Search

Resumen Introduccion La cirugia endoscopica y laparoscopica combinada (CELS) ha surgido como un metodo para el tratamiento de lesiones colonicas benignas complejas que, de otro modo, requeririan una reseccion quirurgica. El objetivo de este estudio es describir las distintas tecnicas CELS y evaluar su seguridad, en un procedimiento escasamente difundido en nuestro entorno. Metodo Estudio observacional, retrospectivo, donde se evaluaron los resultados a corto plazo de pacientes diagnosticados de polipos no resecables endoscopicamente sometidos a CELS entre octubre del 2018 a junio del 2020. Se valoraron los resultados postoperatorios, la estancia hospitalaria y los hallazgos patologicos. Resultados Diecisiete pacientes consecutivos fueron sometidos a CELS durante el periodo de estudio. El tamano medio de la lesion fue de 3,5 cm (rango 2,5 a 6,5 cm), la localizacion mas recurrente fue el ciego (10 de 17). La tecnica CELS mas frecuente aplicada fue la reseccion en cuna laparoscopica asistida por endoscopia (11 de 17). En cuatro pacientes, esta reseccion se combino con otra tecnica CELS. Dos casos se sometieron a una reseccion del segmento laparoscopico asistido por endoscopia. El exito de CELS en nuestra serie fue en 14 de 17 (82,4%). La mediana del tiempo quirurgico y estancia hospitalaria fue de 85 min (rango 50 a 225 min) y de dos dias (rango uno a 15 dias), respectivamente. Solo un paciente presento infeccion del organo-cavitaria que no requirio cirugia adicional. Conclusiones CELS es una tecnica segura multidisciplinar, que requiere la colaboracion entre gastroenterologos y cirujanos. Se puede considerar como una alternativa a la reseccion de colon para polipos benignos complejos.

Background: Tissue ischemia is a key risk factor for anastomotic leakage (AL). Indocyanine green (ICG) is widely used in colorectal surgery to define the segments with the best vascularization. In an experimental model, we present a new system for quantifying ICG saturation, SERGREEN software.Methods: This was a controlled experimental study with eight pigs. In the initial control stage, ICG saturation was analyzed at the level of two anastomoses in the right and left colon. Control images of the two segments were taken after ICG administration. The images were processed with the SERGREEN program. Then, in the experimental ischemia stage, the inferior mesenteric artery was sectioned at the level of the anastomosis of the left colon. Fifteen minutes after the section, sequential images of the two anastomoses were taken every 30’ for the following 2 h.Results: At the control stage, the mean scores were 134.2 (95% CI: 116.3-152.2) for the right colon and 147 (95% CI: 134.7-159.3) for the left colon (p = 0.174). The right colon remained stable throughout the experiment. In the left colon, saturation fell by 47.9 points with respect to the preischemia value (p Conclusions: The SERGREEN program quantifies ICG saturation in normal and ischemic situations and detects differences between them. A reduction in ICG saturation of 32.6% or more was correlated with complete tissue ischemia.

Aim The COVID‐19 pandemic has forced surgeons to adapt their standard procedures. The modifications introduced are designed to favour minimally invasive surgery. The positive results obtained with intracorporeal resection and anastomosis in the right colon and rectum prompt us to adapt these procedures to the left colon. We describe a ‘don't touch the bowel’ technique and outline the benefits to patients of the use of less surgically aggressive techniques and also to surgeons in terms of the lower emission of aerosols that might transmit the COVID‐19 infection. Methods This was an observational study of intracorporeal resection and anastomosis in left colectomy. We describe the technical details of intracorporeal resection, end‐to‐end stapled anastomosis and extraction of the specimen through mini‐laparotomy in the ideal location. Results We present preliminary results of 17 patients with left‐sided colonic pathologies, 15 neoplasia and two diverticular disease, who underwent four left hemicolectomies, six sigmoidectomies and seven high anterior resections. Median operating time was 186 min (range 120–280). No patient required conversion to extracorporeal laparoscopy or open surgery. Median hospital stay was 4.7 days (range 3–12 days). There was one case of anastomotic leak managed with conservative treatment. Conclusion Intracorporeal resection and end‐to‐end anastomosis with the possibility of extraction of the specimen by a mini‐laparotomy in the ideal location may present benefits and also adapts well to the conditions imposed by the COVID‐19 pandemic. Future comparative studies are needed to demonstrate these benefits with respect to extracorporeal anastomosis.

Background The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) in obese patients. Methods Observational descriptive study evaluating the feasibility of TES in obese rectal tumors between June 2004 and January 2019. Patients were assigned to two groups: body mass index (BMI) Results From 775 patients, 681 were enrolled in the study, 145 (21.3%) of them obese. No statistically significant differences between groups were found with respect to overall morbidity (27, 18.6%).The obese patients presented trends towards shorter mean surgical time (65 min, IQR 48 min), less perforation in the peritoneal cavity (eight, 5.5%), and 133 (91.7%) presented a lower rate of lesion fragmentation. Conclusion There were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes in obese patients (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). TES in those obese patients does not represent a factor of surgical difficulty.

Resumen Introduccion La fragilidad se asocia con una mayor morbimortalidad postoperatoria. El manejo multidisciplinar individualizado de estos pacientes puede mejorar la calidad asistencial. Los objetivos de este trabajo son conocer el porcentaje de pacientes fragiles con cancer colorrectal en nuestra poblacion y describir la morbimortalidad asociada a la cirugia y la evolucion del tratamiento paliativo. Metodos Estudio observacional prospectivo de pacientes con cancer colorrectal quirurgico (1 de febrero del 2018-30 de abril del 2019). Cribado de paciente fragil y clasificacion segun grados de fragilidad. Decision terapeutica (cirugia o tratamiento paliativo) segun grado de fragilidad y voluntades explicitas del paciente. Analisis de comorbilidad postoperatoria (segun Clavien-Dindo y Comprehensive Complication Index), mortalidad y seguimiento oncologico. Resultados Fueron visitados 193 pacientes con cancer colorrectal quirurgico, con una edad media de 74 anos (44-92). Cribado: 46 pacientes fragiles (24%), con una edad media de 80 anos (57-92). Se optimizo e intervino a 22 pacientes (48%), con una edad media de 78 anos (57-89). Efectos adversos relevantes del 27,7% (4 efectos adversos grado iv a, uno iv b y otro v, segun Clavien-Dindo). Comprehensive Complication Index de 17,5. Tratamiento paliativo en 24 pacientes (52%), con una edad media de 82 anos (59-92). Seguimiento medio de 7,8 meses, 2 muertes por progresion de la enfermedad (8,3%), 5 reconsultas por complicaciones del cancer colorrectal (20,1%). Conclusiones El manejo multidisciplinar e individualizado del paciente fragil con cancer colorrectal es clave para mejorar la calidad asistencial en el tratamiento de este grupo de pacientes.

Background and objectives The complexity of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) treatment calls for a multidisciplinary approach. We therefore created a multidisciplinary team to manage surgical care. This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of the patients we evaluated and the outcomes of the surgical techniques used. Material and methods Descriptive cross-sectional study of 104 patients evaluated by our surgical case management team between September 2015 and July 2018. Results Surgery was used to treat 46% of the patients with HS who were evaluated. Most were men (73%) with no family history of HS (63%) and smokers or former smokers (76%). Gluteal HS comprised the largest phenotype group (41%) and the majority of cases were serious (Hurley stage II, 36%; stage III, 46%). The anatomical regions with the largest number of lesions were the axillae (51.9%) and the groin (41.3%). Surgery was most often performed in the axilla (38.3%), followed by the gluteus (23.4%). The most common drug treatment was a combination of rifampicin and clindamycin, Deroofing was the technique used most often (in 48% of the patients who underwent surgery). Postoperative outcomes were assessed as satisfactory overall in 63.4% of the cases. The HS lesion recurred in 20% and 12% developed wound dehiscence. Conclusions Our experience leads us to recommend forming multidisciplinary teams to improve communication between specialists, provide tailored treatment for the patient with HS, and improve follow-up.

Resumen Antecedentes y objetivos La complejidad del tratamiento de la hidradenitis supurativa (HS) hace necesario un abordaje multidisciplinar, y con este fin disenamos un comite quirurgico para su abordaje. Este estudio describe las caracteristicas clinicas de los pacientes evaluados y los resultados de las tecnicas quirurgicas realizadas. Material y metodos Presentamos un estudio descriptivo transversal que recoge 104 pacientes que fueron evaluados en nuestro comite desde setiembre de 2015 hasta julio de 2018. Resultados En nuestra serie, el 46% de los pacientes con HS evaluados recibieron tratamiento quirurgico. La mayoria fueron varones (73%), sin antecedentes familiares de HS (63%), exfumadores o fumadores (76%). El fenotipo clinico predominante fue el tipo III (41%), con presencia de patologia grave en la mayor parte de los casos (36% con Hurley II y 46% con Hurley III). Las areas anatomicas mas afectadas fueron las axilas (51,9%) y las ingles (41,3%); mientras que las intervenidas con mayor frecuencia fueron la axilar (38,3%), seguida de la glutea (23,4%). Entre los tratamientos medicos, el mas usado fue la combinacion de rifampicina con clindamicina. El destechamiento (deroofing) se posiciono como la tecnica quirurgica mas empleada entre los pacientes intervenidos (hasta en un 48%). En cuanto al resultado posquirurgico global: un 63,4% obtuvo un resultado satisfactorio, un 20% recidivo y un 12% presento dehiscencia de la herida quirurgica. Conclusiones Dada nuestra experiencia, recomendamos la instauracion de comites multidisciplinares para mejorar la comunicacion entre los diferentes especialistas, asi como individualizar el tratamiento y mejorar el seguimiento de los pacientes con HS.

The aim was to describe the robot-assisted intracorporeal anastomosis technique in left colon surgery (rLCS) and report the initial results.The rLCS was performed in 25 consecutive patients, starting with a Pfannenstiel incision and introducing a prepared anvil. The robot was docked and the affected segment resected. Colotomy was performed and the anvil was introduced in the proximal segment. End-to-end anastomosis was performed and reinforced. An air-leak test was performed.The results varied in terms of patient's age, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, weight and the technique performed. Most patients had cancer. There was no suture failure or mortality, and the mean hospital stay was 3 days.The rLCS is a safe, reproducible technique with good initial results. Prospective studies should be performed to demonstrate its advantages.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) has become the treatment of choice for benign rectal lesions and early rectal cancer (T1). The size classification of rectal polyps is controversial. Some articles define giant rectal lesions as those larger than 5 cm, which present a significantly increased risk of complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of TEM in these lesions.An observational descriptive study with prospective data collection evaluating the feasibility of TEM in large rectal adenomas was performed between June 2004 and September 2018. Patients were assigned to one of the three groups according to size: 5 cm, very large (5-7.9 cm) and ultra-large (≥ 8 cm). Descriptive and comparative analyses between groups were performed.TEM was indicated in 761 patients. Five hundred and seven patients (66.6%) with adenoma in the preoperative biopsy were included in the study. Three hundred and nine out of 507 (60.9%) tumors 5 cm, 162/507 (32%) very large tumors (5-7.9 cm) and 36/507 (7.1%) ultra-large tumors (≥ 8 cm) were reviewed. Morbidity increased with tumor size: 17.5% in tumors 5 cm, 26.5% in those 5-7.9 cm, and 36.1% in those 8 cm. Peritoneal perforation, fragmentation, free margins and stenosis were also more common in very large and ultra-large tumors (p 0.001). There were no statistical differences between the groups in the definitive pathology (p = 0.38).TEM in these large tumors is associated with higher rates of morbidity, peritoneal perforation, free margins and stenosis. Although these tumors do not require total mesorectal excision and are eligible for TEM, the surgery must be carried out by experienced surgeons.

Loop ileostomy reduces the rates of morbidity due to colorectal anastomotic dehiscence. For its part, ileostomy closure is associated with low mortality (0–4%) but substantial morbidity (11–37%). Incisional surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most frequent complications (2–40%). A single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial of two study groups: control (conventional primary skin closure) and experimental (primary skin closure with a contralateral Penrose® drain). Seventy patients undergoing loop ileostomy closure between April 2013 and June 2017 were included (35 per branch). Four were later removed from the study. Six of the remaining 66 patients (per protocol analysis) were diagnosed with incisional SSI (9.1%); there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (control group: 9.7%; experimental group: 8.6%) or between the risk factors associated with incisional SSI. Rates of overall and relevant morbidity (Clavien ≥ III) were considerable (28.1% and 9.1%, respectively), and there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. No patients died. Contralateral drainage does not significantly affect the results of primary ileostomy closure. The rate of incisional SSI was similar in the drainage and non-drainage groups, and the overall rate of 9.1% was in the low range of those reported in the literature. The absence of mortality (0%) and the non-negligible rates of overall and relevant morbidity (28.1% and 9.1%, respectively) in our series suggest that loop ileostomy is a safe procedure. However, the bowel reconstruction involves risks that must be borne in mind. The study was registered and approved by the clinical research ethics committee of the study center (reference number 2012076). Clinical trial was registered in ClinicalTrial.gov (identification number NCT02574702 and reference: ILEOS-ISS_2013).

The aim of this study is to assess postoperative morbidity and mortality in tumors with a proximal margin 15 cm or more from the anal verge operated with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).This observational study of consecutive rectal tumor patients undergoing TEM was carried out from July 2004 to June 2017. We compared the results of rectal tumors at distances of ≥15 cm (group A) and15 cm (group B) from the anal verge.During the study period 667 patients were included: 118 in group A and 549 in group B. In the comparative analysis there were no significant differences in morbidity (p = 0.23), mortality (p = 0.32) or free margin involvement (p = 0.545). Differences were observed in terms of lesion size (p 0.001), surgical time (p 0.001) and peritoneal cavity perforation, which were all increased in group A.TEM for lesions in the rectosigmoid junction is feasible and is not associated with higher morbidity or mortality.