Search

Ana Cristina García-Ulloa,1 Liliana Pérez-Peralta,1,2 Salvador Jaime-Casas,3 Aida Jiménez-Corona,2,4 David Rivera-De La Parra,1,2 Enrique Octavio Graue-Hernández,2 Sergio Hernández-Jiménez1 On behalf of the Group of Study CAIPaDi1Centro de Atención Integral del Paciente con Diabetes (CAIPaDi) Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico; 2Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana IAP, Mexico City, Mexico; 3Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Panamericana, Mexico City, Mexico; 4Dirección General de Epidemiología, Secretaría de Salud, Mexico City, MexicoCorrespondence: Liliana Pérez-Peralta, Centro de Atención Integral del Paciente con Diabetes, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga No. 15. Colonia Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City, 14080, Mexico, Tel +52 55 54870900 (5045), Email liliana.perezp@incmnsz.mxPurpose: To evaluate the risk factors associated with diabetic macular edema (DME) in patients with a recent type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) diagnosis.Patients and Methods: We conducted a case-control study at a third-level hospital in Mexico City. We enrolled patients ≥ 18 years old, with T2DM less than five years of diagnosis, without disabling complications, and non-smokers. The control group was patients with diabetic retinopathy and without macular edema (DR-DME). Cases were patients with DR+DME. We measured fasting glucose, creatinine, lipid profile, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR), and HbA1c. An ophthalmological examination consisted of visual acuity measurement, digital three-field fundus photography with an automatic non-mydriatic camera, slit lamp, and Optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination.Results: 183 and 61 patients with DR-DME and DR+DME, respectively, were included in the analysis. The prevalence of mild DR was higher in the DR-DME group, but the frequencies of moderate and severe retinopathy were higher in the DR+DME group. Patients in the DR-DME group had better vision than those in the DR+DME group. Logistic regression analysis revealed that age (OR, 1.07), HbA1c (OR, 1.19), and Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio (ACR) > 30 mg/g (OR, 3.37) were associated with an increased possibility of DME compared to DR-DME.Conclusion: Our study provides insights into the association between risk factors and DME. We found a statistically strong association between HbA1c levels, age, and ACR. Patients with poor metabolic control should undergo an extensive medical examination to screen for DME, which may be related to the chronicity of DM and renal damage.Keywords: macular edema, recent diagnosis, diabetes mellitus, metabolic control

Pedro Santos-Moreno,1 Gabriel-Santiago Rodríguez-Vargas,1 Susan Martínez,2 Linda Ibatá,2 Laura Villarreal-Peralta,1 Anggie Aza-Cañon,1 Manuel Rivero,1 Pedro Rodriguez,1 Adriana Rojas-Villarraga3 1Rheumatology Department, Biomab IPS, Bogotá, Colombia; 2Epidemiology Department, Epithink Health Consulting, Bogotá, Colombia; 3Research Institute, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud–FUCS, Bogotá, ColombiaCorrespondence: Pedro Santos-Moreno, Rheumatology Department, Biomab IPS, Calle 48 # 13-86, Bogotá, Colombia, Tel +57 320 8094232, Email pedrosantosmoreno@hotmail.comPurpose: To describe clinical characteristics and effectiveness of health care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as part of a multidisciplinary care model (MCM) in a specialized rheumatology center, compared with the results of a national registry of RA (NARRA) as evidence of real-world management.Patients and Methods: We conducted a real-world study (July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019) based on an analysis of electronic health records of a cohort of RA patients managed with the “Treat-to-Target” strategy in a specialized rheumatology center in Colombia with an MCM, compared with the NARRA that includes different models of usual care.Results: We have analyzed 7053 subjects with RA treated at a specialized rheumatology center and 81,492 patients from the NARRA. Cohorts were similar in their baseline characteristics, with women in predominance and diagnosis age close to 50 years. At the time of diagnosis, a higher proportion of clinical diagnostic test use and rheumatology consultation access was observed in the specialized rheumatology center than in the national registry (4– 6 per year versus three or less). In addition, higher proportions of patients in remission and low disease activity were reported for the specialized rheumatology center, with a > 40% amount of data lost in the national registry. Pharmacological management was similar regarding the analgesic use. In the specialized center, Certolizumab was more frequently used than in the NARRA registry; also, there were significant differences in methotrexate, leflunomide, and sulfasalazine use, being higher in the specialized rheumatology center.Conclusion: The MCM of a specialized center in RA can guarantee comprehensive care, with better access to all the services required to manage the disease. It ensures specialist management and evidence-based care that facilitates the achievement of therapeutic objectives. In addition, better patient records and follow-ups are available to evaluate health outcomes.Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis, therapeutics, multidisciplinary healthcare, real-world data