Search

RESUMEN : Introducción: La carcinomatosis peritoneal es una manifestación en etapa tardía de varias neoplasias malignas gastrointestinales o ginecológicas, que tienen el potencial de diseminarse y crecer en la cavidad peritoneal. Su consideración como fase terminal ha cambiado gracias al tratamiento con cirugía citorreductora y su asociación con HIPEC, que ha supuesto un aumento significativo en la supervivencia de estos pacientes. El Índice de Carcinomatosis Peritoneal preoperatorio mediante pruebas de imagen es el método objetivo más utilizado para medir la extensión de la carcinomatosis y así poder seleccionar los pacientes subsidiarios de tratamiento curativo. Objetivos: Analizar la fiabilidad de los Índices de Carcinomatosis Peritoneal radiológicos como método de estadiaje preoperatorio de la carcinomatosis peritoneal. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes con diagnóstico de carcinomatosis peritoneal subsidiarios de intervención quirúrgica tratados en el Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla de Santander, durante el período 2015-2021, ambos inclusive. Resultados: se incluyeron un total de 108 pacientes (98 mujeres y 10 hombres), siendo la carcinomatosis en su mayoría de origen ovárico (71) y colorrectal (21). La resonancia magnética fue superior a la tomografía computarizada con una correlación más fuerte en la estimación del índice de carcinomatosis peritoneal quirúrgico (moderada frente a baja). Únicamente la RM para la carcinomatosis de origen colónico y el TC para la carcinomatosis de origen apendicular presentaron una correlación alta con los hallazgos obtenidos posteriormente durante la exploración quirúrgica. Las pruebas de imagen fueron informadas por un elevado número de radiólogos diferentes (21). Conclusiones: En nuestro hospital, los resultados de las pruebas de diagnóstico por imagen para estadiaje preoperatorio de pacientes con carcinomatosis peritoneal no se correlacionan adecuadamente con los hallazgos detectados durante la intervención quirúrgica. ABSTRACT : Introduction: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a late-stage manifestation of various gastrointestinal or gynecological malignancies, which have the potential to spread and grow in the peritoneal cavity. Its consideration as terminal phase has changed thanks to treatment with cytoreductive surgery and its association with HIPEC, which has led to a significant increase in the survival of these patients. The preoperative Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index by means of imaging tests is the most widely used objective method to measure the extent of carcinomatosis and thus be able to select patients who are eligible for curative treatment. Objectives: To analyze the reliability of radiological Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Indices as a method of preoperative staging of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Material and methods: Retrospective study of patients diagnosed with peritoneal carcinomatosis who underwent surgical intervention at the Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital in Santander, during the period 2015-2021, both inclusive. Results: A total of 108 patients (98 women and 10 men) were included, with carcinomatosis being mostly of ovarian (71) and colorectal (21) origin. Magnetic resonance imaging was superior to computed tomography with a stronger correlation in estimating the rate of surgical peritoneal carcinomatosis index (moderate vs low). Only MRI for carcinomatosis of colonic origin and CT for carcinomatosis of appendiceal origin showed a high correlation with the findings obtained later during surgical exploration. Imaging tests were reported by a large number of different radiologists (21). Conclusions: In our hospital, the results of diagnostic imaging tests for preoperative staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis do not correlate adequately with the findings detected during surgery. Grado en Medicina

BackgroundComplete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the only curative treatment for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) arising from the appendix. High peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) is associated with an increased risk of surgical complications. The objective of this study was to present the results of a planned two-step surgical strategy to decrease postoperative morbidity and improve resectability of patients with very high PCI.MethodsAll consecutive patients who underwent a planned two-step surgical approach for PMP between January 2012 and March 2020 were retrospectively included. This approach was offered for patients with low-grade PMP with PCI > 28 for which feasibility of a complete CRS in one operation was uncertain. The first surgery included a complete CRS of the inframesocolic compartment and omentectomy. HIPEC was delivered at the second surgery, after complete CRS of the supramesocolic compartment. Postoperative morbidity was assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification and survival results were also collected.ResultsEight patients underwent the two-step approach. The median PCI was 33 (29–39) and the median time between the two procedures was 111 days (90–212 days). One patient was deemed unresectable at the second surgery. The rate of major morbidity was 0% for the first step and 25% for the second step, with no mortality. Median follow-up was 53.8 months (3–73 months).ConclusionA two-step surgical management for low-grade PMP patients with very high PCI is safe and feasible, with acceptable postoperative morbidity and no compromise on oncological outcomes.

Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment in patients with peritoneal metastases is complex. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are under debate. The aim of this study was to assess the consensus among international experts for decision-making regarding CRS/HIPEC in CRC patients. Materials and methods Twelve of 15 experts provided their decision algorithms for CRS/HIPEC for patients with or at high risk for peritoneal metastases from CRC. Based on the objective consensus methodology, the results were transformed into decision trees, which then provided information on the consensus and discordance. Results There was only one scenario in which the consensus on performing HIPEC reached 100%, which was when treating young patients with complete cytoreduction and a peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) of less than 16 in the presence of certain risk factors (RFs). Five major decision criteria were identified and displayed: age, PCI, completeness of cytoreduction (CC), extent of extraperitoneal metastases (EoM) and, in the case of nonverified extraperitoneal metastases, further RFs. There was consensus to refrain from using HIPEC in older patients with a high PCI, and the consensus further increased when addressing incomplete cytoreduction and extensive EoM. Conclusion A definite consensus concerning the use of HIPEC was only determined for very selected scenarios. These findings can be used for general guidance, but due to the heterogeneity of each individual situation and the impracticality to present this information through decision trees, as well as the unclear future of the role of HIPEC in the adjuvant setting, a one-on-one transfer to daily clinical practice cannot be achieved.

This study aimed to describe short- and medium-term longitudinal quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Consecutive patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC were recruited. The primary outcome was QoL, measured using the short-form 36 questionnaire and expressed as a physical component score (PCS) and a mental component score (MCS), with higher scores representing better QoL. Data were collected prospectively at baseline and before discharge, then 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Trajectories of the PCS and MCS were described for the study period and grouped according to a peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) (≤ 12 vs. ≥ 13) and a completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score (CC0 vs. CC1–CC3). Overall, 117 patients underwent CRS and HIPEC and 115 (98.3%) of the 117 patients participated in the study. The main primary pathology was colorectal in 52 (45%) of the 115 patients and appendiceal in 27 (23.5%) of the 115 patients. The median baseline PCS [48.16; interquartile range (IQR), 38.6–54.9] had decreased at pre-discharge (35.34; IQR, 28.7–41.8), then increased slightly at 3 months (42.54; IQR, 37.6–51.6), before returning to baseline within 6 months (48.35; IQR, 39.1–52.5) and remaining unchanged 12 months after surgery (48.55; IQR, 40.8–55.5). The MCS remained unchanged during the study period. The patients with a PCI of 13 or higher had worse PCS and MCS during the postoperative period than the patients with a PCI of 12 or lower. The CRS and HIPEC procedures impaired PCS, with scores returning to baseline within 6 months after surgery, whereas MCS remained unchanged. The patients with a lower PCI had better postoperative QoL outcomes. For patients with peritoneal malignancy, CRS and HIPEC can be performed with acceptable short- to medium-term QoL outcomes.

Background: The Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) and the Intra-operative Mapping for Ovarian Cancer (IMO), to a lesser extent, have been universally validated in advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) to describe the extent of peritoneal dissemination and are proven to be powerful predictors of the surgical outcome with an added sensitivity of assessment at laparotomy of around 70%. This leaves room for improvement because the two-dimensional anatomic scoring model fails to reflect the patient’s real anatomy, as seen by a surgeon. We hypothesized that tumor dissemination in specific anatomic locations can be more predictive of complete cytoreduction (CC0) and survival than PCI and IMO tools in EOC patients. (2) Methods: We analyzed prospectively data collected from 508 patients with FIGO-stage IIIB-IVB EOC who underwent cytoreductive surgery between January 2014 and December 2019 at a UK tertiary center. We adapted the structured ESGO ovarian cancer report to provide detailed information on the patterns of tumor dissemination (cancer anatomic fingerprints). We employed the extreme gradient boost (XGBoost) to model only the variables referring to the EOC disseminated patterns, to create an intra-operative score and judge the predictive power of the score alone for complete cytoreduction (CC0). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were then used for performance comparison between the new score and the existing PCI and IMO tools. We applied the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) framework to support the feature selection of the narrated cancer fingerprints and provide global and local explainability. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression. (3) Results: An intra-operative disease score was developed based on specific weights assigned to the cancer anatomic fingerprints. The scores range from 0 to 24. The XGBoost predicted CC0 resection (area under curve (AUC) = 0.88 CI = 0.854–0.913) with high accuracy. Organ-specific dissemination on the small bowel mesentery, large bowel serosa, and diaphragmatic peritoneum were the most crucial features globally. When added to the composite model, the novel score slightly enhanced its predictive value (AUC = 0.91, CI = 0.849–0.963). We identified a “turning point”, ≤5, that increased the probability of CC0. Using conventional logistic regression, the new score was superior to the PCI and IMO scores for the prediction of CC0 (AUC = 0.81 vs. 0.73 and 0.67, respectively). In multivariate Cox analysis, a 1-point increase in the new intra-operative score was associated with poorer progression-free (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03–1.09, p < 0.005) and overall survival (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01–1.07), by 4% and 6%, respectively. (4) Conclusions: The presence of cancer disseminated in specific anatomical sites, including small bowel mesentery, large bowel serosa, and diaphragmatic peritoneum, can be more predictive of CC0 and survival than the entire PCI and IMO scores. Early intra-operative assessment of these areas only may reveal whether CC0 is achievable. In contrast to the PCI and IMO scores, the novel score remains predictive of adverse survival outcomes.

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG), the International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group, and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based statements on the pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors, including imaging techniques, biomarkers, and prediction models. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE nominated a multidisciplinary international group, including expert practising clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors and management of patients with ovarian cancer (19 experts across Europe). A patient representative was also included in the group. To ensure that the statements were evidence-based, the current literature was reviewed and critically appraised. Preliminary statements were drafted based on the review of the relevant literature. During a conference call, the whole group discussed each preliminary statement and a first round of voting was carried out. Statements were removed when a consensus among group members was not obtained. The voters had the opportunity to provide comments/suggestions with their votes. The statements were then revised accordingly. Another round of voting was carried out according to the same rules to allow the whole group to evaluate the revised version of the statements. The group achieved consensus on 18 statements. This Consensus Statement presents these ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE statements on the pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors and the assessment of carcinomatosis, together with a summary of the evidence supporting each statement. ispartof: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER vol:31 issue:7 pages:961-982 ispartof: location:England status: published

Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a common variant of metastasis of malignant tumors of the abdominal cavity and pelvis. Modern methods of complex and combined treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis can significantly increase the survival of patients with this pathology. Determining the prevalence of peritoneal lesions is crucial for both planning and evaluating treatment. The lecture presents the anatomy and function of the peritoneum, the epidemiology of peritoneal carcinomatosis, the analysis of the capabilities of existing methods of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting signs of tumor dissemination of the peritoneum, reflects the principles for assessing the peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) and its role in choosing a treatment strategy in cancer patients.

The standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) is cytoreduction surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor volume after surgery is a major prognostic factor for these patients. The ability to perform complete cytoreduction depends on the extent of disease and the skills of the surgical team. Several predictive models have been proposed to evaluate the possibility of performing complete cytoreductive surgery (CCS). External validation of the prognostic value of three predictive models (Fagotti index and the R3 and R4 models) for predicting suboptimal cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in AOC was performed in this study. The scores of the 3 models were evaluated in one hundred and three consecutive patients diagnosed with AOC treated in a tertiary hospital were evaluated. Clinicopathological features were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. The performance of the three models was evaluated, and calibration and discrimination were analyzed. The calibration of the Fagotti, R3 and R4 models showed odds ratios of obtaining SCSs of 1.5, 2.4 and 2.4, respectively, indicating good calibration. The discrimination of the Fagotti, R3 and R4 models showed an area under the ROC curve of 83%, 70% and 81%, respectively. The negative predictive values of the three models were higher than the positive predictive values for SCS. The three models were able to predict suboptimal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer, but they were more reliable for predicting CCS. The R4 model discriminated better because it includes the laparotomic evaluation of the peritoneal carcinomatosis index.

For recurrent ovarian, fallopian or primary peritoneal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), it is challenging to resect tumors completely or to get complete remission by intravenous (IV) chemotherapy, and many patients show the resistance to various chemotherapeutic agents for IV chemotherapy ultimately. As an alternative, pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has been introduced for treating the disease, which delivers chemotherapeutic agents as an aerosol form while maintaining high intraperitoneal (IP) pressure. Based on preclinical studies, PIPAC showed better penetration depth and distribution of drugs into the peritoneum in comparison to conventional IP chemotherapy. Tumor regression on histology and peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) has also been shown in relevant studies. In addition, most of the PIPAC procedures were completed successfully with acceptable toxicity due to the use of a low dose of chemotherapeutic agents. For considering these advantages of PIPAC, we review the current status of PIPAC for treating recurrent ovarian, fallopian or primary peritoneal cancer through literature review.

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG), the International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based statements on the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors, including imaging techniques, biomarkers and prediction models. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE nominated a multidisciplinary international group, including expert practising clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors and management of patients with ovarian cancer (19 experts across Europe). A patient representative was also included in the group. To ensure that the statements were evidence-based, the current literature was reviewed and critically appraised. Preliminary statements were drafted based on the review of the relevant literature. During a conference call, the whole group discussed each preliminary statement and a first round of voting was carried out. Statements were removed when consensus among group members was not obtained. The voters had the opportunity to provide comments/suggestions with their votes. The statements were then revised accordingly. Another round of voting was carried out according to the same rules to allow the whole group to evaluate the revised version of the statements. The group achieved consensus on 18 statements. This Consensus Statement presents these ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE statements on the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors and the assessment of carcinomatosis, together with a summary of the evidence supporting each statement.

Introduction/Background In our study, we evaluated the peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) and to study the influence of PCI on the cytoreductive surgery outcomes in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Methodology We analyzed the results of 133 patients with serous high-grade ovarian cancer FIGO IIIC-IVB stages. PCI was evaluated at 13 regions (score 0–3 for each region) via pelvic MRI, chest and abdominal CT and staging laparoscopy (S-LPS.) Results Were performed 23% (31/133) of primary and 77% (102/133) of interval debulking surgery (DS), 68% (90/133) of them were optimal (no residual disease, ODS) and 32% (43/133) were suboptimal (residual tumor of > 1 cm, SDS). The frequency of ODS for PCI 0–15 score was 60–86%, for PCI 15–20 score - 9%, PCI> 20 score – 0%. Preoperative and intraoperative determination of the PCI was equal in 58%. In 19.8% PCI was overestimated during preoperative examination, while the use of laparoscopy evaluated PCI allowed to perform an ODS in these cases. In 21% PCI was underestimated and S-LPS helped to avoid SDS in 89% because of noting a diffuse bowel mesentery involvement. Conclusion A combination of MRI/CT scans and staging laparoscopy in PCI evaluating is an effective treatment modality which can improve the cytoreductive outcomes in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Disclosures No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this study. We confirm that no funding source were used in this study.

Introducción: la citorreducción más quimioterapia hipertérmica intraoperatoria (HIPEC) aborda la carcinomatosis peritoneal (CP) como una enfermedad locorregional, con respuesta adecuada en la supervivencia considerando la severidad de la patología. La agresividad del procedimiento se asocia con altos índices de morbimortalidad. Objetivo: evaluar la supervivencia global y libre de enfermedad a 1 año en pacientes con CP, en quienes se realizó tratamiento mediante citorreducción más HIPEC en el Hospital Infantil Universitario de San José entre enero 2016 y diciembre 2017. Metodología: estudio observacional de una cohorte con CP de diferentes etiologías que recibieron citorreducción más HIPEC, se obtuvo información a partir de las historias clínicas. Resultados: se incluyeron 10 casos con una mediana de edad de 49 años (RIC 43-54) y CP de origen primario en apéndice (60%, n=6), colon (20%, n=2) y ovario (20%, n=2). El índice de carcinomatosis peritoneal (ICP) presentó una mediana de 14.5 (RIC 6-24). Se observó recaída en 3 pacientes y 4 desenlaces fatales. Se estimó una supervivencia global de 54% y libre de enfermedad de 58% a un año. Conclusión: se encontraron mejores resultados en supervivencia global y libre de enfermedad a un año que los descritos en quimioterapia sistémica. Es importante la selección estricta de los pacientes, así como efectuar estudios con un mayor número para determinar con evidencia la relación entre el procedimiento y la supervivencia global y libre de enfermedad.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from gastric cancer has traditionally been considered a terminal progression of the disease and is associated with poor survival outcomes. Positive peritoneal cytology similarly worsens the survival of patients with gastric cancer and treatment options for these patients have been limited. Recent advances in multimodality treatment regimens have led to innovative ways to care for and treat patients with this disease burden. One of these advances has been to use neoadjuvant therapy to try and convert patients with positive cytology or low-volume PC to negative cytology with no evidence of active peritoneal disease. These strategies include the use of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy alone, using neoadjuvant laparoscopic heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NLHIPEC) after systemic chemotherapy, or using neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy (NIPS) in a bidirectional manner. For patients with higher volume PC, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been mainstays of treatment. When used together, CRS and HIPEC can improve overall outcomes in properly selected patients, but overall survival outcomes remain unacceptably low. The extent of peritoneal disease, commonly measured by the peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI), and the completeness of cytoreduction, has been shown to greatly impact outcomes in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC. The uses of NLHIPEC and NLHIPEC plus NIPS have both been shown to decrease the PCI and thus increase the opportunity for complete cytoreduction. Newer therapies like pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy and immunotherapy, such as catumaxomab, along with improved systemic chemotherapeutic regimens, are being explored with great interest. There is exciting progress being made in the management of PC from gastric cancer and its’ treatment is no longer futile.

Appendiceal tumors are rare, and there are various subtypes with very different histologic characteristics and biologic behavior. Mucinous appendiceal tumors tend to spread within the peritoneal cavity and lead to the clinical syndrome of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). Because PMP tends to stay confined to the peritoneal cavity, aggressive regional therapy with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been applied to this disease and is currently considered the standard-of-care. The aim of this chapter is to summarize existing data on CRS with HIPEC for appendiceal tumors with peritoneal dissemination, including both PMP from mucinous neoplasms and carcinomatosis from appendiceal adenocarcinoma.

Antoni Llueca,1–3 Anna Serra,1–3 José Luis Herraiz,2 Isabel Rivadulla,1,4 Luis Gomez-Quiles,1,4 Juan Gilabert-Estelles,5,6 Javier Escrig1,3,4On behalf of the MUAPOS (Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominal Pelvic Oncology Surgery) working group 1Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominal Pelvic Oncology Surgery (MUAPOS), University General Hospital of Castellón, Castellón, Spain; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital of Castellón, Castellón, Spain; 3Department of Medicine, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain; 4Department of General Surgery, University General Hospital of Castellón, Castellón, Spain; 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; 6Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain Objective: To analyze the surgical outcomes and diaphragmatic involvement in stage III and IV ovarian cancer.Patients and methods: All patients with stage III–IV ovarian cancer between January 2013 and January 2016 were included. The outcomes of interest reviewed were as follows: surgical (complications, mortality), peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI), rate of complete resection, and disease-free interval and survival.Results: Fifty-seven patients were included, 38 (67%) with diaphragmatic involvement; in 10 cases (18%), diaphragmatic resection was required. Optimal cytoreduction (OCR) was obtained in 49 cases (86%). The PCI was >10 in 31 cases (54%). Respiratory complications occurred in 10 cases (18%) and mortality in 3 (5%). Disease-free survival rate in 3 years was 53%, being 87% in cases without diaphragmatic involvement. The overall survival rate in 3 years is 46%, 83% in the cases without diaphragmatic involvement and 27% in cases with affectation (p10, virtually all cases will present diaphragmatic involvement (p10 constitutes a useful prognostic factor of the affectation and forces the surgeon to thoroughly review both diaphragms.Keywords: advanced ovarian cancer, peritoneal cancer index, diaphragmatic involvement, upper abdominal surgery, carcinomatosis

Background Serum tumour levels have been shown to be prognostic in patients with epithelial appendiceal mucinous neoplasms with peritoneal dissemination (pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP)). A singular index which incorporates both tumour activity (as depicted by serum tumour marker levels) and tumour volume (as depicted by peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI)), may give a more precise surrogate of tumour biological behaviour. The prognostic implication of this index has not yet been reported. Methods A retrospective cohort study of all patients with PMP managed from 1996 to 2016 with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) was performed by analysing the survival effect of the ratio of preoperative serum CEA, CA19.9 and CA125 to PCI. Results Three hundred and eighty-six patients were included. In patients with low-grade PMP, elevated CA19-9/PCI ratio resulted in poorer median overall survival times (104 months vs NR, 95%CI 83 – NR, log-rank p Conclusion CA19-9/PCI ratio is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with low-grade PMP undergoing CRS and IPC. By accounting for both tumour activity and tumour volume simultaneously, this novel index behaves as a surrogate of tumour biology and provides a useful adjunct for decisions regarding treatment allocation in this patient group.

International audience; Background and Objectives: The aims of this multi‐institutional study were to assess the feasibility of iterative cytoreductive surgery (iCRS)/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, iCRS in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC), evaluate survival, recurrence, morbidity and mortality outcomes, and identify prognostic factors for overall survival.Methods: Patients with CRPC that underwent an iCRS, with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy, from June 1993 to July 2016 at 13 institutions were retrospectively analyzed from prospectively maintained databases.Results: The study comprised of 231 patients, including 126 females (54.5%) with a mean age at iCRS of 51.3 years. The iterative high‐grade (3/4) morbidity and mortality rates were 23.4% and 1.7%, respectively. The median recurrence‐free survival was 15.0 and 10.1 months after initial and iCRS, respectively. The median and 5‐year survivals were 49.1 months and 43% and 26.4 months and 26% from the initial and iCRS, respectively. Independent negative predictors of survival from the initial CRS included peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) > 20 ( P = 0.02) and lymph node positivity ( P = 0.04), and from iCRS, PCI > 10 ( P = 0.03 for PCI 11‐20; P 20), high‐grade complications ( P = 0.012), and incomplete cytoreduction ( P

Background The quest to cure or to contain the disease in cancer patients leads to new strategies and techniques being added to the armamentarium of oncologists. Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a recently described surgical technique which is being evaluated at many centers for the management of peritoneal metastasis (PM). The present study is a systematic review to evaluate the current role of PIPAC in the management of gastric cancer associated PM. Methods A systematic search was conducted in Pubmed and EMBASE database using relevant keywords and confirming to the PRISMA guidelines to identify the articles describing the role of PIPAC in gastric cancer associated PM. All the studies which were published prior to July 1, 2018 in English literature and reported the role of PIPAC in gastric cancer associated PM were included in the systematic review. Results The search yielded 79 articles; there were ten published studies which have reported the use of PIPAC in gastric cancer associated PM. A total of 129 patients with gastric cancer associated PM were treated in the studies. Only two studies had an exclusive cohort of gastric cancer patients while eight other studies had a heterogeneous population with a small proportion of gastric cancer patients. There was only one study highlighting the role of PIPAC in neoadjuvant setting to downgrade the peritoneal carcinomatosis index. All the studies revealed that PIPAC is feasible and has minimal perioperative morbidity, even after repeated applications. Conclusion There is a scarcity of English literature related to the role of PIPAC in gastric cancer associated PM. PIPAC is a safe and well-tolerated procedure which has the potential to contain spreading PM. Further studies are warranted to better define the role of PIPAC in gastric cancer associated PM.

Summary Background Surgical procedures that combine both complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have improved the survival of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Current imaging and laboratory investigations are not very useful to diagnose PC. This prospective study sought to determine the usefulness of routine second-look surgery (RSLS) combined with HIPEC in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with PC at high-risk for recurrence. Methods From 2007 to 2011, RSLS was performed on 14 patients who had undergone a complete initial oncological resection for synchronous colonic PC and/or ovarian metastasis with PC discovered during primary colon cancer surgery after a course of 12 cycles of intravenous chemotherapy, eventually associated with HIPEC. Results Pathology confirmed PC in 71% of patients during RSLS, with a median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) of 10. There was no post-operative mortality, while 7% of patients exhibited Dindo Grade III–IV complications. The 2-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 91% and 38%, respectively. Following RSLS and CCRS, peritoneal recurrence was observed in only 8% of patients who had undergone HIPEC. Conclusion RSLS combined with HIPEC after initial resection of synchronous colonic PC allows diagnosis and treatment of low-score PC, with limited post-operative complications and increased overall survival rates.

BACKGROUND:To compare CT and MRI for peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) assessment and to compare assessments made by the radiologist based on their experiences.METHOD AND MATERIALS:MRI and CT o ...

Background. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has been introduced as a novel repeatable treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis. The available evidence from the pioneer center suggests good tolerance and high response rates, but independent confirmation is needed. A single-center cohort was analyzed one year after implementation for feasibility and safety. Methods. PIPAC was started in January 2015, and every patient was entered into a prospective database. This retrospective analysis included all consecutive patients operated until April 2016 with emphasis on surgical feasibility and early postoperative outcomes. Results. Forty-two patients (M : F = 8 : 34, median age 66 (59–73) years) with 91 PIPAC procedures in total (4×: 1, 3×: 17, 2×: 12, and 1×: 12) were analyzed. Abdominal accessibility rate was 95% (42/44); laparoscopic access was not feasible in 2 patients with previous HIPEC. Median initial peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 10 (IQR 5–17). Median operation time was 94 min (89–108) with no learning curve observed. One PIPAC application was postponed due to intraoperative intestinal lesion. Overall morbidity was 9% with 7 minor complications (Clavien I-II) and one PIPAC-unrelated postoperative mortality. Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (2-3). Conclusion. Repetitive PIPAC is feasible in most patients with refractory carcinomatosis of various origins. Intraoperative complications and postoperative morbidity rates were low. This encourages prospective studies assessing oncological efficacy.

Purpose: In patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an evolving approach with curative intention. Previous studies indicate a correlation between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical findings regarding the extent of peritoneal carcinomatosis. The aim of this study was to assess retrospectively whether preoperative MRI can predict the outcome and is therefore a suitable tool for patient selection. Materials and methods: Fifteen patients with laparoscopically proven peritoneal carcinomatosis were preoperatively examined using a 1.5-T whole-body MRI system. Results were correlated with surgical exploration. Follow-up was done by contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography and, if suspicious for recurring disease, laparoscopy or laparotomy. Survival time and interval to recurring disease were correlated with the preoperative peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) on MRI (Spearman’s rank correlation). Results: In five patients radical resection could not be achieved (PCI 34 ± 6.9); survival time was 78.2 ± 54.1 days. In seven patients recurring disease was found 430 ± 261.2 days after initial complete cytoreduction (PCI 11.6 ± 6.9); survival time was 765.9 ± 355 days. Two patients are still alive after 3 years. Two patients with initially complete cytoreduction are without recurring disease after 3 years (PCI 5 and 12). One patient was lost for follow-up. Conclusions: Results of the preoperative MRI correlate well with the surgical PCI, postoperative resection status, and survival time. MRI might be a suitable technique for patient selection when considering peritonectomy and HIPEC. In our patients the outcome seems to correlate well with the extent of peritoneal carcinomatosis found by the preoperative MRI.

Background The aim was to determine the incremental value of MRI compared with CT in the preoperative estimation of the peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI). Methods CT and MRI examinations of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis were evaluated. CT images were first analysed by two observers who determined a first PCI (PCICT). Then, the two observers reviewed MRI examinations in combination with CT and determined a second PCI (PCICT+MRI). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of the two imaging sets were determined using surgery as a reference standard (PCIRef). Results CT plus MRI was more accurate in predicting the surgical PCI than CT alone. The absolute difference between PCICT+MRI and PCIRef was lower than that between PCICT and PCIRef (mean(s.d.) 3·96(4·10) versus 4·89(4·73); P = 0·010). The number of true-positive findings increased from 106 to 125 for reader 1 and from 117 to 132 for reader 2 with the adjunct of MRI. For both readers, an increased sensitivity was obtained when both MRI and CT were used (from 63 to 81 per cent for reader 1; from 44 to 81 per cent for reader 2). The increase in sensitivity was greater for patients with a moderate volume of disease. Conclusion The combination of CT and MRI improved the preoperative estimation of PCI compared with CT alone.

Background: The outcome of cytoreductive surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis is influenced by incomplete resection as a result of inadequate detection of a tumor, i.e. residual disease. The future perspective of complete resection, made possible by application of intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging (NIRF), led to the development and validation of a bioluminescent colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis xenograft rat model to act as the gold standard for the evaluation of new optical imaging modalities. Methods: Twenty nude rats were inoculated intraperitoneally with 2 × 106 luciferase-labeled human colorectal tumor cells (HT-29-luc-D6). The peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was estimated using visual observation (PCI-VO) and VO combined with bioluminescence imaging (PCI-BLI). Subsequently, the BL images were presented, and residual tumor tissue was localized by PCI-BLI scoring and compared with the PCI-VO. Results: BLI revealed additional tumor tissue, confirmed by HE staining, compared to VO alone in 7 out of 8 rats (p < 0.02). Conclusion: The developed model turned out to be suitable. The use of BLI for tumor detection was more sensitive compared to VO alone. In this model, BLI significantly detected residual disease, and therefore, BLI can be denominated as the gold standard for the evaluation of optical imaging modalities like NIRF.

Purpose: In patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an evolving therapeutic approach with curative intention. The differentiation between posttherapeutic findings after HIPEC and relapse of PC is challenging. We evaluated the diagnostic value of F-18-FDG-PET/CT in patients with relapse of PC after HIPEC. Materials and Methods: 36 patients with recurring PC after HIPEC were examined on a whole-body PET/CT system (44 examinations). The examination included 3 D F-18-FDG-PET and contrast-enhanced CT. Images were assessed by two experienced readers regarding the presence and the extent of PC using the peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI). Imaging results were correlated with surgical findings or follow-up. Results: Relapse was suspected in 40 of 44 examinations. Relapse was missed by F-18-FDG PET/CT in 4 patients and significantly underestimated in 8 patients. The diagnostic accuracy for the detection of PC on a patient basis was 91 %, the sensitivity was 91 % and the positive predictive value was 100 %. The mean PCI was 11.4 ± 11.9 for PET/CT, 8.4 ± 10.3 for CT and 16.6 ± 15.0 in the case of surgical exploration. The extent of PC was underestimated by PET/CT and even more by CT alone (p Conclusion: The diagnostic value of F-18-FDG PET/CT after cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in the detection of recurring PC is superior to contrast-enhanced CT. However, the quantification of the extent of PC is limited due to post-therapeutic tissue alterations. Key Points: • Imaging of recurrent PC after HIPEC is challenging due to posttherapeutic tissue alterations. • The extent of recurrent PC after HIPEC is systematically underestimated by F-18-FDG PET/CT. • F-18-FDG PET/CT provides improved sensitivity for recurrent PC compared to contrast-enhanced CT. • The correlation of the extent of recurrent PC depicted by F-18-FDG PET/CT and surgical exploration is better than that of contrast-enhanced CT and surgical exploration. Citation Format: • Klumpp B, Schwenzer N F, Gatidis S et al. Assessment of Relapse in Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis after Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy using F-18-FDG-PET/CT. Fortschr Rontgenstr 2014; 186: 359 – 366