Search

This study investigated the water sorption and solubility of two light-cured resin composites (Filtek P60 and Solitaire 2), one compomer (Compoglass F), one ormocer (Admira) and the associated bonding agents (Scotchbond 1 [Scotchbond 1 = Scotchbond Single Bond in USA], Gluma One Bond, Excite and Admira Bond, respectively) and of a RMGIC (Fuji II LC). Five disks of each product type were subjected to water sorption and solubility tests based on ISO 4049 requirements. The data were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis and non-parametric multiple-comparison tests using ranked sums at 95% confidence interval. Fuji II LC showed the highest water sorption (167.5 ug/mm3). Fuji II LC and Compoglass F had higher solubility values (8.3 and 10.0 ug/mm-3, respectively) than the other materials. Bonding agents have very high water sorption and solubility values (between 77.4 and 355.4 ug/mm-3 and between 75.9 and 144.9 ug/mm-3, respectively) compared to the restorative material. Gluma One Bond and Admira Bond showed lower sorption and solubility than Excite and Scotchbond 1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to quantify the changes in the watertightness of three temporary filling materials over 1 wk with a new electrochemical technique: the impedance a measurement technique. Forty sound extracted human maxillary teeth were selected and prepared for the measurements. They were divided into three groups in addition to positive and negative controls. The resistance, and therefore the watertightness, of the intact crown and the resistance after preparation of an endodontic access cavity were registered. After a randomization procedure, 12 teeth were obturated with Cavit G, 12 teeth with Fermit-N, and 12 teeth with Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM). The changes in the resistance were measured first just after obturation (time 0), then after days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7. The results showed that the IRM group was significantly more watertight than the Fermit-N group (p < 0.05) and much more than the Cavit G group (p < 0.005).

This study compared in vitro the debridement ability of a 3% sodium hypochlorite with a new quaternary ammonium derivative, a 0.5% Bardac-22 solution, in the apical third of freshly extracted teeth with straight root canals. Root canals were instrumented sequentially from size 10 to size 35 using alternatively hand and ultrasonic files. When the hand file was loose in the canal, the ultrasonic instrument of the same size was operated at working length for 30 s, delivering 15 ml of the selected solution. Both solutions were able to flush out pulpal debris from the canal space. At the apical end of the preparation, sodium hypochlorite left a thicker smear layer than Bardac-22 did. The quaternary ammonium derivative easily dissolved the inorganic portion of the smear layer, but did not dissolve proteins as well as sodium hypochlorite.