Search

International audience; Purpose: A European network was initiated in 2012 by 23 partners from 16 European countries with the aim to significantly increase individualized dose reconstruction in case of large-scale radiological emergency scenarios. Results: The network was built on three complementary pillars: (1) an operational basis with seven biological and physical dosimetric assays in ready-to-use mode, (2) a basis for education, training and quality assurance, and (3) a basis for further network development regarding new techniques and members. Techniques for individual dose estimation based on biological samples and/or inert personalized devices as mobile phones or smart phones were optimized to support rapid categorization of many potential victims according to the received dose to the blood or personal devices. Communication and cross-border collaboration were also standardized. To assure long-term sustainability of the network, cooperation with national and international emergency preparedness organizations was initiated and links to radiation protection and research platforms have been developed. A legal framework, based on a Memorandum of Understanding, was established and signed by 27 organizations by the end of 2015. Conclusions: RENEB is a European Network of biological and physical-retrospective dosimetry, with the capacity and capability to perform large-scale rapid individualized dose estimation. Specialized to handle large numbers of samples, RENEB is able to contribute to radiological emergency preparedness and wider large-scale research projects. © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

International audience; Purpose To establish a training data set of digital images and to investigate the scoring criteria and dose assessment of the dicentric assay within the European network of biodosimetry (RENEB), a web based scoring inter-comparison was undertaken by 17 RENEB partners. Materials and methods Two sets of 50 high resolution images were uploaded onto the RENEB website. One set included metaphases after a moderate exposure (1.3 Gy) and the other set consisted of metaphases after a high dose exposure (3.5 Gy). The laboratories used their own calibration curves for estimating doses based on observed aberration frequencies. Results The dose estimations and 95% confidence limits were compared to the actual doses and the corresponding z-values were satisfactory for the majority; only the dose estimations from two laboratories were too low or too high. The coefficients of variation were 17.6% for the moderate and 11.2% for the high dose. Metaphases with controversial results could be identified for training purposes. Conclusions Overall, the web based scoring of the two galleries by the 17 laboratories produced very good results. Application of web based scoring for the dicentric assay may therefore be a relevant strategy for an operational biodosimetry assistance network. © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor and Francis Group.

48th Spring Meeting of the Deutsche-Gesellschaft-fur Experimentelle-ung-Klinische-Pharmakologie-und-Toxikologie, Mar 13-15, 2007, Mainz, Germany

The influence of simulated microgravity weightlessness on the outcome of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations was investigated using the clinostat as a tool to simulate weightlessness conditions. Treatments were performed in the G0 phase of human lymphocytes with 1.5 Gy of X-rays alone or in combination with the DNA synthesis inhibitor of 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (ara-C) to check also for possible specific radiation-induced DNA repair processes impairment (excision repair caused by base damage) under microgravity conditions. The results obtained, which confirmed previous findings, showed significantly higher increases of aberrant cells and hence total number of aberrations compared to the parallel treatments performed 'on ground'. For what concern ara-C its contribution in terms of potentiation in the induction of aberrant cells was equivalent in absolute terms under simulated microgravity conditions and 'on ground' indicating that excision repair caused by base damage and inhibited by ara-C is not affected by simulated microgravity. A possible explanation for this outcome could quote two major factors: i) Enhanced probability that under simulated microgravity conditions the reactive DSB are spatially brought together to better interact, hence increasing the probability of mis-rejoining. ii) Alternatively chromatin structure could be modified under simulated microgravity conditions generating different quality and quantities of DNA lesions compared to treatments performed 'on ground'.

Two clones of the L5 myoblast line (M6 and the fusion-defective M12) were examined for the expression of myogenin, one of the regulatory genes involved in the regulation of differentiation to myofibers after treatment with 3-deazaadenosine, a metabolic inhibitor of methyl transfer reactions. Cultures treated with 3-deazaadenosine showed, using Northern blot hybridization, a conspicuous increase in myogenin expression, which in clone M6 correlated to the extent of cell differentiation under fusing conditions but was evident also in growth medium, although the drug was unable to start the myogenic program. We also tested the extent of total DNA methylation to verify whether the activation of the regulatory cascade could be correlated to the decrease of the overall number of 5-methylcytosines present in the genome. The results show that the loss of 5-methylcytosine from newly synthesized DNA, but not from preexisting DNA, is evident in fusing conditions and enhanced by 3-deazaadenosine. It appears that there is a positive correlation between the passive demethylation of newly synthesized DNA, the activation of the myogenin gene by demethylation, and the differentiation of myoblasts. However, in fusing conditions, the defective clone M12, although it is able to express myogenin and its DNA is hypomethylated, fuses only in the presence of 3-deazaadenosine, suggesting some alternative way of induction.