Claudia H D Metz, Annette Paschen, Bastian Schilling, Rajmohan Murali, Elisabeth Livingstone, Antje Sucker, Mathias Stiller, Lisa Zimmer, Michael Zeschnigk, Henrike Westekemper, Henning Reis, Inga Möller, Susanne Horn, Klaus-Peter Steuhl, Dirk Schadendorf, Wiebke Sondermann, Simone L. Scholz, and Klaus G. Griewank
// Simone L. Scholz 1 , Susanne Horn 2 , Rajmohan Murali 6, 7 , Inga Moller 2 , Antje Sucker 2 , Wiebke Sondermann 2 , Mathias Stiller 2, 5 , Bastian Schilling 2 , Elisabeth Livingstone 2 , Lisa Zimmer 2 , Henning Reis 3 , Claudia H. Metz 1 , Michael Zeschnigk 4 , Annette Paschen 2 , Klaus-Peter Steuhl 1 , Dirk Schadendorf 2 , Henrike Westekemper 1 , Klaus G. Griewank 2 1 Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, West German Cancer Center and the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen Germany 2 Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, West German Cancer Center and the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen Germany 3 Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, West German Cancer Center and the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen Germany 4 Department of Human Genetics, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, West German Cancer Center and the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen Germany 5 University Duisburg-Essen and the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen Germany 6 Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY, USA 7 Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY, USA Correspondence to: Klaus Griewank, e-mail: klaus.griewank@uk-essen.de Keywords: melanoma, SDHD, promoter mutations Abbreviations: NGS = next generation sequencing; ETS = E26 transformation-specific; SDHD = Succinate dehydrogenase complex subunit D Received: May 09, 2015 Accepted: July 15, 2015 Published: July 27, 2015 ABSTRACT Objectives: Recently, recurrent mutations in regulatory DNA regions, such as promoter mutations in the TERT gene were identified in melanoma. Subsequently, Weinhold et al. reported SDHD promoter mutations occurring in 10% of melanomas and being associated with a lower overall survival rate. Our study analyzes the mutation rate and clinico-pathologic associations of SDHD promoter mutations in a large cohort of different melanoma subtypes. Methods: 451 melanoma samples (incl. 223 non-acral cutaneous, 38 acral, 33 mucosal, 43 occult, 43 conjunctival and 51 uveal melanoma) were analyzed for the presence of SDHD promoter mutations by Sanger-sequencing. Statistical analysis was performed to screen for potential correlations of SDHD promoter mutation status with various clinico-pathologic criteria. Results: The SDHD promoter was successfully sequenced in 451 tumor samples. ETS binding site changing SDHD promoter mutations were identified in 16 (4%) samples, of which 5 mutations had not been described previously. Additionally, 5 point mutations not located in ETS binding elements were identified. Mutations in UV-exposed tumors were frequently C>T. One germline C>A SDHD promoter mutation was identified. No statistically significant associations between SDHD promoter mutation status and various clinico-pathologic variables or overall patient survival were observed. Conclusions: Melanomas harbor recurrent SDHD promoter mutations, which occur primarily as C>T alterations in UV-exposed melanomas. In contrast to the initial report and promoter mutations in the TERT gene, our analysis suggests that SDHD promoter mutations are a relatively rare event in melanoma (4% of tumors) of unclear clinical and prognostic relevance.