1. Fluorescence investigation of the recombinant cyanobacterial phytochrome (Cph1) and its C-terminally truncated monomeric species (Cph1Δ2): implication for holoprotein assembly, chromophore–apoprotein interaction and photochemistry
- Author
-
Sineshchekov, V., Koppel’, L., Esteban, B., Hughes, J., and Lamparter, T.
- Subjects
- *
PHYTOCHROMES , *CERATODONTIDAE , *MOSSES - Abstract
Recombinant dimeric full-length Cph1 holophytochrome and its C-terminally-truncated monomeric species [Cph1Δ2, comprising the chromophore-bearing N-terminal sensory module (residues 1 to 514)] from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis expressed in E. coli and reconstituted in vitro with phycocyanobilin (PCB) were investigated with the use of fluorescence spectroscopy and photochemistry in the temperature range from 85 to 293 K. Holoprotein assembly in Cph1 apparently proceeds via intermediate states with the emission maximum at 680–690 nm (I685) and 700 nm (I700) and a half-life time, at room temperature, of ≤5 s. Conversion of the putative I685 into mature Cph1 involves relaxation of the chromophore into a more flexible conformation. Cph1 and Cph1Δ2 were closely similar in their spectroscopic and photochemical characteristics (position of the emission band and its width, character of the temperature dependence of the fluorescence and activation energy of the fluorescence decay, kinetics and extent of the Pr conversion at low and ambient temperatures), suggesting that there is no immediate effect of the C-terminus on the photochemical properties of the chromophore in Cph1 and that chromophore–chromophore interactions in the dimer are not significant. The latter is also supported by the lack of energy transfer from the phycoerythrobilin (PEB) to PCB in the mixed PEB/PCB adduct of Cph1. At the same time, certain variations in the fluorescence and photochemical parameters of Cph1 with temperature of the sample and intensity of the excitation light and dependence of the emission spectra on excitation wavelength were observed. These variations are interpreted as a manifestation of the Cph1 heterogeneity which may be due to the existence of different conformers of the chromophore and photoproduct formation under excitation light. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF