Search

In this article, we introduce a novel procedure for improving power of multiple testing procedures (MTPs) of interval hypotheses. When testing interval hypotheses the null hypothesis $P$-values tend to be stochastically larger than standard uniform if the true parameter is in the interior of the null hypothesis. The new procedure starts with a set of $P$-values and discards those with values above a certain pre-selected threshold, while the rest are corrected (scaled-up) by the value of the threshold. Subsequently, a chosen family-wise error rate (FWER) or false discovery rate MTP is applied to the set of corrected $P$-values only. We prove the general validity of this procedure under independence of $P$-values, and for the special case of the Bonferroni method, we formulate several sufficient conditions for the control of the FWER. It is demonstrated that this "filtering" of $P$-values can yield considerable gains of power. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For over a decade functional gene-to-gene interaction (epistasis) has been suspected to be a determinant in the "missing heritability" of complex traits. However, searching for epistasis on the genome-wide scale has been challenging due to the prohibitively large number of tests which result in a serious loss of statistical power as well as computational challenges. In this article, we propose a two-stage method applicable to existing case-control data sets, which aims to lessen both of these problems by pre-assessing whether a candidate pair of genetic loci is involved in epistasis before it is actually tested for interaction with respect to a complex phenotype. The pre-assessment is based on a two-locus genotype independence test performed in the sample of cases. Only the pairs of loci that exhibit non-equilibrium frequencies are analyzed via a logistic regression score test, thereby reducing the multiple testing burden. Since only the computationally simple independence tests are performed for all pairs of loci while the more demanding score tests are restricted to the most promising pairs, genome-wide association study (GWAS) for epistasis becomes feasible. By design our method provides strong control of the type I error. Its favourable power properties especially under the practically relevant misspecification of the interaction model are illustrated. Ready-to-use software is available. Using the method we analyzed Parkinson's disease in four cohorts and identified possible interactions within several SNP pairs in multiple cohorts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Undiscovered gene-to-gene interaction (epistasis) is a possible explanation for the "missing heritability" of complex traits and diseases. On a genome-wide scale, screening for epistatic effects among all possible pairs of genetic markers faces two main complications. Firstly, the classical statistical methods for modeling epistasis are computationally very expensive, which makes them impractical on such large scale. Secondly, straightforward corrections for multiple testing using the classical methods tend to be too coarse and inefficient at discovering the epistatic effects in such a large scale application. In this chapter, we describe both the underlying framework and practical examples of two-stage statistical testing methods that alleviate both of the aforementioned complications.