Frush, Donald Paul, Vassileva, Jenia, Brambilla, Marco, Mahesh, Mahadevappa, Rehani, Madan, Samei, Ehsan, Applegate, Kimberly, Bourland, John, Ciraj-Bjenlac, Olivera, Dahlstrom, Danielle, Gershan, Vesna, Gilligan, Paddy, Godthelp, Barbara, Hjemly, Hakon, Kainberger, Franz, Mikhail-Lette, Miriam, Holmberg, Ola, Paez, Diana, Schrandt, Suz, and Valentin, Andreas
Medical imaging is both valuable and essential in the care of patients. Much of this imaging depends on ionizing radiation with attendant responsibilities for judicious use when performing an examination. This responsibility applies in settings of both individual as well as multiple (recurrent) imaging with associated repeated radiation exposures. In addressing the roles and responsibilities of the medical communities in the paradigm of recurrent imaging, both the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) have issued position statements, each affirmed by other organizations. The apparent difference in focus and approach has resulted in a lack of clarity and continued debate. Aiming towards a coherent approach in dealing with radiation exposure in recurrent imaging, the IAEA convened a panel of experts, the purpose of which was to identify common ground and reconcile divergent perspectives. The effort has led to clarifying recommendations for radiation exposure aspects of recurrent imaging, including the relevance of patient agency and the provider-patient covenant in clinical decision-making. Clinical relevance statement: An increasing awareness, generating some lack of clarity and divergence in perspectives, with patients receiving relatively high radiation doses (e.g., ≥ 100 mSv) from recurrent imaging warrants a multi-stakeholder accord for the benefit of patients, providers, and the imaging community. Key Points: • Recurrent medical imaging can result in an accumulation of exposures which exceeds 100 milli Sieverts. • Professional organizations have different perspectives on roles and responsibilities for recurrent imaging. • An expert panel reconciles differing perspectives for addressing radiation exposure from recurrent medical imaging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]