Search

Peripheral I.V. access failure is a source of patient discomfort and dissatisfaction with a significant financial impact on healthcare. This article reviews the benefits and the risks of peripheral I.V. catheter (PIVC) utilization, infusate characteristics and their impact on peripheral vasculature, PIVC site assessment and management, and PIVC research priorities. Part 1 of this series was published in Nursing's September 2024 issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In 2020, as a result of evidence of demonstrated safety of an initial pilot program, our institution set out to implement a peripheral vasopressor infusion protocol. Objective: To evaluate the use of peripheral lines for vasopressor administration to reduce placement of unnecessary central lines and central line days. Methods: This is an Institutional Review Board approved, single center retrospective chart review conducted as pre/post-analysis. Our hospital is a quaternary care, level 1 trauma center in Hartford, Connecticut that serves 100,000-120,000 patients annually. Patients >18 years admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) were included if meeting protocol specific inclusion criteria pertaining to moderate expected duration and dose of vasopressor. Patients were excluded if vasculature not supportive of placement of two peripheral intravenous (PIV) sites, PIV sites without brisk blood return, had a limb restriction, or metacarpal line. All analyses were conducted with SPSS v. 26 (IBM; Armonk, NY 2019), using an a priori alpha level of 0.05 such that all results yielding p <.05 were deemed statistically significant. Primary efficacy outcomes of this study are number of central lines placed and number of central line days. The primary safety outcome is the number of extravasation events attributed to peripheral administration of vasopressors. Results: Overall, 146 patients avoided central line placement constituting a 58.4% (p <.001) decrease in central line placement with peripheral vasopressor use. Out of 382 administrations there were a total of 14 extravasation events that occurred with peripheral vasopressor use in the post-intervention group. Implementation was associated with a statistically significant reduction in CLABSI occurrence. Conclusions: The results of this analysis demonstrate that vasopressors can peripherally administered safely, when proximal to the antecubital fossa, at lower doses, and for short durations of infusion with minimal adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses research which examined how nursing practices may have impacted central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates among intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19 during the first few months of the pandemic. Cited are the relationship between ICU COVID-19 patients with those with and without CLABSI, in terms of adherence, ICU incident reporting data on infusion and infusion medication errors and near misses, and study implications for nurse leaders.

Background: Despite implementation of central catheter bundles, central line [catheter]–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) remain a preventable hospital-acquired infection. Local Problem: A new population of patients with pulmonary artery catheters was introduced to the cardiac progressive care unit, increasing central catheter days, device use, and CLABSI rate. Methods: A quality improvement project was conducted. Nursing staff implemented a standardized central catheter rounding process 3 days a week to critically assess all central catheter dressings, deter-mine the necessity of each central catheter, and educate patients on the importance of keeping central catheter dressings clean, dry, and intact. Data were collected during central catheter rounds for each patient, entered in an electronic survey tool via mobile devices, and analyzed. Results: From July 2019 through June 2022, a total of 2692 rounds were conducted for 707 individual patients with 3064 central catheters. Main interventions were dressing management, monitoring insertion site bleeding that extended beyond edges of the chlorhexidine gluconate pad, treating patients' allergies to products, and maintaining sustainability within the unit. Central catheter rounds decreased the CLABSI rate from 1.86 to 0.0 despite the continued increase in central catheter days. Conclusions: Central catheter dressing assessment, intervention, and education help reduce CLABSIs. Central catheter rounds are an important adjunct to the CLABSI bundle. A central catheter dressing management algorithm helps nurses decide when to change a dressing and which type of dressing to use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To design, develop and validate a new tool, called NEUMOBACT, to evaluate critical care nurses' knowledge and skills in ventilator‐associated pneumonia (VAP) and catheter‐related bacteraemia (CRB) prevention through simulation scenarios involving central venous catheter (CVC), endotracheal suctioning (ETS) and mechanically ventilated patient care (PC) stations. Background: Simulation‐based training is an excellent way for nurses to learn prevention measures in VAP and CRB. Design: Descriptive metric study to develop NEUMOBACT and analyse its content and face validity that followed the COSMIN Study Design checklist for patient‐reported outcome measurement instruments. Methods: The first version was developed with the content of training modules in use at the time (NEUMOBACT‐1). Delphi rounds were used to assess item relevance with experts in VAP and CRB prevention measures, resulting in NEUMOBACT‐2. Experts in simulation methods then assessed feasibility, resulting in NEUMOBACT‐3. Finally, a pilot test was conducted among 30 intensive care unit (ICU) nurses to assess the applicability of the evaluation tool in clinical practice. Results: Seven national experts in VAP and CRB prevention and seven national simulation experts participated in the analysis to assess the relevance and feasibility of each item, respectively. After two Delphi rounds with infection experts, four Delphi rounds with simulation experts, and pilot testing with 30 ICU nurses, the NEUMOBACT‐FINAL tool consisted of 17, 26 and 21 items, respectively, for CVC, ETS and PC. Conclusion: NEUMOBACT‐FINAL is useful and valid for assessing ICU nurses' knowledge and skills in VAP and CRB prevention, acquired through simulation. Relevance for Clinical Practice: Our validated and clinically tested tool could facilitate the transfer of ICU nurses' knowledge and skills learning in VAP and CRB prevention to critically ill patients, decreasing infection rates and, therefore, improving patient safety. Patient or Public Contribution: Experts participated in the Delphi rounds and nurses in the pilot test. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are a significant concern in intensive care units (ICUs) as they lead to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Fortunately, these infections are largely preventable through strict adherence to CLABSI prevention guidelines. Nurses play a critical role in preventing CLABSIs. Aim: This study aimed to investigate factors affecting critical care nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers related to implementing CLABSI prevention guidelines, and to predict factors influencing compliance with these guidelines. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from April to May 30, 2023, with a convenience sample of 470 critical care nurses from ICUs across eight hospitals in Sana'a, Yemen. Data were collected using an observational checklist and self-administered questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, Independent Student's t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficient, multiple linear regression, and multilayer perceptron neural networks were performed. Results: Critical care nurses exhibited low knowledge of CLABSI prevention guidelines, with compliance reaching an acceptable level. Despite the higher perceived barriers, the nurses demonstrated a positive attitude. Nurses with greater knowledge and positive attitudes displayed higher compliance levels. However, perceived barriers were negatively associated with knowledge and compliance. Notably, multilayer neural network analysis identified knowledge and perceived barriers as the strongest predictors of nurses' compliance. Conclusion: The current findings emphasize the need for multifaceted strategies to implement the CLABSI prevention guidelines. These strategies should address knowledge gaps, support positive attitudes, and address practical barriers faced by nurses to ensure successful implementation of CLABSI prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Central Venous Lines (CVL) are an important part of patient care, allowing the administration of intravenous fluids, blood, drugs and parenteral solutions. Their use is a cause of infections due to micro-organisms colonizing the skin at the entry point or the catheter or other point along it or the fluids administered by the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI's) in children's ICUs are an important factor that negatively affects the course of the disease, causing complications, perhaps irreversible. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the interventions for the management of CLABSI's in neonatal and pediatric ICUs. Methodology: Published research articles in the years 2016-2021 in valid scientific journals referring to children with CVL hospitalized in neonatal and pediatric ICUs were studied. A systematic search of the literature was performed in digital scientific databases (Medline, PubMed Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library) using keywords. The PICOS (Population, Interventions, Controls, Outcome, Study design) procedure was used as a criterion for the inclusion of an article in the present study. The evaluation of the articles of the bibliographic search were evaluated using the PRISMA method. Results: Interventions for the management of CLABSI's included the use of chlorhexidine-soaked pads, implementation of measures to prevent CLABSI's, use of a pre-filled disposable syringe for flushing, implementation of an infection surveillance system, use of new methods/measures for introduction of the catheter, use and management of CVL, use of ethanol lock, use of antibiotic-impregnated catheter and multidimensional approaches. Conclusions: As it was seen from the results of the study, there are several research evidence regarding the effectiveness of nursing interventions to limit CLABSI's in neonatal and children's ICUs. Nevertheless, it seems that prevention measures for CLABSI's and hand hygiene guidelines have a decisive role in limiting CLABSI's in neonatal and pediatric ICUs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI's) burden the health care of children with cancer. Aim: The purpose of the study was to investigate CLABSI's in children with cancer. Material-Method: Systematic review of the literature carried out from 2012-2022, with a search for articles using keywords in international bibliographic databases (PubMed, Scopus). The study sample includes published research articles addressing the treatment, incidence, and risk factors for CVC infections. The inclusion criteria for the articles in the study were: 1. to be written in the English language, 2. to concern children (<18 years old) with cancer who carry central venous line (CVL), 3. to concern the CLABSI's of these children. After searching the databases a total of 12 articles were retrieved. Results: CLABSI's in children with cancer concern 4.5-29% of those children with CVL's. The most common organisms seen in CLABSI's were coagulase-negative staphylococci and Klebsiella pneumoniae and fungi. The factors related to the occurrence of CLABSI's in children with cancer mainly concern the degree of acute illness, the degree of neutropenia, the type of catheter, the intensive administration of chemotherapy, parenteral nutrition, the length of hospital stay, the place of admission of the catheter, antibiotic use, CVL insertion day and function, number of blood transfusions and number of blood tests. Compliance of health professionals with recommended measures for CVL care remains high while compliance of parents/families is low. Conclusions: Healthcare professionals caring for children with cancer should systematically monitor for the occurrence of CLABSI's, take measures to limit the factors that influence their occurrence, and inform/educate parents to comply with the guidelines for care of CVL's. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a leading cause of hospitalizations and mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) therapy, especially those with a central venous catheter (CVC) for dialysis access. The use of chlorhexidine impregnated catheter caps (ClearGuard) has been associated with a decrease in the rate of HD catheter-related BSIs (CA-BSIs) in adults; similar data have not been published for children. Methods: We compared CA-BSI data from participating centers within the Standardizing Care to Improve Outcomes in Pediatric Endstage Kidney Disease (SCOPE) collaborative based on the center's use of ClearGuard caps for patients with HD catheter access. Centers were characterized as ClearGuard (CG) or non-ClearGuard (NCG) centers, with CA-BSI data pre- and post-CG implementation reviewed. All positive blood cultures in participating centers were reported to the SCOPE collaborative and adjudicated by an infectious disease physician. Results: Data were available from 1786 SCOPE enrollment forms completed January 2016–January 2022. January 2020 served as the implementation date for analyzing CG versus NCG center data, with this being the time when the last CG center underwent implementation. Post January 2020, there was a greater decrease in the rate of HD CA-BSI in CG centers versus NCG centers, with a decrease from 1.18 to 0.23 and 0.41 episodes per 100 patient months for the CG and NCG centers, respectively (p = 0.002). Conclusions: Routine use of ClearGuard caps in pediatric dialysis centers was associated with a reduction of HD CA-BSI rates in pediatric HD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: People who use drugs are disproportionally affected by sexually transmitted and blood‐borne infections (STBBIs). While the benefits of methadone in reducing injecting‐risk behaviours are well documented, less is known on its impacts on sexual‐related risks, as well as its comparative effectiveness to buprenorphine/naloxone, particularly in the context of highly potent opioids. The aim of this study was to estimate the relative effects of buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone on injecting and STBBI risks among people with prescription‐type opioid use disorder (POUD). Methods: Secondary analysis of a pan‐Canadian pragmatic 24‐week randomized clinical trial comparing methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone models of care among 272 people with POUD (including licit or illicit opioid analgesics, fentanyl). The Risk Behaviour Survey was used to collect injecting and sexual risks at baseline, and weeks 12 and 24. Results: In total, 210 participants initiated treatment (103 buprenorphine/naloxone and 107 methadone). At baseline, 113/205 (55.1%) participants reported recently injecting drugs, 37/209 (17.7%) unsafe injection practices and 67/162 (41.4%) high‐risk sex. Both methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone were associated with reductions in the prevalence of injection drug use and high‐risk sex at weeks 12 and 24 with no interactions between treatment arm and time. Conclusion: Methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone were similarly effective in reducing injecting and sexual risk behaviours among people with POUD. Clinical Trials Registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03033732. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Nővér is the property of Chamber of Hungarian Health Care Professionals and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a significant global health burden, particularly among people who inject drugs. Rapid point-of-care HCV testing has emerged as a promising approach to improve HCV detection and linkage to care in harm reduction organizations such as needle and syringe programs. The objective of this study was to use an intersectionality lens to explore the barriers and enablers to point-of-care HCV testing in a needle and syringe program. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with clients (people who inject drugs) and service providers in a large community organization focused on the prevention of sexually transmitted and blood borne infections and harm reduction in Montreal, Canada. An intersectionality lens was used alongside the Theoretical Domains Framework to guide the formulation of research questions as well as data collection, analysis, and interpretation. Results: We interviewed 27 participants (15 clients, 12 providers). For clients, four themes emerged: (1) understanding and perceptions of HCV testing, (2) the role of an accessible and inclusive environment, (3) the interplay of emotions and motivations in decision-making, and (4) the impact of intersectional stigma related to HCV, behaviors, and identities. For providers, five themes emerged: (1) knowledge, skills, and confidence for HCV testing, (2) professional roles and their intersection with identity and lived experience, (3) resources and integration of services, (4) social and emotional factors, and (5) behavioral regulation and incentives for HCV testing. Intersectional stigma amplified access, emotional and informational barriers to HCV care for clients. In contrast, identity and lived experience acted as powerful enablers for providers in the provision of HCV care. Conclusion: The application of an intersectionality lens provides a nuanced understanding of multilevel barriers and enablers to point-of-care HCV testing. Findings underscore the need for tailored strategies that address stigma, improve provider roles and communication, and foster an inclusive environment for equitable HCV care. Using an intersectionality lens in implementation research can offer valuable insights, guiding the design of equity-focused implementation strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) remain a significant patient safety problem that can lead to illness and death, despite the implementation of clinical bundles to prevent HAIs. Management practices can support HAI prevention, but their role in HAI performance monitoring and feedback is not well understood. To address this knowledge gap, we previously conducted semi-structured interviews with staff at 18 hospitals to examine the role of management practices around the prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). Interview transcripts were analyzed to identify themes related to HAI performance monitoring and feedback. The current analysis focuses on 10 higher-performing hospitals that were successful in preventing CLABSIs and CAUTIs. These institutions had robust practices including timely event analysis, leadership engagement, and multidisciplinary participation in HAI reviews. Across these sites, we found common goals including investigating HAIs without blame and identifying opportunities for improvement. Management practices such as timely analysis of HAIs, collaboration between facility leadership and multidisciplinary team members, and a focus on identifying the failure of a procedure or protocol, rather than the failure of staff members, are all approaches that can support infection prevention efforts. These management practices may be especially important as hospitals attempt to address increases in CLABSI and CAUTI rates that may have occurred during the coronavirus pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article evaluates the efficacy of ultraviolet C (UV-C) decontamination technologies in enhancing terminal cleaning of hospital rooms, particularly in light of recent randomized controlled trials. Topics include the mixed quality of evidence supporting UV-C's impact on healthcare-associated infections, comparisons with other decontamination methods like hydrogen peroxide vapor, and the need for further research to address questions raised by recent studies on UV-C effectiveness.

High-reliability organizations aim to achieve zero harm. The clinical nurse specialist (CNS) is an advanced practiceRNwho adds value to the leadership team. The CNS is proficient in influencing care delivery across the continuum and the master of developing collaborative relationships that aid in the discovery of deficiencies in care and generation of innovative ideas to minimize deficiencies. This column provides some examples of the impact and role of the CNS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Evidence-based nursing practice can reduce complications associated with central venous catheters (CVCs). In this project, the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework was considered an ideal theoretical instrument to identify facilitators and barriers to implementing evidence-based practice. Methods: The project was conducted in pediatric intensive care units in six Chinese tertiary children's hospitals. Twenty-two audit criteria were obtained from best practice recommendations, and a baseline audit was conducted to assess current practice against best practice. Next, the i-PARIHS framework was used to identify facilitators and barriers to best practice and develop improvement strategies. A follow-up audit was then conducted to measure changes in compliance with best practices. Results: Facilitators and barriers were identified at the innovation, recipient, and context levels. A comprehensive CVC maintenance strategy was then developed to apply the best evidence to nurses' clinical work. Of the 22 audit criteria, 17 showed significant improvement compared with the baseline audit. Conclusions: The i-PARIHS framework is an effective tool for developing targeted, evidence-based improvement strategies and applying these to the clinical setting. The quality of the nurses' clinical practice improved during CVC maintenance. However, there is no certainty that these positive results can be maintained, and long-term data are needed to verify this. http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A185 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Unscheduled dressing changes for central venous lines (CVLs) have been shown to increase the risk of bloodstream infections. Objective: The objective of this study is to determine if the use of an innovative dressing change kit reduces the rate of unscheduled dressing changes. Methods: This pre–post interventional study took place at a large, academic, tertiary care center in metro Detroit, Michigan, the United States. We assessed the impact of the interventional dressing change procedure kit on the rate of unscheduled dressing changes for adult patients who underwent placement of a CVL inclusive of a central catheter, peripherally inserted central catheter, or hemodialysis catheter. Data was collected for the pre-intervention cohort through electronic health records (EHRs), while data for the post-intervention cohort were collected by direct observation by trained research staff in combination with EHR data. The primary outcome was the rate of unscheduled dressing changes. Secondary outcomes included rate of unscheduled dressing changes based on admission floor type, etiology of unscheduled dressing changes, and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Results: The study included a convenience sample of 1548 CVLs placed between May 2018 and June 2022 with a matched analysis including 488 catheters in each of the pre- and post-intervention groups. The results showed that the unadjusted rate of unscheduled dressing evaluations was significantly reduced from the pre-intervention group (0.21 per day) to the post-intervention group (0.13 per day) (p <.001). The adjusted rate ratio demonstrated the same trend at 1.00 pre- and 0.60 post-intervention (p <.001). Stratifying the analysis based on the highest level of care showed that the intervention was effective in reducing the unadjusted rate of unscheduled dressing evaluations for both the advanced and regular medical floor subgroups pre- to post-intervention; the advanced subgroup had an reduction from 0.22 to 0.15 per day (p =.001), while the regular medical floor subgroup had a reduction from 0.21 to 0.09 per day (p <.001). CLABSIs were similar in both groups (0.6% vs 0.8%; p = 1.00) in pre- and post-intervention groups, respectively. Discussion: Procedural kits for central line dressing changes are effective in reducing unscheduled dressing changes and may have a role in reducing CLABSI. Further studies assessing the impact of dressing change kits on cost, procedural compliance, and the precise impact on CLABSI are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Increased sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBI) testing can reduce the burden of disease among Two-Spirit, gay, bisexual, transgender, and other queer Black, Indigenous, people of colour (2SGBTQ+ BIPOC). However, this population encounters barriers, such as discrimination, when accessing in-person STBBI testing services. Digital STBBI testing, such as self-testing/collection kits ordered online and digital requisitions, may address some of these barriers. Our aim was to understand acceptability of free digital STBBI testing among 2SGBTQ+ BIPOC living in Ontario, Canada. We approached this analysis using Implementation Science and Critical Race Theory. We conducted interviews and focus groups with 21 2SGBTQ + BIPOC individuals from 2020–2021. Participants were asked about their perceptions of the benefits and drawbacks of digital STBBI testing, populations that would benefit from using these services, and recommendations for how these services may be implemented in Ontario. Interviews and focus groups were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Six themes emerged. Digital STBBI testing services: (1) May reduce oppression experienced by 2SGBTQ + BIPOC when testing in-person; (2) Should address the unique needs that 2SGBTQ + BIPOC experience due to other intersecting identities they possess; (3) Should adapt their services to suit the varying cultural contexts and living circumstances of 2SGBTQ + BIPOC; (4) Should be accessible to 2SGBTQ + BIPOC who hold diverse or no documentation; (5) Should be offered in multiple languages; (6) May be inaccessible to those without Internet access or devices. Digital STBBI testing is one strategy that may reduce discrimination experienced by 2SGBTQ + BIPOC when getting tested in-person. However, digital STBBI testing services may not address all the needs of 2SGBTQ + BIPOC. Racism and other forms of oppression embedded into in-person and digital testing services will need to be addressed to meet the needs of this diverse population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: Blood transfusions can be a crucial, life-saving treatment in modern medical and surgical practice. The primary objective of blood transfusion services worldwide is to guarantee the availability of a sufficient and safe supply of blood and blood products. Meticulous donor screening and use of highly sensitive techniques for the detection of transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs) may help reduce the risk of TTIs and, hence, are important steps to ensure safety for both donor and recipient. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective record-based study done at Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research. The blood donors' data from January 2012 to December 2022 (10 years) were collected from the blood bank registry at the study site and were analyzed. Results: Males dominated the donor population (98.2%) with females comprising only (1.8%). In total, 10.9% were found unfit for donation for various reasons. Voluntary donors were (6.3%) and replacement donors were (93.7%). Out of the reasons for deferral, majority 497/1223 (40.6%) donors were deferred due to hemoglobin <12.5 g/dl, followed by 156/1223 (12.8%) deferrals due to alcohol intake within the past 72 h. Conclusion: Safe donor selection is the first step toward safe transfusion services. Identification of population groups that can be targeted to enhance the pool of willing blood donors is made easier by studying and analyzing the blood donor profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Intravenous cannula-related infections are one of the leading causes of healthcare-associated infections. It leads to morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Nurses play a significant role in the prevention of these infections. Whereas in Ethiopia, there is limited information and published studies done on nurses' knowledge, practice, and associated factors and also most of other available studies done only the magnitude it lack associated factors. The purpose of this study was to assess nurses' knowledge, practice, and associated factors toward intravenous cannula-related infection prevention. Methods: An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted at Northwest Amhara Regional State Comprehensive Specialized Hospitals on May 1-30/2022. By using single population proportion formula the sample size was determined; we used a 50% proportion value (0.05), and 95% Confidence Interval 5% margin of error. A simple random sampling method was used to select 423 nurses. The data were collected by using structured pretested self-administered questionnaires. Then coded, and enter into epi-data version 4.6 and exported into the statistical package for social science version 23 for cleaning and analyzing the data. Data were presented by texts, tables, and figures. A binary logistic regression model was used to assess the association between variables. Based on the adjusted odds ratio, variables having a p-value less than 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval were used to state associated with the outcome variables. Results: A total of 412 nurses participated in this study with 97.4% response rate. The participants had good knowledge and practice in proportions of (54. 9%) and (53. 4%) respectively. Being male, working wards/units, having training, and a higher educational level were factors that were significantly associated to having good knowledge. Working wards/units, having good knowledge, training, and access to guidelines were significantly associated with performing good practice. Conclusion: The finding of this study revealed that nearly half of the nurses had poor knowledge and practice in intravenous cannula-related infection prevention. As a result, hospital administrators and other concerned stakeholders better to prepare and ensure that guidelines are available, provide training, and develop the educational levels of nurses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Situations involving increased workloads and stress (i.e., the COVID-19 pandemic) underline the need for healthcare professionals to minimize patient complications. In the field of vascular access, tunneling techniques are a possible solution. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of tunneled Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (tPICCs) to conventional Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (cPICCs) in terms of bleeding, overall success, procedural time, and late complications. Methods: Randomized controlled trials without language restrictions were searched using PUBMED®, EMBASE®, EBSCO®, CINAHL®, and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register from August 2022 to August 2023. Five relevant papers (1238 patients) were included. Results: There were no significant differences in overall success and nerve or artery injuries between the two groups (p = 0.62 and p = 0.62, respectively), although cPICCs caused slightly less bleeding (0.23 mL) and had shorter procedural times (2.95 min). On the other hand, tPICCs had a significantly reduced risk of overall complications (p < 0.001; RR0.41 [0.31–0.54] CI 95%), catheter-related thrombosis (p < 0.001; RR0.35 [0.20–0.59] IC 95%), infection-triggering catheter removal (p < 0.001; RR0.33 [0.18–0.61] IC 95%), wound oozing (p < 0.001; RR0.49 [0.37–0.64] IC 95%), and dislodgement (p < 0.001; RR0.4 [0.31–0.54] CI 95%). Conclusions: The tunneling technique for brachial access appears to be safe concerning intra-procedural bleeding, overall success, and procedural time, and it is effective in reducing the risk of late complications associated with catheterization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate the relevance of signs and symptoms for the clinical identification of ESI and TI in HD‐CVC, by means of international expert consensus, and to reach a consensus on a definition and clinical management (CM) for these infections. Background: A recent systematic review showed a high heterogeneity in the signs/symptoms used for determining exit site infection (ESI) and tunnel infection (TI) of haemodialysis central venous catheter (HD‐CVC). Design: A modified Delphi ranking process was carried out between November 2020 and March 2021, consisting of four rounds using an online questionnaire with a panel of 26 experts from 12 countries. Methods: Experts responded on the level of relevance for the identification of ESI and TI, based on a list of 22 signs/symptoms obtained from a previous systematic review, using a 4‐point Likert‐type scale. After reaching consensus on the signs/symptoms, they followed the same method to reach consensus on the CM. The STROBE Checklist was used to report this study. Results: A high degree of consensus was reached to identify the presence of ESI based on nine signs/symptoms: presence of pain at the exit site (ES) during interdialysis period, with fever ≥38°C do not suspect other cause, local signs at the ES (inflammation, induration, swelling, hyperemia/erythema ≥2 cm from ES) and obvious abscess or purulent exudate at ES; and of TI. Likewise, 5 cm were agreed upon. Conclusion: This Delphi study provides international expert consensus definitions of ESI and TI in HD‐CVC, laying the groundwork for the validation of an HD‐CVC ES clinical assessment scale for early identification of ESI. Relevance to Clinical Practice: In addition, this study provides a series of attitudes to consensual clinics regarding signs/symptoms of local infections in HD‐CVC, which may be useful as expert opinion in clinical practice guidelines, when there is insufficient scientific evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Central venous access devices (CVADs), including peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and cuffed tunnelled catheters, play a crucial role in modern medicine by providing reliable access for medication and treatments directly into the bloodstream. However, these vital medical devices also pose a significant risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) alongside associated complications such as thrombosis or catheter occlusion. To mitigate these risks, healthcare providers employ various strategies, including the use of locking solutions in combination with meticulous care and maintenance protocols. KiteLock 4% catheter lock is a solution designed to combat the triple threat of infection, occlusion and biofilm. This locking solution is described as the only locking solution to provide cover for all three complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In patients with central venous catheters (CVCs) in situ, the development of catheter‐related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) is often linked with increased morbidity and mortality. Sterile gauze or transparent polyurethane dressings are conventionally used as extraluminal barriers; however, antimicrobial chlorhexidine CVC dressings could potentially reduce infection risk. This short evidence‐based review examined the literature comparing the effectiveness of chlorhexidine‐based CVC dressings against non‐chlorhexidine dressings in reducing CRBSI occurrence. Four systematic reviews with meta‐analysis were reviewed, all of which reported a statistically significant reduction in CRBSI occurrence on using chlorhexidine‐based dressings. Further research is needed to determine the cost‐effectiveness of chlorhexidine‐based CVC dressings and their effectiveness in reducing CRBSIs in different catheter types and entry sites because infection risk is not uniform. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is a major need to improve the knowledge and practice of critical care nurses in India regarding central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), which is a serious potential complication of total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Objectives: To develop and validate a skills competency programme; assess knowledge and practice of critical care nurses regarding prevention of CLABSI due to TPN administration; evaluate the effectiveness of the programme; find correlation between knowledge and practice scores. Design: Quasi-experimental: non-equivalent pre-test post-test design. Settings: Two hospitals in Meerut, India. Participants: 80 nurses (40 in the control group in one hospital, 40 in the experimental group in another hospital). Inclusion criteria: staff nurses from critical care units only, who were present at the time of data collection and willing to participate. Exclusion criteria: staff nurses with <6 months' work experience. Method: Knowledge was assessed using a structured knowledge questionnaire and interpretation scoring. To assess practice, the OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) method was used with four stations and interpretation scoring. The skills-competency programme was delivered to the experimental group only. The post test was conducted with both groups. Results: The post-test knowledge and practice scores in the control group were: mean=12.55; SD=2.57 and mean=21.82; SD= 5.13 respectively. In the experimental group, the post-test knowledge and practice scores were: mean=23.75; SD=1.75 and mean=38.9; SD=2.02 respectively. The unpaired t-test in post-test knowledge between the control and experimental groups was t=22.78, with P=0.0001 at df 39, 0.05 level of significance, 95% CI; for posttest practice the results were, t=19.59, with P=0.0001 at df 39, 0.05 level of significance, 95% CI. Correlation between post-test knowledge and the practice score was r=0.7 (P<0.05), 95% CI. Conclusion: There was a significant difference in post-test knowledge and practice scores, therefore, the skills competency programme was effective. It also highlighted areas that institutions should focus on for effective training and professional development programmes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tunneled central venous hemodialysis catheters have higher infection rates compared to other access devices. Recommendations for dressing changes of these catheters are to apply povidone iodine (PI) or a triple antibiotic ointment during catheter dressing changes. Growing evidence supports using chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) dressings to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients with short-term central venous catheters. This quality improvement project studied whether dressing changes with PI ointment in tunneled dialysis catheters was equivalent to CHG-impregnated dressings in preventing vascular access infections (VAIs). Standardized education was required for all nurses and dialysis technicians working at four dialysis centers. VAIs were measured before and after the change. Results showed that CHG is equivalent to PI ointment in preventing VAI in tunneled dialysis catheters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In 2016, a 263-bed public district hospital in California trialed a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) inserted using ultrasound, with the potential to increase first attempt success in difficult intravenous access (DIVA) patients. This led to the implementation of a hospital-wide initiative to improve nursing vascular access skills and expedite vascular access device (VAD) placement. Methods: To trial a PIVC and ultrasound-guided (USG) insertion, a training program was developed and led to a doctoral Capstone project piloting an evidence-based nurse-driven protocol for the identification of DIVA patients. A Vascular Access Committee was established to achieve vascular access excellence throughout the hospital by increasing the number of nurses with advanced skills in VAD placement and by developing a central venous access device (CVAD) insertion and maintenance bundle to decrease the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). With ongoing support of nursing leadership and achievement of ANCC Magnet Recognition® in 2021, the hospital developed a comprehensive initiative to provide patients with a consistent level of nursing expertise for VAD placement across all shifts. Results: Requests for USGPIVCs increased throughout the hospital, DIVA patients themselves requested ultrasound guidance be used for PIVC insertions, and there were fewer requests for Emergency Department (ED) physicians to insert CVADs. From the related Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Capstone project, there were higher first-attempt cannulation successes, longer PIVC dwell times, and a reduction in devices and supplies utilized. The CVAD bundles resulted in the number of central line-associated bloodstream infections decreasing from four in 2019 to one in 2020. Since the initiative's inception, a total of 92 nurses completed the USGPIVC insertion training, and patient access to advanced-skilled clinicians is now available around the clock. Discussion: This manuscript discusses the initiative implemented to standardize patient care through a collaborative multidisciplinary approach and has potential generalizability to other acute care hospitals to reduce associated healthcare costs and to prevent poor patient outcomes by expediting the arrival of a vascular access nurse for DIVA patients. Conclusion: The vascular access excellence initiative implemented provided an effective strategy to enhance the skills and confidence of nurses in VAD placement and improved efficiency in processes to expedite the arrival of an advanced skilled nurse to place VADs on DIVA. Targeted educational initiatives improved patient outcomes by reducing catheter-related bloodstream infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

HIGHLIGHTS: CLABSIs are a major concern in both the adult and pediatric patient population. Contamination of catheter hubs is a common cause of CLABSI. A novel, transparent line guard protects CVAD hubs from gross contamination. Central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs) are a serious and potentially deadly complication in patients with a central venous access device (CVAD). CVADs play an essential role in modern medicine, serving as lifelines for many patients. To maintain safe and stable venous access, infection prevention bundles are used to help protect patients from complications such as CLABSI. Despite most CLABSIs being preventable, rates have been on the rise, often disproportionately impacting critically ill children. New solutions are needed to strengthen infection prevention bundles and protect CVADs from pathogen entry at catheter hubs and line connections. A novel, Food and Drug Administration–listed device has become available recently to guard CVADs from sources of gross contamination, addressing this apparent gap in infection prevention technology and practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Currently, there is no instrument available to assess intensive care unit (ICU) nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of central line--associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention practices. Purpose: To develop and validate a CLABSI questionnaire to measure ICU nurses' KAP (CLABSI-KAP-Q). Methods: Data were collected from 255 nurses at 4 hospitals in Gansu Province, China. Questions on the CLABSI-KAP-Q were generated through a review of the literature, interviews with nurses, and multiple rounds of content validity evaluation by experts. The validity and reliability of the CLABSI-KAP-Q were assessed with exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, and correlation coefficients. Results: The final version of the CLABSI-KAP-Q consisted of 32 items. The reliability was represented by a Cronbach α of 0.946, while the test-retest reliability was 0.945. The overall content validity was 0.95. Conclusions: The CLABSI-KAP-Q is shown to be valid and reliable and recommended for use in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

From January to April 2020, the average rate of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in the pediatric intensive care unit was 8.7%, which was higher than the standard threshold of 4% in the hospital. A clinical survey found that the completion rate of the central venous catheter care bundle was only 77%. Therefore, this project aimed to improve the completion rate of central catheter combined care. The main reasons for the low completion rate include: insufficient awareness of central catheter combined care; insufficient accessibility and availability of catheter placement-related materials; and lack of audit for central venous catheter care bundle. During the project period from June 2020 to January 2021, intervention focused on the three major areas of cognition, affect and skills as the core, combined with E-oriented education, planning on-the-job education, setting up catheter disinfection boxes and exclusive vehicles, and establishing an audit system. The intervention resulted in the completion rate of central catheter combined care reaching 100%, the correct rate of nursing cognition increased from 84.3% to 98.3%, and the CLABSI decreased from 8.7% to 3.8%. In addition to improve the quality of care and infection control, the project united the medical team and promoted work efficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The future of Indigenous STBBI (sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections) research must address the unique needs of diverse First Nations, Inuit, and Métis (FNIM) communities across Canada. This requires the expansion of culturally responsive research approaches centred on FNIM ways of being, knowing, and doing. The Feast Centre for Indigenous STBBI Research (Feast Centre) is dedicated to expanding the use of FNIM research methods in response to the unique needs of distinct Indigenous communities and foregrounds the voices of Indigenous Peoples living with or affected by STBBI. Indigenous Peoples in Canada experience higher rates of STBBI compared to other populations, and this is linked to significant health disparities, meaning that conventional public health approaches are not meeting the needs of Indigenous communities. Canada's colonial health policies sustain health disparities through a lack of culturally responsive approaches to STBBI prevention, treatment, and care. In this article we examine Indigenous STBBI initiatives foundational to the Feast Centre by focusing on the outcomes of a CAAN Communities, Alliances & Networks–led national Indigenous community consultation, the findings of the project's Indigenous HIV and AIDS scoping review, and vital theoretical insights from Indigenous STBBI literature. We provide key recommendations that emphasize culturally responsive approaches to STBBI research that strive to meet community-identified needs while cultivating the inherent strengths of FNIM communities. We envision these key recommendations within the theoretical framework of Indigenous futurisms in ways that reconceptualize Indigenous STBBI research through cultural strengths and offer guidance for the direction of future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and objectives: Bloodstream infections are common in critically ill patients using central venous access devices (CVAD) in intensive care units (ICU). This project aimed to decrease the incidence of central lineassociated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) by using evidence-based strategies. Methods: The project applied the JBI audit and feedback methods. Thirty-two nurses and five resident physicians from the medical ICU of a medical center participated in the project. Preintervention compliance was measured for the 11 key evidence-based criteria (six audit criteria of central venous catheter insertion and five audit criteria of dressing and catheter securement). Strategies were implemented to overcome the barriers identified in the baseline assessment. Impact evaluation and sustainability were conducted to change the CLABSI rate and the competence of healthcare professionals in providing CVAD care. The JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System and Getting Research into Practice audit tools were used for the data collection, analysis, and implementation planning. Results: Barriers included insufficient knowledge among nurses and physicians, poor compliance with the standard CVAD insertion procedure by physicians, inadequate cooperation among the CVAD care team members, and lack of CVAD-related equipment. The strategies included education and training in CVAD care, the establishment of a team resource management program, and the provision of appropriate equipment. Following project implementation, the CLABSI rate decreased from 8.38 to 3.9 BSIs/1000 CVAD-days. Conclusions: The project successfully decreased the CLABSI rate and increased the competence of healthcare professionals. Implementation of best practices in clinical care should focus on leadership, team resource management, education, monitoring, and innovation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim/Objections: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a central line maintenance bundle in preventing catheter-related (implanted venous access devices, port) Candida bloodstream infections. Methods: The study encompassed two distinct time periods, namely, pre-bundle and bundle. The number of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) episodes per catheter days for each timeframe was determined. Findings/Results: Upon implementation of the central line bundle, the rate of CRBSI reduced significantly from 4.27 per 1000 central line days in the pre-bundle period to 1.0 per 1000 central line days in the bundle period (p <.001). Discussion: Using a central line bundle to avoid CRBSIs in pediatric cancer patients with ports led to a significant decrease in Candida species-related CRBSIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients admitted to critical care need timely interventions after evaluating all clinical parameters. This study aims to assess the impact of the comprehensive rounding checklist on physician compliance and patient-related outcomes in a multidisciplinary pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Subjects and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in two phases over period of 2 months at multidisciplinary PICU from Pakistan. A structured rounding checklist of 35 components encompassing patient care was introduced and implemented in the PICU. During the preimplementation phase, a nurse took notes of relevant patient clinical details missed by the physician during the round, included them in the rounding checklist. And during the implementation phase, the nurse actively intervened when a physician did not discuss a particular component during the round. All components discussed were check marked. Results: The checklist was completed for 812 rounds (162 patients) in preimplementation and 2348 rounds (590 patients) in the postimplementation phase. Most frequently missed components in the preimplementation phase were checking for surgical site infection (8.9%), discharge plan (7.5%), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis (7.3%), and ventilator-associated pneumonia bundles (7.0%). Whereas, during the postimplementation phase, resident teaching (8.0%), discharge plan (7.2%), and DVT prophylaxis (6.5%) were most frequently missed. Hospital length of stay decreased from 4.5 ± 3.7 to 4.1 ± 2.9 days (P = 0.05), and overall mortality decreased from 19% to 11.4% (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Introducing the checklist with a prompter, improved physician compliance and patient-related outcomes in our PICU. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Central venous catheters (CVCs) support the administration of chemotherapy and other medications, blood products, fluids, and nutrient infusions, and reduce the need for peripheral blood sampling in children with cancer. CVC use is also associated with the risk of central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). Despite the implementation of CLABSI care bundles, CLABSI prevention remains challenging. Method: This project implemented supportive preventive care interventions to decrease CLABSI in pediatric hematology/oncology patients in a tertiary hospital in the Middle East region. Interventions included bathing or skin care once daily, oral care twice daily, and ambulating patients three times daily. Parent and staff education materials were developed. The project moniker was Step 1-2-3, inspired by successful implementations of such measures in a U.S. cohort showing reduced CLABSI rates. The project used a mixed methods approach. We report outcomes through August 2022. Results: Pre-project (12/2019–05/2020) five CLABSIs occurred in the inpatient unit. Following the implementation of Step 1-2-3, Pediatric Oncology achieved 492 CLABSI-free days. Six CLABSIs then occurred over a short period of time between October 2021 and January 2022, which was associated with high levels of patient acuity and staff sick leave. The inpatient ward remained CLABSI-free from January 9, 2022, through August 2022. Discussion: Extended periods of CLABSI-free care in a pediatric hematology/oncology unit are achievable. A variety of factors contribute to the sustainability of being CLABSI-free. Data collection and analysis are important factors which aided in our understanding of our own CLABSI events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the rates of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), its etiology, and risk factors in critically ill patients, because Slovakia was one of the countries experiencing a high burden of COVID-19 infections, and hospitals faced greater challenges in preventing and managing CLABSI; (2) Methods: A retrospective analysis of CLABSI data from all patients admitted to adult respiratory intensive care units before and during COVID-19 pandemic was conducted. We followed the guidelines of the Center for Disease Control surveillance methodology for CLABSI. Data were analyzed using STATISTICA 13.1; (3) Results: We analyzed the data of 803 ICU patients hospitalized for 8385 bed days, with 7803 central line days. Forty-five CLABSI events were identified. The CLABSI rate significantly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to before the COVID-19 pandemic (2.81 versus 7.47 events per 1000 central line days, (p < 0.001). The most frequently identified pathogens causing CLABSI were Gram-negative organisms (60.20%). The risk factors found to increase the probability of developing CLABSI were length of stay (OR = 1.080; 95% Cl: 1.057–1.103; p < 0.001) and COVID-19 (OR = 5.485; 95% Cl: 32.706–11.116; p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increases in CLABSI in ICUs. These data underscore the need to increase efforts in providing surveillance of CLABSI and implementing infection prevention measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE Parenteral nutrition (PN) has been shown to be a safe method of feeding in the intensive care unit with modern infection prevention practices, but similar analysis in the hematology-oncology setting is lacking. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 1,617 patients with hematologic malignancies admitted and discharged from the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania during 3,629 encounters from 2017 to 2019 was undertaken to evaluate the association of PN administration with risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). Proportions of mucosal barrier injury (MBI)-CLABSI and non-MBI-CLABSI were also compared between groups. RESULTS Risk of CLABSI was associated with cancer type and duration of neutropenia but not with PN administration (odds ratio, 1.015; 95% CI, 0.986 to 1.045; P = .305) in a multivariable analysis. MBI-CLABSI comprised 73% of CLABSI in patients exposed to and 70% in patients not exposed to PN, and there was no significant difference between groups (≤ = 0.06, P = .800). CONCLUSION PN was not associated with increased risk of CLABSI in a sample of patients with hematologic malignancy with central venous catheters when adjusting for cancer type, duration of neutropenia, and catheter days. The high proportion of MBI-CLABSI highlights the effect of gut permeability within this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Staphylococcus aureus is a global pathogen that is frequently responsible for healthcare-associated infections, including surgical site infections (SSIs). Current infection prevention and control approaches may be limited, with S. aureus antibiotic resistance remaining problematic. Thus, a vaccine to prevent or reduce S. aureus infection is critically needed. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of an investigational 4-antigen S. aureus vaccine (SA4Ag) in adults undergoing elective open posterior spinal fusion procedures with multilevel instrumentation. Methods In this multicenter, site-level, randomized, double-blind trial, patients aged 18–85 years received a single dose of SA4Ag or placebo 10–60 days before surgery. SA4Ag efficacy in preventing postoperative S. aureus bloodstream infection and/or deep incisional or organ/space SSIs was the primary end point. Safety evaluations included local reactions, systemic events, and adverse events (AEs). Immunogenicity and colonization were assessed. Results Study enrollment was halted when a prespecified interim efficacy analysis met predefined futility criteria. SA4Ag showed no efficacy (0.0%) in preventing postoperative S. aureus infection (14 cases in each group through postoperative day 90), despite inducing robust functional immune responses to each antigen compared with placebo. Colonization rates across groups were similar through postoperative day 180. Local reactions and systemic events were mostly mild or moderate in severity, with AEs reported at similar frequencies across groups. Conclusions In patients undergoing elective spinal fusion surgical procedures, SA4Ag was safe and well tolerated but, despite eliciting substantial antibody responses that blocked key S. aureus virulence mechanisms, was not efficacious in preventing S. aureus infection. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02388165. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Central line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are a common, preventable healthcare–associated infection. In our 3-hospital health system, CLABSI rates in non-intensive care unit (ICU) settings were above the internal target rate of zero. A robust quality improvement (QI) project to reduce non-ICU CLABSIs was undertaken by a team of Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP)-prepared nurse leaders enrolled in a post-DNP Quality Implementation Scholars program and 2 QI experts. Based on a review of the literature and local root cause analyses, the QI team implemented the evidence-based practice of using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) cloths for daily bathing for non-ICU patients with a central line. Methods: A pre-post-design was used for this QI study. CHG bathing was implemented using multifaceted educational strategies that included an e-learning module, printed educational materials, educational outreach, engagement of unit-based CLABSI champions, and an electronic reminder in the electronic health record. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to assess the change in CLABSI rates before and after implementation of CHG bathing. CLABSI rates were also tracked using statistical process control (SPC) charts to monitor stability over time. CHG bathing documentation compliance was audited as a process measure. These audit data were provided to unit-based leadership (nurse managers and clinical team leaders) on a monthly basis. A Qualtrics survey was also disseminated to nursing leadership to evaluate their satisfaction with the CHG bathing implementation processes. Results: Thirty-four non-ICU settings participated in the QI study, including general medical/surgical units and specialty areas (oncology, neurosciences, cardiac, orthopedic, and pediatrics). While the change in CLABSI rates after the intervention was not statistically significant (b = −0.35, P =.15), there was a clinically significant CLABSI rate reduction of 22.8%. Monitoring the SPC charts demonstrated that CLABSI rates remained stable after the intervention at all 3 hospitals as well as the health system. CHG bathing documentation compliance increased system-wide from 77% (January 2020) to 94% (February 2021). Overall, nurse leaders were satisfied with the CHG bathing implementation process. Conclusions: To sustain this practice change in non-ICU settings, booster sessions will be completed at least on an annual basis. This study provides further support for using CHG cloths for daily patient bathing in the non-ICU setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control established the central line maintenance care bundle in 2011, yet nurses' adherence to all seven components remains challenging. The specific aim of this study was to explore and understand intensive care nurses' perceptions and beliefs regarding central line maintenance, bundle care elements, and associated adherence. This qualitative study used a phenomenological approach. Three main themes emerged as follows: (1) thoughts about the ability to adhere to the central line bundle created feelings about central line maintenance care, (2) feelings about the nurses' ability to adhere to the central line bundle influenced behaviors, and (3) behaviors for central line bundle adherence reinforced thoughts. Each theme had several subthemes. Organizations must assess and mitigate the unique cognitive and behavioral factors that affect nurses' adherence to the central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) maintenance bundle. In addition, nursing adherence requires knowledge of CLABSI rates and direct care nurse involvement in identifying solutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the tasks of emergency nurses in infection prevention and control in emergency departments (ED) in the U.K. Topics covered include the main pathogens linked to infection, and the importance of reducing their transmission risk to lessen the hospital stay, mortality and morbidity of patients and improving their experience. Also noted are the antimicrobial stewardship responsibility of all clinicians, and the emergency nurse's role in implementing them.

Background: Central line–associated bloodstream infection is a preventable contributor to excess death and excess cost in the health care system. Vasopressor infusion is one of the primary reasons for central line placement. In the medical intensive care unit (MICU) at an academic medical center, there was no standard practice for peripheral versus central infusion of vasopressors. Objective: The objective of this quality improvement project was to implement an evidence-based, nurse-driven protocol to guide the peripheral infusion of vasopressors. The goal was to reduce central line utilization by 10%. Methods: Education on the protocol was provided to the MICU nurses, MICU residents, and crisis nurses, followed by a 16-week implementation period. Nursing staff were also surveyed preimplementation and postimplementation of the protocol. Results: Central line utilization was reduced by 37.9%, and there were no central line–associated bloodstream infections recorded during project implementation. Most of the nursing staff indicated that use of the protocol increased their confidence in administering vasopressors without a central line. No significant extravasation events occurred. Discussion: Although a causal link between implementation of this protocol and reduction of central line utilization cannot be established, the reduction is clinically meaningful given the known risks of central lines. Increased nursing staff confidence also provides support for continued use of the protocol. Conclusion: A nurse-driven protocol to guide the peripheral infusion of vasopressors can be effectively implemented into nursing practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Central line‐associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) have been a significant challenge in care, increasing healthcare costs and leading to adverse outcomes, including mortality. Aim: The present study aimed to assess the knowledge of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses on the prevention of CLABSI and the implementation barriers of evidence‐based guidelines in practice. Design: A cross‐sectional study. Methods: Data were collected from adult, paediatric, and neonatal ICU nurses working in seven hospitals in Iran, using census sampling from April to July 2020. Results: A number 209 out of 220 ICU nurses participated in the present study (response rate of 95%). The median score of knowledge of ICU nurses towards the prevention of CLABSI was 3.00 out of 11. 50.72% of ICU nurses had insufficient knowledge. The most critical implementation barriers of evidence‐based guidelines were high workload, shortage of necessary equipment, and lack of CLABSI prevention workshops. Conclusions: Overall, the knowledge of ICU nurses towards the prevention of CLABSI was insufficient. Study findings suggest that the knowledge of ICU nurses may be improved by reducing the workload, increasing the number of nursing staff in the ICU, having an adequate supply of equipment needed to ensure safe practice in the ICU, and providing regular related educational workshops for nurses working in the ICU. Relevance to Clinical Practice: The present study's findings suggest that regular training programs should be developed to improve the knowledge of ICU nurses in the care and prevention of CLABSI. Nursing policymakers and managers need to identify and address implementation barriers of evidence‐based guidelines to improve nursing, such as high workload, shortage of necessary equipment, and lack of CLABSI prevention workshops. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article explores ways to achieve positive clinical outcomes and prevent intravenous catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) using guidance and evidence-based practice for the care and maintenance of vascular access devices (VAD). Topics discussed are morbidity and mortality caused by CRBSIs, economic burden posed by CRBSI, sources of contamination that lead to CRBSI, and best practice strategies to prevent CRBSI and VAD infection such as hand hygiene and aseptic non-touch technique.

The article describes cases that illustrate the use of BD ChloraPrep and BD PosiFlush Prefilled Saline Syringe in adult and paediatric patients. A 65-year old man with metastatic colorectal cancer had a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placed for his chemotherapy. A 48-year old woman with bladder cancer was admitted for PICC replacement. A 13-year old girl with acute myeloid leukemia required peripheral intravenous cannula for contrast media administration for computed tomography.

Background and aim: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a global threat spreading like a wildfire and taking the world by its storm. It has challenged the healthcare delivery systems and disrupted them in a way no one ever imagined before. We at Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India received many patients in the COVID critical care unit (CCU) and found a gradual lack of bundle care compliance resulting in an upsurge of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) amid the patients. Materials and methods: A qualitative research approach and quasi-experimental research design were selected to assess the knowledge of the 150 frontline COVID CCU nurses regarding the CLABSI bundle and its prevention strategies. Results: This study revealed that 57% [mean (M) = 12.6; standard deviation (SD) = 2.37] of nurses had inadequate knowledge of the CLABSI bundle and its prevention strategies, in the pretest and scored 80% (M = 6.7; SD = 2.28) in the post-test, with "t" = 22.06 at p < 0.00001 after the hands-on training. The percentage of compliance to CLABSI bundle care increased to 83% and thereafter in an increasing trend. This was clearly evident through the reduction in the preventable CLABSI rate among critically ill COVID-19 patients. Conclusion: Nurses are on the frontline in preventing and controlling healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Fighting with all the visible and invisible challenges, our research focused on hands-on training for frontline warriors to adhere to the CLABSI bundle care which drove us to the reduction in preventable CLABSI rate in our hospital through improved CLABSI bundle compliance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs) remain a major threat to the patients receiving blood. The incidence of the transmission of various infectious agents has reduced ever since the introduction of various molecular techniques for detection. Aims: The study tried to figure out accurate estimates of risk and trend of TTI over a period of sixteen years, essential for monitoring the safety of blood supply and evaluating the efficacy of the currently employed screening procedures. Methods and Material: A total of 57942 blood donors' records were analyzed for the period from January 2001 to December 2016. Chi-square test (Χ2) was used to evaluate the relationship between serological positivity and particular donor characteristics. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 57942 donations, overall prevalence of TTI was 2.7%. Of these, the reactivity rate of hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C, HIV, syphilis, and malaria was 1.8%, 0.42%, 0.2%, 0.31%, and 0.017%, respectively with significant P value (P < 0.05, CI: 95%). Overall prevalence was higher in replacement donors as compared to voluntary blood donors. Trend of TTI prevalence decreased from 2001 to 2016. Conclusions: This epidemiological research on TTI is important for the region, as estimated disease burden based on comprehensive epidemiological research provides the foundation for public policy to ensure an easily accessible and adequate supply of safe and quality blood and blood components to the needy patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]