Search

Background and Objectives: The intronic biallelic AAGGG expansion in the replication factor C subunit 1 ( RFC1 ) gene was recently associated with a phenotype combining cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, and vestibular areflexia syndrome, as well as with late-onset ataxia. Following this discovery, studies in multiple populations extended the phenotypic and genotypic spectrum of this locus. Multiple benign and additional pathogenic configurations are currently known. Our main objectives were to study the prevalence of the pathogenic AAGGG expansion in the Cypriot population, to further characterize the RFC1 repeat locus allele distribution, and to search for possible novel repeat configurations., Methods: Cypriot undiagnosed patients, in the majority presenting at least with cerebellar ataxia and non-neurologic disease controls, were included in this study. A combination of conventional methods was used, including standard PCR flanking the repeat region, repeat-primed PCR, long-range PCR, and Sanger sequencing. Bioinformatics analysis of already available in-house short-read whole-genome sequencing data was also performed., Results: A large group of undiagnosed patients (n = 194), mainly presenting with pure ataxia or with ataxia accompanied by neuropathy or additional symptoms, as well as a group of non-disease controls (n = 100), were investigated in the current study. Our findings include the diagnosis of 10 patients homozygous for the pathogenic AAGGG expansion and a high percentage of heterozygous AAGGG carriers in both groups. The benign AAAAG n , AAAGG n , and AAGAG n configurations were also identified in our cohorts. We also report and discuss the identification of 2 recently reported novel and possibly benign repeat configurations, AAAGGG n and AAGAC n , thus confirming their existence in another distinct population, and we highlight an increased frequency of the AAAGGG n in the patient group, including a single case of homozygosity., Discussion: Our findings indicate the existence of genetic heterogeneity regarding the RFC1 repeat configurations and that the AAGGG pathogenic expansion is a frequent cause of ataxia in the Cypriot population., Competing Interests: The authors report no relevant disclosures. Go to Neurology.org/NG for full disclosures., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of Neuroaspis plp10 nutritional supplement when added to interferon (IFN)-β treatment in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS)., Design: A 30-month phase III multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Randomisation stratified by centre using a computer-generated procedure with Neuroaspis plp10 versus placebo in 1:1 ratio. The first 6 months were used as both the pre-entry and normalisation period., Setting: 3 teaching hospitals in Greece and 1 Neurology Institute in Cyprus., Participants: 61 patients with RRMS on IFN-β were randomly assigned to receive Neuroaspis plp10 (n=32) or placebo (n=29), 20 mL, orally, once daily, for 30 months., Intervention: Neuroaspis plp10, a cocktail mixture, containing specific PUFA (12 150 mg) and γ-tocopherol (760 mg) versus virgin olive oil (placebo)., Main Outcome Measure: The primary end point was the annual relapse rate (ARR) whereas the secondary ones were the rate of sustained progression of disability, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the brain T2 and gadolinium-enhancing lesions, at 2 years., Results: For the intention-to-treat analyses Neuroaspis plp10 significantly reduced the ARR by 80%, (RRR, 0.20; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.45; p=0.0001) and the risk of sustained progression of disability by 73% (HR, 0.27; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.83; p=0.022) versus placebo, at 2 years. The number of T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions and the number of new/enlarged T2-hyperintense lesions were significantly reduced (p=0.01 and p<0.0001, respectively). Both T1-enhancing and new/enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions were significantly reduced (p=0.05 and p<0.0001, respectively). No significant adverse events were reported., Conclusions: Neuroaspis plp10 added to IFN-β was significantly more effective than IFN-β alone in patients with RRMS., Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN06166891., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MCP, GL, IP received grand support from the Cyprus Ministry of Energy, Commerce, Industry and Tourism—Structural Funds Program (Creation of New High Technology and Innovation Enterprises). PALUPA Medical is a research company formed and registered under the Incubator program. MCP, GL and IP are stockholders of PALUPA Medical. MAR received speaker honoraria from Bayer, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche and Teva, and receives research support from the MS Society of Canada and Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla. NG received speaker honoraria from Bayer, Biogen, Gensis Pharma, Celgene, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Teva, and receives research support from Biogen and TEVA. CB received travel support and/or lecture fees from Novartis, Merck, Genesis, Sanofi, Teva, Roche and Mylan. GH, ED, EN, GM, SO, PV, RM and PP declare no competing interests. No pharmaceutical companies were involved in this project. The intervention, trade marked as Neuroaspis plp10, is under a US patent application, and covered with granted patent in several other countries including Canada, Japan, China, Ukraine, Australia, Israel and New Zealand., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) (or Willis-Ekbom disease) is a neurological disorder with high prevalence among the end-stage renal disease population. This is one of the most predominant types of secondary RLS, and it is called uremic RLS. Despite the fact that uremic RLS has been less studied compared to idiopathic RLS, recent studies now shed light in many aspects of the syndrome including clinical characteristics, impact, epidemiology, and treatment options. The current review discusses the above topics with special emphasis given on the management of uremic RLS, including the management of symptoms that often appear during a hemodialysis session. Uremic RLS symptoms may be ameliorated by using pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Evidence so far shows that both approaches may be effective in terms of reducing the RLS symptom's severity; nevertheless, more research is needed on the efficiency of treatments for uremic RLS.

Objective: To assess whether three novel interventions, formulated based on a systems medicine therapeutic concept, reduced disease activity in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) who were either treated or not with disease-modifying treatment., Design: A 30-month randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design, phase II proof-of-concept clinical study., Settings: Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics., Participants: 80 participants were randomised into four groups of 20 each. A total of 41 (51%) patients completed the 30-month trial. The eligibility criteria were an age of 18-65; a diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS according to the McDonald criteria; a score of 0.0-5.5 on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS); MRI showing lesions consistent with MS; at least one documented clinical relapse and either receiving or not a disease-modifying treatment within the 24-month period before enrolment in the study. Patients were excluded because of a recent (<30 days) relapse, prior immunosuppressant or monoclonal antibody therapy, pregnancy or nursing, other severe disease compromising organ function, progressive MS, history of recent drug or alcohol abuse, use of any additional food supplements, vitamins or any form of polyunsaturated fatty acids, and a history of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or known specific nutritional hypersensitivity., Interventions: The first intervention (A) was composed of Ω-3 and Ω-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids at 1:1 wt/wt. Specifically, the Ω-3 fatty acids were docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid at 3:1 wt/wt, and the Ω-6 fatty acids were linoleic acid and γ-linolenic acid at 2:1 wt/wt. This intervention also included minor quantities of other specific polyunsaturated, monounsaturated and saturated fatty acids as well as vitamin A and vitamin E (α-tocopherol). The second intervention (B, PLP10) was a combination of A and γ-tocopherol. The third intervention (C) was γ-tocopherol alone. The fourth group of 20 participants received placebo. The interventions were administered per os (by mouth) once daily, 30 min before dinner for 30 months., Main Outcome Measures: The primary end point was the annualised relapse rate (ARR) of the three interventions versus the placebo at 2 years. The secondary end point was the time to confirmed disability progression at 2 years., Results: A total of 41 (51%) patients completed the 30-month trial. Overall, for the per-protocol analysis of the 2-year primary end point, eight relapses were recorded in the PLP10 group (n=10; 0.40 ARR) versus 25 relapses in the placebo group (n=12; 1.04 ARR), representing a 64% adjusted relative rate reduction for the PLP10 group (RRR 0.36, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.87, p=0.024). In a subgroup analysis that excluded patients on monoclonal antibody (natalizumab) treatment, the observed adjusted RRR became stronger (72%) over the 2 years (RRR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.79, p=0.016). The per-protocol analysis for the secondary outcome at 2 years, the time to disability progression, was significantly longer only for PLP10. The cumulative probability of disability progression at 2 years was 10% in the PLP10 group and 58% in the placebo group (unadjusted log-rank p=0.019). In a subgroup analysis that excluded patients on natalizumab, the cumulative probability of progression was 10% for the 10 patients in the PLP10 group and 70% for the 12 patients in the placebo group, representing a relative 86% decrease in the risk of the sustained progression of disability in the PLP10 group (unadjusted log-rank p=0.006; adjusted HR, 0.11; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.97, p=0.047). No adverse events were reported. Interventions A (10 patients) and C (9 patients) showed no significant efficacy., Conclusions: In this small proof-of-concept, randomised, double-blind clinical trial; the PLP10 treatment significantly reduced the ARR and the risk of sustained disability progression without any reported serious adverse events. Larger studies are needed to further assess the safety and efficacy of PLP10., Trial Registration: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN87818535.