no clear standard of care. We retrospectively evaluated 1162 adult patients across 21 US academic centers with DLBCL or similar histologies who received single-route CNS prophylaxis as part of frontline therapy between 2013 and 2019. Prophylaxis was administered intrathecally(IT) in 894 (77%) and using systemic high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) in 236 (20%); 32 patients (3%) switched route due to toxicity and were assessed separately. By CNS-International Prognostic Index (IPI), 18% were considered low-risk, 51% moderate, and 30% high. Double-hit lymphoma (DHL) was confirmed in 243 of 866 evaluable patients (21%). Sixty-four patients (5.7%) had CNS relapse after median 7.1 months from diagnosis, including 15 of 64 (23%) within the first 6 months. There was no significant difference in CNS relapse between IT and HD-MTX recipients (5.4% vs 6.8%, P = .4), including after propensity score matching to account for differences between respective recipient groups. Weighting by CNS-IPI, expected vs observed CNS relapse rates were nearly identical (5.8% vs 5.7%). Testicular involvement was associated with high risk of CNS relapse (11.3%) despite most having lower CNS-IPI scores. DHL did not significantly predict for CNS relapse after single-route prophylaxis, including with adjustment for treatment regimen and other factors. This large study of CNS prophylaxis recipients with DLBCL found no significant difference in CNS relapse rates between routes of administration. Relapse rates among high-risk subgroups remain elevated, and reconsideration of prophylaxis strategies in DLBCL is of critical need.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a distinct spatiotemporal pattern in the United States. Patients with cancer are at higher risk of severe complications from COVID-19, but it is not well known whether COVID-19 outcomes in this patient population were associated with geography.To quantify spatiotemporal variation in COVID-19 outcomes among patients with cancer.This registry-based retrospective cohort study included patients with a historical diagnosis of invasive malignant neoplasm and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between March and November 2020. Data were collected from cancer care delivery centers in the United States.Patient residence was categorized into 9 US census divisions. Cancer center characteristics included academic or community classification, rural-urban continuum code (RUCC), and social vulnerability index.The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. The secondary composite outcome consisted of receipt of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, and all-cause death. Multilevel mixed-effects models estimated associations of center-level and census division-level exposures with outcomes after adjustment for patient-level risk factors and quantified variation in adjusted outcomes across centers, census divisions, and calendar time.Data for 4749 patients (median [IQR] age, 66 [56-76] years; 2439 [51.4%] female individuals, 1079 [22.7%] non-Hispanic Black individuals, and 690 [14.5%] Hispanic individuals) were reported from 83 centers in the Northeast (1564 patients [32.9%]), Midwest (1638 [34.5%]), South (894 [18.8%]), and West (653 [13.8%]). After adjustment for patient characteristics, including month of COVID-19 diagnosis, estimated 30-day mortality rates ranged from 5.2% to 26.6% across centers. Patients from centers located in metropolitan areas with population less than 250 000 (RUCC 3) had lower odds of 30-day mortality compared with patients from centers in metropolitan areas with population at least 1 million (RUCC 1) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.11-0.84). The type of center was not significantly associated with primary or secondary outcomes. There were no statistically significant differences in outcome rates across the 9 census divisions, but adjusted mortality rates significantly improved over time (eg, September to November vs March to May: aOR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.17-0.58).In this registry-based cohort study, significant differences in COVID-19 outcomes across US census divisions were not observed. However, substantial heterogeneity in COVID-19 outcomes across cancer care delivery centers was found. Attention to implementing standardized guidelines for the care of patients with cancer and COVID-19 could improve outcomes for these vulnerable patients.

In the last decade, a better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas has resulted in the development of novel targeted therapies, such as small molecule inhibitors of select kinases in the B-cell receptor pathway, antibody-drug conjugates, and small molecules that target a variety of proteins (eg, CD-19, EZH2, and XPO-1-mediated nuclear export). Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, first approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, has also emerged as a novel treatment option for R/R follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. These NCCN Guideline Insights highlight the new targeted therapy options included in the NCCN Guidelines for B-Cell Lymphomas for the treatment of R/R disease.

ImportanceDetermining whether neurofilament light chain (NfL) elevations in patients who develop immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occur before or after infusion of cellular product is important to identify high-risk patients and inform whether neuroaxonal injury is latent or a consequence of treatment.ObjectiveTo quantify serial NfL levels in patients undergoing cellular therapy.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective 2-center study examined plasma NfL levels in 30 patients with detailed medical and treatment history, including all major pretreatment and posttreatment risk factors. Exclusion criteria included dementia and severe, symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) involvement.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPatients’ NfL levels were measured at 7 time points: baseline (prelymphodepletion), during lymphodepletion, postinfusion day (D) 1, D3, D7, D14, and D30. Prediction accuracy for the development of ICANS was next modeled using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) classification. Finally, univariate and multivariate modeling examined the association between NfL levels, ICANS, and potential risk factors including demographic (age, sex), oncologic (tumor burden, history of CNS involvement), neurologic (history of nononcologic CNS disease or neuropathy), and neurotoxic exposure histories (vincristine, cytarabine, methotrexate, or CNS radiotherapy).ResultsA total of 30 patients (median [range] age, 64 [22-80] years; 12 women [40%] and 18 men [60%]) were included. Individuals who developed ICANS had elevations in NfL prior to lymphodepletion and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell infusion compared with those who did not develop ICANS (no ICANS: 29.4 pg/mL, vs any ICANS: 87.6 pg/mL; P Conclusions and RelevanceIn a subset of patients in this cross-sectional study, the risk of developing ICANS was associated with preexisting neuroaxonal injury that was quantifiable with plasma NfL level. This latent neuroaxonal injury was present prior to drug administration but was not associated with historic neurotoxic therapies or nononcologic neurologic disease. Preinfusion NfL may further permit early screening and identification of patients most at risk for ICANS. Additional studies are needed to determine NfL’s utility as a predictive biomarker for early (preemptive or prophylactic) intervention and to delineate the origin of this underlying neural injury.

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive but potentially curable malignancy; however, cure is highly dependent on the ability to deliver intensive, anthracycline-based chemoimmunotherapy. Nearly one third of cases of DLBCL occur in patients over age 75 years, and advanced age is an important adverse feature in prognostic models. Despite this incidence in older patients, there is no clear accepted standard of care due to under-representation of this group in large randomized clinical trials. Furthermore, insufficient assessments of baseline frailty and prediction of toxicity hamper clinical decision-making. Here, we present an ongoing randomized study of R-miniCHOP chemoimmunotherapy with or without oral azacitidine (CC-486, Onureg) for patients age 75 and older with newly diagnosed DLBCL and associated aggressive lymphomas. The incorporation of an oral hypomethylating agent is based on increased tumor methylation as a biologic feature of older patients with DLBCL and a desire to minimize the injection burden for this population. This is the first randomized study in this population conducted in North America by the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) and will enroll up to 422 patients including 40 patients in a safety run-in phase. This study incorporates an objective assessment of baseline frailty (the FIL Tool) and a serial comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Key correlative tests will include circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays at pre-specified timepoints to explore if ctDNA quantity and methylation patterns correlate with response. S1918 has the potential to impact future trial design and to change the standard of care for patients 75 years and older with aggressive lymphoma given its randomized design, prospective incorporation of geriatric assessments, and exploration of ctDNA correlatives. Trial registration: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier NCT04799275

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens frequently provide insufficient disease control in patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We evaluated intensification of fludarabine/busulfan (Flu/Bu) RIC with targeted marrow irradiation (TMI) in a dose escalation with expansion phase I clinical trial. TMI doses were delivered at 1.5 Gy in twice daily fractions on days -10 through -7 (dose levels: 3 Gy, 4.5 Gy, and 6 Gy), Flu (30 mg/m

Introduction: Variability in expression of B-cell surface antigens could be an important mechanism of treatment failure after immunotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Understanding the evolution of target antigen expression can guide selection and sequencing of newer therapies targeting CD19 and CD20. We sought to quantitate the change in expression of CD19 and CD20 in R/R DLBCL after Rituximab (R)-based chemo immunotherapy (CIT) relative to pretreatment levels. Methods: Pts. diagnosed with DLBCL after January 2014 who were R/R to R-based CIT (R-CHOP or R-EPOCH), were identified and clinical variables at diagnosis (Dx) and first R/R were recorded. Data from archival flow cytometry assays on Dx and R/R biopsies were accessed. Using FCS Express® software, neoplastic cells were gated, and fluorescence intensity (FI) of CD19 and CD20 expression were reported. Multivariate linear mixed model was used to compare median and geometric mean FI of CD19 and CD20 between Dx and R/R. Results: A total of 51 flow cytometry assays (26 Dx and 25 R/R) were analyzed for 33 pts., of whom paired assays (at both Dx and R/R) were available for 18 pts. Median age at Dx was 64 (range, 41-76) yrs, 24 pts. (73%) were male and 29 (88%) had IPI ≥ 2. Cell of origin at Dx was GCB in 16 (49%), non-GCB in 12 (36%) pts., while two had a double-hit rearrangement. Median time to R/R was 10.4 months. There was a significant reduction in median FI of CD20 from Dx [median: 40,610 (range: 167 - 259,962)] to R/R [median: 11,596 (range: 63 - 79,592)], representing a reduction of 63% at R/R relative to Dx (P= 0.01; 95% CI: 20-73%). Similar change was observed in geometric mean FI of CD20, which was reduced 65% at R/R relative to Dx (P< 0.01; 95%CI: 31-82%). Median and geometric mean FI of CD19 at R/R were 38% and 20% lower compared to Dx, respectively, but these differences were not statistically significant (P= 0.08 and 0.39, respectively). Relative change in FI at R/R in individual cases, compared to the mean FI of all Dx cases, showed that 21 out 25 R/R cases (84%) had reduction of CD20 whereas only 14/25 (56%) had reduction of CD19. Interestingly, 7/25 (28%) R/R cases had an increase in CD19 expression by >80%. Reduction in CD20 geometric mean FI from Dx to R/R was significantly associated with age >60 years (p=0.04), bone marrow involvement (p 1 site of extra nodal involvement (p= 0.03) at Dx. Conclusions: Quantitative assessment by flow cytometry revealed a significant decline in expression of CD20 at R/R compared to Dx in patients with DLBCL treated with R-based CIT. CD19 expression was largely unchanged, although dramatically upregulated in a subset of R/R cases. Given the role of CD19 mediated pathways in B-cell NHL and its association with PI3K pro-survival signaling, these data merit further exploration as a potential mechanism of treatment resistance. Citation Format: Agrima Mian, Narendra Bhattarai, Wei Wei, Manishkumar S. Patel, Paolo F. Caimi, Sarah L. Ondrejka, Brian T. Hill. Quantitative assessment of the evolution of therapeutic target antigen expression in diffuse large b-cell lymphoma in response to treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3480.

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase-δ (PI3Kδ) inhibitors are active in lymphoid malignancies, although associated toxicities can limit their use. Umbralisib is a dual inhibitor of PI3Kδ and casein kinase-1ε (CK1ε). This study analyzed integrated comprehensive toxicity data from 4 open-label, phase 1 and 2 studies that included 371 adult patients (median age, 67 years) with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (follicular lymphoma [n = 147]; marginal zone lymphoma [n = 82]; diffuse large B-cell lymphoma/mantle cell lymphoma [n = 74]; chronic lymphocytic leukemia [n = 43]; and other tumor types [n = 25]) who were treated with the recommended phase 2 dose of umbralisib 800 mg or higher once daily. At data cutoff, median duration of umbralisib treatment was 5.9 months (range, 0.1-75.1 months), and 107 patients (28.8%) received umbralisib for ≥12 months. Any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 366 (98.7%) of 371 patients, with the most frequent being diarrhea (52.3%), nausea (41.5%), and fatigue (31.8%). Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 189 (50.9%) of 371 patients and included neutropenia (11.3%), diarrhea (7.3%), and increased aminotransferase levels (5.7%). Treatment-emergent serious AEs occurred in 95 (25.6%) of 371 patients. AEs of special interest were limited and included pneumonia (29 of 371 [7.8%]), noninfectious colitis (9 of 371 [2.4%]), and pneumonitis (4 of 371 [1.1%]). AEs led to discontinuation of umbralisib in 51 patients (13.7%). Four patients (1.1%) died of AEs, none of which was deemed related to umbralisib. No cumulative toxicities were reported. The favorable long-term tolerability profile and low rates of immune-mediated toxicities support the potential use of umbralisib for the benefit of a broad population of patients with lymphoid malignancies.

The mechanism of aging is not yet fully understood. It has been recognized that there are age-dependent changes in the DNA methylation pattern of the whole genome. To date, there are several DNA methylation-based estimators of the chronological age. A majority of the estimators use the DNA methylation data from a single tissue type, such as blood. In 2013, for the first time, Steve Horvath reported the DNA methylation-based age estimator (353 CpGs were used) that could be applied to multiple tissues. A refined, more sensitive version that uses 391 CpGs was subsequently developed and validated in human cells, including fibroblasts. In this review, the age predicted by DNA methylation-based age estimator is referred to as DNAmAge, and the biological process controlling the progression of DNAmAge is referred to as the epigenetic aging in this minireview. The concepts of DNAmAge and epigenetic aging provide us opportunities to discover previously unrecognized biological events controlling aging. In this article, we discuss the frequently asked questions regarding DNAmAge and the epigenetic aging by introducing recent studies of ours and others. We focus on addressing the following questions: (1) Is there any synchronization of DNAmAge between cells in a human body?, (2) Can we use in vitro (cell culture) systems to study the epigenetic aging?, (3) Is there an age limit of DNAmAge?, and (4) Is it possible to change the speed and direction of the epigenetic aging? We describe our current understandings to these questions and outline potential future directions. IMPACT STATEMENT: Aging is associated with DNA methylation (DNAm) changes. Recent advancement of the whole-genome DNAm analysis technology allowed scientists to develop DNAm-based age estimators. A majority of these estimators use DNAm data from a single tissue type such as blood. In 2013, a multi-tissue age estimator using DNAm pattern of 353 CpGs was developed by Steve Horvath. This estimator was named “epigenetic clock”, and the improved version using DNAm pattern of 391 CpGs was developed in 2018. The estimated age by epigenetic clock is named DNAmAge. DNAmAge can be used as a biomarker of aging predicting the risk of age-associated diseases and mortality. Although the DNAm-based age estimators were developed, the mechanism of epigenetic aging is still enigmatic. The biological significance of epigenetic aging is not well understood, either. This minireview discusses the current understanding of the mechanism of epigenetic aging and the future direction of aging research.