Search

Purpose: Antibodies against the lymphocyte PD-1 (aPD-1) receptor are cornerstone agents for advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), based on their ability to restore the exhausted antitumor immune response. Our study reports a novel, lymphocyte-independent, therapeutic activity of aPD-1 against NSCLC, blocking the tumor-intrinsic PD-1 receptors on chemoresistant cells. Experimental Design: PD-1 in NSCLC cells was explored in vitro at baseline, including stem-like pneumospheres, and following treatment with cisplatin both at transcriptional and protein levels. PD-1 signaling and RNA sequencing were assessed. The lymphocyte-independent antitumor activity of aPD-1 was explored in vitro, by PD-1 blockade and stimulation with soluble ligand (PD-L1s), and in vivo within NSCLC xenograft models. Results: We showed the existence of PD-1+ NSCLC cell subsets in cell lines and large in silico datasets (Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia and The Cancer Genome Atlas). Cisplatin significantly increased PD-1 expression on chemo-surviving NSCLC cells (2.5-fold P = 0.0014), while the sequential treatment with anti–PD-1 Ab impaired their recovery after chemotherapy. PD-1 was found to be associated with tumor stemness features. PD-1 expression was enhanced in NSCLC stem-like pneumospheres (P < 0.0001), significantly promoted by stimulation with soluble PD-L1 (+27% ± 4, P < 0.0001) and inhibited by PD-1 blockade (−30% ± 3, P < 0.0001). The intravenous monotherapy with anti–PD-1 significantly inhibited tumor growth of NSCLC xenografts in immunodeficient mice, without the contribution of the immune system, and delayed the occurrence of chemoresistance when combined with cisplatin. Conclusions: We report first evidence of a novel lymphocyte-independent activity of anti–PD-1 antibodies in NSCLC, capable of inhibiting chemo-surviving NSCLC cells and exploitable to contrast disease relapses following chemotherapy. See related commentary by Augustin et al., p. 505

37 ALK FISH-positive NSCLC cases diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 in 7 Italian centres were investigated with ICH using three different anti-ALK antibodies (ALK1, 5A4 and D5F3). Staining for ALK1 and 5A4 was graded as 0+,1+,2+, and 3+, while the scoring for D5F3 was recorded as negative or positive. Proportion agreement analysis was done using Cohen's unweighted kappa (k). TS and β-actin expression levels were analysed by quantitative RT-PCR. Comparison between TS expression in ALK FISH-positive specimens and a control cohort of ALK FISH-negative ones was performed with the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests.Considering 2+ and 3+ as positive, the proportion of IHC agreement was 0.1691 (95% CI 0-0.4595) for ALK1/5A4, 0.1691 (95% CI 0-0.4595) for ALK1/D5F3, and 1 for D5F3/5A4. Considering 3+ as positive, it was 0.1543 (95% CI 0-0.4665) for ALK1/ 5A4, 0.0212 (95% CI 0-0.1736) for ALK1/D5F3, and 0.2269 (95% CI 0-0.5462) for 5A4/D5F3. Median TS expression was 6.07 (1.28-14.94) and ALK-positive cases had a significant lower TS expression than ALK-negative tumoursIHC proved to be a reliable tool for the diagnosis of ALK-rearranged NSCLC. D5F3 and 5A4 clones have the highest percentage of agreement. TS levels are significantly lower in FISH-positive patients.

Background: The new paradigm of precision medicine brought an increasing interest in survival prediction based on the integration of multi-omics and multi-sources data. Several models have been developed to address this task, but their performances are widely variable depending on the specific disease and are often poor on noisy datasets, such as in the case of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Objective: The aim of this work is to introduce a novel computational approach, named multi-omic two-layer SVM (mtSVM), and to exploit it to get a survival-based risk stratification of NSCLC patients from an ongoing observational prospective cohort clinical study named PROMOLE. Methods: The model implements a model-based integration by means of a two-layer feed-forward network of FastSurvivalSVMs, and it can be used to get individual survival estimates or survival-based risk stratification. Despite being designed for NSCLC, its range of applicability can potentially cover the full spectrum of survival analysis problems where integration of different data sources is needed, independently of the pathology considered. Results: The model is here applied to the case of NSCLC, and compared with other state-of-the-art methods, proving excellent performance. Notably, the model, trained on data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), has been validated on an independent cohort (from the PROMOLE study), and the results were consistent. Gene-set enrichment analysis of the risk groups, as well as exome analysis, revealed well-defined molecular profiles, such as a prognostic mutational gene signature with potential implications in clinical practice.

Molecular modifiers of KRAS G12C inhibitor (KRAS G12Ci) efficacy in advanced KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC are poorly defined. In a large unbiased clinico-genomic analysis of 424 NSCLC patients, we identified and validated co-alterations in KEAP1, SMARCA4 and CDKN2A as major independent determinants of inferior clinical outcomes with KRAS G12Ci monotherapy. Collectively, co-mutations in these three tumor suppressor genes segregated patients into distinct prognostic subgroups and captured ~50% of those with early disease progression (PFS≤3 months) with KRAS G12Ci. Pathway-level integration of less prevalent co-alterations in functionally related genes nominated PI3K/AKT/MTOR pathway and additional baseline RAS gene alterations, including amplifications, as candidate drivers of inferior outcomes with KRAS G12Ci, and revealed a possible association between defective DNA damage response/repair and improved KRAS G12Ci efficacy. Our findings propose a framework for patient stratification and clinical outcome prediction in KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC that can inform rational selection and appropriate tailoring of emerging combination therapies.

PD-L1/2 and phospho-p38 MAPK expression in NSCLC cells. Tumor membrane expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 in NSCLC cell lines was intensely enhanced by treatment with Interferon γ (n=9, PD-L1 p=0.02, PD-L2 p

Treatment with PD-L1s is associated with the up-regulation of expression of key protein coding genes involved in processes of tumorigenesis, EMT, tumor aggressiveness and chemoresistance. Heatmap showing z-scaled DESeq2-normalized expression values of the 14 differentially expressed genes between PD-L1s and untreated cells. Right annotation indicates the mean DESeq2-normalized gene expression values. Top annotations depict the pneumosphere of origin and the treatment. Hierarchical clustering of genes and samples is shown on the left and top, respectively (A). Volcano plot showing the log2 fold change (log2FC) and adjusted p-value values of all genes between PD-L1s and untreated samples. Differentially expressed genes are depicted in red (B).

Double positive OCT3/4-PD1 subsets in the bulk NSCLC cells after cisplatin treatment. OCT3/4 expression preferentially co-localized on PD-1+ NSCLC cells as compared with the PD-1- counterpart (14% vs 0.1%). Representative flow cytometry histograms of OCT3/4 expression are reported in figure.

Despite the progress in outcomes seen with immunotherapy in various malignancies, including nonsmall cell lung cancer, the benefits are less in small cell lung cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma and thymic epithelial tumours. New effective treatment options are needed, guidedviamore in-depth insights into the pathophysiology of these rare malignancies. This review comprehensively presents an overview of the clinical presentation, diagnostic tools, staging systems, pathophysiology and treatment options for these rare thoracic cancers. In addition, opportunities for further improvement of therapies are discussed.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy deeply changed the treatment paradigm of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the past years. However, the objective response rate (ORR) after immunotherapy is about 20–30% of NSCLC patients. Therefore, identification of predictive biomarkers is crucial for selecting patients with NSCLC who would most benefit from programmed cell death receptor protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor-based immunotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively collected medical records and thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) data from 90 patients with a NSCLC who received PD-1 inhibitor-based combination therapy. Serum biomarkers were also measured at 6- and 12-week post-treatment and compared with their baseline values. Associations between changes in serum biomarkers, clinical characteristics and treatment efficacy were evaluated using univariate tests. The patients who were still alive were followed up remotely by phone or email to assess survival. The association between serum biomarkers and TrxR with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression. Nomogram prediction models were constructed using factors associated with PFS and OS, respectively. RESULTS: The median follow-up time among the 90 patients was 19.7 (range, 13.6 to 25.8) months. Median PFS and OS were 13.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.5 to 13.7] and 19.7 (95% CI: 13.6 to 25.8) months, respectively. Patients with decreased carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), albumin (Alb), and TrxR values at 6- and 12-week post-treatment compared to baseline had statistically significantly improved disease remission rates (P

KRAS mutations occur in approximately 30% of lung adenocarcinomas, mainly in codon 12 (83% of cases), p.G12C being the prevalent one (40%), followed by p.G12V and p.G12D (22 and 16%, respectively). Treatment options for advanced KRAS mutant non-small-cell lung cancer ( KRAS-MT NSCLC) are limited to chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). However, clinical trials exploring specific targeted agents are expected to change the treatment landscape of this disease. Here, we describe the design and scientific rationale of the randomized, phase II, open label, RAMP-202 study, which will evaluate the efficacy and safety of VS-6766 versus VS-6766 in combination with defactinib in advanced KRAS-MT NSCLC patients after failure of prior platinum-based chemotherapy and CPI.

Introduction: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) histologic transformation upon immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is rare. Case presentation: We described the case of a patient with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma who relapsed after surgery. At the time of relapse, he received chemo-radiotherapy, followed by consolidation immunotherapy. After 3 cycles the patient experienced disease hyperprogression for onset of a new lung mass, which resulted in squamous cell carcinoma. The preservation of an atypical mutation in the v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) gene in both the primary adenocarcinoma and the new squamous carcinoma suggests histological transformation, likely ICI-related. Discussion: We reviewed similar cases in literature, highlighting common patterns and substantial differences. For a deeper insight into inherent biological mechanisms, re-biopsy in case of atypical ICI response should be encouraged.

Aim: Since severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection rapidly spread around the world, Italy has quickly become one of the most affected countries. Healthcare systems introduced strict infection control measures to ensure optimal care, especially in frail groups such as cancer patients (pts). This study investigated the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 pre-procedure screening and whether coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) influenced timely diagnosis and therapy. Methods: Data of oncological procedures of pts with confirmed or suspected cancer diagnosis, treated at Oncology Department or coming from Emergency Department of San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital between June 2020 and March 2021 were retrospectively collected. A nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) was performed in outpatients 24/48 h before procedures. Inpatients were tested by NPS before and after hospitalization. Results: Two hundred and twenty-one pts were included in this analysis. Median age was 73 years, males were 58%. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status was 0 or 1 in 88% of pts. The most frequent cancer type was lung cancer (57%). Stages IV were 77%. Two hundred and forty three scheduled procedures were performed with diagnostic (n: 142; 58%), therapeutic (n: 55; 23%), and palliative (n: 46; 19%) intent. One hundred and four and 139 procedures were performed in out- and in-pts, respectively. Of the 234 NPS performed, 10 (4%) were positive. Two pts were infected during hospitalization, 8 in community. Most of them were asymptomatic, while only 2 had mild symptoms. Eight procedures (3%) were postponed, 1 cancelled, while 2 were performed in positive pts. Median time to resolution of the infection was 17 days (11-36). Median delay in the procedures was 25 days (14-55). Five pts started systemic treatment, after a median time of 37.5 days (13-57). Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 infection led to the postponement of a small, but not negligible percentage of oncological procedures. However, the low infection rate observed suggests that structured screening for COVID-19 is critical for the best management of scheduled procedures during pandemic.

Background: dNLR at the baseline (B), defined by neutrophils/[leucocytes-neutrophils], correlates with immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). However, dNLR is dynamic under therapy and its longitudinal assessment may provide data predicting efficacy. We sought to examine the impact of dNLR dynamics on ICI efficacy and understand its biological significance. Patients and methods: aNSCLC patients receiving ICI at 17 EU/US centres were included [Feb/13-Jun/18]. As chemotherapy-only group was evaluated (NCT02105168). dNLR was determined at (B) and at cycle2 (C2) [dNLR

Objectives: Exercise has been reported to alleviate disease as well as treatment impact in patients with lung cancer. Nevertheless, there is limited information available regarding the perception of lung cancer dedicated healthcare professionals’ and their advice on exercise. Materials and Methods: An online survey exploring healthcare professionals’ practice patterns, perceptions, barriers, and facilitators of exercise in patients with lung cancer was conducted within members of the EORTC Lung Cancer Group (LCG). Results: One hundred forty-one healthcare providers completed the survey, mainly medical and radiation oncologists. Overall, 63% of the study participants declared that they frequently assessed exercise level in their patients, and 43% of them reinforced the importance of exercise. However, only 10% referred patients to an exercise program or specialist. Although the majority of the respondents had a positive perception regarding the benefits and safety of exercise (even in patients with advanced disease and/or bone metastasis), two-thirds of clinicians reported not having adequate training about exercise counselling. Moreover, 53% reported to lack of knowledge of guidelines referring to exercise in patients with cancer. Several obstacles and facilitators to improve exercise promotion in lung cancer care were identified. Conclusion: Healthcare providers recognize the relevance and feasibility of exercise as part of cancer treatment intervention, but specific pathways to do the referral are frequently missing. Future structured and well-designed strategies and initiatives are needed to support an effective referral in order to implement exercise interventions routinely in clinical practice.

Mortality risk in COVID-19 patients is determined by several factors. The aim of our study was to adopt an integrated approach based on clinical, laboratory and chest x-ray (CXR) findings collected at the patient’s admission to Emergency Room (ER) to identify prognostic factors. Retrospective study on 346 consecutive patients admitted to the ER of two North-Western Italy hospitals between March 9 and April 10, 2020 with clinical suspicion of COVID-19 confirmed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase reaction chain test (RT-PCR), CXR performed within 24 h (analyzed with two different scores) and recorded prognosis. Clinical and laboratory data were collected. Statistical analysis on the features of 83 in-hospital dead vs 263 recovered patients was performed with univariate (uBLR), multivariate binary logistic regression (mBLR) and ROC curve analysis. uBLR identified significant differences for several variables, most of them intertwined by multiple correlations. mBLR recognized as significant independent predictors for in-hospital mortality age > 75 years, C-reactive protein (CRP) > 60 mg/L, PaO2/FiO2 ratio (P/F) 7. Among the patients with at least two predictors, the in-hospital mortality rate was 58% against 6% for others [p p

Background: Irreversible allosteric KRAS p.G12C inhibitors (KG12Ci) such as sotorasib and adagrasib have revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of advanced KG12C-mutant NSCLC, however individual responses are heterogeneous and curtailed by innate and adaptive/acquired resistance. Molecular determinants of KG12Ci efficacy in NSCLC are poorly defined. We dissected the impact of major KG12C co-mutations and explored the effects of less prevalent co-alterations on the clinical activity of KG12Ci in the largest treated cohort to date of patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. Key findings were validated in preclinical KG12C NSCLC models. Methods: Baseline clinico-genomic features and clinical outcome data from pts with stage IV KG12C NSCLC (ECOG PS 0-2) treated with single-agent KG12Ci were collected retrospectively from 20 centers in the US and Europe. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS and differences were assessed with the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% CI were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model stratified for clinical co-variates. The impact of selected co-alterations on sotorasib efficacy was assessed in syngeneic (C57BL/6) KG12C NSCLC models. Results: 411 eligible pts were included in the study. Median age was 68 years, 77% of pts had received both platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-(L)1 inhibitors and 35% had brain metastases. 83% of pts received sotorasib. ORR with KG12Ci was 32.4% (95% CI, 27.9-37.1), PFS was 5.1m (95% CI, 4.5-5.6) and OS was 10.2m (95% CI, 8.4-12.1). Co-alterations in KEAP1, SMARCA4 and CDKN2A/B were each associated with significantly shorter PFS (KEAP1: 2.8m vs 5.5m, HR 2.50, P Conclusions: Co-mutations in KEAP1, SMARCA4 and CDKN2A/2B define subgroups of KG12C NSCLC pts with markedly distinct outcomes with KG12Ci monotherapy. Tailoring of KG12C inhibitor-anchored therapeutic strategies and patient stratification should take into account the co-mutation status of individual tumors. Citation Format: Marcelo V. Negrao, Haniel A. Araujo, Giuseppe Lamberti, Alissa J. Cooper, Teng Zhou, Neal Akhave, Lukas Delasos, J Kevin Hicks, Mihaela Aldea, Gabriele Minuti, Jacobi Hines, Jacqueline V. Aredo, Michael J. Dennis, Turja Chakrabarti, Susan Scott, Paolo Bironzo, Matthias Scheffler, Petros Christopoulos, So Yeon Kim, Sarah Goldberg, Ying Ni, Blerina Resuli, Lorenza Landi, Shu-Chi Tseng, Mizuki Nishino, Dwight Owen, Collin Blakely, Giannis Mountzios, Catherine A. Shu, Christine Bestvina, Marina Garassino, Kristen Marrone, Jhanelle Gray, Sandip Pravin Patel, Amy L. Cummings, Heather A. Wakelee, Jurgen Wolf, Giorgio V. Scagliotti, Federico Cappuzzo, Fabrice Barlesi, Pradnya Patil, Don L. Gibbons, Funda Meric-Bernstam, J Jack Lee, John V. Heymach, David S. Hong, Rebecca S. Heist, Mark M. Awad, Ferdinandos Skoulidis. Molecular determinants of KRAS p.G12C inhibitor efficacy in advanced NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3431.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations are responsible of neoplastic transformation in a limited subset of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. In recent years outcomes of these patients improved due to the development and clinical availability of specific and extremely active targeted therapies [i.e., next-generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI)]: ALK+ patients are now reaching impressive results when treated with more potent inhibitors upfront with an average median progression-free survival (mPFS) around 35 months. However, under drug pressure, cancer cells develop resistance and patients eventually progress. Multiple mechanisms of intrinsic or acquired resistance have been extensively characterized. Less potent ALK inhibitors (ALKi)—like crizotinib—usually tend to induce a large spectrum of secondary intra-kinase mutations; however, these alterations may be observed also after sequential administration of multiple ALKi. Noteworthy, neoplastic cells may evade ALK targeting through a myriad of different mechanisms involving cell-stroma interaction, activation of parallel signaling pathways, intracellular downstream adaptation and histological reshaping, as relevant molecular events. Often these phenomena are restricted to a limited number of cases or even can be patient-specific, thus hindering the development of therapeutic strategies largely applicable. Consequently, the recognition of specific resistance mechanisms seldom translates in clinical opportunities. Management of ALK+ patients is drastically changed and deciphering the molecular biology underlying this disease during treatment is of paramount relevance. The bedrock of resistance to TKI is that, after the diagnosis, we face with a different disease that needs to be re-characterized through tissue or/and liquid biopsies. Understanding molecular pathways driving the resistant phenotype will give us the chance to know what we are dealing with and, rather than choose an empirical approach, will help us to properly define the best targeted treatment for these patients.

Germline mutations in the tumor suppressor gene BRCA1-associated protein-1 (

Lung cancers account for over 90% of thoracic malignancies and the rapid development of specific cytotoxic drugs and molecular therapies requires a detailed identification of the different histologies, gene drivers or immune microenvironment biomarkers. Nevertheless, the heterogeneous clonal evolution, the emergency of drug-induced resistance and the limited occurrence of genetic alterations claim the need of a deep integration of the tumor's and the patient's biological features. The aim of the present study is to generate a tecnological platform for precision medicine in order to set predictive personalized algorithms for patient diagnosis and therapy. All resectable patients having histologically confirmed stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer will be enrolled for tissue sampling. A large biobank of lung cancer samples and the corresponding healthy tissues and biological components (ie, blood, stools, etc.) with complete clinical, pathological and molecular information will be collected. The platform will include: a) digital patient data collection; b) whole NGS molecular analyses (exome, transcriptome, methylome) for tumor characterization; c) exploitation and collection of organoids from tissue patients; d) Surface Amplified Raman Spectroscopy; e) microfluidic-based technological drug screening; f) preclinical in vivo models based on patient-derived xenografts; g) generation of specific predictive algorithms taking into account all collected multiparameters. The project will lay the basis of a knowledge hub and qualified technology aimed not only at answering the medical and scientific community's questions, but also meant to be useful to individual patients by predicting the response to adjuvant and second-line drugs in case of relapse of the disease.

Although there is substantial evidence on the impact of nutritional-status deterioration on quality of life, treatment tolerance, morbidity, and mortality in people with cancer, clinical nutrition intervention trials in oncology are still limited. The rationale for deepening this topic is also justified by the availability of innovative treatment options, such as immunotherapy, which take into consideration potential modulation of the immune system by several factors. In this article, we aimed to focus on the unexplored issue of immunonutrition and its potential modulatory activity on treatment response in people receiving immunotherapy. With this perspective, we propose a clinical-trial model to explore the potential impact of immunonutrition on nutritional, functional, immunologic, safety, and efficacy parameters in people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer undergoing first-line immunotherapy-based anticancer treatment.

Contains fulltext : 215810.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) BACKGROUND: Anti-PD1/PD-L1 directed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are widely used to treat patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The activity of ICI across NSCLC harboring oncogenic alterations is poorly characterized. The aim of our study was to address the efficacy of ICI in the context of oncogenic addiction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study for patients receiving ICI monotherapy for advanced NSCLC with at least one oncogenic driver alteration. Anonymized data were evaluated for clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes for ICI therapy: best response (RECIST 1.1), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) from ICI initiation. The primary end point was PFS under ICI. Secondary end points were best response (RECIST 1.1) and OS from ICI initiation. RESULTS: We studied 551 patients treated in 24 centers from 10 countries. The molecular alterations involved KRAS (n = 271), EGFR (n = 125), BRAF (n = 43), MET (n = 36), HER2 (n = 29), ALK (n = 23), RET (n = 16), ROS1 (n = 7), and multiple drivers (n = 1). Median age was 60 years, gender ratio was 1 : 1, never/former/current smokers were 28%/51%/21%, respectively, and the majority of tumors were adenocarcinoma. The objective response rate by driver alteration was: KRAS = 26%, BRAF = 24%, ROS1 = 17%, MET = 16%, EGFR = 12%, HER2 = 7%, RET = 6%, and ALK = 0%. In the entire cohort, median PFS was 2.8 months, OS 13.3 months, and the best response rate 19%. In a subgroup analysis, median PFS (in months) was 2.1 for EGFR, 3.2 for KRAS, 2.5 for ALK, 3.1 for BRAF, 2.5 for HER2, 2.1 for RET, and 3.4 for MET. In certain subgroups, PFS was positively associated with PD-L1 expression (KRAS, EGFR) and with smoking status (BRAF, HER2). CONCLUSIONS: : ICI induced regression in some tumors with actionable driver alterations, but clinical activity was lower compared with the KRAS group and the lack of response in the ALK group was notable. Patients with actionable tumor alterations should receive targeted therapies and chemotherapy before considering immunotherapy as a single agent.

The standard front-line treatment for pleural mesothelioma (PM) is pemetrexed-based chemotherapy, whose major target is thymidylate synthase (TS). In several cancer models, miR-215 and miR-375 have been shown to target TS, while information on these miRNAs in PM are still limited although suggest their role in epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Seventy-one consecutive PM tissues (4 biphasic, 7 sarcomatoid, and 60 epithelioid types) and 16 commercial and patient-derived PM cell lines were screened for TS, miR-215, and miR-375 expression. REN and 570B cells were selected for miR-215 and miR-375 transient transfections to test TS modulation. ZEB1 protein expression in tumor samples was also tested. Moreover, genetic profile was investigated by means of BAP1 and p53 immunohistochemistry. Expression of both miR-215 and miR-375 was significantly higher in epithelioid histotype. Furthermore, inverse correlation between TS protein and both miR-215 and miR-375 expression was found. Efficiently transfected REN and 570B cell lines overexpressing miR-215 and miR-375 showed decreased TS protein levels. Epithelioid PM with a mesenchymal component highlighted by reticulin stain showed significantly higher TS and ZEB1 protein and lower miRNA expression. A better survival was recorded for BAP1 lost/TS low cases. Our data indicate that miR-215 and miR-375 are involved in TS regulation as well as in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in PM.

Aim: Reporting toxicities of targeted therapies (TTs) and immunotherapy in oncology requires special attention. Materials & methods: We identified TTs and immunotherapies approved by the US FDA for solid malignancies in the adult population. Publications were reviewed according to a 24-point score based on the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidance. Results: We identified 81 trials (>45,000 patients). The experimental drug was studied as single agent in 51% of the cases; setting of disease was mainly (95%) advanced/metastatic. Lowest scores in adverse event (AE) description regarded: reporting recurrent/late toxicities and duration of the AEs (>90%), time of occurrence and indication of all-grade AEs (>75%). Conclusion: Suboptimal reporting of AEs in trials leading to approval of TTs and immunotherapy was shown. Improving AE descriptions should be a priority in ongoing trials.

Lung cancer represents the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with NSCLC being the most common type. Two-thirds of NSCLC patients harbor oncogenic driver alterations, among which EGFR activating mutations and ALK rearrangements occur in 16% and 5% of cases, respectively. However, in both genetic backgrounds the benefit of molecular therapies, including next generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs), is temporally limited with therapy evasion representing a major roadblock against cancer eradication. Patient Derived Organoids (PDOs) have raised a tremendous interest in cancer research for their ability to preserve the original tumoral architecture, including its microenvironment, at both the genomic and functional level. Notably, PDOs can be stabilized from a very limited amount of starting material, such as needle biopsies from local and distal metastases, including lesions originated upon molecular therapy relapse. The possibility to perform pharmacogenomic screening and functional analyses renders PDOs an ideal tool for co-clinical studies. Thereby, we have systematically collected 87 oncogene-addicted lung cancer specimens, among which 48 were suitable for 3D cultures in terms of tumor cell number and viability. We successfully established 15 long-term PDO cultures that maintain the proliferation capability throughout passages, and obtained a subset of corresponding 2D cell lines. Histological and immunohistochemical analyses revealed that PDOs faithfully recapitulate the features of the original neoplastic lesions. Moreover, targeted molecular annotation confirmed that our PDOs retained the somatic oncogene alterations of the matching tumors. In addition, drug sensitivity tests and functional experiments have demonstrated the ability of PDOs to reproduce patient response to targeted therapies, indicating the translational relevance of our platform. Furthermore, we exploited organoids to study the molecular circuits responsible for tumor cell evasion to targeted therapy, identifying bypass track signaling as critical for the emergence of drug resistance. Finally, we tested the therapeutic efficacy of drug treatments based on the combination of early and next generations TKIs. Overall, our data highlight the translational relevance of PDO interrogation in clinical oncology, especially for patients who relapse to different lines of therapy. We provide evidence that in oncogene-addicted tumors bypass track signaling is a common non-genetic mechanism of resistance to last generation TKIs. Thus, the correct co-administration of different molecules and/or the use of earlier-generation inhibitors upon progression may improve treatment strategies, potentially impacting on patient’s benefit and clinical outcome. Citation Format: Francesca Picca, Francesca Bersani, Fabrizio Tabbo', Francesca Napoli, Paolo Bironzo, Angela Listi', Francesco Passiglia, Marco Volante, Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti, Luisella Righi, SIlvia Novello, Riccardo Taulli. Patient-derived organoids from oncogene-addicted lung cancers to define molecular circuits involved in drug resistance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 6208.

TPS8591 Background: Surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is indicated mainly in multimodal approaches and in clinical trial settings. Different studies have shown significantly lower complication rates, lower peri-operative morbidity and mortality with pleural/decortication (P/D), with similar overall survival rates. The biology of mesothelioma shows significant heterogeneity. Surgical tumor reduction may create a host environment more amenable to immunotherapy by reducing the ratio of tumor cells versus antitumor effector T lymphocytes, reducing the quantities of intratumor and/or systemic immunosuppressive cells, and ablating tumor-derived paracrine factors that promote local recruitment of immunosuppressive cells. Encouraging clinical data emerging in the field of tumor immunotherapy have demonstrated that therapies focused on enhancing T-cell responses against cancer can result in a significant survival benefit. The AtezoMeso Study evaluates the introduction of atezolizumab-ATEZO in MPM, patients (pts) after P/D and platinum/pemetrexed perioperative therapy. Methods: This is a double-blind, placebo controlled, phase III trial, in 20 Italian centers. Main inclusion criteria are P/D without macroscopic residual and ECOG-PS 0-1. Pts who underwent to P/D without macroscopic residual disease and have received at least 4 cycles of perioperative therapy with cisplatin/carboplatin and pemetrexed, will be randomized (2:1) to receive ATEZO or placebo. Therapy will be administered at dose of 1,200 mg iv, every 21 days, for 12 months or until recurrence, unacceptable toxicity or patient/physician decision. Randomization will be done through a centralized system, using histology (epithelioid vs nonepithelioid) and stage (I vs > I) as stratification factors. Pts will be radiologically evaluated after surgical before starting therapy and then every 12 weeks for 24 months or until recurrence. Quality of life (QoL) will be evaluated with the EQ-5D questionnaire administered at baseline and every 12 weeks. Tissue tumor samples will be centrally analyzed to determinate the genomic profile using FoundationOne CDx platform. The primary endpoint is the evaluation of the atezolizumab efficacy in terms of disease free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints include the safety and efficacy in terms of overall survivall and QoL. Assuming a median DFS equal to 9 months in placebo arm, an accrual time of 24 months and a follow-up time of 24 months, a sample size of 162 pts will allow to detect true hazard ratios of 0.62 with power 0.8, at a confidence level of 95%. At February 14th, 2022, 3 pts have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: 2020-003762-39; GOIRC-02-2019.

Simple Summary The marine drug lurbinectedin revealed an unprecedented efficacy against patient-derived malignant pleural mesothelioma cells, regardless of the histological type and the BAP1 mutation status. By inducing strong DNA damages, it dramatically arrested cell cycle progression and induced apoptosis. These results may be translated into the use of lurbinectedin as an effective agent for malignant pleural mesothelioma patients. Abstract Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly aggressive cancer generally diagnosed at an advanced stage and characterized by a poor prognosis. The absence of alterations in druggable kinases, together with an immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment, limits the use of molecular targeted therapies, making the treatment of MPM particularly challenging. Here we investigated the in vitro susceptibility of MPM to lurbinectedin (PM01183), a marine-derived drug that recently received accelerated approval by the FDA for the treatment of patients with metastatic small cell lung cancer with disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: A panel of primary MPM cultures, resembling the three major MPM histological subtypes (epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic), was characterized in terms of BAP1 status and histological markers. Subsequently, we explored the effects of lurbinectedin at nanomolar concentration on cell cycle, cell viability, DNA damage, genotoxic stress response, and proliferation. Results: Stabilized MPM cultures exhibited high sensitivity to lurbinectedin independently from the BAP1 mutational status and histological classification. Specifically, we observed that lurbinectedin rapidly promoted a cell cycle arrest in the S-phase and the activation of the DNA damage response, two conditions that invariably resulted in an irreversible DNA fragmentation, together with strong apoptotic cell death. Moreover, the analysis of long-term treatment indicated that lurbinectedin severely impacts MPM transforming abilities in vitro. Conclusion: Overall, our data provide evidence that lurbinectedin exerts a potent antitumoral activity on primary MPM cells, independently from both the histological subtype and BAP1 alteration, suggesting its potential activity in the treatment of MPM patients.