Search

Aim A randomized clinical trial proposing a new laparoscopic prosthetic and fascial approach to severe posterior vaginal prolapse. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the objective and subjective outcomes of our laparoscopic posterior plication (LPP) combined to "two-mesh" sacral colpopexy (laparoscopic sacral colpopexy [LSC]) in severe posterior vaginal prolapse, with a 1-year follow-up. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the safety of this surgical procedure. Methods This is single-center prospective randomized double-blinded clinical trial. A total of 130 consecutive patients with anterior and/or apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) (POP-Q stage >= II) and severe posterior vaginal prolapse (posterior POP-Q stage >= III) were prospectively assessed for inclusion into the study from November 2018 to January 2020. Patients underwent "two-meshes" LSC and were randomized in Group A (LSC plus LPP) and Group A (LSC alone). Of the 130 included subjects, 8 were excluded, not meeting inclusion criteria. Cure rate was evaluated objectively, using POP-Q study, and subjectively using PGI-I, POPDI-6, and FSDS questionnaires. Complications were assessed intra-, peri-, and postoperatively. Twelve-month follow-ups were analyzed for the study. Results We found in LSC plus LPP Group a significant improvement of Ap and genital hiatus POP-Q points. Our subjective study showed, at 12 months, a statistical difference in PGI-I successful outcomes rate in favor of LPP. Also the FSDS resulted significantly much more improved in Group A. We observed no statistical differences in terms of postoperative complications. Conclusions Our LPP approach to LSC could be considered an effective and safe technique to POP patients with severe posterior prolapse.

Introduction: Bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) is either Hunner lesion interstitial cystitis (HL IC) or non-Hunner lesion interstitial cystitis (N-HL IC), differing in the presence of HLs on cystoscopy. Cystoscopy is essential in diagnosing HL but are bladder biopsies useful in N-HL IC patients? Our objective was to assess bladder biopsy in patients with N-HL IC, evaluating whether the count of mast cells (MCs) and percentage of activated MCs could measure severity. Materials and Methods: This is a single-centre retrospective study. Inclusion criteria: diagnosis of BPS/IC by ESSIC definition; absence of HLs. Each patient had three bladder biopsies. Statistical analysis: chi(2)/Fischer's exact test; Wilcoxon signed-ranks test/Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical significance: p < 0.05. Results: We separated 48 women into Group 1 with <50% of MCs activated and Group 2 with >50%. We compared the results of the O'Leary-Sant questionnaire between the two groups and did not find any correlation between the severity of the pathology and either the MC count in the detrusor or the percentage of activated MCs in the lamina propria or detrusor. Discussion/Conclusion: These findings cast doubt on the usefulness of bladder biopsy for the evaluation of severity in N-HL IC. (C) 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel

Objectives: As Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) has proven to be the gold-standard for treating Pelvic Organ Prolapse, management of recurrence after its failure is a challenge with upcoming interest. In these patients, repeat LSCP might represent a suitable surgical choice.Study design: We present a retrospective observational study analysing safety, feasibility and outcomes of Redo LSCP. Data of 20 patients with POP recurrence who underwent previous sacrocolpopexy were recruited, and all successfully underwent a repeat LSCP.Results: Median 24-months follow-up demonstrated a statistically significant improvement of objective and subjective outcome. No intra and postoperative complications were noted. Anatomical cure rate was 95%. Subjective cure rate was 100%, with a statistically significant POP symptoms resolution and improvement of voiding and storage symptoms.We compared perioperative data and outcome of Redo patients to a population who underwent LSCP for a first-time diagnosed POP. The findings demonstrated that surgery did not differ from standard procedure in terms of intra/postoperative complications, hospital stay, blood loss, except for operative time.Conclusions: Minimally invasive Redo LSCP appears to be a safe and effective procedure in treating recurrent and symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Our series shows low recurrence rates, comparable to data from patients who underwent their primary surgery for POP.

Objectives: Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) of the vaginal apex for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has gained popularity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate perioperative outcomes and complications, subjective and objective success rates and recurrence rates in women undergoing this surgical procedure.Study Design: A systematic literature search was performed in December 2021. The critical appraisal skills pro-gram (CASP) was used to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies. The Clavien-Dindo (CD) scale and the Satava scale were used to classify periprocedural complications. Continuous variables were described as means and standard deviations while categorical were expressed as percentages of the whole group. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.Results: 26 articles were selected and analysed, with a total population of 1401 patients. Anatomical and sub-jective success rates after LUSLS ranged from 79% and 100% and from 76.2% to 100% respectively. The re -operation rate varied from 2% to 4.5% in the largest cohorts. The overall complication rate was 13.6%, how-ever grade III CD complications occurred only in 1% of patients. Ureteral complications were described in only 2 cases.Conclusions: LUSLS represent a safe and effective technique for vaginal apex resuspension in women with POP. Further larger prospective randomized studies are required to confirm these data.

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a dynamic disorder that affects the entire pelvic diaphragm. POP may often involve multiple organs. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is considered the gold standard to treat female anterior and apical prolapse. Abdominal ventral mesh rectopexy has gained increasing acceptance as an effective treatment for rectal prolapse. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety, feasibility and 1-year outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy as a combined treatment of multicompartment POP. Methods: All female patients at our institution with anterior and apical prolapse with symptoms of obstructed defecation were examined by an urogynecologist and a colorectal surgeon, and were judged suitable for the study. Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system stage III and IV and concomitant rectal prolapse were treated by laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy. After surgery, 1- and 12-month follow-up was performed and the data were retrospectively analyzed. Patients’ symptoms were evaluated using the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12), and Wexner–Agachan constipation score. Results: A total of 98 patients underwent surgery. No intraoperative or postoperative morbidity occurred. At the time of follow-up, all women expressed great satisfaction with the surgical treatment: all the patients had at most POP-Q Stage 1 and 78.8% had a Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score < 3. Significant improvement of symptoms related to POP and to obstructed defecation syndrome, as shown by the FSDS, PISQ-12, and Wexner–Agachan constipation score, was observed in all patients at follow-up Conclusions: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with ventral rectopexy is a feasible and safe procedure for the combined surgical management of anterior, apical, and posterior prolapse, and provides excellent objective and su

Objective: In this series we investigate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of our laparoscopic modified Shull technique describing the fundamental aspects of this surgical procedure in order to add a new feasible abdominal approach for apex resuspension. Study design: A retrospective case series of 10 patients referring to our Urogynecological department for symptomatic apical prolapse, enrolled consecutively between September 2018 and November 2018. All women underwent the presented technique which we described in detail explaining the fundamental tips and tricks of our procedure. We examined perioperative details, postoperative complication- evaluated with Clavien–Dindo's classification-, anatomical outcome and subjective satisfaction, assessed with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire. Results: All women presented symptomatic apical prolapse of II-III grade. No perioperative complications including ureteral damages were recorded. There was only one case of de novo stress urinary incontinence. At 1-year follow-up the POP-Q apex was well suspended in all women with only 2 cases of asymptomatic anterior recurrence. All patients reported a complete resolution of pelvic organ prolapse (POP)-related symptoms and were fully satisfied with the treatment received. Conclusion: Laparoscopic modified Shull technique suggests safety, feasible and efficacy in the treatment of apical prolapse. In addition, this report represents a useful instrument for surgeon to understand key aspects of this surgical procedure allowing to him to perform the described technique in a safe and timely manner.

Not available

INTRODUCTION: The present study aim to compare the anatomic landmarks of two pelvic floor repair systems, in order to identify the potential neurovascular lesions related to different mesh fixation techniques. METHODS: Abdominal and perineal dissections of 10 fresh cadavers after prolapse surgery using transobturator/transgluteal versus single incision techniques. Neuro-vascular structures of obturator region and perineum were isolated. Distances between needles and anatomical structures were measured. RESULTS: During transobturator anterior repair, the superficial cannula passed 2.5 ± 0.6 cm medially to the obturator canal. The distance of superficial arm to the anterior obturator vessels was 2.2 ± 0.4 cm. The distance of deep cannula to the posterior obturator vessels branches was 1.3 ± 0.5 cm. In two of these cases we observed a lesion of posterior obturator vessels. During single incision repair the distance between the obturator canal and the superficial arms was 2.3 ± 0.7. The mean distances of superficial arms to the anterior and posterior obturator vessels were, respectively, 2.3 ± 0.5 cm and 3.2 ± 0.7 cm. During transgluteal posterior repair the distance between the cannula guide and the ischial spine was 1.7 ± 0.5 cm while it measured 2.3 ± 0.4 cm when single incision posterior device was placed. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior transobturator system presents an increased risk of posterior obturator vessels branches injury. During posterior transgluteal repair the distance of the ischio-anal fossa to sacrospinous ligament represents a way that could rule against the correct needle positioning with increased risk of pudendal lesions. Single incision approach offers an easier access to the sacrospinous ligament with lower risk of pudendal lesions.

Aims: Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy (LSC) for pelvic prolapse is a complex procedure, characterized by long operative times and, when combined with supracervical hysterectomy, by a high risk of spreading of unsuspected cancerous tissue. The aim of the present study was to compare, in patients who underwent hysterectomy plus LSC for severe POP, different methods for cervical incision and uterine morcellation. Methods: This is a prospective single Institution randomized double-blinded clinical trial enrolling 124 patients with severe POP from June 2014 to May 2015. Patients underwent laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) plus LSC for pelvic organ prolapse and were randomized in Group 1 (monopolar hook and conventional mechanical morcellator) and Group 2 (bipolar laparoscopic loop and bipolar morcellator), for supracervical incision and uterine morcellation, respectively. Our primary endpoints were the operative times and the secondary endpoints the incidence of intra- or post-operative complications. Results: A total of 50 patients for group completed the study. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Cervical cutting time (32 vs. 3.10 sec; P <0.01), morcellation (4.10 vs. 2.13 min; P <0.01) and operative time (131 vs. 118 min; P <0.05) resulted significantly lower in Group 2. No differences were found in terms of intra- or post-operative complications. Conclusions: Laparoscopic bipolar loop and morcellator guaranteed a faster and hemostatic tool during supracervical incision and a controlled and rotation-free uterine extraction. The significant surgical time reduction linked to these devices should be considered even more helpful and effective to perform a complex procedure represented by LSH plus LSC. Neurourol. Urodynam. 36:798–802, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.