Search

Your search keyword '"Padbury, Robert T."' showing total 182 results
Start Over Author "Padbury, Robert T."
182 results on '"Padbury, Robert T."'

1. Sociocultural and Demographic Factors Predict Readmissions for General Surgery Patients

Author

Kovoor, Joshua G., Bacchi, Stephen, Gupta, Aashray K., Nann, Silas D., Stretton, Brandon, Chong, Esther H. L., Hewitt, Joseph N., Bhanushali, Ameya, Nathin, Kayla, Aujayeb, Nidhi, Lu, Amy, Ovenden, Christopher D., John, Athul, Reid, Jessica L., Gluck, Samuel, Liew, Danny, Reddi, Benjamin A., Hugh, Thomas J., Dobbins, Christopher, Padbury, Robert T., Hewett, Peter J., Trochsler, Markus I., and Maddern, Guy J.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Depression after stoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Kovoor, Joshua G., Jacobsen, Jonathan Henry W., Stretton, Brandon, Bacchi, Stephen, Gupta, Aashray K., Claridge, Brayden, Steen, Matthew V., Bhanushali, Ameya, Bartholomeusz, Lorenz, Edwards, Suzanne, Asokan, Gayatri P., Asokan, Gopika, McGee, Amanda, Ovenden, Christopher D., Hewitt, Joseph N., Trochsler, Markus I., Padbury, Robert T., Perry, Seth W., Wong, Ma-Li, Licinio, Julio, Maddern, Guy J., and Hewett, Peter J.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Delayed return of bowel function after general surgery in South Australia

Author

Kovoor, Joshua G., Bacchi, Stephen, Stretton, Brandon, Gupta, Aashray K., Jacobsen, Jonathan Henry W., To, Minh-Son, Goh, Rudy, Hewitt, Joseph N., Ovenden, Christopher D., Warren, Leigh, Marshall-Webb, Matthew, Jones, Karen L., Reddi, Benjamin A., Liew, Danny, Dobbins, Christopher, Padbury, Robert T., Hewett, Peter J., Hugh, Thomas J., Trochsler, Markus I., and Maddern, Guy J.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Surgery’s Rosetta Stone: Natural language processing to predict discharge and readmission after general surgery

Author

Kovoor, Joshua G., Bacchi, Stephen, Gupta, Aashray K., Stretton, Brandon, Nann, Silas D., Aujayeb, Nidhi, Lu, Amy, Nathin, Kayla, Lam, Lydia, Jiang, Melinda, Lee, Shane, To, Minh-Son, Ovenden, Christopher D., Hewitt, Joseph N., Goh, Rudy, Gluck, Samuel, Reid, Jessica L., Khurana, Sanjeev, Dobbins, Christopher, Hewett, Peter J., Padbury, Robert T., Malycha, James, Trochsler, Markus I., Hugh, Thomas J., and Maddern, Guy J.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Understanding the length of hospital stay after general surgery using a prospectively maintained local database

Author

Kovoor, Joshua G., primary, Nematzadeh, Nasim, additional, Ataie, Sara, additional, Thomas, Bev, additional, Short, Rachel, additional, Davey, Amy, additional, Goodrich, Angie, additional, Shrestha, Tapaswi, additional, Gupta, Aashray K., additional, Stretton, Brandon, additional, Bacchi, Stephen, additional, Marshall-Webb, Matthew, additional, Kaeppeli, Reto, additional, Navidi, Maziar, additional, Liyanage, Chrisanthi, additional, Maddern, Guy J., additional, Barreto, S. George, additional, Kow, Lilian, additional, and Padbury, Robert T., additional

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Vital signs and medical emergency response (MER) activation predict in‐hospital mortality in general surgery patients: a study of 15 969 admissions

Author

Kovoor, Joshua G., primary, Bacchi, Stephen, additional, Stretton, Brandon, additional, Gupta, Aashray K., additional, Lam, Lydia, additional, Jiang, Melinda, additional, Lee, Shane, additional, To, Minh‐Son, additional, Ovenden, Christopher D., additional, Hewitt, Joseph N., additional, Goh, Rudy, additional, Gluck, Samuel, additional, Reid, Jessica L., additional, Hugh, Thomas J., additional, Dobbins, Christopher, additional, Padbury, Robert T., additional, Hewett, Peter J., additional, Trochsler, Markus I., additional, Flabouris, Arthas, additional, and Maddern, Guy J., additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. Additional file 1 of Depression after stoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Kovoor, Joshua G., Jacobsen, Jonathan Henry W., Stretton, Brandon, Bacchi, Stephen, Gupta, Aashray K., Claridge, Brayden, Steen, Matthew V., Bhanushali, Ameya, Bartholomeusz, Lorenz, Edwards, Suzanne, Asokan, Gayatri P., Asokan, Gopika, McGee, Amanda, Ovenden, Christopher D., Hewitt, Joseph N., Trochsler, Markus I., Padbury, Robert T., Perry, Seth W., Wong, Ma-Li, Licinio, Julio, Maddern, Guy J., and Hewett, Peter J.

Abstract

Additional file 1: Appendix 1. PRISMAChecklist. Appendix 2. Studies included at full-text review. Supplementary Figure 1. Funnel plot summarising publication bias for studies with data regarding effect of age on depressive symptoms after stoma surgery. Supplementary Figure 2. Funnel plot summarising publication bias for studies with data regarding mean age and standard deviations in studies with data regarding effect of age on depressive symptoms after stoma surgery. Supplementary Figure 3. Funnel plot summarising publication bias for studies with data regarding effect of sex on depressive symptoms after stoma surgery. Supplementary Figure 4. Forest plot summarising prevalence of male sex in studies with data regarding effect of sex on depressive symptoms after stoma surgery. Supplementary Figure 5. Funnel plot summarising publication bias for studies with data regarding prevalence of male sex and data regarding effect of sex on depressive symptoms after stoma surgery. Supplementary Figure 6. Forest plot showing prevalence of depressive symptoms after stoma surgery in studies reporting by region. Supplementary Figure 7. Funnel plot summarising publication bias for studies with data regarding effect of region on depressive symptoms after stoma surgery. Supplementary Figure 8. Forest plot summarising the odds of experiencing depressive symptoms before versus after stoma surgery. Supplementary Figure 9. Funnel plot summarising publication bias in studies reporting odds of experiencing depressive symptoms before versus after stoma surgery. Supplementary Figure 10. Forest plot summarising the odds of experiencing depressive symptoms after surgery in stoma versus non-stoma populations. Supplementary Figure 11. Funnel plot summarising publication bias in studies reporting data regarding the odds of experiencing depressive symptoms after surgery in stoma versus non-stoma populations. Supplementary Figure 12. Forest plot summarising mean differences in experiencing depressive symptoms after surgery in stoma versus non-stoma populations. Supplementary Figure 13. Funnel plot summarising publication bias in studies reporting data regarding mean differences in experiencing depressive symptoms after surgery in stoma versus non-stoma populations. Supplementary Figure 14. Forest plot summarising the mean differences in experiencing depressive symptoms after surgery in colostomy versus ileostomy patients. Supplementary Figure 15. Funnel plot summarising publication bias in studies reporting data regarding the mean differences in experiencing depressive symptoms after surgery in colostomy versus ileostomy patients. Supplementary Table 1. Risk of bias assessment using the Downs and Black Checklist for 65 non-randomised studies of interventions included in the present systematic review. Supplementary Table 2. Overall risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 checklist for three randomised controlled trials included in the present systematic review.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

10. Splenectomy

Author

Padbury, Robert T. A., Bland, Kirby I., editor, Büchler, Markus W., editor, Csendes, Attila, editor, Sarr, Michael G., editor, Garden, O. James, editor, and Wong, John, editor

Published
2009
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. Achieving safe surgery after COVID‐19 vaccination

Author

Kovoor, Joshua G., primary, Jacobsen, Jonathan Henry W., additional, Duncan, Joanna, additional, Addo, Afua A., additional, Tivey, David R., additional, Babidge, Wendy J., additional, Penn, David, additional, Churchill, James, additional, Collinson, Trevor G., additional, Kok, Jen, additional, Kelly, Shane, additional, Lu, Vicky H., additional, Beavis, Vanessa S., additional, MacCormick, Andrew D., additional, Kearney, Brendon J., additional, Gowans, Eric J., additional, Hewett, Peter J., additional, Hugh, Thomas J., additional, Woo, Henry H., additional, Padbury, Robert T., additional, Scott, David A., additional, Frydenberg, Mark, additional, and Maddern, Guy J., additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

15. Proposed Delay for Safe Surgery after COVID-19

Author

Kovoor, Joshua G., primary, Scott, David A., additional, Beavis, Vanessa S., additional, Kok, Jen, additional, MacCormick, Andrew D., additional, Padbury, Robert T., additional, Hugh, Thomas J., additional, Hewett, Peter J., additional, Collinson, Trevor G., additional, and Frydenberg, Mark, additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

17. In‐hospital survival after pancreatoduodenectomy is greater in high‐volume hospitals versus lower‐volume hospitals: a meta‐analysis

Author

Kovoor, Joshua G., primary, Ma, Ning, additional, Tivey, David R., additional, Vandepeer, Meegan, additional, Jacobsen, Jonathan Henry W., additional, Scarfe, Anje, additional, Vreugdenburg, Thomas D., additional, Stretton, Brandon, additional, Edwards, Suzanne, additional, Babidge, Wendy J., additional, Anthony, Adrian A., additional, Padbury, Robert T. A., additional, and Maddern, Guy J., additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

18. Oestrogen hormone receptors in focal nodular hyperplasia

Author

Chandrasegaram, Manju D., Shah, Ali, Chen, John W., Ruszkiewicz, Andrew, Astill, David S., England, Georgina, Raju, Ravish S., Neo, Eu Ling, Dolan, Paul M., Tan, Chuan Ping, Brooke-Smith, Mark, Wilson, Tom, Padbury, Robert T. A., and Worthley, Christopher S.

Published
2015
Full Text
View/download PDF

22. Diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines

Author

Hirota, Masahiko, Takada, Tadahiro, Kawarada, Yoshifumi, Nimura, Yuji, Miura, Fumihiko, Hirata, Koichi, Mayumi, Toshihiko, Yoshida, Masahiro, Strasberg, Steven, Pitt, Henry, Gadacz, Thomas R, de Santibanes, Eduardo, Gouma, Dirk J., Solomkin, Joseph S., Belghiti, Jacques, Neuhaus, Horst, Büchler, Markus W., Fan, Sheung-Tat, Ker, Chen-Guo, Padbury, Robert T., Liau, Kui-Hin, Hilvano, Serafin C., Belli, Giulio, Windsor, John A., and Dervenis, Christos

Published
2007
Full Text
View/download PDF

23. Flowcharts for the diagnosis and treatment of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines

Author

Miura, Fumihiko, Takada, Tadahiro, Kawarada, Yoshifumi, Nimura, Yuji, Wada, Keita, Hirota, Masahiko, Nagino, Masato, Tsuyuguchi, Toshio, Mayumi, Toshihiko, Yoshida, Masahiro, Strasberg, Steven M., Pitt, Henry A., Belghiti, Jacques, de Santibanes, Eduardo, Gadacz, Thomas R., Gouma, Dirk J., Fan, Sheung-Tat, Chen, Miin-Fu, Padbury, Robert T., Bornman, Philippus C., Kim, Sun-Whe, Liau, Kui-Hin, Belli, Giulio, and Dervenis, Christos

Published
2007
Full Text
View/download PDF

28. Screening and testing forCOVID‐19 before surgery

Author

Kovoor, Joshua G., primary, Tivey, David R., additional, Williamson, Penny, additional, Tan, Lorwai, additional, Kopunic, Helena S., additional, Babidge, Wendy J., additional, Collinson, Trevor G., additional, Hewett, Peter J., additional, Hugh, Thomas J., additional, Padbury, Robert T. A., additional, Frydenberg, Mark, additional, Douglas, Richard G., additional, Kok, Jen, additional, and Maddern, Guy J., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

30. Surgery triage during the COVID ‐19 pandemic

Author

Babidge, Wendy J., primary, Tivey, David R., additional, Kovoor, Joshua G., additional, Weidenbach, Kristin, additional, Collinson, Trevor G., additional, Hewett, Peter J., additional, Hugh, Thomas J., additional, Padbury, Robert T. A., additional, Hill, Nicola M., additional, and Maddern, Guy J., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

31. Safe surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 crisis

Author

Tivey, David R., primary, Davis, Sean S., additional, Kovoor, Joshua G., additional, Babidge, Wendy J., additional, Tan, Lorwai, additional, Hugh, Thomas J., additional, Collinson, Trevor G., additional, Hewett, Peter J., additional, Padbury, Robert T. A., additional, and Maddern, Guy J., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

33. In‐hospital survival after pancreatoduodenectomy is greater in high‐volume hospitals versus lower‐volume hospitals: a meta‐analysis.

Author

Kovoor, Joshua G., Ma, Ning, Tivey, David R., Vandepeer, Meegan, Jacobsen, Jonathan Henry W., Scarfe, Anje, Vreugdenburg, Thomas D., Stretton, Brandon, Edwards, Suzanne, Babidge, Wendy J., Anthony, Adrian A., Padbury, Robert T. A., and Maddern, Guy J.

Subjects
PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY, HOSPITAL mortality, HOSPITALS, DATA extraction
Abstract

Background: Variation in cut‐off values for what is considered a high volume (HV) hospital has made assessments of volume‐outcome relationships for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) challenging. Accordingly, we performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis comparing in‐hospital mortality after PD in hospitals above and below HV thresholds of various cut‐off values. Method: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to 4 January 2021 for studies comparing in‐hospital mortality after PD in hospitals above and below defined HV thresholds. After data extraction, risk of bias was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist. A random‐effects model was used for meta‐analysis, including meta‐regressions. Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42021224432. Results: From 1855 records, 17 observational studies of moderate quality were included. Median HV cut‐off was 25 PDs/year (IQR: 20–32). Overall relative risk of in‐hospital mortality was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.30, 0.45), that is, 63% less in HV hospitals. All subgroup analyses found an in‐hospital survival benefit in performing PDs at HV hospitals. Meta‐regressions from included studies found no statistically significant associations between relative risk of in‐hospital mortality and region (USA vs. non‐USA; p = 0.396); or 25th percentile (p = 0.231), median (p = 0.822) or 75th percentile (p = 0.469) HV cut‐off values. Significant inverse relationships were found between PD hospital volume and other outcomes. Conclusion: In‐hospital survival was significantly greater for patients undergoing PDs at HV hospitals, regardless of HV cut‐off value or region. Future research is required to investigate regions where low‐volume centres have specialized PD infrastructure and the potential impact on mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

42. Proposed delay for safe surgery after COVID‐19.

Author

Kovoor, Joshua G., Scott, N. Ann, Tivey, David R., Babidge, Wendy J., Scott, David A., Beavis, Vanessa S., Kok, Jen, MacCormick, Andrew D., Padbury, Robert T. A., Hugh, Thomas J., Hewett, Peter J., Collinson, Trevor G., Maddern, Guy J., and Frydenberg, Mark

Subjects
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, ONCOLOGIC surgery, MEDICAL research, GREY literature
Abstract

Background: Long‐term effects after COVID‐19 may affect surgical safety. This study aimed to evaluate the literature and produce evidence‐based guidance regarding the period of delay necessary for adequate recovery of patients following COVID‐19 infection before undergoing surgery. Methods: A rapid review was combined with advice from a working group of 10 clinical experts across Australia and New Zealand. MEDLINE, medRxiv and grey literature were searched to 4 October 2020. The level of evidence was stratified according to the National Health and Medical Research Council evidence hierarchy. Results: A total of 1020 records were identified, from which 20 studies (12 peer‐reviewed) were included. None were randomized trials. The studies comprised one case–control study (level III‐2 evidence), one prospective cohort study (level III‐2) and 18 case‐series studies (level IV). Follow‐up periods containing observable clinical characteristics ranged from 3 to 16 weeks. New or excessive fatigue and breathlessness were the most frequently reported symptoms. SARS‐CoV‐2 may impact the immune system for multiple months after laboratory confirmation of infection. For patients with past COVID‐19 undergoing elective curative surgery for cancer, risks of pulmonary complications and mortality may be lowest at 4 weeks or later after a positive swab. Conclusion: After laboratory confirmation of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, minor surgery should be delayed for at least 4 weeks and major surgery for 8–12 weeks, if patient outcome is not compromised. Comprehensive preoperative and ongoing assessment must be carried out to ensure optimal clinical decision‐making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

43. Screening and testing for COVID‐19 before surgery.

Author

Kovoor, Joshua G., Tivey, David R., Williamson, Penny, Tan, Lorwai, Kopunic, Helena S., Babidge, Wendy J., Collinson, Trevor G., Hewett, Peter J., Hugh, Thomas J., Padbury, Robert T. A., Frydenberg, Mark, Douglas, Richard G., Kok, Jen, and Maddern, Guy J.

Subjects
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, SYMPTOMS, PATIENT safety
Abstract

Background: Preoperative screening for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) aims to preserve surgical safety for both patients and surgical teams. This rapid review provides an evaluation of current evidence with input from clinical experts to produce guidance for screening for active COVID‐19 in a low prevalence setting. Methods: An initial search of PubMed (until 6 May 2020) was combined with targeted searches of both PubMed and Google Scholar until 1 July 2020. Findings were streamlined for clinical relevance through the advice of an expert working group that included seven senior surgeons and a senior medical virologist. Results: Patient history should be examined for potential exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2). Hyposmia and hypogeusia may present as early symptoms of COVID‐19, and can potentially discriminate from other influenza‐like illnesses. Reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction is the gold standard diagnostic test to confirm SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, and although sensitivity can be improved with repeated testing, the decision to retest should incorporate clinical history and the local supply of diagnostic resources. At present, routine serological testing has little utility for diagnosing acute infection. To appropriately conduct preoperative testing, the temporal dynamics of SARS‐CoV‐2 must be considered. Relative to other thoracic imaging modalities, computed tomography has the greatest utility for characterizing pulmonary involvement in COVID‐19 patients who have been diagnosed by reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction. Conclusion: Through a rapid review of the literature and advice from a clinical expert working group, evidence‐based recommendations have been produced for the preoperative screening of surgical patients with suspected COVID‐19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results