Search

Background: To evaluate the impact of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and gastric bypass (LGB) on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods: GERD was evaluated by the Modified Italian Gastroesophageal reflux disease—Health-Related Quality of Life (MI-GERD-HRQL) questionnaire, pH-manometry, endoscopy, and Rx-esophagogram, before and 12 months after surgery. Based on these exams, patients without GERD underwent LSG, and patients with GERD underwent LGB. Results: Thirteen and six patients underwent LSG and LGB, respectively. After LSG, the only statistically significant difference observed at pH-manometry was the median DeMeester score, from 5.7 to 22.7 (P =.0026). De novo GERD occurred in 6 patients (46.2%), with erosive esophagitis in one. The median MI-GERD-HRQL score improved from 3 to 0. Overall, nine patients underwent LGB, but three were lost to follow-up. Preoperative pH-manometry changed the surgical indication from LSG to LGB in 7 out of 9 patients (77.8%). Six patients who underwent LGB completed the study, and at pH-manometry, statistically significant differences were observed in the percentage of total acid exposure time, with the number of reflux episodes lasting >5 minutes and DeMeester score (P =.009). The median MI-GERD-HRQL score improved from 6.5 to 0. Statistically significant differences were not observed at endoscopy and Rx-esophagogram findings in both groups. Conclusions: LSG has a negative impact on GERD, even in patients without preoperative GERD. LGB confirmed to be the intervention of choice in patients with GERD. Preoperative pH-manometry may identify patients with silent GERD, to candidate them to LGB rather than LSG. pH-manometry should be used more liberally to establish the correct surgical indication on objective grounds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Anastomotic leakage (AL) after anterior rectal resection unresponsive to diverting ileostomy is difficult to manage. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted (E-VAC) wound closure system is a new approach based on co-axial sponge positioning under endoscopic control. If the abscess is not co-axial, however, endoscopic positioning is not feasible. Aim is to report an original method of sponge positioning., Case Experience: A 62-year-old woman with chronic AL after anterior rectal resection for cancer was referred. AL had been treated with diverting ileostomy without healing. Due to the peri-rectal abscess anatomy, standard E-VAC positioning was not possible. A combined endoscopic-interventional radiology procedure for Endo-SPONGE® (B. Braun Aesculap AG, Germany) positioning was thus employed. Under general anesthesia, a guidewire was passed after small counter-incision on the left gluteus and through the left levator muscle, reaching the anastomotic dehiscence and rectal lumen through the chronic abscess. The guidewire was retrieved through the anus and connected to a long silk thread. By retracting the trans-gluteal guidewire, the silk thread was pulled through the abscess to exit from the gluteal skin incision. A tailored Endo-SPONGE® was then connected to the trans-anal silk thread. By pulling on the gluteal silk thread, the sponge was positioned inside the abscess. The silk thread remained in place under a medication for sponge replacements., Discussion and Results: Twelve Endo-SPONGE replacements under sedation were required until AL completely resolved after 35 days., Conclusion: When traditional endoscopic sponge insertion into AL is not possible, this original "pulley system" proved effective for sponge introduction and replacement., Key Words: Anastomotic leakage (AL), Anterior rectal resection, Endo-SPONGE, Endoscopic-Interventional radiology, Pulley system.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is the treatment of choice for management of adrenal tumors. Several approaches are proposed, including the transperitoneal one with patient in lateral or supine position, and the retroperitoneal one, with patient in lateral or prone position. The best approach, however, has yet to be defined. In patients with gallstones and common bile duct (CBD) stones, available options are one-stage [including laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with CBD exploration (LC-LCBDE) and LC with endoscopic rendez-vous (LC-ERV)], or two-stage management [LC and pre or postoperative Endoscopic-Retrograde-Cholangio-Pancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES)]. Both are safe and effective, with lower hospital stay after one-stage option. The decision for one or the other depends on local resources and patient conditions. We report the case of a hypertensive 53-years-old man with Cushing's disease from pituitary ACTH-secreting adenoma, after three failed trans-sphenoidal pituitary gland surgical resection procedures, and recurrent biliary symptoms from gallstones and CBD stones. The patient underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal bilateral adrenalectomy in supine position (anterior approach on the right, submesocolic approach on the left) together with LC, intraoperative cholangiography, choledochotomy, CBD exploration, T-tube drainage. In this challenging case, laparoscopic transperitoneal bilateral adrenalectomy with patient in supine position together with one-stage laparoscopic management of gallstones and CBD stones, offered the patient the opportunity to solve both adrenal and biliary problems in the same session, reducing hospital stay and costs. In experienced hands, the transperitoneal combination of different surgical approaches during the same anesthesia with patient in supine position may provide safe and effective patient management. KEY WORDS: Bilateral adrenalectomy, Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA), Choledochotomy, Common bile duct (CBD) stones, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), Submesocolic approach, Transperitoneal anterior approach.

Aim: Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is the treatment of choice for benign adrenal lesions including pheocromocytoma (PHE) and in selected patients with malignant lesions. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the authors' results after laparoscopic left anterior transperitoneal submesocolic adrenalectomy (LLATSA) for unilateral PHE., Material of Study: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. From 1994 to 2018, 552 patients underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). Of these, 34 patients (14 men, 20 women, mean age 52.8 years) underwent LLATSA for PHE., Results: Mean operative time was 93.1 ± 44.9 minutes. Conversion to open surgery occurred in two patients due to difficult identification of the anatomy. Intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate instability were observed in four cases, but with no need for conversion. Postoperative morbidity was nil. One American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III patient died on postoperative day 4 from acute myocardial infarction. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.8 ± 1.8 days (range 2 - 8)., Discussion: The main advantage of this approach is the early ligation of the main adrenal vein prior to any gland manipulation. This reduces the risk of catecholamines' spread and consequently the risk of hemodynamic instability. Intraperitoneal dissection is limited and there is no need to mobilize the colon or pancreas, with a lower risk of complications from organ manipulation., Conclusions: LLATSA is feasible and safe for the treatment of PHE. A randomized trial design and a larger cohort of patients would be required to confirm these conclusions., Key Words: Adrenal tumors, Adrenal lesions, Laparoscopic adrenalectomy, Pheochromocytoma, Transperitoneal anterior approach, Laparoscopic left anterior transperitoneal submesocolic adrenalectomy (LLATSA).

Aim: The aim of the study is analyze the results after Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) and Trans-Anal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) for rectal cancer in terms of Quality of Life (QoL) and anorectal function., Material of Study: The authors have conducted a review of the literature through the PubMed database using the following keywords: "quality of life", "rectal cancer", "transanal surgery", "TEM" and "TAMIS"., Results: Six and five studies were included on TEM and TAMIS, respectively, for a total of 619 patients with a follow up of up to five years. QoL and anorectal function were evaluated by questionnaires and anorectal manometry in four out of eleven studies. At postoperative evaluation, patients reported temporary changes (from 3 weeks to 36 months) but no long-term effects on anorectal function and QoL. There were no differences in the postoperative functional outcome between surgery with rigid (TEM) or soft (TAMIS) devices. Some of the studies reported postoperative changes at manometry that were not clinically confirmed by the questionnaires., Discussion: During TEM and TAMIS the risk of pelvic autonomic nerves damage, that may compromise urinary and sexual function and the risk of permanent sphincter damage with the need to perform a stoma, are very low., Conclusions: Quality of life and anorectal function after TEM or TAMIS for the treatment of rectal tumors are good with no postoperative sequelae at mid-term follow up., Key Words: Quality of Life (QoL), Rectal cancer, Transanal surgery, Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM), Trans-Anal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS).